Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34127
題名: 公務人員退休制度附加採行節約儲蓄制度之投資策略模擬分析
作者: 王麗婷
Wang, Li-Ting
貢獻者: 王儷玲
王麗婷
Wang, Li-Ting
關鍵詞: 公務人員退撫基金
確定提撥制
所得替代率
金錢價值比
生命循環假說
Public servants
Defined Contribution
Replacement Rate
Money`s worth ratio
Lifecycle Hypothesis
日期: 2005
上傳時間: 18-Sep-2009
摘要: 為使台灣公部門能利用確定提撥的概念及妥善運用投資資源,以期在減少政府負擔的情況下獲得足夠的退休所得,故本研究以所得替代率、金錢價值比及平均數-變異數比等指標來針對公務人員退撫基金附加節約儲蓄制度採行之可能與投資策略彼此運用之模擬結果加以分析,結果如下:\n\n1. 各情境下以BH策略所得出之期末個人帳戶平均累積值表現最佳,然其具相當大的波動變異程度,投資人需承受相當大的風險。而TIPP策略之表現則與前述完全相反。\n2. 若投資者採用BH策略或是採用CPPI與TIPP策略(CM策略)且欲追求較高的所得替代率,則建議採用Lifecycle(平衡型)的投資比例配置方式,加計DB制下之給付則平均可提供男(女)性約70.204%-75.204% (65.49%-70.49%)的所得替代率,而金錢價值比則為2.399(2.95)。\n3. 無論投資者採用何種策略進行投資,若欲追求最小的可能變異風險,則建議採取平衡型的投資比例配置方式,加計確定給付制下之給付則平均可提供男(女)性約67.924%-72.924%(65.318%-70.318%)的所得替代率,金錢價值比則為2.6835。\n\n本文模擬結果所得出之所得替代率平均維持於70%上下,代表若政府將可藉此制度減輕政府負擔外亦可使員工擁有一定水平的退休生活,故可採用。至於投資策略與配置方式如何取捨須依不同的投資者而定。\n \n關鍵詞:公務人員退撫基金、確定提撥制、所得替代率、金錢價值比、Lifecycle
Abstract\n\nBecause the improvement of medical technology and the structure of population is aging. It makes human worry about the living in the future. In order to enable the public servants of Taiwan to utilize the system of the Defined Contribution and to relief the pressure of fiscal, so we simulate in this article and analysis the results of simulation by using replacement rate, money’s worth ratio, and mean-variance ratio. The result is as follows:\n1.When investor adopt the BH strategy in the process of investment, it will create the best replacement rate and money’s worth ratio under every situation, but it can be anticipated more uncertainty. Investors need to think thrice before they act. The TIPP strategy is opposite.\n2.If investors adopt BH strategy or CPPI and TIPP strategy (CM strategy) and wanting to pursue the substituting rate of the higher income , the best selection is proposed adopting the Lifecycle (balanced) scenario, and it can offer replacement ratio about 70.204% - 75.204% (65.49% - 70.49% ) for the man (the woman ) under adding the DB system. Besides, the money’s worth rate is 2.399 (2.95).\n3. If the investors want to pursue the least influence in the process of investment whatever investors adopt which strategies, the best scenario is the balanced type, and it can offer replacement ratio about 67.924%-72.924%(65.318%-70.318%) for the man (the woman) under adding the DB system. Besides, the money’s worth rate is 2.6835.\n\nThe outcome of the simulation in this article is keep the replacement rate maintain about 70% equally, What is the best selection for investor that must be contingent upon different characteristics of investors.\n\nKeywords: public servants, Defined Contribution, Replacement rate, The money’s worth ratio, Lifecycle hypothesis.
參考文獻: 一. 中文文獻:
1.王儷玲,我國公務人員兼採儲金制之可行性分析,公務人員月刊,94期,民國八十三年三月。
2.藍榆萍,勞工退休金制度投資策略之探討,淡江大學保險學系研究所碩士論文,民國九十三年。
3.黃明煜,公務人員退休撫卹基金管理與運用之研究,政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文,民國八十五年。
4.曾德宜,我國公務人員新退休撫卹制度之研究,政治大學公共行政學研究所碩士論文,民國八十四年。
5.鍾淑華,員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,民國九十四年六月。
6.林郁棻,投資組合保險策略之延伸及應用,政治大學金融研究所碩士論文,民國九十二年。
7.王昱如,投資組合保險運用在退休基金委託經營之研究,臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文,民國九十一年。
8.李宛珊,台灣退休金投資策略之模擬研究,臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文,民國九十二年。
9.柯輝芳,公元二OOO年全球退休金改革趨勢,退休基金季刊,第1卷第2期,民國89年12月
10.黃宏光,退撫基金委託經營制度現況探討,公務人員月刊第63期、台北:銓敘部發行,民90年9月。
11.梁夏怡,金融機構參與退休金運作,Advisers財務顧問第187期,民國九十三年。
12.張世傑與林妙珊,確定提撥方式下退休所得的風險評估,風險管理學報第一卷第一期,
民國88年5月。
13.彭穌蓉,風險容忍度與變額保險購買決策之研究,逢甲大學保險學系研究所碩士論文,民國九十二年十二月。
14.陳麗宇,風險承受度與資產配置之研究,彰化師範大學商業教育學系研究所碩士論文,民國九十二年六月。
15.刑益慈,確定提撥計畫下退休基金之資產配置策略,中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文,民國八十九年。
16.邱瑜明,投資組合保險策略-在台灣股市之相關研究,政治大學金融研究所士論文,      民國八十九年。
二. 英文文獻:
1. Andersson B., 2001,”Portfolio Allocation over the Life Cycle : Evidence from Swedish Household Data.”, working paper series,4.
2. Cocco, J.F., Gomes, F.J. and Maenhout, P.J., 2005,”Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life-Cycle”, The Review of Financial Studies. Vol.18,2: pp.491-533.
3. Bellante D. and Green C.A., 2004,”Relative Risk Aversion Among the Elderly”, Vol. 13,Issue 3:pp269-281
4. Bodie Z., 2002,”Life-Cycle Finance in Theory and in Practice”, working paper,2.
5. Pursaill, “Development and Trend of Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans”, 八十八年度公務人員退休撫卹基金專題研討會會議實錄。
6. Florence Legros, 2005, ”Life cycle options and preferences”,Legros KW 2nd。
7. Barber B.M. and Odean T., 2001,”Are Individual Investors Tax Savvy? Asset Location Evidence from Retail and Discount Brokerage Accounts.”, Finance Program of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Asset Location Conference.
8. Canner,N.N., Mankiw,G. and Weil,D., 1997,”An asset allocation puzzle.”, The American Economic Review87 : pp.181-191
9. Palsson,A-M., 1996,\"Does the degree of relative risk aversion vary with household characteristic?”,Journal of Economic Psychology,17,pp.771-787
10. Khorasanee M.Z., 1995,\"A Pension Plan Incorporating both Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit Principles\", Journal of Actuarial Practice, 3, pp 269-300
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險研究所
93358019
94
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093358019
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
35801901.pdf49.68 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801902.pdf74.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801903.pdf72.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801904.pdf91.58 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801905.pdf131.4 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801906.pdf207.05 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801907.pdf250.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801908.pdf267.06 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801909.pdf136.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801910.pdf85.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
35801911.pdf123.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.