Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33090
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蘇蘅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorSu,Herngen_US
dc.contributor.author邱宜儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiu,Yi-Yien_US
dc.creator邱宜儀zh_TW
dc.creatorChiu,Yi-Yien_US
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:28:40Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:28:40Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:28:40Z-
dc.identifierG0094941009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33090-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description94941009zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究以政治人物馬英九為例,探討台灣主要報紙是否出現「名人政治」現象,並探討「名人政治」的新聞框架為何?有何主要特質?呈現的方式是否和傳統政治新聞報導不同?研究對象為自由時報、聯合報及中國時報三家報紙從馬英九從擔任台北市長起至卸任國民黨主席止的新聞報導。以等距抽樣法抽取864則新聞進行分析。研究發現三家主要報紙報導馬英九新聞時都出現「名人政治」的新聞框架,其中以「政治風格」的框架最為顯著,報紙重視政治姿態、品行道德的領導能力描述,另外,報紙也常用「背景故事」把名人私領域的生活面向帶入公領域。「馬英九現象」和「個人特質」、「背景故事」和「社會互動」等框架的論述密切相關,因此確實減少了公共政策或政治議題的報導數量,不過不同報紙的框架仍有差異,隨著馬英九政治位置的重要性,名人政治的新聞框架也有所變化。但就馬英九這位政治人物來說,台灣主要報紙確實出現個人特質和政治風格鮮明的「名人化」現象。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn a time when it is commonplace for political celebrities to garner media attention as much media attention for their political performance as for their particular personal life. The author wanted to analyze a famous political figure Ma Ying-jeou to learn the process of celebrification coupled with Gans description of the norms of news reporting, the following indicators would suggest celebrification of political content. The author used the news stories from three major newspapers in Taiwan as sample to find out elements of a celebrity that would attract the journalists as well as media organizations. The result showed that the strategies were utilized to sell the political celebrity was similar to those of the Western media.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………1 \n第一節 研究源起…………………………………………………………………1\n第二節 研究背景…………………………………………………………………6 \n第三節 相關研究及研究目的……………………………………………………10\n\n第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………12\n第一節「名人政治」的政治文化背景 …………………………………………12\n第二節「名人政治」現象及內涵 ………………………………………………15\n 壹、「名人政治」現象………………………………………………………15\n 貳、「名人政治」之內涵……………………………………………………18\n 參、「名人政治」時代的媒體互動…………………………………………21\n 肆、媒體再現的政治角色形象………………………………………………25\n第三節 「名人政治」的新聞框架………………………………………………27\n 壹、新聞框架之定義與運用…………………………………………………27\n 貳、何謂「名人政治」新聞框架……………………………………………29\n 參、政治行動場域:公領域、公共流行文化場域、私領域 ……………44\n第四節 國內外相關研究…………………………………………………………51\n第五節 研究問題與研究架構……………………………………………………53\n 壹、研究問題…………………………………………………………………53\n 貳、研究架構圖………………………………………………………………55\n\n第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………57\n第一節 內容分析法………………………………………………………………57\n第二節 研究對象與範圍…………………………………………………………58\n 壹、研究對象…………………………………………………………………58\n 貳、分析單位…………………………………………………………………60\n 參、抽樣………………………………………………………………………61\n第三節 類目建構…………………………………………………………………63\n 壹、從政階段…………………………………………………………………64\n 貳、政治行動場域……………………………………………………………65\n 參、「名人政治」新聞框架…………………………………………………67\n 肆、新聞呈現形式……………………………………………………………73\n 第四節 信度檢驗及統計方法 ………………………………………………75\n\n第四章 資料分析…………………………………………………………………78\n第一節「名人政治」新聞框架之分佈及三報差異 ……………………………80\n 壹、版面分析…………………………………………………………………80\n 貳、篇幅分析…………………………………………………………………81\n 參、類型分析…………………………………………………………………82\n 肆、議題分析…………………………………………………………………82\n 伍、消息來源分………………………………………………………………83\n 陸、新聞立場分析……………………………………………………………89\n 柒、馬英九新聞的「名人政治」新聞框架 ……………………………… 90\n第二節 政治行動場域之分佈及三報差異………………………………………96\n 壹、三報政治行動場域整體分佈……………………………………………97\n 貳、版面分析…………………………………………………………………98\n 參、篇幅分析……………………………………………………………… 101\n 肆、類型分析 ………………………………………………………………103\n 伍、議題分析……………………………………………………………… 104\n 陸、新聞立場分析………………………………………………………… 107\n第三節不同從政階段、三報之變化及差異 ……………………………………109\n 壹、「名人政治」新聞框架再現 …………………………………………109\n 貳、四種「名人政治」新聞框架 …………………………………………123\n 參、政治行動場域 …………………………………………………………126\n第四節 小結………………………………………………………………………130\n\n第五章 研究發現及建議……………………………………………………137\n第一節 研究發現……………………………………………………………137\n第二節 研究限制與建議……………………………………………………141\n\n參考文獻 \n中文部分 …………………………………………………………………………145\n英文部分 …………………………………………………………………………149\n\n附錄\n附錄一:編碼表………………………………………………………………… 156\n附錄二:編碼須知……………………………………………………………… 158\n附錄三:馬英九從政經歷……………………………………………………… 164\n\n圖表目錄\n圖1-1:馬英九不同政治角色時程圖……………………………………………11\n圖2-1:從政者特質………………………………………………………………31\n圖2-2:政治行動場域……………………………………………………………44\n圖2-3:研究架構圖………………………………………………………………55\n圖4-1:「名人政治」新聞框架分佈趨勢圖……………………………………79\n圖4-2:從政階段、新聞數量變化趨勢圖 ……………………………………110圖4-3:從政階段、新聞版面變化趨勢圖 ……………………………………112\n圖4-4:從政階段、新聞類型變化趨勢 ………………………………………113\n圖4-5:從政階段、新聞篇幅變化趨勢圖 ……………………………………115\n圖4-6:從政階段、新聞議題變化趨勢圖 ……………………………………117\n圖4-7:從政階段、新聞立場變化趨勢圖 ……………………………………120\n圖4-8:從政階段、政治行動場域趨勢圖 ……………………………………127\n表 1-1 :媒體形容馬英九形象之正面語 ………………………………………8\n表 1-2 :媒體形容馬英九形象之負面語彙………………………………………9\n表 3-1:抽樣樣本 ………………………………………………………………62\n表 3-2:類目建構總表………………………………………………………… 63\n表 3-3:從政階段分析項目 ……………………………………………………64表 3-4:政治行動場域分析項目 ………………………………………………66\n表3-5:「名人政治」新聞框架類目及操作型定義……………………………70表4- 1:報別、版面卡方分析 …………………………………………………81\n表4- 2:報別、篇幅卡方分析………………………………………………… 81\n表4- 3:報別、新聞類型卡方分析…………………………………………… 82\n表4- 4:報別、新聞議題分佈統計表………………………………………… 83\n表4- 5:報別、消息來源分佈統計表………………………………………… 84\n表4-6:報別、新聞主要立場卡方分析…………………………………………89\n表4-7:類型、新聞主要立場卡方分析…………………………………………90\n表4-8:報別、「名人政治」新聞框架分佈統計表 ………………………… 93\n表4-9:報別、「個人特質」新聞框架分佈統計表……………………………94\n表4-10:報別、「背景故事」新聞框架分佈統計表………………………… 95\n表4-11:報別、「政治風格」新聞框架分佈統計表………………………… 95\n表4-12:報別、「社會同步互動」新聞框架分佈統計表…………………… 96\n表4-13:報別、政治行動場域分佈統計表…………………………………… 97\n表4-14:報別、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表………………………… 98\n表4-15:報別、版面、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表………………… 99\n表4-16:報別、篇幅、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表…………………102表4-17:報別、類型、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表…………………103表4-18:報別、議題、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表…………………105表4-19:報別、立場、政治行動場域分析項目分佈統計表…………………108表4-20:從政階段、報別報導數量分佈統計表………………………………110表4-21:從政階段、新聞版面卡方分析………………………………………111表4-22:從政階段、新聞類型卡方分析………………………………………113表4-23:從政階段、新聞篇幅分佈統計表……………………………………114表4-24:從政階段、新聞議題分佈統計表……………………………………116表4-25:從政階段、消息來源分佈統計表……………………………………118表4-26:從政階段、新聞立場卡方分析………………………………………120表4-27:從政階段、三報新聞立場卡方分析…………………………………122表4-28:從政階段、「名人政治」新聞框架分佈統計表……………………124表4-29:從政階段、三報、「名人政治」新聞框架分佈統計表……………125\n表4-30:從政階段、政治行動場域卡方分析…………………………………126\n表4-31:從政階段、三報、政治行動場域分佈統計表………………………129zh_TW
dc.format.extent45817 bytes-
dc.format.extent79260 bytes-
dc.format.extent83765 bytes-
dc.format.extent71595 bytes-
dc.format.extent198181 bytes-
dc.format.extent371386 bytes-
dc.format.extent223783 bytes-
dc.format.extent418861 bytes-
dc.format.extent133042 bytes-
dc.format.extent169931 bytes-
dc.format.extent176700 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094941009en_US
dc.subject民主zh_TW
dc.subject新聞媒體zh_TW
dc.subject名人政治zh_TW
dc.subject新聞框架zh_TW
dc.subject馬英九zh_TW
dc.subjectdemocracyen_US
dc.subjectnews mediaen_US
dc.subjectcelebrity politicsen_US
dc.subjectnews frameen_US
dc.subjectMa Ying-jeouen_US
dc.title「名人政治」的新聞框架-馬英九不同從政時期新聞報導之比較zh_TW
dc.titleHow newspapers frame political celebrity? The case of Ma Ying-jeouen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王石番(1991)。《傳播內容分析法》。臺北:幼獅。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王建雄(2006)。《政務決策與落實過程中政治庸俗化之影響-以台灣中程施政計畫中高教改革為例》。東海大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王家俊(2006年10月17日)。〈李敖:馬英九軟弱 國民黨倒閣案放水〉,《中央社》。上網日期:95年10月20日,取自http://news.sina.com/cna/101-102-101-101/2006-10-16/20151420390.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference王渡(2002)。《馬英九現象》。臺北:普天。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王慧馨(2005)。《 二○○四年報紙報導總統選舉新聞的政治偏差》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江孟穎(2003)。《首長形象建構之研究 - 以台北市與高雄市政府新聞稿為例》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱錦華(2005年12月13日)。〈政治偶像,媒體寵兒〉,《民生報》(香港),A3版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余紀忠(2000)。〈精勤惕勵,無私無懼——五十年的信念與秉持〉。收錄在中國時報編《中國時報五十年》,頁5-21。台北:中國時報社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference谷玲玲(2006)。〈傳統報業及電子報發展前景〉,《行政院新聞局2006出版年鑑》。上網日期:97年2月10日,取自http://www.gio.gov.tw/info/publish/yearbook/95/02-05.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference李人豪(2005)。〈電視新聞中立法委員表演行為比例探討:非選舉與選舉期比較〉,《2005年中華傳播學會年會》,臺北縣深坑。上網日期:96年2月2日,取自:http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/2005students.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference李人豪(2005)。〈政治人物表演行為之媒體再現:以立法委員的電視新聞報導為例〉。國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李東展(2005)。《喬丹商品收藏迷的資訊尋求行為研究》。世新大學資訊傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林文益譯(1997)。《政治傳播學》。台北:風雲論壇。(原書McNair B. [1995].An Introduction to Political Communication. London: Routledge.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林瑜霜(2002)。《二○○二年台北市長選舉候選人新聞媒體守門研究》。私立中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金溥聰 (1997)。〈報紙的形象設定效果研究:以民國八十三年台北市長選舉為例〉,《新聞學研究》,55: 203-223。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳璧如(2003)。《「總統形象塑造之研究--以陳水扁總統之媒體呈現為例」》。東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁千雯(2005)。《時尚消費、名人效應的閱聽人接收分析」》。國立台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐子樵(2006年10月19日)。〈本土味 馬英九就欠這一味〉。《新台灣新聞周刊》。上網日期:95年10月24日,取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/061003/12/4wm0.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐子樵(2006年10月19日)。〈泛藍共主洗牌? 施明德等著收割〉《新台灣新聞週刊》。上網日期:95年10月20日,取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/marticle/url/d/a/061012/12/59hl.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫哲、沈國麟 (2002)。〈美國政治中的媒體與國會選舉〉。《美國研究》。2: 66-78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference唐梅江(2003)。〈政治媒體化:當代西方媒體與政治關係的型態分析〉,《求索》,1: 90-92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬維敏(2001年2月20日)。〈馬維敏專欄-馬英九的機會與危機〉,《中國時報》。上網日期:95年10月24日,取自 http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/senior/rd-seniorcontent/0,2127,17060201+172001021902588,00.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference倪鴻祥(2001年8月19日)。〈馬英九南下輔選 政治行情看漲〉,《東森新聞報》。上網日期:95年8月1日,取自http://gb.ettoday.com.tw/2001/08/19/141-554728.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference康若曄 (2006年3月22日)。。〈馬英九赴美資格考 蘇貞昌島內拚政績〉。《亞洲時報》。上網日期:96年2月11日,取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/6/3/22/n1263211.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference范陵嘉(2005年12月4日)。〈國民黨大贏泛藍共主態勢底定 馬 直奔2008大位〉。《聯合報》,A3版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范陵嘉(2006年6月2日)。〈蘇揆掌權 馬討不到便宜〉。《聯合報》,A4版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱金蓮(2003)。《旅館業服務接觸之研究— 管理者、員工及顧客觀點之比較》。大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃少梅(2002)。《前總統李登輝卸任後之媒體形象-以聯合報、中國時報、自由時報三大報相關事件報導之分析》。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃兆慧(2005年9月)。〈馬英九靠耳語戰當選?〉。《動腦雜誌》。上網日期:95年8月6日,取自http://magazine.sina.com.tw/brain/353/2006-01-09/21541165.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃秀(1998)。《政治人物在大眾傳播媒介中的形象研究--以台視,中視,民視,及無線衛星電視台對陳水扁報導為例》。國立政治大學廣播電視學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃忠榮(2006年1月7日)。〈馬副主委的主張 馬主席忘光光?〉。《自由時報》。上網日期:96年2月11日,取自http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2006/new/jan/7/today-fo3.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃振家譯(2003)。《大眾媒體研究》。台北:學富文化。(原書Wimmer, R. D., & J. R. Dominick [1983]. Mass media research: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃國樑、唐孝民(2006年6月10日)。〈7百天後的馬英九…還是問號〉,《聯合晚報》,4版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃惠鈴(1997)。《報紙如何報導總統選舉新聞》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾薏蘋(2006年10月23日)。〈李:扁執政六年不合格 都為私利〉,《中國時報》,A2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郁嬿如(1996)。《國際媒體對中華民國總統大選的報導-以紐約時報、國際論壇報為例》。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉玲(2006)。《臺灣報紙對319槍擊事件的新聞報導之研究─比較聯合報、中國時報、蘋果日報、自由時報》。世新大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許國賢(2005)。〈民主的政治成本〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,17(2):271-297。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游淑惠、楊少騏(2006年10月5日)。〈馬科長就祇會「依法行政」〉,《中國時報》。上網日期:95年10月24日,取自http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,130501+132006100500933,00.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference葛永光(2005年9月)。〈國民黨主席選舉-意義與挑戰〉,《台灣民主季刊》,2(3): 125-131。陳文浩(2002年10月15日)。〈「慢」跑、「軟」網何罪之有?-吳淑珍女士批馬,運動迷傷感〉,《國政評論》,教文(評)091-156號。上網日期:95年9月29日,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/EC/091/EC-C-091-156.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊鎮全(2006年10月23日)。TVBS-N新聞。台北:TVBS。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳函謙(2006年9月15日)。〈政績66.7分 獲頒畢業證書 議員 要馬英九進總統府深造〉,《中國時報》,C2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯(2004)。《特新大眾傳播理論》。台北:韋伯文化出版社。( 原書McQuail, D. .[2000]. Mass Communication Theory, 4th ed. London:SAGE Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳裕仁(2003)《名人代言人與產品相關度之研究》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳詩婷(2006年3月28日)。〈心結不再?王金平:大家對他有好感 就是馬英九現象〉,《東森新聞報》。上網日期:95年9月3日,取自http://news.yam.com/ettoday/politics/200603/20060328406894.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳憶寧(2004)。〈媒體議題與公眾議題演化過程之探討:以2002年台北市長選舉為例〉,《新聞學研究》,81:125-126。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳憶寧(2002)。〈公共議題之遊戲框架初探:以核四議題為例〉,《新聞學研究》。72: 85-117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference繆宇綸(2006年8月10)。〈就任一週年 「馬英九主席」的問題〉,《中國時報》。上網日期:95年9月3日,取自http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,110101+112006081000690,00.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝佳珍(2006年7月13日)。〈周玉蔻自我推銷 選市長不貪不涉弊〉,《中zh_TW
dc.relation.reference央社》。上網日期:95年10月20日,取自zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://times.hinet.net/news/20060713/polity/59ef01ef51e0.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝銘金(2004)。《品牌名稱、公關報導、名人代言及消費者知識對品牌聯想與顧客回應之研究-以生技化妝保養品為例》。國立台灣大學企業管理系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡筱穎譯(2000)。《布赫迪厄論電視》。台北:麥田。(原書Bourdeu P.[1996]. Sur la television. Paris: Liber editions.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭瑞城(1991)。〈從消息來源途徑詮釋近用媒介權:台灣的驗證〉,《新聞學研究》第45期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛支川(2005)。〈”硬新聞娛樂化”失誤類型分析及對策〉,《上饒師範學院學報》,2: 112-114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅文輝、鍾蔚文(1992) <報紙與電視如何報導民國八十年的選舉>,《亞洲協會專題研究報告》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭振輝(1997)。《報紙報導政黨形象之研究--以聯合報,中國時報,自由時報為例》。中國文化大學新聞學系研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇蘅(2001年)。《報紙新聞「小報化」的趨勢分析》。(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 89-2412-H-004-031)。臺北:國立政治大學新聞系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈「挑戰國民黨,挑戰2008,馬英九出任國民黨第六任國民黨主席」火線話題系列報導〉(無日期)。上網日期:96年6月2日,取自中央廣播電台網頁:http://www.rti.org.tw/big5/topic/taiwan/kmt01/5-3.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈呂秀蓮:學歷接近但行政經歷比馬英九高〉(2007年5月2日)。上網日期:96年6月2日,取自中央社網頁:http://www.rti.org.tw/big5/topic/taiwan/kmt01/5-3.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerican Institute for Political Communication. (1970). Anatomy of a crucial election. Washington, D. C.: American Institute for Political Communication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnkersmit, F. R. (1990). De navel van de geschiedenis. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnkersmit, F.R. (1996). Aesthetic politics. Stanfordl: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnkersmit, F. R. (1997). History and tropology : The rise and fall of metaphor. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnkersmit, F. R. (2002). Aesthtic politics : political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlmond, Gabriel A. and G.. Bingham Powell, Jr. (1966). Comparative politics : A development approach. Boston: Little Brown Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaym, N. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soap, fandom and online community. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennett, W. L. (2003). Lifestyle politics and citizen-consumers: identity, communication and political action in late modern political. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 41-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerlson, B.(1952). Conntent analysis in communication research. Glencoe, Ill. : The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeck, U. and Beck-Gerrnsheim, E. ( 2002 ). Individualization. London: Fontana.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBreed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces , 33 : 326-355.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampell, A. (1966). Interpreting the presidential victory, in M. C. Cunnings Jr. (Ed.), The national election of 1964. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCorner, J. (2003). Mediated persona and political culture. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 67-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceConger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Behavioral dimensions of charismatic leadership. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 78–97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrick, B. (2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDowning, M. (1980). American TV drama-men, women, sex, and love, in M. J. Voigt and G. J. Hanneman( Eds.), Progress in communication science ( vol.Ⅱ ). New Jersey: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDowd, M. (2000). Liberties: Tin cup cuple. New York Times, September 24.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEntman, R. M. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41 (4), 6-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEntman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of Communication, 43, 51-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHendrickson and Wilkins (April 30, 2007). The Political is the personal: Celebritizing politicians in the 21st Century. Student papers on program at 2007 International Communication Association Conference. http://www.journalism.missouri.edu/news/2007/04-30-ica-conference.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGamson, J. (1994). Claims to fame: Celebrity in contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGamson, W. A. and Modigliani, A (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1), 1-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGamson, W. A. (1984). What’s news : A game simulation of TV news. NY: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news : A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiorgetti, C. (2001).‘Dress, politics, and fashion, 1960- 80’, in L. Cheles and L. Sponza(Eds.), The art persuation : Political communication in Italy from 1945 to the 1990s. Manchester: Manchester Unviersity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrossberg, L., Nelson, C., and Treichler, P. A. (Eds.), (1992). Cultural studies. New York and London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHallin, D. C. and Macini, P. (1984). Political structure and representational form in US and Italian TV news, Theory and Society , 13(40): 829-850.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolmes, M. (2000). When is th the personal political? The president`s penis and other stories. Sociology 34(2), 305-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolsi, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHorton, D, and Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observation on intimacy at a distance. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media Interpersonal communication and the media world (1979, ed.) . 32-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHouse, R.J., and Howell, J.M., (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 3(2): 81-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKerlinger, Fred N. (1986). Foundation of behavior research. New York : Holy, Rinehart and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKleinrensink, J. (2001). Partijen zonder ideologie geven LN de ruimte, Volkskrant, June 12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis : An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKwon, Up. (1992). Organizational culture and relational role behaviors in service encounters: an empirical test of relationship retailing. Doctoral dissertation. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIsaak, A. C. (1981). Scope and methods of political science, (3d ed.). Illinois: The Dorsey Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17, 93-114.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLee-Mashment, J. (2001). The marriage of politics and marketing, Political studies, 49(4): 692-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLipton, J. (1981). Soap opera are for real, in B. Cole(ed.). Television Today. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarshall, P. D. (1997). Celebrity and power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcGrath, J. E. and McGrath, M. F. (1962). Effects of partisanship on perceptions of political figures, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26 : 236-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcLaren, M. (2000). Ignore these nasty politicians, London needs an independent voice. Independent, Febuary 8, Accessed atzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp:// news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=9816 (April 5, 2007)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeyer, T. (2002). Media democracy: How the media colonise politics. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, A., Wattenberg, M. and Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assesments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review. 80, 521-540.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMuir, K. (2005). Media darling and falling stars: Celebrity and reporting of political leaders. Westminster Papers in Communication Culture. 2(2), 54-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMumford, L. S. (1995). Love and ideology in the afternoon: Soap ppera, women, and television genre. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNewcomb, H. (1974). TV: The most popular Art. N.Y. : Anchor Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNimmo, D. and Savage, R. L. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOber, J. (1989). Mass and elite in democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlson, David M. (1994). Democratic legislative institutions. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Sullivan, T., Hartley, J., Saunders, D., Montgomery, M., and Fiske, J. (1994). Key conception in communication and cultural studies (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePan, Z. D., and Kosicki. G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10 (1), 55-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePels, D. (2003). Aesthetic representation and political style: Re-balancing identity and difference in media democracy. In J. Corner and D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: Consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 41-66). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolsby, Nelson W. (1968). The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 62( 3) ,144-68zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePostman, N. (1987). Amusing ourselves to Death . London: Methuen.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRawnsley, A. (2000). Tony’s still winning the rating war. Observer, July 9. Accessed at http:// observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903/341470,00.html (April 5, 2007)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRapoport, A. (1969). A System-theoretic view of content analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRenshon, S. A. (1995). The Clinton presidency: Campaigning, governing and psychology of leadership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRenshon, S. A. (1996). The psychological assesment of presidential candidates. New York: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRess, L. (1992). The myth of the leader. London: Methuen.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRhee, J. W. (1995). The interaction between news frames and an interpreter’s schemata: A theory and a simulation. Paper presented to the AEJMC convention, Washington, D.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRojek, C. (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubin, R. B., and McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 279-292.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSamuels, A. (1993). The political psyche. New York & London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSamuels, A. (2001). Politics on the couch: Citizenship and the Internal Life. London: Profile books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchlesinger, P. (1990). Rethinking the sociology of journalism: Source strategies andthe limits of media-centrism. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 61-83). London: Sage Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchumpeter, J. (1976). Socialism and democracy. (Ed.), T.B. Bottomore. New York: Harper Torchbooks.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSecord, Paul F. and Carl W. Backman. (1974). Social psychology. (2d ed). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSemetko, H. A., and Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50 (2, Spring), 93-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShabad, G. and Andersen, K. (1979). Candidate evaluations by men and women. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43: 18-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheafer, T. (2001). Charismatic skill and media legitimacy:An actor-centered approach to understanding the political communication competition. Communication Research, 28(6), 711-736.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShils, E. (1965). Charisma, order, status. American Sociological Review, 30, 199-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShoemaker, P. J., and Reese, S. D. (1991). Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content. NY: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShusterman, R. (1992). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSilvera, D. H., and Austad, B. (2004). Factors predicting the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12) , 1509-1526zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStorey, J. (2001). Culture theory and popular culture: An introduction. New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStreet, J. (1997). Politics and popular culture. Cambridge: Political press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStreet, J. (2000). Aesthetics, policy and politics of popular culture. Cultural Studies, 3(1): 27-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStreet, J. (2003). The celebrity politician: Political style and popular culture. In J. Corner & D. Pels (Eds.), Media and the restyling of politics: consumerism, celebrity, cynicism (pp. 85-98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStreet, J. (2004). Celebrity politicians: Popular culture and political representation. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBritish Journal of Politics & International Relations. 6( 4), 435-452.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSusman, T. (2006). Stars take new leading roles: Celebrities seek a deeper part in global campaigns for social justice. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News. Jun. 19, p. 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, J. (1995). The media and mordernity. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, J. B. (2000). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age . Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencevan Zoonen, L. (1998).‘Finally I have my mother back’: Politicians and their families in popular culture. Harvard Journal of Press / Politics, 3(1) , 48-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVan Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture converge. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeiskel, T. C. (2005). From sidekick to sideshow-Celebrity, entertainment, and the politics of distraction. American Behaviour Scientist, 491(3), 393-409.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWest, D. M., and Orman, J. M. (2002). Celebrity politics. New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWolfsfeld, G. (1991). Media and political conflict. Cambridge university press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZolo, D. (1992). Democracy and complexity. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
100901.pdf44.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100902.pdf77.4 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100903.pdf81.8 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100904.pdf69.92 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100905.pdf193.54 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100906.pdf362.68 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100907.pdf218.54 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100908.pdf409.04 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100909.pdf129.92 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100910.pdf165.95 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100911.pdf172.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.