Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33448
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林啟一zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChi-yee, Linen_US
dc.contributor.author楊貞婉zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen-wan,Yangen_US
dc.creator楊貞婉zh_TW
dc.creatorChen-wan,Yangen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:37:17Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:37:17Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:37:17Z-
dc.identifierG0929510022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33448-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description929510022zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討各種不同種類網路閱讀活動對不同程度學生的回應,進而研究受試者對不同種類網路學習活動對於英文閱讀能力的實際影響。\r\n\r\n 本研究的實驗對象是十七位台北市信義區一所職業學校的高一學生。在研究初期,研究者以北市職校全民英檢考題之閱讀能力部分測試學生並將他們分出高、中、低三種程度,繼而讓學生接受為期將近四個月不同種類網路閱讀活動訓練。實驗過程中,每項活動後均以各種不同簡單的讀後測驗、練習、筆記或作業來檢視學生利用網路培養閱讀能力之可行性。在學期近結束前,再以另一份北市職校全民英檢考題之閱讀能力測驗題作為本實驗的後測。研究是藉由背景問卷調查以及回饋問卷調查中瞭解不同種類網路閱讀活動對於學生之影響。\r\n\r\n 本研究採用質與量的分析方法。質的分析涵蓋:(一)實驗對象對於不同種類網路閱讀活動的回應﹔(二)實驗對象應用網路學習對於英文閱讀及網路技巧的影響。量的分析根據SPSS來統計:前後測數值的差異。\r\n\r\n 根據以上的研究結果發現:(一)學生對於本研究所採用的四種網路閱讀活動(兒童英語學習、網路字彙查詢、網路資料搜尋與設計—WebQuest、教學式的網路會議)感到有趣,尤其是教學式的網路會議﹔(二)網路閱讀活動引起學生主動使用各種不同網路工具來解讀文章內容及找尋有益的英語學習網站﹔(三)經過訓練後,教學成效方面,以高等程度學生進步最多,中等學生次之,低程度學生幾乎看不出進\r\n\r\n步。最後,本研究提出一些英文教學上之建議:(一)應選擇有趣、有幫助的網路閱讀活動提升學生的閱讀興趣與閱讀理解能力﹔(二)應藉由網路字典所提供的快速搜尋功能輔助學生找回閱讀英文的信心﹔(三)應盡量利用課後網路閱讀活動,如改良式的網路會議,以提升同儕及師生間的互動並培養自學習慣。希望本研究能提供目前台灣職業學校教師及學生在閱讀教學與學習方面一些啟示與方向。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis research aims mainly at the effect of different types of web-based reading tasks on different levels of students’ English reading comprehension ability, reading attitude, and motivation. \r\n\r\n Seventeen vocational high school students were involved in this research. All the participants were given the TVHSGEPT (Taipei Vocational High School General English Proficiency Test) as a pre-test in the beginning of the first semester of the 2005 school year. The participants were then categorized into three proficiency levels—high, middle, and low—based on the scores of the test result. A less than four-month Web-based reading program was then introduced to the participants. During this process, every task was examined through tests, exercises, note taking, or homework to understand the practicality of using web-based tasks to cultivate students’ reading ability. At the end of the semester, another TVHSGEPT was given to the participants as a post-test. However, the research chiefly used background and feedback questionnaires to understand the effects of different web-based reading tasks on the participants.\r\n\r\n This research adopted both qualitative and quantitative analyses. The qualitative analysis consisted of (1) the students’ responses to different types of web-based reading tasks and (2) the improvement of the participants’ English learning and computer and Web-use skills. By executing SPSS program, the quantitative analysis included the difference of statistical values between the pre-test and post-test.\r\n \r\n According to the findings, first, the students were interested in the four types of web-based reading tasks (online children’s reading websites, online dictionaries, WebQuest, and modified web conferencing). Second, the web-based reading tasks helped the students to actively find different web-based tools to comprehend reading content and search for new and helpful English-learning websites automatically. Third, high-proficiency students gained the most, then middle-proficiency students; the low-achievers showed very little obvious progress. This research offers some suggestions: first, teachers may select interesting and helpful web-based reading tasks to enhance students’ interest and reading comprehension. Second, through the use of online dictionaries with their quick search functions, students can regain their confidence in learning English. \r\nThird, after-school web-based reading tasks such as modified web-conferencing are a good motivator; they also help in cultivating cooperation and relationships among peers and between the teacher and students.\r\n\r\n In conclusion, this research offers pedagogical implications for vocational high school English teachers who are considering using web-based reading tasks and effective teaching strategies.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsPage\r\n\r\nAcknowledgements........................................iii\r\nTable of Contents.........................................v\r\nList of Tables.........................................viii\r\nList of Chart............................................ix\r\nList of Figures...........................................x\r\nChinese Abstract.........................................xi\r\nEnglish Abstract.......................................xiii\r\n\r\nChapter 1 Introduction....................................1\r\n 1.1 Background....................................1\r\n 1.2 The Purpose of the Research...................3\r\n 1.3 The Significance of the Research..............4\r\n 1.4 Definition of Terms...........................5\r\n 1.5 Organization of the Thesis....................6\r\n\r\nChapter 2 Literature Review...............................8\r\n 2.1 Reading Theory................................8\r\n 2.1.1 Reading Process.....................8\r\n 2.1.2 Reading Strategies Used by Skilled \r\n and Less-Skilled Readers............12\r\n 2.2 Technology and Language Learning..............14\r\n 2.2.1 Technology and Language Learning in \r\n the Past............................14\r\n 2.2.2 Technology and Language Learning \r\n Today...............................16\r\n 2.3 Web-Based Reading Tasks and Reading...........18\r\n 2.3.1 The Computer and Reading............18\r\n 2.3.2 The Web and the Reading.............19\r\n 2.3.3 Web-Based Reading Tasks.............20\r\n 2.3.4 Web-Based Reading Tasks and Motivation\r\n ....................................24\r\n 2.3.5 Web-Based Reading Tasks and Their \r\n Design..............................25\r\n 2.3.6 Web-Based Reading Tasks and \r\n Reading.............................25\r\n 2.4 Research Questions............................26\r\n 2.5 Summary of Chapter Two........................27\r\n\r\nChapter 3 Methodology.....................................28\r\n 3.1 Participants..................................28\r\n 3.2 Instruments...................................33\r\n 3.2.1 The Web-Based Task Materials and \r\n Designed Tasks......................34\r\n 3.2.2 Reading Tests.......................34\r\n 3.2.3 Two Questionnaires..................36\r\n 3.2.4 Different Reading Tasks.............37\r\n 3.2.4.1 Practice..................38\r\n 3.2.4.2 Resources.................41\r\n 3.2.4.3 Communication.............44\r\n 3.3 Procedures....................................47\r\n 3.3.1 Pilot Study.........................47\r\n 3.3.1.1 The Criteria for Screening \r\n the Web-Based Reading Tasks\r\n ..........................49\r\n 3.3.1.2 The Results of the Pilot \r\n Study.....................49\r\n 3.3.2 Formal Study........................50\r\n 3.4 Data Processing and Methods of Analysis.......52\r\n 3.4.1 Methods of Analyzing the Feedback \r\n Questionnaire.......................52\r\n 3.4.2 Methods of Statistical Analysis.....53\r\n 3.5 Summary of Chapter Three......................53\r\n\r\nChapter 4 Results and Discussion..........................54\r\n 4.1 Participants’ Response toward the Web-Based \r\n Reading Tasks.................................54\r\n 4.1.1 Participants’ Response toward the \r\n Web-Based Reading Tasks.............55\r\n 4.1.2 Other Noticeably-Improved Skills....60\r\n 4.1.3 Advantages and Disadvantages of the \r\n Web-Based Reading Tasks.............61\r\n 4.1.4 General Opinions on the Web-Based \r\n Reading Tasks.......................63\r\n 4.1.5 Suggestions for Web-Based Learning..64\r\n 4.2 The Change of Motivation and Attitude toward \r\n Web-Based Learning............................65\r\n 4.2.1 Learning Motivation Before and \r\n After...............................65\r\n 4.2.2 Learning Attitude Before and After..67\r\n 4.3 Results of Statistical Analyses (TVHSGEPT)....69\r\n 4.3.1 Comparison of Participants’ \r\n Performance on TVHSGEPT Pre-test and \r\n Post-test...........................70\r\n 4.3.2 Results of the Vocabulary Test......72\r\n 4.4 Summary of Chapter Four.......................72\r\n\r\nChapter 5 Conclusions.....................................73\r\n 5.1 Summary of Findings...........................73\r\n 5.2 Pedagogical Implications......................75\r\n 5.2.1 Guidelines on Selecting and Designing \r\n Web-Based Reading Tasks.............77\r\n 5.2.2 Guidelines for Using Web-Based \r\n Reading Tasks.......................78\r\n 5.3 Limitations...................................81\r\n 5.4 Suggestions for Further Research..............82\r\n\r\nReferences................................................84\r\nNotes.....................................................89\r\nAppendices................................................95\r\n Appendix A Background Questionnaire and \r\n Results...........................95\r\n Appendix B-1 Children’s Website 1.........97\r\n B-2 Children’s Website 2.........98\r\n Appendix C Dictionaries....................99\r\n Appendix D-1 Rules of Designed WebQuest...102\r\n D-2 Works of Group 1.............103\r\n D-3 Works of Group 2.............104\r\n D-4 Works of Group 3.............105\r\n Appendix E-1 Web-Conferencing Site........106\r\n E-2 Oct. 3, 2005 (in Taipei Uni. Of \r\n Technology)..................107\r\n E-3 Oct. 4, 2005 (at home).......109\r\n E-4 Nov. 1, 2006 (two participants)\r\n .............................110\r\n E-5 Jan. 1, 2006 (free talk).....111\r\n Appendix F Vocabulary Test................113\r\n Appendix G Feedback Questionnaire.........114\r\n Appendix H Results of Background \r\n Questionnaire..................117\r\n Appendix I Results of Feedback Questionnaire\r\n ...............................119\r\n Appendix J Useful EFL Websites............122zh_TW
dc.format.extent68431 bytes-
dc.format.extent16312 bytes-
dc.format.extent31280 bytes-
dc.format.extent85734 bytes-
dc.format.extent35249 bytes-
dc.format.extent74004 bytes-
dc.format.extent180520 bytes-
dc.format.extent144670 bytes-
dc.format.extent51705 bytes-
dc.format.extent29294 bytes-
dc.format.extent1561009 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929510022en_US
dc.subject網路學習zh_TW
dc.subject教學式的網路會議zh_TW
dc.subject網路閱讀活動zh_TW
dc.subject網路資料搜尋與設計zh_TW
dc.subjectWeb-based learningen_US
dc.subjectInstructional web conferencingen_US
dc.subjectWeb-based reading tasksen_US
dc.subjectWebQuesten_US
dc.title不同網路活動對於高職學生英文閱讀能力的影響:個案研究zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of Different Web-Based Tasks on Local Vocational High School Students’ English Reading Ability: A Case Studyen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAlessi, S. M. & Trollip Stanley R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading—Issues and strategies. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBamford, J. and Day, R. R. (Eds.). (2004). Extensive reading activities for teaching language. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. England: Pearson Education Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBickel, B and Truscello, D. (1996). New opportunities for learning: styles and strategies with computers. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 15-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983) Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markham (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1) New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceButler-Pascoe, M. E. & Wilburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553-573.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrel, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1987). Methodology in TESOL: A book of reading by Long, M. H. & Richards, J. C.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, C. (2002). Instructor-led learning vs. Web-based learning: A case study. Taipei: The Proceedings of the Conference on Multimedia Language Education at Chin Min College. (p.16).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChien, Ichuan. (2002). A study of an on-line multi-user English learning environment for senior high school student. Master Thesis: NTHU.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChu, Huimei. (2006) Teaching EFL Beginning Readers: An examination of English curricula in East Asian Countries. Taipei: English Teaching & Learning: 30. 3 (January 2006): 23-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In Ronald Hackay, Bruce Brakeman, and R. R. Jordan (Eds.), In Reading a second language (pp. 5-12). Rowledy, MA: Newbury House Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCurran, C. (1972). Counseling-learning: A whole person model for education. New York: Grune and Stratton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCurran, C. (1982). Community language learning. In Robert W. Blaire (Ed.), Innovative Approaches to language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDay, Richard R. (Ed.). (1993). New ways in teaching reading. Bloomington: Pantagraph Printing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDodge, Bernie. (2006). Site overview. Retrieved July 2, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://webquest.sdsu.edu/overview.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDudeney, G. (2000). The Internet and the Language Classroom: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEgbert, J. (2005). Call essentials: Principles and practice in CALL classrooms. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFelix, U. (2002) Teaching languages online: Deconstructing the myths. Paper presented at the Setting the agenda: Languages, linguistics and area studies in higher education conference, Manchester. In press conference proceedings, London: CILT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFelix, U. (Ed.). (2003). Language learning online: Towards best practice. The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGibbs, J. L. (2002). Loose coupling in global teams: Tracing the contours of cultural complexity. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoodman, K. (1971). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. Paul Pimsleur and Terence Quinn (Eds.). In The psychology of second language learning. (pp. 135-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarmer, J. (2003). Editor. How to use the Internet in ELT (4th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHope, G. R., H. F. Taylor & J. P. Pusack. (1984). Using computers in teaching foreign language. Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHung, Shu-mei. (2001). The effects of constructive reading courseware on EFL reading instruction for junior high school students. Master Thesis: NKNU.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIoannou-Gerogiou, S. (2002). Constructing meaning with virtual reality. TESOL Journal: 11(3), 21-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Journal: 40(1), 183-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading (2nd ed.). Heinemann: A division of Reed Elsevier Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKress, G.. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Yu-ying. (1998). A survey study of computer-mediated communication activities for EFL/ESL teaching. (pp. 4-7). Master Thesis: NCCU.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMedgyes, P. (1986). Queries from a communicative teacher. ELT Journal, 40, 107-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMurtagh, L. (1989). Reading in a second or foreign language: models, processes, and pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum 2: 91-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNyikos, M. (1987). The effect of color and imagery a mnemonic strategies on learning and retention of lexical items in German, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford, R. L. (1992, Winter) Language learning strategies in a Nutshell:Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal: 18-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2000, Spring). The lexical advantages of narrow reading for second language learners. TESOL Journal: 4-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchrock, K. (2002). WebQuest in our future: The teacher’s role in cyberspace. Retrieved May 5, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/webquest/webquest.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSperling, D. (1997). The Internet guide for English language teachers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStevens, V. (1989). A direction for CALL: From behaviorist to humanistic courseware. In M. Pennington (Ed.). Teaching language with computers: The states of the art. La Jolla, CA: Athelstand Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUrquhart, S. & Weir, C. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWarschauer, M. (1996). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium (pp. 29-46). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWarschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Virginia: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, C. M. (2005). English majors’ preference and behavior in reading via IPD: the context of STUT. Master thesis, NTUT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZecker, L. B. (2004). Learning to read and write in two languages: The development of early literacy abilities. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Siliman, & B. J. Ehren (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorder (pp. 248-265). New York: The Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, Zhicheng. (1993). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research Association (New Orleans, LA, November 10-12, 1993).zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
51002201.pdf66.83 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002202.pdf15.93 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002203.pdf30.55 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002204.pdf83.72 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002205.pdf34.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002206.pdf72.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002207.pdf176.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002208.pdf141.28 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002209.pdf50.49 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002210.pdf28.61 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51002211.pdf1.52 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.