Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33390
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃麗儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHuang, Li-yien_US
dc.contributor.author鄭孟淳zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Meng-chunen_US
dc.creator鄭孟淳zh_TW
dc.creatorCheng, Meng-chunen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:27:33Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:27:33Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:27:33Z-
dc.identifierG0905550071en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33390-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description90555007zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract字彙學習在語言學習上佔有非常重要的地位。本研究之目的旨在探究台灣國中學生在學習英語字彙時使用字彙學習策略的情形,首先,想了解各種不同字彙學習策略的使用頻率,並找出較常和較少使用的字彙學習策略,此外,想探討字彙學習策略的使用和字彙學習成就之間的關係,並找出不同字彙學習成就程度的學生在字彙學習策略使用上的差異之處。\n 本研究以147位國中三年級學生為調查對象,研究的工具為字彙學習策略問卷和字彙學習成就測驗,資料的分析採用SPSS,包含描述性統計、皮爾遜積差相關分析及單因子變異數分析。研究結果指出(1)整體而言,國中學生使用字彙學習策略的頻率並不高;(2)國中學生最常使用認知策略,最少使用社會策略;(3)國中學生比較常使用「表層」處理策略,比較少使用「深層」處理策略,例如,學生會注意單字的發音及拼法,並且偏愛重複背誦的方式,相反地,他們很少使用聯想或造句的方式來學習字彙;(4)國中學生的字彙學習成就和字彙策略的使用有顯著的相關性,在字彙學習上成就較高的學生,不僅會使用較多樣的策略來學習字彙,而且會更常使用這些字彙策略;(5)在字彙學習上成就較高的學生會比較注意上下文的關聯性、發音與拼法的相關性、字彙的詞性,他們會把單字分成音節而且會把字彙學習與自身的經驗相結合,另外,他們在教材的使用比較積極,相反地,成就較低的學生比較不注重單字的發音;(6)國中學生的學習策略來源主要是學校老師,他們選擇使用某些特定的策略主要原因是因為這些策略比較方便且容易使用,此外他們最想學的字彙學習策略與增加自然練習英語的環境有關。\n 最後,本研究建議老師應該 (1)教導學生如何使用各種不同的字彙學習策略;(2)在介紹策略的時候要考慮學生的程度;(3)教導學生聯合使用「表層」及「深層」處理策略;(4)教學生猜測單字的意思後,要查字典;(5)提供互動的活動讓學生在自然的環境下學習字彙;(6)鼓勵學生獨立規劃自己的字彙學習。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractVocabulary learning is of critical importance to language acquisition, whether the language is first, second, or foreign. After suffering from being neglected for decades, vocabulary learning and teaching now have attracted considerable attention in the field of ESL or EFL research. The interest of research has been particularly in studying learners’ approaches to vocabulary learning. \n The present study aims to investigate the kinds of vocabulary learning strategies used by JHS students in Taiwan. Moreover, it examines whether there is any relationship between JHS students’ vocabulary strategy use and their vocabulary learning achievement. The data were collected from 147 third-grade students from a junior high school in Miaoli by means of two materials. The Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire was designated to survey what kinds of vocabulary learning strategies JHS students used and how often. The Vocabulary Achievement Test was used to discriminate the participants into different levels in vocabulary learning achievement. Data analysis was performed by SPSS, including descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlations, and one-way ANOVA. \nThe major findings of this study are summarized as follows. (1) JHS students as a whole are moderate users of vocabulary learning strategies. (2) JHS students use cognitive strategies most frequently and social strategies least frequently. (3) JHS students employ “shallow” processing strategies more often than “deep” processing strategies. They particularly favor repetition strategies and pay more attention to the form of a word. On the other hand, they seldom put words in a meaningful context or utilize imagery techniques. (4) JHS students’ vocabulary strategy use is strongly related to their vocabulary learning achievement. Students with better vocabulary learning achievement not only use a wider range of strategies but also use them much more frequently. (5) JHS students with the highest level of vocabulary learning achievement pay much more attention to textual context, dividing words into syllables, active use of the learning materials, the matching between spelling and sound, word classes, and the personalization of information. On the other hand, JHS students with the lowest level of vocabulary learning achievement pay much less attention to the sound of a word. (6) JHS students learn vocabulary strategies primarily from school teachers and their major reason for strategy choice is because of convenience and ease of employment. The strategies that they want to learn most have something to do with increasing authentic input. \n According to the findings, several pedagogical implications are suggested. Teachers should (1) help JHS learners to raise their awareness of vocabulary learning strategy use; (2) take JHS learners` individual differences, such as vocabulary learning achievement, into account when recommending strategies; (3) instruct JHS learners to increase using the “shallow” processing and “deep” processing strategies in combination; (4) guide JHS students to use the “guessing” and “dictionary” strategies in combination; (5) provide JHS students with more authentic input and communicative interaction for vocabulary learning; (6) encourage JHS students to take charge of their vocabulary learning and view it as a life-long process. If JHS students can be equipped with the abilities to employ appropriate strategies, they can build up vocabulary more effectively and efficiently on their own.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPage\nACKNOWLEDGEMENT i\nCHINESE ABSTRACT ii \nENGLISH ABSTRACT iv\nTABLE OF CONTENTS vi\nLIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES x\n \nCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1\n1.1 Background and Motivation 1\n1.1.1 The Importance of Vocabulary Learning 1\n1.1.2 The Difficulty of Vocabulary Learning 2\n1.1.3 The Importance of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 4\n1.1.4 The Factors Affecting the Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 5\n1.2 Need for the Study 6\n1.3 Purposes of the Study and Research Questions 7\n1.4 Significance of the Study 8\n1.5 Organization of the Thesis 9\nCHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10\n2.1 Language Learning Strategies 10\n2.1.1 Definitions of Language Learning Strategies 11\n2.1.2 Classifications of Language Learning Strategies 12\n2.1.3 Studies on the Relationship between Language Learning Strategy Use and Language Performance 16\n2.1.3.1 Studies on “Good Language Learners” 16\n2.1.3.2 Quantitative Studies Employing Statistical Procedures 18\n2.1.3.3 Summary 21\n2.2 Vocabulary learning strategies 22\n2.2.1 Definitions of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 22\n2.2.2 Classifications of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 23\n2.2.3 Schmitt`s Taxonomy of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 28\n2.2.4 Studies on the Relationship between Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Language Performance 34\n2.2.4.1 “Good” and “Poor” Learners’ Vocabulary Learning Strategies 34\n2.2.4.2 The Relationship with Vocabulary Leaning Achievement 35\n2.2.4.3 The Relationship with Vocabulary Size and General English Proficiency 37\n2.2.4.4 The Relationship with Academic Vocabulary Knowledge and General English Proficiency 39\n2.2.4.5 Studies on EFL Learners in Taiwan 40\n2.2.4.6 Summary 42\nCHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 43\n3.1 Participants 43\n3.2 Materials 44\n3.2.1 Vocabulary Achievement Test 44\n3.2.1.1 The Development of the VATEST 45\n3.2.1.2 The Content of VATEST 46\n3.2.2 Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire 47\n3.2.2.1 The Development of VLSQ 47\n3.2.2.2 The Content of VLSQ 50\n3.3 Procedures 51\n3.3.1 Pilot Study 51\n3.3.1.1 The Procedures of the Pilot Study 52\n3.3.1.2 The Results of the Pilot Study 52\n3.3.1.3 The Problems and Modifications 54\n3.3.2 Main Study 55\n3.4 Data Analysis 56\nCHAPTER 4 RESULTS 58\n4.1 The Kinds of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by JHS Students in Taiwan 58\n4.1.1 How Often do JHS Students Use Vocabulary Learning Strategies? 59\n4.1.1.1 Frequency of Use: Overall Strategies and the Five Strategy Categories 59\n4.1.1.2 Frequency of Use: Individual Strategies 60\n4.1.2 What Are the Ten Most and the Ten Least Frequently Used Vocabulary Learning Strategies? 68\n4.1.2.1 The Ten Most Frequently Used Vocabulary Learning Strategies 68\n4.1.2.2 The Ten Least Frequently Used Vocabulary Learning Strategies 69\n4.1.3 Summary 71\n4.2 The Relationship between JHS Students’ Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Their Vocabulary Learning Achievement 72\n4.2.1 Does JHS Students’ Performance on the Vocabulary Achievement Test Correlate Significantly with Their Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use? 73\n4.2.1.1 Correlations between the VATEST Scores and The Use of Overall Strategies and Five Strategy Categories 73\n4.2.1.2 Correlations between the VATEST Scores and Individual Strategy Use 74\n4.2.2 What are the Variations in Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use among the Students with Different Levels of Vocabulary Learning Achievement? 79\n4.2.2.1 The Variations in the Use of Overall Strategies and Five Strategy Categories 80\n4.2.2.2 The Variations in the Use of Individual Strategies 81\n4.2.2.3 A Comparison of the Top Ten Most Frequently Used Strategies among the Three Scoring groups 89\n4.2.3 Summary 91\n4.2.3.1 The Results of the Pearson Product-moment Correlations 92\n4.2.3.2 The Results of the One-way ANOVA 92\n4.3 The Responses to the Further Questions 94\n4.3.1 The Sources of the Participants’ Strategy Learning 95\n4.3.2 The Reasons for the Participants’ Strategy Choice 96\n4.3.3 The Strategies that the Participants Want to Learn Most 97\n4.3.4 Additional Vocabulary Learning Strategies 98\n4.3.5 Summary of the Participants’ Responses to Further Questions 98\nCHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 100\n5.1 The Discussion on the Kinds of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by JHS Students in Taiwan 100\n5.1.1 Frequency of Use: Overall Strategies and the Five Strategy Categories 100\n5.1.2 Frequency of Use: Individual Strategies 102\n5.1.2.1 Determination Strategies 102\n5.1.2.2 Social Strategies 105\n5.1.2.3 Memory Strategies 106\n5.1.2.4 Cognitive Strategies 109\n5.1.2.5 Metacognitive Strategies 111\n5.1.3 The Ten Most Frequently Used Vocabulary Learning Strategies 113\n5.1.4 The Ten Least Frequently Used Vocabulary Learning Strategies 114\n5.2 The Discussion on the Relationship between JHS Students’ Vocabulary Learning Achievement and Their Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies 116\n5.2.1 The Relationship between JHS Students’ Overall Strategy Use and Their Vocabulary Learning Achievement 117\n5.2.2 The Relationship between JHS Students’ Vocabulary Learning Achievement and Their Use of Five Strategy Categories 118\n5.2.3 The Relationship between JHS Students’ Vocabulary Learning Achievement and Their Use of Individual Strategies 120\n5.2.3.1 Determination Strategies 121\n5.2.3.2 Social Strategies 123\n5.2.3.3 Memory Strategies 123\n5.2.3.4 Cognitive Strategies 125\n5.2.3.5 Metacognitive Strategies 126\n5.2.3.6 The Strategies of Significant Negative Correlations 127\n5.2.3.7 A Comparison of the Top Ten Most Frequently Used Strategies among the High-scoring, Mid-scoring, and Low-scoring groups 128\n5.3 The Responses to the Four Further Questions 129\n5.3.1 The Sources of The Participants’ Strategy Learning 129\n5.3.2 The Reasons for the Participants’ Strategy Choice 130\n5.3.3 The Strategies that the Participants Want to Learn Most 130\n5.3.4 The Additional Vocabulary Learning Strategies 131\n5.3.5 Principal Findings in the Present Study 131\nCHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION 133\n6.1 Summary of the Major Findings 133\n6.1.1 The Kinds of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by JHS Students 133\n6.1.2 The Relationship between JHS Students’ Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use and Vocabulary Learning Achievement 135\n6.1.3 The Responses to the Further Questions 139\n6.2 Pedagogical Implications 139\n6.2.1 Raising JHS Students’ Awareness of Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use 139\n6.2.2 Considering JHS Students’ Individual Differences: Taking Vocabulary Learning Achievement as an Example 140\n6.2.3 Instructing JHS Students to Use the “Shallow” and “Deep” Processing Strategies Together 141\n6.2.4 Guiding JHS Students to Use the “Guessing” and “Dictionary” Strategies in Combination 143\n6.2.5 Providing Authentic Input and Communicative Interaction for Vocabulary Learning 144\n6.2.6 Encouraging JHS Students to Take Charge of Their Own Vocabulary Learning 144\n6.3 Concluding Remarks 145\n6.4 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Further Research 146\nAPPENDIX A Vocabulary Learning Achievement Test 149\nAPPENDIX B Vocabulary Learning Strategy Questionnaire 151\nAPPENDIX C Summary of the Frequencies of Use of Individual Strategies 155\nREFERENCES 158zh_TW
dc.format.extent87260 bytes-
dc.format.extent17070 bytes-
dc.format.extent74483 bytes-
dc.format.extent15140 bytes-
dc.format.extent27709 bytes-
dc.format.extent37135 bytes-
dc.format.extent244732 bytes-
dc.format.extent215405 bytes-
dc.format.extent320629 bytes-
dc.format.extent212110 bytes-
dc.format.extent147893 bytes-
dc.format.extent439026 bytes-
dc.format.extent151883 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0905550071en_US
dc.subject字彙學習策略zh_TW
dc.subject學習策略zh_TW
dc.subject字彙學習zh_TW
dc.subject字彙學習成就zh_TW
dc.subjectVocabulary learning strategiesen_US
dc.subjectLearning strategiesen_US
dc.subjectVocabulary learningen_US
dc.subjectVocabulary learning achievementen_US
dc.title台灣國中學生英語字彙學習策略之研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Investigation into English Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Junior High School Students in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAbraham, R. G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. L. Wenden, & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.85-102). London: Prentice Hall International.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAhmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: CILT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Eric Digest. Education Resources Information Center.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBéjoint, H. B., & Moulin A. (1987). The place of the dictionary in an EFL programme. In A. Cowie (ed.), The dictionary and the language learner (pp. 381-392). Tübingen: Niemeyer.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65, 24-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication (pp. 100-118). Harlow, England: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 490-514.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategies learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 655-670.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarter, R., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71-83). New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChamot, A. U. (2001). The role of learning strategies in SLA. In M. P. Been (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 25-43). London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChamot, A. U., & Kupper. L. (1989) Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, H. J. (1998). Second language vocabulary learning strategies: A preliminary investigation of Chinese EFL learners. The proceedings of the 7th international symposium on English teaching (pp. 219-230). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChou, Y. C. (2002). An exploratory study of language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and language proficiency among EFL Taiwanese technological and vocational college students. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Iowa.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClarke, D.F., & Nation, J.S.R. (1980). Guessing the meaning of words from context: Strategy and techniques. System, 8, 211-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoady, J. M. (1986). Vocabulary acquisition: Mystery and paradox. Anaheim, CA: International TESOL.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A.D., & Aphek, E. (1980). Retention of second language vocabulary over time: Investigating the role of mnemonic associations. System, 8, 221-235.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A.D., & Aphek, E. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 221-235.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCook, L. K., & Mayer. R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley and J. Levin (Eds.) Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1994). Ways with words—Chinese students learning of English vocabulary. The proceedings of the second international symposium on English teaching (pp. 15-28). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCraik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCraik, F., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268-284.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDansereau, D. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. C. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Relating learning to basic research (pp. 209-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285-299). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and applications. London: SAGE.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1986). Course Design: Developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEllis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFan, M. Y. (1999). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong Learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (2), 222-241.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreen, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreen, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGu, Y. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL learners. In Bird, N. et al. (Eds.), Language and learning (pp. 376-401). Hong Kong Education Department, Hong Kong. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 411).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGu, Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), A-4. Retrieved October 30, 2005 from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej26/a4.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643-679.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHosenfeld, C. (1979). A learning-teaching view of second language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 12, 51-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuckin T., Haynes M., & Coady J. (Eds.) (1993). Second Language Reading and Vocabulary. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJiménez Catalán, R. M. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKelly, P. (1992). Does the ear assist the eye in the long-term retention of lexis? IRAL, 30, 137-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlassen, J.M. (1994). The language learning strategies of freshman English students in Taiwan: A case study. Paper presented at the Third International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students with different verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 285-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M.(1999). Students` approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 176-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved September 25, 2005 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKung, J. W. (2004). An Exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taipei Teachers College.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLan, R., & Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41, 339-379.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46, 101-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiao, Y. F. (2004). A survey study of Taiwanese EFL freshmen’s vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of Pingtung Teachers College, 21, 271-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, L. (2001). Taiwanese Children`s EFL vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Tsinghua University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLu, M. C. (2002). A study of the effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, M. (1984). A new look at vocabulary in EFL. Applied Linguistics, 5, 12-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcDonough, S.H. (1999). State of the art article: Learner strategies. Language Teaching, 32(1), 1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeara, P. (1982). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. In V. Kinsella (Ed.), Surveys I: Eight state-of-the-art articles on key areas in language teaching (pp. 100-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNaiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, The Modern Language Center.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, P., & Waring R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Küpper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 557-584.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO`Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Langue Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L. (1986). Development and psychometric testing of the strategy inventory for language learning. ARI Technical Report 728. Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Science.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L., & Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings, and instructional issues. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L. (1992/1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Research update and ESL classroom implications. TESOL Journal, 1, Cover, 18-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParibakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady, & T. Huckin (Eds), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 211-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParry, K. (1993). Too many words: learning the vocabulary of an academic subject. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 109-159). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESO Quarterly, 19, 103-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Delaney, J. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52, 61-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePurpura, J. E. (1994). The role of learners strategies in language learning and testing. Paper given at the Thai TESOL Conference, Bangkok, January, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: a theoretical perspective. In O`Neil, H. F. Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubin, J. (1975). What the \"good language learner\" can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubin, J. (1981). The study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 118-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners` approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. Modern Language Journal, 79, 15-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShih, H. H. (2004). The effects and the strategies of vocabulary learning on EFL junior and senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275-298.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpender, D. (1980). Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Alabama.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTomaszczyk, J. (1983). On bilingual dictionaries: the case for bilingual dictionaries for foreign language learners. In R.R.K. Hartmann (ed.), Lexicography: Principles and Practice (pp. 41-51). Academic Press, London.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 2, 177-198.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVermeer, A. (1992). Exploring the second language learner lexicon. In L. Verhoeven, & de J. H. A. L. Jong (Eds.), The construct of language proficiency (pp. 147-162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, A. Y., Thomas, M.H., Inzana, C. M., & Primicerio, L. J. (1993). Long-term retention under conditions of intentional learning and the keyword mnemonic. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 545-547.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Chengchi University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeinstein, C., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp.315-327). New York: Collier Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWen, Q. F., & Johnson K. (1997). L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 27-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWenden, A. (1986). Helping language learner think about their learning. ELT journal, 40(1), 3-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWenden, A. L. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A. L. Wenden, & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.3-13). London: Prentice Hall International.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXia, L. Y. (2002). The effects of vocabulary learning strategies on EL learning. Journal of Jiangsu University Higher Education Study Edition, 24 (4), 53-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, N. D. (1994a). An Investigation of Taiwanese College Students’ Us of English Learning Strategies. Research report for the National Science Council (Project No. NSC 82-0301-H-002-071-T). Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, N. D. (1994b). A study of factors affecting EFL learners’ use of learning strategies: An investigation of Taiwanese college students. Paper from the eleventh conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYou, H. L. (2004). Analysis of the Basic Competence English Test for Junior High School. Unpublished Master Degree Thesis, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZimmerman, C. B. (1994). Self-selected reading and interactive vocabulary instruction: Knowledge and perceptions of word learning among L2 learners. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王文科 (1994): 教育研究法。台北: 五南圖書公司。zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
55007101.pdf85.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007102.pdf16.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007103.pdf72.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007104.pdf14.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007105.pdf27.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007106.pdf36.26 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007107.pdf239 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007108.pdf210.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007109.pdf313.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007110.pdf207.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007111.pdf144.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007112.pdf428.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55007113.pdf148.32 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.