Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33347
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor謝瑤玲<br>陳音頤zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsieh, Yau-ling<br>Chen, Yin-ien_US
dc.contributor.author梁曉菁zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Hsiao-chingen_US
dc.creator梁曉菁zh_TW
dc.creatorLiang, Hsiao-chingen_US
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:20:16Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:20:16Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:20:16Z-
dc.identifierG0915510081en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33347-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description915510081zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract阿蘭達蒂•羅依的第一部長篇小說(也是目前唯一一部)《微物之神》迄今已出版了八年之久。由於書中所觸及到的議題繁多,包括印度賤民階級所受到的不平等待遇,施加在婦女身上的肉體與精神上的暴力,或是在全球化下地方文化的邊緣化,所以至今仍贏得許多不同領域的研究者的關注。有些研究者將這本小說視為一個表現後殖民時期印度社會的文本;有些則將其視為將正規英文轉化為實驗性語言的絕佳典範;另外有些則將其視為一本宣揚女性權利的小說。\n 以上這些議題我在這本論文中或多或少都有所涉及,並以「純潔」典範的角度來探討。這裡所謂的「純潔」典範,指的是一種只接受特定受認可特質,並排斥任何在認可範圍外的存在,具將其視為「不潔」的系統。因此在文中「純潔」一字的指涉範圍含括衛生方面的乾淨,儀式上的潔淨,以至於在種族以及文化意含中的純淨。在第一章中,我會對文本做一個背景知識的介紹。在第二章,我將表明羅伊在小說中刻意破壞「大論述」的目的,並說明羅伊行文中表現出「大故事」的單薄度,以及這些大故事如何造成弱勢主體的隱&#27809;。在第三章中,討論將延伸到維魯沙這個角色上。首先我會解釋及解讀他賤民身份所被賦與的本質,接下來我會分析他所帶有的「不潔」意涵是如何及為什麼使他成為是代罪羔羊。在第四章中,我同樣的運用「純潔」與「不潔」間的對立關係來解讀小說中女性角色的處境。如同維魯沙一般,瑞海兒與阿慕也同樣在「純潔」符碼的宰制之下。它的標準支配了女性以及母性的合宜行止的內含。這些女性主角們也因此受限於「純潔」意涵的羅網之中。最後,我會在第五章中回頭總結前面幾章所提到的議題。此外,我會對於羅伊小說內容中所反映出來的當代印度社會與歷史的角度做一些討論,因為這點曾經引起爭議,並以此做為這本論文的尾聲。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractArundhati Roy’s prestigious first novel (and maybe the only novel), The God of Small Things, has already come out for eight years. It contains such exuberance of topics, such as the inequality towards the untouchables, the physical and mental violence abuse upon woman, or the marginalization of the local culture under the influences of globalization, that it has earned the attention of many researchers from different fields even till now. Some of researchers consider the text as a fiction which presents postcolonial India, others find the book as a perfect demonstration of how proper English is transformed into a more experimental form; still others treat the novel as an assertion of female rights.\n In this thesis, I more or less touch all of the above topics, and investigate them in the light of “the model of purity,” the system which only recognizes the approved essence and wipes off anything that is not. Thus in this thesis the term purity refers to concepts of the hygienic purity, ritual purity, and also the purity in the ethnic and cultural aspect. I will give background knowledge to the book in Chapter One. Then, in Chapter Two I declare Roy’s intention to mime the grand narrative in her novel, and how Roy’s writing lays bare the fragility of The Great Stories and how they work to ensure the invisibility of the minor subjects. In Chapter Three, I extend my discussion to the character Velutha. Firstly I explain and interpret his essence by his untouchable background; then I will analyze how and why his impure essence makes him a victim of others’ irrational malice. In Chapter Four, I also apply the opposition of purity and impurity to read the situation of the female characters in the novel. Like Velutha, the heroines Rahel and Ammu are also under surveillance of the purity code. The criterion of purity dictates not only the context of decent womanhood but also motherhood. The female protagonists are thus caught in the inescapable network of purity. Finally, I will have a retrospective look on my thesis in Chapter Five. Apart from this, I will have a brief discussion about the social reality reflected in Roy’s text as this issue once brought about controversy. This small debate will serve as my finale.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgments...........................................iii\nChinese abstract..........................................iv\nEnglish Abstract..........................................v\nChapter\n I. Introduction..................................1\n II. What Myth Are We Living in?..................17\n III. Velutha the Obscure: the Man Who Left No\n Footprints.......................42\n IV. The Hidden Myth of the Dirty Goddess.........69\n V. Conclusions...................................97\nWorks Cited...............................................103zh_TW
dc.format.extent48228 bytes-
dc.format.extent14804 bytes-
dc.format.extent14114 bytes-
dc.format.extent14886 bytes-
dc.format.extent90527 bytes-
dc.format.extent20932 bytes-
dc.format.extent80392 bytes-
dc.format.extent148013 bytes-
dc.format.extent92366 bytes-
dc.format.extent91579 bytes-
dc.format.extent30841 bytes-
dc.format.extent40775 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915510081en_US
dc.subject阿蘭達蒂•羅依zh_TW
dc.subject《微物之神》zh_TW
dc.subject李歐塔zh_TW
dc.subject大論述zh_TW
dc.subject克莉斯蒂娃zh_TW
dc.subject《恐怖的力量》zh_TW
dc.subject賤斥zh_TW
dc.subject賤民zh_TW
dc.subjectArundhati Royen_US
dc.subjectThe God of Small Thingsen_US
dc.subjectJean-Fran&ccedil;ois Lyotarden_US
dc.subjectgrand narrativeen_US
dc.subjectJulia Kristevaen_US
dc.subjectPowers of Horroren_US
dc.subjectabjecten_US
dc.subjectthe untouchablesen_US
dc.title重訪偉大故事:《微物之神》中的純潔神話zh_TW
dc.titleRevisiting Great Stories: the Myth of Purity in The God of Small Thingsen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAdhikari, Madhumalati. “Enclosure and Freedom: Arundhati Roy’s The God of Smallzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThings.” Explorations : Arundhati Roy`s the God of small things. Ed. Indirazh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBhatt and Indira Nityanandam. New Delhi: Creative Books, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAhmad, Aijaz. “Reading Arundhati Roy Politically.” Frontline. 8 Aug. 1997: 103-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlexander, K. C. “The Neo-Christian of Kerala.” The Untouchables in Contemporaryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIndia. Ed. J. Michael Mahar. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllen, Michael, and S. N. Mukherjee. Women in India and Nepal. Canberra: AMUzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrinting for the South Asian History, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michaelzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: The University of Texas Press, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarthes, Roland. Mythologies. Trans. Jonathan Cape Ltd. New York: Hill and Wang,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBataille, Georges. The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. Trans. La partzh_TW
dc.relation.referencemaudite. Vol. 2. New York: Zone Books, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlodgett, Harriet. “Mimesis and Metaphor: Food Imagery in Twentieth-Centuryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWomen’s Writing.” Language & Literature. 40.3(2004): 260-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBose, Brinda. “In Desire and in Death: Eroticism as Politics in Arundhati Roy’s Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGod of Small Things.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.2(1998): 59-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrah, Avtar. Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarroll, David. “Narrative, Heterogeneity, and the Question of the Political: Bakhtinzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Lyotard”. Ed. Murray Krieger, The Aims of Representation: Subject/Text/History. Stanford: Stanford Up. 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChandra, Amit. “The Construction of the Indian Novel in English.” The Picador bookzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof Modern Indian Literature. London: Macmillan, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDasan, M. “Arundhati Hits the Socio-Political Ball.” The Critical Studies ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Ed. Jaydipshinh Dodiya and Joyazh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCharkravarty. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 1999. P. 26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDhruvarajan, Vanaja. Hindu Women and The Power of Ideology. Massachusetts:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBergin & Garvey Publishers, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDinnerstein, Dorothy. The Mermaid and The Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuman Malasaise. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDouglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLondon: Routledge, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDumont, Louis. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Trans.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMark Sainsbury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFriedman, Susan Stanford. Mappings: Feminism and the Cultural Geographies ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEncounter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. “Feminism, State Fictions and Violence: Gender, Geopolitics andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTransnationalism.” Communal/ Plural: Journal of Transnational &zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrosscultural Studies. 9.1(2001):111-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFromm, Erich. Man for himself: An Enquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoutledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFrumkes, Lewis Burke. Writer. 111.11(1998): 23-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGedalof, Irene. Against Purity: Rethinking Identity with Indian and Western Feminism. London: Routledge, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilbert, Sandra and Susan Gubar. The Mad Woman in the Attic. New Haven: Yalezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarriet, Blodgett. “Mimesis and Metaphor: Food Imagery in Twentieth-Centuryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWomen’s Writing.” Language & Literature. 40.3(2004): 260-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJessica, Benjamin. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDomination. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJung, C. G. “A Psychological Approach to the Dogma of the Trinity.” Psychology andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReligion: West and East. New York: Pantheon Books, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. “Stabat Mater.” The Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York : Columbia University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceColumbia University Press, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKumar, Sujith Chandra. “Facts and Fictions.” The Week. 26 Oct. 1997: 43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLayoun, Mary. “Woman, Nation, and Narration in Midnight`s Children: The Scopiczh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand the Civic.” Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeministPractices. Ed. Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLyotard, Jean-Fran&ccedil;ois. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Georges Van Denzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAbbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minnesapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLyotard, Jean-Fran&ccedil;ois, and Jean-Loup Th&eacute;baud. Just Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManchester: Manchester University Press, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarquand, Robert. “India`s Arundhati Roy: Novelist Turned Social Activist.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristian Science Monitor. 91.133 (1999):7.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMead, Margaret. Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: W. Morrow, 1949.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMee, Jon. “After midnight: the Indian Novel in English of the 80s and 90s.” Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePostcolonial Studies. 1.1(1998): 127-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMullaney, Julie. The God of Small Things: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continum,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNarula, Smita. Broken People: Caste Violence Against India`s \"Untouchables.\" Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: Human Rights Watch, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNational Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Highlights of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReport of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for the Years 1994-95 & 1995-96. New Delhi: Government of India, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNishant, Shulin. “Arundhati Roy`s The God of Small Things.” Contemporaryzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePostcolonial and Post Imperial Literature in English. June. 2001. Nationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity of Singapore. 6 Apr. 2005 <http://www.scholars.nus.edu.sg/landow/zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepost/India/roy/nishant1.html#colonialism>.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOmvedt, Gail. “Rural Women and the Family in an Era of Liberalization: India inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComparative Asian Perspective.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholarszh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.4(1997): 33-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePauline, Rolend. Caste in Contemporary India: Beyond Organic Solidarity. Menlozh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark: Benjamin/ Cummings Publisher, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrasad, Amar Nath. “Arundhati Roy: A Novelist of New Style.” The Critical Studieszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Ed. Jaydipsinh Dodiya and Joya Chakravarty. Delhi: Atlantic Publisher, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRao, Ranga. “The Book(er) of the Year.” The Hindu Magazine 16 Nov. 1997. XIII.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRich, Adrienne. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: W. W. Norton, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoy, Arundhati. “Come September.” Frontline 12 Oct. 2002 <http://www.hinduonnet. com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=20021011003106500.htm&date=fl1920/&prd=fline&>.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. The God of Small Things. New York: HarperPerennial, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThormann, Janet. “The Ethical Subject of The God of Small Things.” Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society. 8.2 (2003): 299-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrinh, T. Minh-ha. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUpdike, John. “Mother Tongues: Subduing the Language of the Colonizer.” The Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYorker. 23-30 June. 1997: 156-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWibur, Alix. “Interview: Arundhati Roy, For Me Language Is a Skin on My Thought.” The Week. 15.45(1997): 46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWood, James. “The Noisy Pluralism of Indian Fiction: An Indelicate Balance.” The New Republic. 217.26(1997): 32-7.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWyatt, Andreww K. J. “Dalit Christians and Identity Politics in India.” Bullentin of Concerned Asian Scholars. 30.4(1998): 16-23.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
51008101.pdf47.1 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008102.pdf14.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008103.pdf13.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008104.pdf14.54 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008105.pdf88.41 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008106.pdf20.44 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008107.pdf78.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008108.pdf144.54 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008109.pdf90.2 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008110.pdf89.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008111.pdf30.12 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51008112.pdf39.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.