1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 國際事務學院
  3. 東亞研究所
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33769
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor李英明zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLEE, YING- MINGen_US
dc.contributor.author胡敏遠zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHU, MING-YUANen_US
dc.creator胡敏遠zh_TW
dc.creatorHU, MING-YUANen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T10:05:27Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T10:05:27Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T10:05:27Z-
dc.identifierG0912605071en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33769-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description東亞研究所zh_TW
dc.description91260507zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract國際關係理論歷經第三次的理論大辯論後，理論的發展已朝向「自然主義－反自然主義」、「理論－實踐」、「基礎主義－反基礎主義」議題的論爭中。從這些論爭之中使我們發現做為國際關係學科的本體論、知識論及方法論，已經開始向社會學的方向轉折。其中，尤以新自由制度主義及建構主義的轉折更為明顯。然而，從更深層的視野來看目前各學派的理論，多多少少都含有霸權主義的成分於其中。基於此，本論文借用葛蘭西「文化霸權」的理論觀點，檢視現實主義、新現實主義、自由主義、新自由制度主義及建構主義等主流國際關係理論中的文化霸權因素，同時運用哈伯馬斯的「溝通行動理論」的概念，對上述主流國際關係理論的霸權性質進行反思，以期建構出一個在本體論、知識論、方法論上都能獲得解放的國際關係理論。\n\n基於以上理念，本論文的發展與架構鋪陳共分為8章35節。\n\n第一章為緒論，主要敍述論文的整個架構及重要理論說明，包括葛蘭西的「文化霸權」及哈伯馬斯的「溝通行動理論」，藉由上述兩種理論的哲學基礎，以分析說明目前國際關係理論的爭論議題，及其未來可能的發展趨勢。\n\n第二章介紹國際關係理論三次大辯論及其理論的發展現況，然後闡明國際政治各個學派的哲學與後設基礎。\n\n第三章概述葛蘭西「文化霸權」的理論，主要探討葛蘭西的文化霸權；它並不是一個實體的權力，而是一個意識形態及實體相互結合的領導權概念。\n\n第四章是藉由葛蘭西的文化霸權概念，論析目前國際關係理論無論是在物質及精神意識方面，都具有文化霸權的成分。換言之，目前的國際關係理論並無法完達到解放國家受到壓迫的目標。\n\n第五章介紹哈伯馬斯的「溝通行動理論」，主要研究溝通行動理論所涵蓋的範圍：包括了主體與主體、主體與客體及主體與社會之間的溝通關係。\n\n第六章是運用哈伯馬斯溝通行動理論分析主體與主體（國家╱國家）、主體與客體（國家╱客觀世界）、主體與社會（國家╱國際社會、組織、制度…）之間的溝通關係，藉以解放國際關係理論所受到的壓迫與不公平現象。\n\n第七章陳述反思下的國際關係理論其本體論、知識論及方法論。\n第八章章為結論，提出本論文的主要貢獻：第一，以溝通行動為媒介的國際關係理論，會出現以國際社會的整體做為各個行動體溝通行動的場域，這個場域是一個「實體（物質）結構」、是一個「關係（權力、制度）結構」、也是一個「觀念（意義）結構」，更是經由實踐所織構出的「網絡結構」；第二，國際關係的本體論、知識論及方法論之間是一個相互辯證的過程，他們彼此之間可以相互辯證轉換。\n\n關鍵詞：文化霸權、溝通行動理論、國際關係理論、國際政治、社會理論zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAfter three times of intensive debates, the direction of International Relations theory has moved to “naturalism-anti-naturalism”,”theory-implementation”,\n”fundamentalism-anti-fundamentalism”. From the debates we can realize the International Relations is supported by Ontological, Epistemological, Methodological and it has change into sociology. Although the direction of neo- Liberalism and Constructivism has become clear and if we read of those theories, all of them have included some degree of Cultural Hegemony. This research takes Antonio Gramsci’s “Cultural Hegemony” theory to exam Realism, neo-Realism、Liberalism、neo-Liberalism and Constructivism. At the same time, I also use “theory of Communication” of Jurgen Habermas to talk about the hegemony among those theories, in order to let the ontological, epistemological and methodological can be applied to the theories.\n\nThis research paper is divided into 8 sections and 35 chapters.\n\nChapter one is introduction, of both theories of “Cultural Hegemony” of Gramsci and “theory of Communication” of Jurgen Habermas to illustrate today’s international disputes for International Relations and the possible development for the future.\n\nChapter two is the three intensive debates for International Relations and the development of those theories, including international politics fundamental philosophy.\n\nChapter three is the theory of “Cultural Hegemony” of Gramsci. It’s not an existing power but an ideal form in connection with concept of leading power.\n\nChapter four is the use of the theory of “Cultural Hegemony” of Gramsci in the concepts of today’s international relations. Both substantial and spiritual aspects include hegemony. In other words, today’s theories of international relations can’t reach the goals of resolve the nations under pressure.\n\nChapter five is the theory of Communication” of Jurgen Habermas, focusing on the relations of communication of Subjective to subjective, subjective to objective and subjective to community.\n\nChapter six is the use of theory of Communication” of Jurgen Habermas in terms of the communicate relations among subjective to subjective(nation/nation), subjective to objective(nation/objective world), subjective to social(nation/ international community, organization, institution…) and then to prevent from the pressure and unfairness of theory of international relations.\n\nChapter seven is the theory of international relations of ontology, epistemology and methodology.\n\nChapter eight is the conclusion, with two major points: First, the use of communication actions on the theory of international relations will make the global community into a unique arena in order to provide it for different communication groups. These areas are a entity (substantial) structure, a relation(power, institutional) structure and also a aspect(meaning) structure and furthermore it can be implemented into network-structure；Second, the theory of international relations on ontology, epistemology and methodology is a dialogue and development process, that can be interacted and transfered to others.\n\nKey Word: Cultural Hegemony, Theory of Communication, International Relations theory, International Politic, Social Thioryen_US
dc.description.tableofcontents論文提要\n\n第壹章 導論╱1\n\n第一節 問題意識的提出╱1\n第二節 重要理論的界定與核心概念介紹╱5\n第三節 研究典範╱17\n第四節 文獻資料分析╱18\n第五節 研究架構與章節說明╱23\n\n\n第貳章 國際關係重要理論回顧╱25\n\n第一節 現實主義與自由主義理論論述╱25\n第二節 傳統主義與行為主義理論論述╱36\n第三節 新自由制度主義與新現實主義的論述╱45\n第四節 論戰延續下的產物－建構主義的國際關係理論╱54\n第五節 本章小結╱65\n\n\n第參章 析論葛蘭西「文化霸權」理論－權力結構的氛圍╱69\n\n第一節 葛蘭西的「實踐哲學」╱69\n第二節 葛蘭西的「市民社會理論」╱79\n第三節 葛蘭西的知識分子概念在國家╱社會╱政黨中的功能╱85\n第四節 「文化霸權」的涵義╱91\n第五節 本章小結╱97\n\n\n第肆章 「文化霸權」在國際關係理論中的角色分析╱99\n\n第一節 主流國際關係理論中的「文化霸權」╱99\n第二節 無政府「體系結構」的意義與缺失╱113\n第三節 「理性主義」的效能與盲點╱118\n第四節 國家中心主義的價值與迷思╱126\n第五節　論主流國際政治理論的文化霸權觀（本章小結）╱138\n\n\n第伍章 哈伯馬斯「溝通行動論」－互動與實踐的結構觀╱139\n\n第一節　晚期資本主義社會的合法性問題╱139\n第二節　哈伯馬斯的溝通行動理論概述╱149\n第三節　理解和共識：溝通行動論的最終目標╱158\n第四節　「溝通行動理論」的理性結構╱166\n第五節　本章小結╱173\n\n\n第陸章　解放國際關係理論的霸權觀點－「溝通行動理論」的觀點╱175\n\n第一節 重新詮釋國際政治的批判理論╱175\n第二節 主體間性與國際社會集體認同的關聯性╱193\n第三節 溝通行動與國家行為╱206\n第四節 本章小結╱221\n\n\n第柒章 轉化以「人」為中心的國際關係理論╱225\n\n第一節 行動者的構成因素及其屬性分析：本體論的形成 ╱225\n第二節 國家(行動者)－結構(主體間性)的關係：知識論的探討\n╱247\n第三節　國家(行動体)－結構(主體間性)的關係：方法論的論述\n　　　　╱268\n第四節　本章小結╱282\n\n\n第捌章　結論╱285\n\n第一節　研究心得╱285\n第二節　研究發現╱291\n\n參考書目╱297\n圖目錄\n\n1、圖4-1 葛蘭西世界霸權力量圖╱104\n2、圖4-2 考克斯的霸權與世界秩序╱104\n3、圖7-1 索緒爾語言溝通結構圖╱250\n\n\n表目錄\n\n1、表5-1 哈伯馬斯的知識論架構表╱151\n2、表5-2 哈伯馬斯行為合理的面面觀╱155zh_TW
dc.format.extent61455 bytes-
dc.format.extent88398 bytes-
dc.format.extent61807 bytes-
dc.format.extent105661 bytes-
dc.format.extent273709 bytes-
dc.format.extent367928 bytes-
dc.format.extent307357 bytes-
dc.format.extent369727 bytes-
dc.format.extent316358 bytes-
dc.format.extent395319 bytes-
dc.format.extent422668 bytes-
dc.format.extent208541 bytes-
dc.format.extent221540 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0912605071en_US
dc.subject文化霸權zh_TW
dc.subject溝通行動理論zh_TW
dc.subject國際關係理論zh_TW
dc.subject國際政治zh_TW
dc.subject社會理論zh_TW
dc.subjectCultural Hegemony ,en_US
dc.subjectTheory of Communicationen_US
dc.subjectInternational Relations theory,en_US
dc.subjectInternational Politic,en_US
dc.subjectSocial Thioryen_US
dc.title國際關係理論中「文化霸權」與「溝通行動」的研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《現代漢語辭典》(1987)，北京：商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference山本吉宣(1993)，《國際政治理論》，上海：三聯書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尹樹廣(2001)，《後結構．生活世界．國家》，吉林，黑龍江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(1999)，《認識與興趣》，上海：學林出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(2000)，《合法化危機》，上海：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(2001)，《後形而上學》上海：譯林出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤爾根．哈貝馬斯著(2000)，《重建歷史唯物主義》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference文兵(2004)，《理性：傳統與重建》，北京：當代中國出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference毛韵譯，葛蘭西著(1987)，《葛蘭西：政治家、囚徒和理論家》，北京：求實出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王岳川、尚水編(1993)，《後現代主義文化與美學》，北京：北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王逸舟(1998)，《西方國際政治學：理論與現實》，上海：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王道還、錢永祥譯，D .G. Cedarbaum著(1985)《典範科學革命的結構》，臺北：允晨出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王曉東(2004)，《西方哲學主體間性理論批判》，北京：中國社會科學出社社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王巍(2003)，《相對主義：從典範、語言和理性的觀點看》，北京：清華大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伍德羅，威爾遜著(1985)，「美國各任總統就職演講詞」，《美國文獻選集》，北京：美國駐華大使館新聞文化處編。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任平(1998)，《全球發展：模式、理論與選擇》，北京：中國勞動出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任平(2003)，《交往實踐的哲學－全球化語境中的哲學視域》，昆明：雲南人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任曉、張耀、薛晨譯，查默斯．約翰遜(Johnson， Chalmers)著(2005)，帝國的悲哀上海：世紀出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference安東尼奧，葛蘭西著(1992)，《政治著作選集》，臺北： 遠流出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference安東尼奧，葛蘭西著(1998)，《獄中札記》，臺北：谷風出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱建民(1976)，《國際組織新論》，臺北：正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱寧譯，巴里．布贊、奧利．維夫、迪．懷德爾著(2002)，《新安全論(Security： A New Framework for Analysis)》，浙江：浙江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江恰主編(1998)，《走向新世紀的西方哲學》，北京：中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference衣俊卿(2003)，《20世紀的文化批判》，北京：中央編譯出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference衣俊卿(2004)，《文化哲學十五講》，北京：北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何國強譯，羅伯特．尤林(Robert， Ulin)著(2005)，《理解文化：從人類學和社會理論視角》，北京：北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伽達默爾著(1998)，《讚美理論》，上海：三聯書店。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余萬里、何宗強譯，托布約爾．克魯成著(2004)，《國際關係史理論導讀》，天津：天津人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference克羅齊著(1992)，《歷史學的理論與實踐》，北京：商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳潛誠總編校，杰夫瑞．亞歷山大(Jeffery C． Alesander)編，《文化與社會》，臺北：立緒文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳曉明(1995)，《科學與社會》，上海：遠東出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李小華譯，斯蒂芬．克萊斯勒(Stephen D. Krasner)(2001)，《結構衝突：第三世界對抗全球自由主義》，杭洲：浙江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李青宜(1990)，《西方馬克思主義的當代資本主義理論》，四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明(2004)，《國際關係理論的啟蒙與反思》，臺北：揚智出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李康等譯，安東尼．吉登斯著(1998)，《社會的構成》，北京：三聯書店。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈漢譯，賈恩弗蘭科．波齊(1997)，《近代國家的發展－社會學導論》，北京：商務印書舘。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沉清松(2000)，《呂格爾》，臺北：東大圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference肖佳歡(2003)，《國家主權論》，北京：時事出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference肖歡容譯，David．Baldwin著(2001)，《新現實主義和新自由主義》，杭洲：浙江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林碧炤(1999)，《國際政治與外交政策》，臺北：五南書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金吾倫(1994)，《托馬斯．庫恩》，香港：三聯書店有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金惠敏譯，伽達默爾、杜特著(2005)，《解釋學、美學、實踐哲學伽達默爾與杜特對談錄》，北京：商務印書出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference俞正樑、陳正剛、蘇長和(2005)，《21世紀全球政治範式》，上海：復旦大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洛克著(1959)，《人類理解論》，北京：商務印書舘。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范寶舟(2005)，《論馬克思交往理論及其當代意義》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference倪梁康、張廷國譯，胡塞爾(Edmund Husserl)著(2005)，《生活世界現象學》，上海：商務出社社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫、張博樹編譯，尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(1993)，《交往與社會進化》，四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫、陳學明(1993)，《哈伯馬斯的“晚期資本主義論述”評》，四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫、歐力(1997)，《哈伯馬斯的“批判理論”》，四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫編(1997)，《用馬克思主義評析西方思潮》，四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫編，洪佩郁、藺青譯，尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(1996)，交往行為理論（四川：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐崇溫譯，安東尼奧，葛蘭西著(1990)，《實踐哲學》，重慶：重慶人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青譯，亞歷山大．温特(Alexander Wendt)著(2004)，《國際政治的社會理論》，上海：世紀出版集團。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦治來譯，詹姆斯．德．代元(James Der Derian)編(2003)，《國際關係理論批判》，浙江：浙江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁正清譯，費麗莫爾(Matha Finnemore)(2001)，《國際社會中的國家利益》，杭州：浙江人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郝立新(2002)，《馬克思主義哲學研究述評》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬克思(1990)，《資本論〈第一卷〉》，北京：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬克思、恩格思(1995)，《馬克思恩格思選集〈1~3卷〉》，北京：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬克思．韋伯著(1998)，經濟與社會（上卷），北京：商務印書出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬庫色(Herbert Marcuse)著(2004)，《單向度的人》，臺北：桂冠出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference涂爾幹(Emile Durkheim)著(2002)，《社會分工論》，臺北：左岸文化出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference康德(1997)，《任何一種能夠作為科學出現的未來形而上學導論》，北京：商務印書舘。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張士林譯，拉基斯著，《政治典範》，北京：商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張家銘(1998)，《社會學理論的歷史反思》，臺北：洪葉文化事業公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張勝軍譯，詹姆斯．羅西環(2001)，《沒有政府的治理》，南昌：江西人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹敏、易陶天譯，W． T． Staceb著(1964)，《黑格爾格學(The Philosophy Of Hegel)》，臺北：政工幹校譯印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹衛東譯，尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(2005)，《交往行為理論〈第一卷〉》，上海：世紀出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭官義、李黎譯，尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(1999)《認識與興趣》，上海：學林出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭樹勇(2001)，《建構主義與國際政治》，北京：長征出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玉剛、袁建華主編(2004)，《超越威斯特代利亞？－21世紀國際關係的解讀》，北京：時事出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳炎(2003)，《反理性思潮的反思》，山東：山東大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳墇津譯，拉克勞、墨菲(1994)，《文化霸權和社會主義的策略》，臺北：遠流出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳樂民編(1995)，《西方外交思想史》，北京：中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳學明、吳松、遠東(1984)，《通向理解之路－哈伯馬斯論交往》，昆明：雲南人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸忠偉主編(2003)，《非傳統安全論》，北京：時事出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陶傳進譯，尼格爾．多德(Nigel Dodd)著(2003)，《社會理論與現代性》，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾志隆(2002)，《拉克勞與穆芙》，臺北：生智出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾慶豹(2004)，《哈伯馬斯》，臺北：生智出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference童世駿譯，尤爾根．哈伯馬斯著(2003)，《在事實與規範之間》，北京：生活出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference舒煒光，邱仁宗編(1987)，《當代西方科學哲學評述》，北京：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃光耀、洪霞譯，伊曼紐．華勒斯坦著(2004)，《華勒斯坦精粹》，南京：南京大學出版社，2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃瑞祺(2000)，《馬克思論方法》，臺北：巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黑格爾著(1996)，《法哲學原理》，北京：商務出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference傳偉勲(1990)，《西洋哲學史》，臺北：三民書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄒理民譯，彼得．柏格(Peter． Berg)及湯姆斯．樂格曼(Tomas． Lergema)著(1993)，《知識社會學－社會實體的建構》，臺北：巨流出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉靖華(1997)，《霸權的興衰》，北京：中國經濟出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘一禾(2005)，《文化與國際關係》，杭洲：淅江大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘漢典譯，馬基維里著(1997)，《君主論》，北京：商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡美麗(2004)，《黑格爾》，桂林：廣西師範大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魯凡之(1982)，《西方批判理論評析》，臺北：署光圖書公司出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黎思復等譯，霍布斯(1997)，《利維坦》，北京：商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧卡奇(George Lukacs)著(1989)，《歷史與階級意識－馬克思主義辯證法研究》，臺北：結構群文化出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧明華等譯，漢斯．摩根索著(1995)，《國際縱横策略－爭權，求和平》，上海：上海譯文出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧風、肖巍編(2002)，《應用倫理學導論》，北京：當代中國出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference閻學通、陳寒溪譯，詹姆斯．多爾蒂、小羅伯特．普法爾茲格拉夫閻學通、陳寒溪譯著(2003)，《爭論中的國際關係理論》，北京：世界知識出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference霍克海默、阿多諾著(1990)，《啟蒙辯證法》，重慶：重慶出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference聶保平譯，艾利森．利．布朗，(Alison Leigh Brown)著(2002)，《福科》，北京：中華書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅伯特，基歐漢著(2001)，《霸權之後》，上海：人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅伯特．吉爾平著(1989)，國際關係的政治經濟學，北京：經濟科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅伯特．吉爾平著(1994)，《世界政治中的戰爭與變革》，北京：中國人民大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顧中華譯，馬克思．韋伯(Max Weber)著(2001)，《新教倫理與資本主義精神》，臺北：左岸文化出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference丁韶彬(2004)，「國際政治理論中的無政府狀態假設：不同流派的比較」，《教學與研究》，2，82-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤爾根．哈伯馬斯(1984)，「與法蘭克福學派」，《哲學譯叢》，1，13－24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference方長平，馮秀珍(2002)，「國家利益研究的範式之爭：新現實主義、新自由主義和建構主義」，《(北京)國際政治刊》，8，26－34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王雨辰(2000)，「葛蘭西領導權思想及其當代影響」，《中南財經大學學報》，2，頁27－30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王昭鋒(1998)，「如何理解葛蘭西“領導權”理論」，《教學與研究》，12，57－59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王昭鋒、徐雷(2000)，「從葛蘭西領導權理論看當前意識形態」，《聊城師範學院學報》，3，59－62。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王鐵軍(2000)，「新葛蘭西主義對國際關係理論的創新」，《歐洲》，1，14-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田露(2000)，「傳統現實主義與結構現實主義的比較分析」，《東南亞研究》，3，39-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference白云真、丁蕾(2004)，「世界秩序的變革：一種新葛蘭西主義的基礎」，《烟台師範學院學報（哲學社會科學）》，21卷第4期，84-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference艾四林(1994)，「哈貝馬斯對韋伯合理性理論的改造」，《求是學刊》，1，29－35．zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何宗強(2000)，「現實主義國際關係理論：基本框架及其問題」，《國際論壇》，2卷第6期，12，60-68。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋偉(2001)，「關於國際合作的理論：概述與思考」，《東南亞研究》，4，49-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明(2006)，「國際關係本體論的重建」，政治大學外交系國際關係學報，1，1-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李濱(2005)，「考克斯的批判理論：淵源與特色」，《世界經濟與政治》，7，15-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪行福(2005)，「新啟蒙辯證法－哈貝馬斯的現代化理論」，《（北京）馬克思主義與現實》，4，52-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference辛敬良(1988)，「實踐唯物主義之管見」，《(北京)動態哲學》，12，15－20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周自橫(1996)，「明槍易躱，暗箭難防－試論文化領導權與社會主義之關係」，《社會主義研究》，6，1-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄(1999)，「結構現實主義與中共外格局」，《東亞季刊》，30卷第3期，夏季刊，22－45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference門洪華(2000)，「國際機制理論與國際社會理論的比較」，《歐洲》，2，12-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference門洪華(2003)，「國際關係理論範式的相互啟示與融合之道」，《世界政治與經濟》，5，42-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference俞正梁(2002)，「國際無政府狀態辨析」，《復旦大學外交學院學報》，1，48-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference哈爾納﹝澳﹞(1997)，「葛蘭西和毛澤東關於知識分子在革命發展過程中的作用」，《社會主義研究》，3，10－18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡宗山(2003)，「西方國際關係理論方法論體系初探」，《社會主義研究》，2，91-93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范菊華(2002)，「規範與國際制度安排：一種建構主義闡釋」，《現代國際關係》，10，56-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范菊華(2003)，「對建構主義的解析」，《世界經濟與政治》，7，27－32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范菊華(2003)，「論偏好和國際制度的關係」，《現代國際關係》，8，55-61。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姬高升譯，約瑟夫．格里科著(2001)，「無政府和合作的限制：對新自由主義的現實主義批評」，《國際論壇》，第3卷第1期，2，74-80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫溯源(2003)，「集體認同與國際政治－一種文化視角」，《（北京）現代國際關係》，1，39－43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐強(1996)，「葛蘭西反官僚主義思想探微」，《江淮論壇》，4，61－65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青(1996)，「西方國際關係學的現實主義與新現實主義」，《復旦大學外交學院學報》，2，40-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青(1998)，「國際制度與國際合作－反思新自由制度主義」，《外交學院報》，1，40-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青(1998)，「層次分析與國際關係研究」，《歐洲》，3，4-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青(2001)，「新現實主義和新自由主義：從論爭到趨同」，《(北京)國際論壇》，3卷第3期，40-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青，「國際政治的社會建構－溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論」，《(北京)歐洲雜誌》，3，8-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁正清(2003)，「國際關係理論的行動者－結構之爭」．《國際關係理論》，6，39-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張貴洪(2002)，「均勢理論、均勢體系與多極現實」，《浙江社會科學》，3，71-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張錦華(2001)，「從公共領域與多元文化主義的觀點看西方馬克思主義的轉折：以傳播研究為例」，收錄於黃瑞祺主編，《馬學新論》，臺北：中央研研究院歐美研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戚吟(1996)，「知識分子與革命－論葛蘭西的知識分子理論」，《江淮論譠》，1，80－85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭樹勇(2002)，「《新現實主義及其批判》與國際政治的本質論革命」，載於羅伯特．基歐漢著，郭樹勇譯，《新現實主義及其批判》，北京：北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭樹勇(2003)，「當代國際關係理論批評史上的里程碑－評基歐漢主編的」，《美國研究》，1，137-148。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭樹勇(2004)，「從「世界交往」概念看馬克思的國際政治社會學方法」，《世界經濟與政治》，2004年第1期，21－27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭樹勇、唐小松(1999)，「試論後現代主義對西方國際關係理論的影響」，《解放軍外國語學院學報》，24卷3期，101-105。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玉剛，(1998)「國際政治對國家行為的結構影響」，《太平洋學報》，1，67-73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玉剛、俞正梁(2001)，「國家主權的層次分析」，《歐洲》，3，36-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玉剛、陳志敏(1990)，「構建主義：新現實主義和新自由制度主義之後」，《世界政治與經濟》，8，28-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳玉聃(2004)，「西方國際關係理論中本體論的哲學基礎」，《歐洲研究》，3，13-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳炳輝(2001)，「哈貝馬斯的民主理論」，《廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學學刊)》，2，103－110。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳燕谷(1995)，「Hegemony (霸權╱領導權)」，《讀書月刊》，2，116－117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸煒(1994)，「批判解釋學何以是批判的—析論哈貝馬斯的批判解釋學的思想」，《復旦學報(社會科學版)》，2，41－46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陶文昭(1998)，「葛蘭西的知識分子理論及意義」，《馬克思主義研究》，4，91－94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference傅永軍(1999)，「哈貝馬斯“合法性危機論”評析，」，《馬克斯主義研析》，4，65－72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference喬衛兵(2001)，「認同理論與國家行為」，《歐洲》，3，26-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾枝盛(2004)，「拉克勞、墨菲及其“新霸權”理論」，《浙江學刊》，6，13-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference焦勇勤(2003)，「葛蘭西文化領導權思想解讀」，《山東省青管理幹部學院學報》，2，114－116。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference程德文(2004)，「事實性與有效性：現代法律的重建及其方法－哈伯馬斯的法學方法論初探」，《學習與探索》，3，49－64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鈕菊生、郭樹勇(2003)，「試論法蘭克福學派對國際政治理論的影響」，《世界經濟與政治》，9，47－52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃炎平(1999)，「論葛蘭西的市民社會理論」，《長沙電力學報學報》，2，1－6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃旻華(2000)，「評『論國際關係理論中的建構主義』」，《問題與研究》，39卷11期，11，71－93。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃森(1984)，「重温『關於費爾巴哈提綱』的一點思考」，《哲學研究》，4，23－31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葛揚(1997)，「社會進步的文化動力觀－葛蘭西與毛澤東之比較」，《社會主義研究》，4，10－14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference熊自健(1989)，「葛蘭西與列寧主義」，《問題與研究》，20卷11期，3，2524－2533。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉武通(1999)，「從結構理論到反結構決定論－新現實主義與新自由主義理論評析」，《歐洲》，5，26-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭永光(2004)，「自由主義國際關係理論的源流」，《歷史教學問題》，6，40-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭端耀(2002)，「國際關係『社會建構主義』評析」，《美歐季刊》，15卷2期，117-220。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧志清(1998)，「90代國家干預發展的新趨勢」，《世界經濟與政治》，2，62－67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魯路(2004)，「意識形態批判的嬗變」，《馬克思主義與現實主義》，4，32-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇長和(1997)，「從國家安全到世界安全－現實主義及其後」，《歐洲》，1，43-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇長和(1998)，「非國家行為體與當代國際政治」，《歐洲》，1，4-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇嘉宏(1992)，「理解葛蘭西(Antonio Gramsci)」，《共黨研究》，18卷3期，50－55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李虎(2003)，《自由、法律和制度穩定性》，上海：復旦大學博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明(1986)，《馬克思異化論之研究》，台北：國立政治大學東亞所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference書宗友(2004)，《制衡、追隨與不介入：霸權陰下的三種國家政策反應》，上海：復旦大學博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁正清(2002)，《國際政治理論的社會學轉向－建構主義解讀國際政治》，北京：中國社會科學院博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊筱(2000)，《認同與國際關係》，(北京：中國社會科學院博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧凌宇(2002)，《論冷戰後挑戰主權的理論思潮－重新思考國家主權》，上海：復旦大學博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference四、英文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndrade, Roy (1992), Humane Motives and Cultural Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBanks, Michael (1985), “ The Inter-paradigm Debate,”in M. Light & A. J. R. Groom (eds.), International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennett, Leroy A. (1995), International Organization: Principles and Issues, New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBruce, Bueno Mesquita (1981), The War Trap, New Haven: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBull, Hedley (1995), The Anarchical Society： A Study of Order in World Politics, New York：Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBull, Hedley (1995), The Anarchical Society： A Study of Order in World Politics, New York：Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBull, Hedley and Adam Watson (1984), The Expansion of International Society ,Oxford：Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceButterfield, Hebert and Martin Wight (1966), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuzan, Barry & Richard Charles Little (1994), The Logic of Anarchy, New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCammett, John (1969), Antonio Gramsci and Origins of Italian Communism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarr, Edward (1969), The Twenty Years’Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York: Harper Torchbooks.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClaude, Inis (1962), Power and International Relations, New York: Random House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Robert (1987), Production, Power, and World Order, New York：Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Robert (1996), Approaches to World Order, New York：Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Wayne & Claire Turenne Sjolander (1994), Critical Reflections on International Relations (Boulder : Lynne Rienner Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Wayne and Turenne Coaere (1994), Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCuff, Edward and Sharrock Wes W and Francis D.W, Perspective In Sociologic, London: Routledge Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDer Denian, James (1995), International Theory: Critical Investigation, New York: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeutsch, Karl (1978), The Analysis of International Relations, Prentice Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDodd, Nigel (1999), Social Theory and Modernity, U.K.: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDyer, Hugh and Mangesation Leon (1989), The Study of International Relations, New York：St. Martion’s Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDyer, Hugh and Mangesation Leon (1989), The Study of International Relations, New York：St. Martion’s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinnemore, Matha (1966), National Interests in International Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, Michel (1985), The Use of Pleasure: History of Sexuality Volume Tow, New York: Random House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Antonio (1984), The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Antonio (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGill, Stephen (1993), Gramsci, Historical materialism and international relation, Cambridge：Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldstein, Judith and Robert keohane (1993), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, London: Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGramsci, Antonio (1971) Selection from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci , New York: International Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaack, Susan (2001), Evidence and Inquiry, London: Blackwell Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHabermas, Jurgen (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, An Inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, London: Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, and Volker Rittberger (1997), Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeller, Agnes (1999), A Theory of Modernity, London: Blackwell Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffman, Satnley (1978), Primacy or World Order—American Foreign Policy Since the Cold War, New York: McGraw-Hall Book Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffmann, Stanley and Janus Minerva (1987), Essays in Theory and Practice o0f International Politics, Boulder: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHollis, Martin and Steve Smith (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations, New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHusserl, Edmund(1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, New York: Northwestern University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJim, George (1994), Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical Introduction to International Relations, New York: Lynne Rienner Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJoseph, Smith Michael (1986), Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Louisiana: Louisiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJoseph, Smith Michael (1989), Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Louisiana: Louisiana University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaplan, Morton (1957), System and Process of International Politics, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKegley, Charles (1995), Controversies in International Relations Theory, New York: St. Martin’s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, R. and J. Nye (1977), Power and Interdependence, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1986), Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1989), International Institution and State Power, Essays in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1993), Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change, New York: Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert and Joseph Nye and Stanly Hoffmann (1993), After the Cold War: Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989-1991, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert and Stanly Hoffmann (1991), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Colo: Boulder Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeyman, Fuat (1997), Globalization, State, Identity/ Difference: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Relations, New York: Humanities Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKindleberger, Charles (1973), The World in Depression 1929-1939, Berkeley: California University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKing, Gary & Robert Keohane & Sidney Verba (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKissinger, Henry (1994), Diplomacy, New York: Schuster Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlotz, Audie (1995), Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid, New York: Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnorr, Klause and James Rosenau (1969), Contending Approaches to International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrasner, Stephen (1978), Defending the National Interest, Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrasner, Stephen (1983), International Regimes, Cornell：Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrasner, Stephen (1985), Structural Conflict, Berkley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKratochwel, Friedrich (1989), Rules, Norms, and Decisions：on the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs, New York：Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuhn, Thomas (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLakatos, Immanuel (1978), The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLakatos, Musgrave, (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLapid Yosef (1996), Friedrich Kratochwil, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLinklater, Andrew (1990), Men and Critizens of International Relations ,London: MacMillian Press, 1982).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLittle, Richard (1985), International Relations-A Handbook of Current Theory, New York: Cambridge Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMachiavelli, Nicola (1977), The Prince, New York: Norton Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMandelbaum, Michael (1988), The Fate of Nations: The Search for National Security in the 19th and 20th Centuries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManning, David (1971), Liberalism, London: Dent Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMerritt, Richard and Russett Rruce (1981), From National Development to Global Community, London: George & Unwin Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoore, Thomas, and Yang Dixia (2001), “Empower and Restrained: Chinese Foreign Policy in the age of Economic Interdependence,” in Lampton David, ed. The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy (California: Stanford University Press).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgenthau, Hans J. (1948), Politics Among Nations: Struggle for Power and Peace New York: Knopf Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlson, Mancur (1971), The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOuthwaite, William (1996), Jurgen Habermas, London: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOye, Kenneth (1986), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaul, T. and John Hall (1999), International Order and the Future of World Politics , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePentland, Charles (1973), International Theory and European Integration, London: Aber and Faber.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePierre, Manent, (1994), An Intellectual History of Liberalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRabinow, Paul (1983), The Foucault Reader, Chicago: Chicago University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRittberger, Olker (1993), Regime Theory and International Relations, New York：Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenau, James (1966), International Politics and Foreign Policy, Evanston: northwestern University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John (1998), Constructing the World Polity: essays in international institutionalization, New York: Routledge Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaussure, Ferdinad (1960), Course in General Linguistics. Baskin W trans (London: Peter Owen Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchwartz, Heman (1994), Markets versus States: History. Geography, And the Development of the International Political Economy, New York: St. Martin’s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSjolander, Claire Turenne and Wayne Cox (1994) , Beyond Positvism: Critical Reflections on International Relations, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Michael (1986), Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger, Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, Trevor (1987), Approach and Theory in International Relations, London: Longman Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTerry, Terriff (1999), Security studies today, UK: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, Kenneth (1980), Masters of International Thought, Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVincent, Andrew (1987), Theories of the State, New York: Basic Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceViotti, Paul and Mark Kauppi (1999) , International theory, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVolker, Rittberger (1993), Regime Theory and International Relations, New York： Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, Immanuel (1984), The Politics of the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, Immanuel (1984), The Politics of the World Economy: The States, the Movement and the Civilizations, New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth (1959), Man, the State and War, New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth (1985), Theory of International Politics, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeb, Max (1999), Economy and Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics(Cmabridge: Cambridge University, Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWest ,Cornel (1998), The American Evasion of Philosophy, Wisconsin：Wisconsin University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWight, Martin (1977), Systems of States, London: Leicester University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWillard, Orman Quine (1960), Word and Object, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhao, Quansheng (1996) , Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy: The Micro-Macro Linkage Approach, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference五、英文期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlker, Hayward, Thomas and Biersteker (1981), Dealectical foundations of global disparities, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No.1, March, pp. 69-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBieler, Andreas and David, Morton Adam (2001), “The Cordian Kont of Agency – Structure in International Relations: A Neo – Gramscian Perspective,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol.7 (2001), pp. 5-35zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBooth, Ken (1998), “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice,” International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 527-545zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarlsnaes, Walter (1992), “The Agent – Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas (1999), “China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia.” International Security, Vol. 23, No.4, Spring, pp. 49-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Robert (1981), “Social force, states, and world orders: Beyond international relations theory,” International Studies, Summer, 10(2), pp.126-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCox, Robert (1983), “Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium: A Journal of International Studies, Vol.12, No. 2, Summer, pp, 162-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDessler, David (1989), “What’s at Stake in the Agent – Structure Debate ?” International Organization, Vol. 43, pp.438-467.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFarrel, Theo (2002), “Constructive Security Studies： Portrait of a Research Program,” International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No1., Spring, pp.37-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinnemore, Matha and Kathryn Sikkink (1984), “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organization, Autumn, pp.908-937.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinnemore, Matha and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organization, Autumn, pp.904-936.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeorge, Jim (1989), “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol.33, pp. 259-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldstein, Avery (1998), “The Great Expectation: Interpreting Chinas Arrival”, International Security, Vol. 22, No.3, Winter, pp. 36-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGuzzini, Stegano (1993), “Structure Power: the Limits of Neorealist power Analysis,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No.3, pp.398-421.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHass, Ernst (1980), “Why Collaborate? Issue Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, Vol. 32, April, pp.347-379.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHass, peter (1992), “ Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, Vol.46, Winter, pp.10-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHideme, Suganami (1999), “Agents, Structures, Narratives,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 5, pp. 365－386.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffmann, Stanely (1977), “ An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus, Vol. 106, No.41, Summer, pp.41-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, G. John (1998/1999), “Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order,” International Security, Vol. 23, No. 3 Winter, pp. 43-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane and Krasner (1998), International Organization, Vol. 52, No.4, Winter, p.645-668.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKegley, Charles (1994), “Redirecting Realism: A Rejoinder to Riggs,” International Studies Notes, Vol. 19, No. 1, Winter, pp. 1-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKegley, Charles W.(1994), “Redirecting Realism: A Rejoinder to Riggs,” International Studies Notes, Vol. 19, No. 1, Winter , pp.1-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1988), “International institutions: Two approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, pp.379-396.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert (1988), “International institutions： Two approaches”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32. pp. 379-396.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKratochwi, Friedrich (1984), “The Force of Prescriptions,” International Organization, Vol. 38, Autumn, pp. 697-706.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKratochwil, Friedrich (1986), “International Organization： A State of the art on an art of the state”, International Organization, pp.754-790.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKux, Dennis (2003), “India’s Fine Balance,” Foreign Affairs, Vol.81, pp. 93-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMearsheimer, John (1990), “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War”, International Security,, Vol.15,. pp.20-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceModelski, George (1978), “The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 20, No. 2, Summer, pp. 212-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeufeld, Mark (1994), “ Who’s Afraid of Meta Theory?,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 375-398.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNye, Joseph (1987), “Nuclear Learning and U.S.– Soviet Security Regimes,” International Organization, Vol.41,3, Summer, pp.370-398.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNye, Joseph (1987), “Nuclear Learning and U.S.– Soviet Security Regimes,” International Organization, Vol.41,3, Summer, pp.368-389.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobert, Alker Hayward (2000), “On Learning form Wendt,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 121-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobert, Ross (1999), “The Geography of the Peace: East As Twenty-First Century,” International Security, Vol. 23, No.4, Spring, pp.81-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenberg, Alexander (1985), “Prospects for the elimination of tastes from economics and ethics” , social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 2, pp. 48-68..zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John (1983), “International regimes , transformation in the world : Polity: Toward a neorealist synthesis , World Politics, Vol. 35, No.2, January pp.261-285.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John (1998), “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Changes,” International Organization, vol( 52), Autumn , pp. 874-896.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSegal, Gerald (1996), “East Asia and the Constrainment of China”, International Security, Vol. 24, No.3, Winter, pp. 107-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShambaugh, David (2000),“China’s Military Views the World,” International Security, Vol. 24, No.3, Winter , pp. 52-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth (1990), “Realist Thought and Neo-realist Theory”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol.44, pp. 24-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth (2000), “Structural Realism After the Cold War”, International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1, Summer, pp. 5-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1987), “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,” International Organization, Summer , pp. 349-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1991), “Bridging the Theory/ Meta- ,Theory Gap in International Relations ,” Review of International Studies Vol. 17, p. 369-398.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1992), “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics” International Organization, Vol.46, No.2, Spring, pp.391-425.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1994), “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, Vol.88, No. 2, June, p.366-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (1998), “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 24, Dec. , pp. 105-147.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWendt, Alexander (2000), “On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 26, No.1 (2000), pp. 174-175.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
60507101.pdf60.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507102.pdf86.33 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507103.pdf60.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507104.pdf103.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507105.pdf267.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507106.pdf359.3 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507107.pdf300.15 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507108.pdf361.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507109.pdf308.94 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507110.pdf386.05 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507111.pdf412.76 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507112.pdf203.65 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
60507113.pdf216.35 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.