1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 外國語文學院
  3. 英國語文學系
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33422
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor楊懿麗zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYang，I-lien_US
dc.contributor.author黃惠真zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang，Hui-chenen_US
dc.creator黃惠真zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang，Hui-chenen_US
dc.date2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:33:20Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:33:20Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:33:20Z-
dc.identifierG0090951011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33422-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description90951011zh_TW
dc.description92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討字彙教學透過畫圖是否對字彙學習記憶方面有顯著效益。本實驗對象為八十九位桃園縣立平鎮高中高一兩班的新生，該兩班受試者經過全民英檢初級測試後證實幾乎具有相同英文能力，因此將其中一班視為實驗組，另一班則為控制組。兩組受試者接受三課的字彙教學以及一課單字自學。實驗組接受傳統字彙教學法，且須依照字彙的意義或字彙所形成之句子的意義來畫出一個圖。而控制組則只接受傳統字彙教學法。接受字彙教學後，兩組分別進行四次立即字彙測驗，四次延宕字彙測驗，以及第一次段考中的字彙測驗。最後，九位實驗組的受試者並接受訪談，從訪談中，調查他們對於此次實驗教學的滿意度。所有實驗階段所得的資料再由研究者進行質與量的分析。\r\n研究發現，實驗組在所有的字彙測驗中都比控制組表現的好。此外，兩組之間大部分字彙測驗的結果均達顯著的差異。大部分受試者亦表示畫圖對於學習字彙的確有幫助。這些結果證實學習者透過畫圖可以幫助自己將字彙記得更深刻且更久，學習者可盡量利用畫圖記憶更多的字彙來增強英文能力。因此，本研究建議英文老師可在課堂上對學生介紹如何運用畫圖來改善字彙的學習與記憶。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to explore the effectiveness of drawing on vocabulary learning. In addition, the students’ responses to the study were also discussed. Eighty-nine Taiwan students were selected from Ping-jeng senior high school in Taoyuan County. The subjects were further divided into two groups—the experimental group and the control group—of almost the same English proficiency level. The experimental group received the traditional vocabulary instruction plus drawing according to the meaning of the words or the sentences the words occur in, while the control group received the traditional vocabulary instruction only. Four immediate word quizzes, four delayed word quizzes, and the vocabulary section in the first periodical exam served as post tests. Finally, the instructor interviewed nine students from the experimental group to examine their responses to the study. The data collected in the experimental period were analyzed through both qualitative and quantitative methods.\r\n The results show that the experimental group performed better than the control group on all the post tests. Moreover, most students interviewed took positive attitude toward the study. In other words, the results provide empirical evidence that drawing indeed has positive effects on vocabulary learning. Students can utilize drawing to memorize as much vocabulary as possible to strengthen their English proficiency. Thus, English teachers are encouraged to introduce drawing to students in class in order to facilitate the learners’ vocabulary learning.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction ………………………………………… ……………1\r\n1.1 Background and Motivation………………………………………….1\r\n1.2 Statements of Problem………………………………………………11\r\n1.3 Purposes of the Study………………………………………………13\r\n1.4 Significance of the Study……………………………………....13\r\n2. Literature Review…………………………………………………….15\r\n2.1 Lexical Knowledge……………………………………………………15\r\n2.1.1 The Breadth and Depth of Lexical Knowledge………….....15\r\n2.1.2 The Breadth of Lexical Knowledge……………...… ……….15\r\n2.1.3 Depth of Lexical Knowledge…………...………… ………...17\r\n2.2 Language Learning Strategies…………………… ………………23\r\n2.2.1 Definition and Categorization of Language Learning Strategies….................................................23\r\n2.2.2 Studies on Vocabulary Learning Strategies…………………26\r\n2.3 Cognitive Theories in Vocabulary Learning…………………..31\r\n 2.3.1 The Memory System.………………………………………… 31\r\n2.3.2 Levels of Processing Theory…………………………………..32\r\n2.3.3 Dual Coding Theory……………………………………………….34\r\n2.3.4 The Keyword Method………………………...…………………..36\r\n2.4 Summary…………………………………………………………………39\r\n3.Method……… …………………………………………………………..41\r\n3.1 Subjects……………………………………………………………….41\r\n3.2 Experimental Design …… …………………………………..42\r\n3.3 Hypothesis…………… ……………………………………………..43\r\n3.4 Materials and Equipments……… …………………………......43\r\n3.4.1 English Proficiency Test……………… ……………………..43\r\n3.4.2 An English Textbook-Lung Tung Edition-Book I………...…44\r\n3.4.3 Word Lists………………………………………………………...44\r\n3.4.4 Word Quizzes and One Periodical Exam……………... …….45\r\n3.4.5 A Projector and Tape-recorder… …………………………….47\r\n3.5 Procedures… ………………………………………………………..47\r\n3.6 Data analysis………………………………………………………..52\r\n4. Results and Discussion…… ……………………………………….53\r\n4.1 The Results of the Word Tests……………………………………53\r\n4.1.1 The Results of the Pre-Test…………………………………..53\r\n4.1.2 The Results of Four Immediate Word Quizzes (IWQ1, 2, 3, 4) and Four Delayed Word Quizzes (DWQ1, 2, 3, 4)………… …. 54\r\n4.1.3 The Results of the Vocabulary Section in the Periodical Exam.........................................................59\r\n4.1.4 Summary of the Quantitative Study……………………………60\r\n4.2 Interview Responses from the Subjects in the Experimental Group........................................................61\r\n4.2.1 Summary of the Qualitative Study…………………………… 64\r\n4.3 Discussions on the Major Findings………………… ……...…64\r\n4.3.1 Learning Strategies and Vocabulary Acquisition………….64\r\n4.3.2 Cognitive Theories and Vocabulary Acquisition…… …….67\r\n4.3.3 Lexical Knowledge and Vocabulary Acquisition……… ……69\r\n4.3.4 Factors That Made the Subjects Fail to Spell or Misspell the Words....................................................72\r\n4.3.4.1 Pronounceability and Orthography…………….……… ...73\r\n4.3.4.2 Synformy (similarity of lexical forms)………………….79\r\n4.3.4.3 Abstractness…… ……………………………………………..79\r\n5. Conclusion…………………………………….…………… ……81\r\n5.1 Summary of the Results…………………………………………….81\r\n5.2 Pedagogical Implication………………………………………… 83\r\n5.3 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Further Study................................................87\r\nAppendixes\r\nA…………………… ……………………………………………………...89\r\nB……………………… …………...………………………………………95\r\nC………………………………………………………………………….…112\r\nReferences………………………………….………………………….…120zh_TW
dc.format.extent71724 bytes-
dc.format.extent80885 bytes-
dc.format.extent90494 bytes-
dc.format.extent51671 bytes-
dc.format.extent187869 bytes-
dc.format.extent119359 bytes-
dc.format.extent34682 bytes-
dc.format.extent239755 bytes-
dc.format.extent21770 bytes-
dc.format.extent29148 bytes-
dc.format.extent936560 bytes-
dc.format.extent18709 bytes-
dc.format.extent25878 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090951011en_US
dc.subject單字學習zh_TW
dc.subject畫圖zh_TW
dc.subjectvocabulary learningen_US
dc.subjectdrawingen_US
dc.title透過畫圖教單字:一個個案研究zh_TW
dc.titleTeaching Vocabulary through Drawing: A Case Studyen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAllen, E. D., & Vallette, R. M. (1972). Modern language classroom technique: A handbook. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich Inczh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllen,V. F. (1983). Techniques in teaching vocabulary. London: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, J. R., & Reder, L. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In Cermak, L. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAtkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acqusition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAvila, E., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974).Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarterand, R., & McCarthy, M. (1988). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York: Longman Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChamot, A. U. (1998). Teaching learning strategies to language students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 433 719)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, H. H.J., (1998). A preliminary investigation on Taiwanese EFL learners` vocabulary size. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. Taipei: Crane Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, P.C. (1999). A comparison of the visual and auditory effects in computer assisted English vocabulary learning for Chinese-speaking learners of English as a second language. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multimedia Language Education. Taipei: Crane Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChien, L. C., & Chen, S. H. (2002). A development study on phonological awareness and spelling in Taiwanese EFL children. English Teaching & Learning, 27(1), 41-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotation on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCody, J. & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A. (1990). Language learning : insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Boston, Mass. : Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acqusition, 3(2), 221-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, G., Eysenck, M. W., & Le Voi, M. E. (1986) Memory: A cognitive approach. Philadelphia: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceColes, M. (1982). Word perception, first language script and learners of English as a second language. Birkbeck College, University of London: MA project.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCook, L.K., & Mayer, R.E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In Pressley, M. & Levin, J. (Eds.) Cognitive strategy research. New York: Springer Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCraik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCramer, P. & College, W. (1981). Imagery and learning: item recognition and associative recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 164-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEllis, N. C., & Beaten, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559-617.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEllis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A(3), 533-559.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEillis, N.C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), 234-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFox, G. (2002). The words that learners really need. The Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on English Teaching, 79-84. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFries, C. C. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFromkin, B., & Rodman, R. (1974). An introduction to language. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGairns, R. & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words: A guide to teaching and learning vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGates, A. I. (1937). A list of spelling difficulties in 3876 words. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeorge, H. V. (1983). Classification, communication, teaching and learning. English Language Institute, Victoria University of Wellington. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHenriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. SSLA, 21, 303-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHitch, G., & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 603-621.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsin, A. I. (2000). English syllable structure and English teaching. The Proceedings of the 7th Conference on English Teaching and Learning, 69-77. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, S. H., & Cheng, Y. L. (2002). Incorporating language learning strategy training in senior high school lessons. The Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on English Teaching, 79-84. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, W. T. (2001). A study of integrated vocabulary teaching in a senior high school. A Thesis for Master of Arts Graduate Institute of Western Languages and Literature Tamkang University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHulstijn, J. H. (1993). When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables. Modern Language Journal, 77, 139-147.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHulstijn, J. (1997). Mnemonic methods in foreign language vocabulary learning: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical implications. In Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJiang, J. Y. (2001). Effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on senior high students with different English achievement. A Master`s Thesis Submitted to Education Department of National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recording strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 393-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoda, K. (1997). Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKucera, H. (1982). The mathematics of language. In The American Heritage Dictionary (2nd edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies. (NFLRC Network #14) [HTML Document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/Networks/NW14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’t know, words you think you know, and words you can’t guess. In Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, M. H. (1998). Guo zhueng sheng ing u z huei ji i ce lue xun lian cheng xiao zh ian jiou [The effect of the strategy training of memorizing English vocabulary on junior high students]. A Master`s Thesis Submitted to Education Department of National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiu, N., & I.S.P., Nation. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16(1), 33-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, M. J. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcKeown, M., & Curtis, M. (Eds.). (1987). The Nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcLaughlin, B. (2002) Depth and breadth of vocabulary in two languages: which vocabulary skills transfer? Journal of Education Psychology, 94(4), 719-728.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMelka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in the printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNajjar, Lawrence J. (1997). A framework for learning from media: The effects of materials, tasks, and tests on performance. Multimedia and Learning.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNajjar,Lawrence J. (1995). Dual coding as a possible explanation for the effects of multimedia on learning. Technical Report GIT-GVU-95-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNation, P. & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOgden, C., & Richards, I. (1936). The meaning of meaning. London: Routledge &Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (Reprinted 1979, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParker, F., & Riley, K. (1994). Linguistics for non-linguistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePhilips, T. A. (1981). Difficulties in foreign language vocabulary learning and a study of some of the factors thought to be influential. Birkbeck College, University of London: MA Project.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. The Modern Language Journal, 51, 73-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePressley, M., Levin, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Remembering versus inferring what a word means: Mnemonic and contextual approaches. In M. McKeown & Curtis, M. (Eds). The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 107-123). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePressley, M., Levin, J. R., & Miller, G. E. (1982). The keyword method compared to alternative vocabulary learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 7, 50-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePutnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRamscar, M.J.A., & Yarlett, D. (1999). How to talk about semantics and mean it. Unpublished discussion document. UK: University of Edinburgh.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRead, C. (1986). Children’s creative spelling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRead, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 11, 355-371.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J.C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubin, J. (1987). Learning strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (Eds). Learner strategies in language learning. New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRyan, A. (1997). Learning the orthographical form of L2 vocabulary- a receptive and a productive process. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). Vocabulary: description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word association and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 17-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSegler, T. M. (2001). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Unpublished PhD proposal. Retrieved from the World Wide Web:http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/s9808690/newprop.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSegler, T. M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSingleton, D. (1999). Exploring the second language mental lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSloat, C., & Taylor, S. (1975). The structure of English words. U.S.A.: Pacific Language Associates, Inc. (Reprinted 1996, U.S.A.: Kendal/Hunt Publishing Company).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStevick, E. W. (1982). Teaching and learning language. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStockwell, R., & Minkova, D. (2001). English words: History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, I. & Taylor, M. (1990). Psycholinguistics: Learning and using language. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, I. (1987). Memory in language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 43-56). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice -Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTodd, L. (2000). An introduction to linguistics. UK: York Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVermeer, A. (1992). Exploring the second language learner lexicon. In Verhoeven, L & Jong de J. H. A. L. (Eds.) The construct of language proficiency: 147-62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, A. Y., & Thomas, M.H. (1992). The effect of imgery-based mnemonics on the long-term retention of Chinese characters. Language Learning, 42, 359-376.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, A. Y., Thomas, M. H., & Ouellette, J. A. (1992). Keyword mnemonic and retention of second-language vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 520-528.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, C.W., & Yeh, Y.L. (2001). Effectiveness of vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. The Proceedings of 2001 International Conference on the Application of English Teaching. Taipei: Crane Co.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
95101101.pdf70.04 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101102.pdf78.99 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101103.pdf88.37 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101104.pdf50.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101105.pdf183.47 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101106.pdf116.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101107.pdf33.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101108.pdf234.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101109.pdf21.26 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101110.pdf28.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101111.pdf914.61 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101112.pdf18.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
95101113.pdf25.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.