Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33481
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林正弘<br>藍亭zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor<br>Lane, Timen_US
dc.contributor.author陳智豪zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, ZIH-HAOen_US
dc.creator陳智豪zh_TW
dc.creatorCHEN, ZIH-HAOen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:50:41Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:50:41Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:50:41Z-
dc.identifierG0911540091en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33481-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description91154009zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文乃是藉由現代中醫科學研究,進一步指出中醫科學化的可能性及其問題。由於中醫理論十分駁雜,筆者將焦點主要集中於中醫脈診之上,藉由汪叔游和王唯工的研究,來討論中醫脈診科學化的可能性和問題。\n本論文進行方式,主要可分為兩個步驟,首先針對傳統中醫理論地位的問題加以討論,其次乃是針對現代中醫實驗。\n 在第一步驟中,筆者提出一個理論作為科學理論所必須符合的最低標準,即是科學化三原則,分別是:可落實原則、主體際性原則以及系統化原則。藉由科學化三原則筆者嘗試論證傳統中醫並非是科學理論或是經驗有效的理論,最多僅能將中醫醫療實踐視為經驗有效的醫療診斷技術。\n 在第二步驟中,筆者藉由汪叔游和王唯工的實驗,來討論其經驗上和概念上的問題。藉由兩人的研究,筆者將進一步指出中醫科學化的過程中,必須經過理論的重新建構,而不是僅在於累積客觀的經驗資料就可證實中醫理論。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭\n摘要\n 0. 緒論 \n 0.1 研究動機 1\n 0.2 研究目的 3\n 0.3 研究問題 4\n 0.4 名詞定義 7\n 1. 科學化及其原則\n 1.1 科學為何? 9\n 1.2 可落實原則 10\n A.模型理論與可落實原則 11\n B.程序確定性 20\n 1.3 主體際性原則 22\n A.公開性 24\n B.客觀性 24\n 1.4 系統化原則 26\n 1.5 小結 31\n 2. 傳統中醫的理論定位\n 2.1 前言 33\n 2.2 傳統中醫的經驗基礎 35\n A.可落實原則與五行系統 37\n B.中醫類比推理的批判 41\n 2.3 CVA與中風 43\n 2.4 主體際性問題與詮釋問題 51\n A.主體際性問題與經驗實驗 52\n B.詮釋問題與post hoc說明 54\n 2.5 小結 56\n 3. 脈波圖形分析:資料形成問題與時域分析法\n 3.1 前言 59\n 3.2 客觀描述與理論建構徑路 60\n 3.3 資料形成問題 62\n 3.4 訊息優先性與個人經驗公開化問題 65\n 3.5 診脈手法與脈診儀設計 67\n 3.6 脈波分析時域分析:汪叔游為例 72\n A.中醫二十八脈的初步探究 72\n B.脈波分析方法的改變 75\n C.心臟動力學的引入 79\n D.汪叔游實驗的問題 82\n 3.7 小結:「客觀描述」路徑的評估 85\n 4. 理論建構:血液共振理論與脈診科學化\n 4.1 前言 89\n 4.2 模型與概念建構 93\n A.實體模型的討論 94\n B.類比模型:電路模型的討論 101\n 4.3 動物實驗 105\n A.腎動脈血液流之頻譜分析 105\n B.器官對於主動脈血壓波的影響 110\n C.腹主動脈與腎臟微循環之關聯 114\n D.高血壓鼠與正常鼠之實驗 116\n E.AngII以及Aldosterore對於老鼠血壓波的影響 119\n F.體外聲波對於心頻的實驗 121\n G.對於動物實驗的總評 122\n 4.4 人體實驗的經驗問題 123\n A.人體實驗的一般問題 123\n B.針刺足三里與血液能量分配 125\n 4.5 實驗總結 129\n A.血液共振現象 129\n B.臟腑—血管頻率選擇 130\n C.血流動能問題 132\n D.應用 132\n 4.6 小結:「理論建構」的概念問題 134\n 5. 結論與建議 \n 5.1 結論 141\n 5.2 建議 142\n A.社會面向 142\n B.哲學面向 143\n參考書目 I\n附錄:《診宗三昧‧師傳三十二則》 izh_TW
dc.format.extent46702 bytes-
dc.format.extent154375 bytes-
dc.format.extent80019 bytes-
dc.format.extent101310 bytes-
dc.format.extent299267 bytes-
dc.format.extent950733 bytes-
dc.format.extent543248 bytes-
dc.format.extent843268 bytes-
dc.format.extent1954108 bytes-
dc.format.extent191076 bytes-
dc.format.extent157885 bytes-
dc.format.extent232431 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0911540091en_US
dc.subject中醫zh_TW
dc.subject科學與偽科學zh_TW
dc.subject科學方法論zh_TW
dc.subject脈診zh_TW
dc.subject模型理論zh_TW
dc.subject血流動力學zh_TW
dc.subject時域分析法zh_TW
dc.subject血液共振理論zh_TW
dc.subjectChinese Medicineen_US
dc.subjectScience and Pseudoscienceen_US
dc.subjectScientific Methodologyen_US
dc.subjectPulse Diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectModel Theoryen_US
dc.subjectHemodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectTime Domain Analysisen_US
dc.subjectBlood Resonance Theoryen_US
dc.title中醫脈診科學化研究:以時域分析法和血液共振理論為例zh_TW
dc.titleAn Investigation of the Scientific Credentials of Chinese Pulse Diagnosis:Time Domain Analysis and Blood Resonance Theory as Exampleen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、 英文書目:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlackmore, Susan.2004. Consciousness: An Introduction. New York : Oxford.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, Harold I.. 2005. “Incommensurability Reconsidered”. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2005), pp.149~169.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuchward, Jed Z.. 1993. “Design for Experimenting”. In World Changes:Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBunge, Mario. 1973. Method. Model and Matter. D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarruthers, Peter、Stich, Stephen & Siegal, Michael.2002. The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge, England ; New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press, Walton Street.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press, Trumpington Street.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, Hsing I. et al.. 1996. “Characterization of Arterial Hemodynamics in Rats with Established Hypertension”. In Chinese Journal of Physiology, 39(1), pp44~55.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChurchland, Patricia Smith. 2002. Brain-wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy, p.117~124. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDelkeskamp-Hayes, Corinna & Cutter, Mary A. Gardell.. 1993. Science, Technologu, and the Art of Medicine: European-American Dialogues. Kluswer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDietrich, Eric. 2000. “Analogy and Conceptual Change, or You Can’t Step into the Same World Twice”. In Cognitive Dynamics:Conceptual and Representational Change in Humans and Machine, edited by Dietrich, Eric;Markman,Arthur B. ,pp.268~273.Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDworkin, Ronald W.. “Science, Faith, and Alternative Medicine”. http://www.policyreview.org/aug01/dowrkin.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeyerabend, Paul. 1981. Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers vol.2.. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeyerabend, Paul. 1988. Against Method. Verso. Revised edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeyerabend, Paul. 1999. Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers vol.3.. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeynman, Richard P.. 1963. Lectures on Physics vol. 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGalison, Peter. 1987. How Experiments End. The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGentner, Dedre and Markman, Arthur B.. 1998. “Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity ”. In Mind Readings: Introduction Selections on Cognitive Science, edited by Paul Thagard.. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGentner, Dedre and Wolff, Phillip. 2000. “Metaphor and Knowledge Change”. In Cognitive Dynamics:Conceptual and Representational Change in Humans and Machine, edited by Dietrich, Eric;Markman,Arthur B. ,pp.268~273.Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiere, Ronald. 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. U.S. :The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiere, Ronald. 1997. Understanding Scientific Reasoning. Fort Worth, Tex. : Thomson/Wadsworth, 4th.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiere, Ronald. 2006. “Naturalism”. In 2006 Soochow University International Philosophy Conference and Workshop—Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGillies, Donald. 2005. “Hempelian and Kuhnian Approaches in the Philosophy of Medicine: the Semmelweis Case”. In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2005), pp.159~181.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGooding, David. 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment. Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGruenbaum, Adolf. 1984. The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. The University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What?. Ch3 and CH4. Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHacking, Ian(ed.). 1981. Scientific Revolution. Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHempel, Carl G.. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHempel, Carl G.. 1983. “Valuation and Objectivity in Science”. In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, edited by R.S. Cohen & L. Lauden, pp.73~100. D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHorsey, Richard. 2002. “The Art of Chicken Sexing”. http://www.phon.uel.ac.uk/home/richard/chicken.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsu, Elisabeth. 1999. The Transmission of Chinese Medicine. Ch2. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlee, Robert(ed.). 1999. Scientific Inquiry: Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlemke, E. D., Hollinger, R., and Kline, A. David (ed.). 1988. Introduction Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Prometheus Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuhn, Thomas S.. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. The University of Chicago. Second edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers vol.1. John Worrall and Gregory Currie(ed.). Thw Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarvor, Brendan. 1998. Lakatos: An Introduction. Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. The Regents of the University of California.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaudan, Larry. 1986. Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence. Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLongino, Helen E.1990. Science As Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilnor, William R.. 1982. Hemodynamics. Williams & Wilkins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMurphy, Edmond A..1997. The Logic of Medicine. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Second Edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNichols, Wilmer W. & O’Rourke, Michael F.. 1990. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretic, Experimental and Clinical Principles. Edward Arnold. Third edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNie, Jing-Bao. 2001. “Refutation of the Claim that the Ancient Chinese Described the Circulation of Blood: A Critique of Scientisim in the Historiography of Chinese Medicine”. In New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies3, 2(December, 2001), pp.119~135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNordenfelt, Lennart & Lindahl, B. Ingemar B.(ed.). 1984. Health, Disease, and Causal Explanations in Medicine. D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlufsen, Mette S. & Nadim, Ali. 2004. “On Deriving Lumped Models for Blood Flow and Pressure in the Systemic Arteries”. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol.1, Num 1., June, pp.61~80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeijnenburg, Jeanne. 1999. “Are There Mental Entities? Some Lessons from Hans Reichenbach”. http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:KRCuE2W3e-IJ:www.sorites.org/Issue_11/item07.htm+illata%2Breichenbach&hl=zh-TW&gl=tw&ct=clnk&cd=5zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePopper, Karl R.. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Harper Torchbook.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePutnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchaffner, Kenneth F.. 1983. “Clinical Trails: the Validation of Theory and Therapy”. In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, edited by R.S. Cohen & L. Laudan, pp.191~208. D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchaffner, Kenneth F.. 1993. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchick, Theodore, Jr. & Vaughn, Lewis. 2002. How to Think About Weird Things: Critical Thinking for a New Age. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Third Edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShapiro, Stanley H. and Louis, Thomas A. (ed.). 1983. Clinical Trials: Issues and Approaches. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Benjamin P.C., Williams, C. R., Tyler, M. J., Williams, B. D.. 2004. “A Survey of Frog Odorous Secretions, Their Possible Functions and Phylogenetic Significance”. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/ah/2004/00000002/00000001/art00003zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSuppe, Ferderick(ed.). 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana:University of Illinois Press. 2nd edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSuppe, Frederick. 2000. “Theory Identity”. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by Newton-Smith, W, pp..525~527. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaddeucci, D., Laschi, C., Lazzarini, R., Magni, R., Dario, P., Starita, A.. 1997. “An Approach to Integrated Tactile Perception”. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International conference on Robotics and Automation Albuquerque.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThagard, Paul.1999. How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, N.J : Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTipler, Paul A.. 1999. Physics for Scientists and Engineers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceToulmin, Stephen. 1975. “Concepts of Function and Mechanism in Medicine and Medical Science”. In Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Science, edited by H. T. Engelhardt, Jr., and S. F. Spicker, pp.51~66. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland..zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTymueniecka, Anna-Teresa & Zalwski, Zbigniew. 2000. The Human Being between Life and Death-- A Dialogue between Medicine and Philosophy : Recurrent Issues and New Approaches. Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVernon Coleman - Lynmouth, Devon. Modern Medicine is not a Science. http://www.laleva.cc/choice/modern_medicine.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Wei-Kung et al.. 1994. “Resonance in the Kidney system of Rats”.In Journal of the American Physiological Society, pp.H1544~1548.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Wei-Kung et al.. 2003. “Evaluation of Herbal Formulas by Pulse Analysis Method”. In Acta Pharmacol Sin, 24 (2), pp. 145~151. http://www.chinaphar.com/1671-4083/24/145.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Wei-Kung et al. 2004. “Pressure Pulse Velocity is Related to Longitudinal Elastic Properties of the Artery”. Physiology Measurement, 25(2004), pp.1397~1403.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXu, Jioanchao et al. 2005. “Renalase is a Novel, Soluble Monoamine Oxidase That Regulates Cardiac Function and Blood Pressure”. In the Journal of Clinical Investigation.115:1275~1280.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、 中文書目:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王林玉英(2003):《由共振理論探討心跳速率與血壓之調控1/3》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王叔和(1974):《脈經》。台北:台灣商務。二版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工、王林玉英、林則徐、蔣宜(1989):〈由脈波來研究經絡及能量之分配〉。《生物能量醫學研討會論文集》,pp.302~308。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1990):《以把脈原理來研究傅爾電針在診斷上及治療上之意義》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1991):《以脈診儀協助中醫師診斷之可行性研究(一)》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1993-a):《臟器對血流波之影響》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1993-b):《腎動脈血液流之頻譜分析》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1993-c):〈針刺足三里穴對脈波頻譜之影響〉。In Journal of Chinese Medicine, 4(1), pp.15~38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1994):〈中國傳統醫學儀器之設計原理〉。《量測資訊》,第37期,pp.8~10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1995):《AngII等藥物對老鼠血壓波大小及頻譜之影響》(The Chang of Caudate Arterial Pressure Wave Spectrum by Angiotensin II and Aldoterone in Normal Rats)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工、黃維三(1995):《原氣之研究》台北市 : 行政院國科會科資中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1996-a):《以雷射都卜勒法來研究共振理論在腎臟之表現》(Resonance Theory in Kidney Study by Laser Doppler Method)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1996-b):《血液波前進方程式之建立及其在偵測心臟血管疾病之可能應用》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1998):〈血液壓力波與能量分佈〉,陳光澤記錄。《人體能會刊》,第二期,pp.22~48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1999-a):《以血液共振方程式探討器官共振對主動脈血壓波之影響》(Applying the Coupled Resonance Equation to the Pressure of Aorta with Organ Linking)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(1999-b):《生物能場—脈波診斷與腎臟異常—脈波頻譜與腎臟微循環之關聯》(Pulse Diagnosis and Kidney Abnormality—Relation between Pulse Spectrum and Microcirculation in Kidney)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工、詹明宜、王林玉英(2000):〈由循環理論談起〉(How Does Blood Circulate?)。《2000工程科技與中西醫學應用研討會》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(2001):〈由血液循環看中藥歸經〉。《”身、心、靈”科學學術研討會》,pp.6-1~6-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(2002-a):《正常鼠與高血壓鼠之腎臟脈動微循環與主動脈血壓波關聯之異(3/3)》(Comparsion of the Pulsatile Renal Microcirculation with its Relation to Pulsatile Aortic Blood Pressure between Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats 3/3)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工、王林玉英、許昕、詹明宜(2002-b):《體外聲波對主動脈血壓波之影響(3/3)》(Effects of Sound Wave to Arterial Pressure Waveform)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王唯工(2003):《氣的樂章》。台北:大塊文化。出版六刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王清任(1990):〈醫林改錯〉《中國醫學大成》,鮑國華主編。台北:牛頓。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石明正(1998):《中醫脈診多脈波訊息感測體之設計與製作》。私立逢甲大學自動工程研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田莒昌、張恒鴻、陳瑞照、許吟姿(2001):〈系統性紅斑狼瘡陰虛證患者脈波圖之研究〉。In Journal of Chinese Medicine, 12(3), pp.145~154。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference佚名(1992):《黃帝內經:素問靈樞篇》。唐‧王冰注;宋‧高保衡、林憶、孫奇校正。台南:大孚。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪叔游、陳李仲惠、黃正一、呂恩增、張一華(1977):〈中醫脈診脈象圖形化之初步研究〉。《科學研究發展月刊》,第五卷,第八期,pp.688~697。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪叔游、黃正一、呂恩增、張一華、翁誌宏(1978):〈中醫脈診脈象圖形化之研究(二)〉。《科學研究發展月刊》,第六卷,第九期,pp.94~109。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪叔游、黃正一、陳秀葉(1980):〈中醫脈診脈象圖形化之研究(三)〉。《科學研究發展月刊》,第八卷,第五期,pp.435~455。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪叔游、林鉅超(1989):〈中醫脾證之脈徵分析〉。《中國醫藥學院研究年報》,pp.41~51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪叔游(1993):〈脈波圖及其各同步曲線在時域上與傳統脈學之相互印證〉。In Journal of Chinese Medicine, pp.177~190。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂鴻基、張永賢、林宜信主編(2005):《傳統醫學與現代醫學對話的啟動與機制》。行政院衛生署中醫藥委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂萬安(2000):〈脈波頻譜臨床研究之回顧與仲景肝病傳脾之說〉。《2000年國際仲景學術研究》,pp.609~613。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林永豐(2006):《替中醫看病(一)》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欽裕(1997):〈中醫脈診脈波訊號感測系統之設計〉《行政院衛生署中醫藥委員會八十六年度委託研究計畫研究報告》台北:行政院衛生署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欽裕(1998):〈中醫脈診脈波訊號擷取系統之研究〉。《行政院衛生署中醫藥委員會八十七年度委託研究計畫研究報告 》台北:行政院衛生署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欽裕、戴佳正、于凱群(2000):〈可同步量測血管脈壓與血流量感測體之研製〉。《2000工程科技與中西醫應用研討會》,pp.122~126。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欽裕、陳宗鴻(2003-a):〈血管動態順應性量測儀之結構設計與製作〉《中華民國九十二年度醫學工程年會/研討會大會手冊》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欽裕、董弘(2003-b):〈脈壓感測頭 製作及其驗證〉《中華民國九十二年度醫學工程年會/研討會大會手冊》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡幼慧(1997):《另類療者的社會空間:一項田野研究的初步分析》。「宗教、靈異、科學與社會」學術研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳森(1978):〈從「比較哲學」及「科學哲學」看中醫的基本精神〉《比較哲學與文化》,pp.169~181。台北:東大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳振鵬(1996):《陰陽五行學說醫學上之論證方法》。香港私立能仁學院哲學研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱鴻鐘(1998):〈中醫現代化研究:證實與證偽〉。《中外醫學哲學》,pp.45~59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference侶同俊(1996):《費若本的科學合理性問題對中醫傳統的啟發》。國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬建中(1980):《中醫診斷學》。台北:正中。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference唐雲(2005):《走近中醫》。廣西師範大學出版社。二刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭英調(2000):《臨床研究手冊》。台北:合慶。初版zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張維波(1999):《中醫經絡的科學探索》。台北:啟業。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃維三、許昇峰、張榮森(1993):〈根據傳統中的生理學說對先天原氣之研究〉。《中國醫藥研究叢刊》,第十五期,pp.5~27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃維三(1994):《難經發揮》。台北:正中。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃龍祥(2002):《中國針灸學術史大綱》。台北:知青。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳少宗(1998):〈試論針灸學現代化研究的成果〉。《中外醫學哲學》,pp.61~76。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳華(1996):《中醫的科學原理》。台北:台灣商務。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳瑞麟(2003-a):〈透過可落實模型來檢證科學理論〉(Testing through Realized Models)《台大哲學評論第27期》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳瑞麟(2003-b):《科學與世界之間》。台北:學富。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳瑞麟(2006):”The Structure of Experimentation and the replication Degree:Reconsidering the Replication of Hertz’s Cathode Ray Experiment”。《2006年東吳大學國際哲學會議暨工作坊—自然化的知識論和科學哲學》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference董弘(1999):《多訊息脈波感測體之改良研究》。私立逢甲大學自動工程研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黎恩彰(1990):《脈診機械手指暨脈波分析系統之設計》。私立中原大學碩論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉力紅(2005):《思考中醫》。廣西:廣西師範大學。二版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉芸澧、邱創乾、林育德、葉守正(2003):〈以近似熵與複雜度C偵測動脈血壓波之複雜度分析〉《2003第六屆工程科技與中西醫學應用研討會》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉澄中(1998):〈經絡現象研究的沈寂與出新〉。《中外醫學哲學》,pp.101~114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魏清泉&沈慧宇(2002):〈器官共振理論之電路模型〉。《建國學報》,第二十一期,pp.461~467。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、譯著:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaron, Richard J.(1998):〈溝通臨床距離:已有知識再發現〉,趙培傑譯。《中外醫學哲學》,pp.77~99。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMunson, Ronald(1998):〈為什麼醫學不可能是一門科學?〉,魯旭東譯。《中外醫學哲學》,pp.3~30。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiambattista, Alan,Richardson, B.M.,Richard, R.C.(2004):College Physics(物理學上、下)。黃榮俊審閱,胡裕民等翻譯。台北縣:高立。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHawking, Stephen W..(2002):《時間簡史》。台北:藝文。吳忠超、許明賢合譯。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoore, David S.(1998):《統計,讓數字說話》(Statistics)。鄭惟厚譯。台北:天下文化。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNesse, Randolph N. & Williams, Gerorge C.(2003):《生病,生病,WHY?:解開疾病之謎的新科學「演化醫學」》(Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine)廖月娟譯。台北:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeinberg, Steven(2003):《科學迎戰文化敵手》(Facing Up: Science and its cultural Adversaries)。李國偉翻譯。台北:天下文化。初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencezh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
54009101.pdf45.61 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009102.pdf150.76 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009103.pdf78.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009104.pdf98.94 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009105.pdf292.25 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009106.pdf928.45 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009107.pdf530.52 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009108.pdf823.5 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009109.pdf1.91 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009110.pdf186.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009111.pdf154.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
54009112.pdf226.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.