Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33421


Title: Investigating the Content Validity of the Basic Competence Test of English
國中基本學力測驗英語科內容效度之研究
Authors: 林慧雰
Lin, Hui Fen
Contributors: 楊泰雄
Yang, Tai Hsiung
林慧雰
Lin, Hui Fen
Keywords: 內容效度
國中基本學力測驗
國中英語
Content Validity
Basic Competence Test
Junior High School English
Date: 2005
Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:33:10 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本研究旨在探查台灣國中基本學力測驗英語科之內容效度,以期了解國中基本學力測驗英語科之試題內容是否達到出題者宣稱之目的,進而對英語教師、教育學者、學生、及社會大眾能有啟示作用。
本研究兼採質及量的分析方法。質的研究取自51位現任國中英語教師之專業判斷,以2003年第一次國中基測英語試題為例,從課本的符合程度、學校教學、學校評量、試題難易度等四方面逐題審視國中基測與教學之相關程度,及問卷調查此51位教師對國中基測與課程標準之總目標、分項目標、基測命題原則、及學力指標之看法,透過Aiken之效度指數檢測是否達到顯著。量的研究取自台灣四所國中共1204位畢業生在校三年之英語段考平均成績分別與國中基測英語原始分數之相關。
研究結果顯示:國中基本學力測驗英語科具有內容效度。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the content validity of Basic Competence Test (BCT) in English, hoping to verify whether or not the test reaches what the tester claims to test, and further promote a better understanding of BCT toward teachers, students, educators and the public.
This study adopts both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Fifty-one qualified junior high school teachers examine the relationship between BCT’s items and curricular instruction from textbook coverage, instruction, evaluation, and item difficulty. They also offer their perceptions toward BCT from the content domain the tester claims to test, i.e. the general and specific objectives of Curriculum Standards, test principles from the BCT Center, and Core Competence Indicators. Aiken’s Validity Index checks if items are significantly content valid. Computing the correlation coefficient between 1204 students’ academic scores of monthly tests for three years at four schools and BCT’s raw scores does the quantitative analysis.
The result of this study indicates that first BCT items have high accordance with curricular instruction. Second, students’ performance at school correlates highly to that on BCT. Third, what the BCT Center claims to test is highly acclaimed by the junior high school teachers. In other words, BCT’s content validity is established.
Reference: Anastashi, A. (1982). Psychological Testing (5thed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Berk, R.A., ed. (1980) Criterion-referenced Measurement: The state of art. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brown, J. D. & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Chen, Lih-Mei Donna. (2002). Taiwanese junior high school English teachers’ perception of the washback effect of the basic competence test in English. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2002) (UMI Microform No.3081903)
Crambert, A.C. (1977). Estimation of validity for criterion-referenced tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ED No. 151418)
Crocker, L. M., Miller M. D., &Franks, E. A. (1989). Quantitative methods for assessing the fit between tests and curriculum. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(2), 179-194.
Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18, 519-521.
Gronlund, N. E. (1982). Constructing achievement tests. London: Prentice Hall.
Gronlund, N. E. (1988). How to construct achievement tests (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Henning, G. (1987). A Guide to Language Testing: Developing, Evaluation, Research. L.A.: University of California.
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563-575.
Lyman, B. G. (1983). The construction of a criterion-referenced test of reading for college freshmen: an overview of theoretical considerations. (ED No. 251804)
Lynch, B.K. & Davidson, F. (1994). Criterion-referenced test development: linking curricula, teachers and tests. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 727-43
Mehrens, W. A. & Ebel, R. L. (1979). Some comments on criterion-referenced and norm-referenced achievement tests. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education. (ED No. 182324)
Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, J. J. (1987). Using standardized tests in education. New York: Longman.”
Popham,W. J. (1978). The case for criterion-referenced measurement. Educational Researcher, 7.11:6-10.
Sireci, S. G. (1995). The central role of content representation in test validity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. (ED No. 387508)
Sireci, S. G. (1998). Evaluating content validity using multidimensional scaling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ED No. 428121)
Spool, M. D. (1975). Performing a content validation study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association. (ED No.129915)
中文部份
中央通訊社 (The Central News Agency)。 (2001, June 10)。老師指二次國中學力測驗比上次難,平均成績降。
中央通訊社 (The Central News Agency)。(2002, May 12)。國中基本學測各科試題特色。
中央通訊社 (The Central News Agency)。(2002, May 16)。第二次國中基本學力測驗試題,難度與前次相同。
中央通訊社 (The Central News Agency)。(2003, June 22)。 國中基測試題取材,著重真實生活與學習經驗。
中央通訊社 (The Central News Agency)。(2003, August 11)。二次國中基測寄發成績單,平均分數大幅提高。
王素芸 (Wang, S.Y.) (2001)。「基本能力指標」之發展與概念分析。教育研究資訊,9:1,1-14。
王逸慧 ( Wang, Y. H.) (2001)。基本學力測驗之實施:問題與展望。教育研究資訊,9:1,15-31。
民生報 (Minsheng Daily)。(2000, December 31)。 南市教局長批開倒車。A4版。
民生報 (Minsheng Daily)。(2001, January 06)。5科例題 絕多取材自課程標準 準備方向:國文熟讀課本內容 數學多作模擬考題 英文看看英文報紙 社會務必關心時事 自然著重應用圖表。A9版。
宋曼雯 (Song) (1998)。專訪教育部長林清江談廢除高中、職及五專聯招。中央月刊,31:6,17-21。
余霖 ( Yu, L. ) (2000)。對國民中學學生基本學力測驗之評論與期望。教師天地,109,30-32。
余光雄 (Yu, K.S.) (1993)。論外語實力測驗:它在測量什麼?。高雄師大學報,6,315-326。
何雅娟 ( Ho ) (2000)。多元入學多元思維—談臺北市高中多元入學方案。教師天地,109,33-44。
李珀 (Lee) (2001)。英語科基本學力測驗評析。翰林文教雜誌,第25期,頁16-18。
吳毓瑩 (Wu) (2000)。從基本的確認到水準的期待—探討美國從基本能力測驗到課程標準評量之轉變。教師天地,109,18-8。
林世華 (Lin, S. H.) (2000)。跨世紀的測驗發展計劃-國民中學基本學力測驗發展研究。教師天地,109,4-8。
林世華 (Lin, S. H.) (2002)。基本學力測驗,怎麼測?測什麼?。人本教育札記,162,47-49。
林惠真 (Lin, H. J.) (2001)。教育最大的目的-從國中基本學力測驗說起。九年一貫創新課程「教與學」,第一輯。台北:聯經出版社,頁13-24。
邱兆偉 (Chiou) (2001)。國中基本學力測驗面面觀-解析量尺分數,建議調整日程。師說,154,8-13。
周中天 (Chou) (1997)。從國中英語新教材的實施-期盼評量方法的改進。敦煌英語教學雜誌,13,20-23。
涂柏原、章舜文( Tu, & Chang) (2000)。國中基本學力測驗的分數及相關議題。教師天地,109,9-17。
張拉士 (Chang, L. S.) (2001)。國中學生基本學力測驗我見我思。師說,154,14-16。
張萬助 (Chang, W. J.) (2001)。有關國中基本學力測驗之問題探討。公教資訊,5,26 -31。
國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委原會 (The Committee of the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students) (2000)。國民中學學生基本學力測驗英語科要義與示例。 [WWW document] Retrieved: http://www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/english1.htm。
楊貞婉 (Yang) (2001)。如何幫助學生準備英語科基本學力測驗。翰林文教雜誌,第25期,頁18-19。
雷文 (Lay) (2001)。基本學測總體驗。師說,154,4-7。
蔡璧煌 (Tsai) (1998)。 實施多元入學,回歸教育本質。中央月刊,31:6,23-29。
鄭富森 (Cheng) (1998)。淺談國中基本學力測驗之評鑑原則。測驗與輔導,150,3119-3125。
鄭富森 (Cheng) (2001)。教學評量:教育改革成敗之關鍵。台灣教育,604,2-14。
錢幼蘭 (Chian) (2001)。模糊,能減弱明星學校光環?減輕升學壓力?。師說,154,19-21。
謝霏霏 (Shie) (2001)。既期待又怕受傷害的萬心交集—第一次國中基本學力測驗後。師說,154,17-18。
聯合報 (United Daily News)。 (2000, November 2)。 基本學力測驗 被疑難測實力 計分改變╱會造成多人同分 題型改變╱容易僥倖猜對 採相對分數╱有黑箱作業疑慮。17版。
聯合報 (United Daily News)。(2003, June 23)。命題多樣化 貼近真實生活 英文嘗試各種體裁 社會強調一般事件 數學利用棋盤評量學生概念。A3版。
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
90951009
94
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951009
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
95100901.pdf44KbAdobe PDF1244View/Open
95100902.pdf21KbAdobe PDF1346View/Open
95100903.pdf60KbAdobe PDF1539View/Open
95100904.pdf40KbAdobe PDF2469View/Open
95100905.pdf30KbAdobe PDF3209View/Open
95100906.pdf160KbAdobe PDF1309View/Open
95100907.pdf159KbAdobe PDF1968View/Open
95100908.pdf981KbAdobe PDF1245View/Open
95100909.pdf16KbAdobe PDF1079View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing