Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36738
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蔡政憲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorTsai,Chenghsienen_US
dc.contributor.author雷歸安zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLei ,Quei Anen_US
dc.creator雷歸安zh_TW
dc.creatorLei ,Quei Anen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T11:24:50Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T11:24:50Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T11:24:50Z-
dc.identifierG0933580081en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36738-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description風險管理與保險研究所zh_TW
dc.description93358008zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract不論是對保險監理者或是保戶來說,保險公司是否具有清償能力一直都是大家關注的焦點。這方面的議題探討不勝枚舉。在過去的文獻裡,大家所採用的模型不竟相同,但相同的是,大家焦點都是放在保險公司破產機率這方面。\n 本文使用Moody研發的KMV模型下針對未上市公司有顯著解釋能力的PFM模型(Private Firm Model)。並利用PFM模型來預測北美壽險業的違約風險。一開始,我們先從上市的壽險業中取得足夠的資料,進而去估計未上市壽險業的資產市值及資產波動度,並利用這些資料算出違約距離(Distance-to-Default)。\n 本文的另ㄧ個重點,是將過去文獻中有顯著的比率與違約距離作比較,試圖提出一個能夠代表市場資訊的新比率。因此,我們利用羅吉斯迴歸來對照不同變數下的模型,並利用ROC(Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve)曲線下的範圍來衡量模型的適合度。\n 本文所採用的上市北美壽險業與未上市北美壽險業資料,取自CompuStat、DataStream及NAIC。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractInsurer’s solvency has always been the primary concern of insurance regulators and policyholders. Researchers therefore have strived to develop various models to identify potentially troubled insurers. Our paper will contribute to the literature by applying a new method, the KMV’s private firm model (PFM), to predict the solvency/insolvency of life insurers.In this paper, we will apply the KMV’s PFM to estimate the default risk of life insurers. We will first apply the KMV’s public firm model to public life insurers and then use the two simple mapping methods to estimate the asset value and volatility of private life insurers. The estimated values and volatilities can then be used to calculate an insurer’s distance-to-default (DD) and default probability. The predictive power of PFM will be compared with the common ratio analysis using logistic regressions and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves. The data on public and private life insurers will come from CompuStat, DataStream and NAIC’s A-list data respectively. Both are readily available at our university.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCTION 3\n2. LITERATURE REVIEW 4\n3. CREDIT RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACHES 5\n3.1 KMV EDF Credit Measure 5\n3.1.1 Measure Default Probability 7\n3.2 Private Firm ModelTM 9\n4. EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY AND DATA 11\n4.1 Public Firm Data 11\n4.2 Private Firm Data 13\n5. RESULTS 16\n5.1 The Description of the Public Firms 16\n5.1.1 The Asset Value and EBITDA 16\n5.1.2 The Market Volatility and Sales 21\n5.2 The Statistic Results of the Private Firms 25\n5.2.1 Training Samples 26\n5.2.2 Logistic Regression Results 28\n5.2.3 Summary of the Logistic Regression Results 32\n5.3 Forecast Results 34\n6. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 36\nAPPENDIX 38\nREFERENCES 44zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0933580081en_US
dc.subjectKMVen_US
dc.subjectPFMen_US
dc.subjectROCen_US
dc.title利用KMV的PFM模型來衡量美國壽險業的違約風險zh_TW
dc.titleThe Application of KMV’s Private Firm Model to the Solvency/Insolvency Predictions on US Life Insurersen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceArora, N., J. Bohn, and F. Zhu, 2005, “Reduced Form vs. Structural Models of Credit Risk: A Case Study of Three Models,” KMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlochwitz, S., T. Liebig, and M. Nyberg, 2000, “Benchmarking Deutsche Bundesbank’s Default Risk Model, the KMV Private Firm Model and Common Financial Ratios for German Corporations,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBohn, J.,2000, “An Empirical Assessment of a Simple Contingent-Claims Model for the Valuation of Risky Debt ,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBohn, J., N. Arora, and I. Korablev, 2005, “Power and Level Validation of the EDF□ Credit Measure in the U.S. Market,” KMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrosbie, P. and J. Bohn, 2003, “Modeling Default Risk,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCummins, J. D., M. F. G.race, and R. D. Phillips, “Regulatory Solvency Prediction in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 66, No. 3(Sep., 1999), 417-458zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDouglas, W. D., 2005, “Examples of Overfitting Encountered When Building Private Firm Default Prediction Models”, MKMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFalkenstein, E., A. Boral, and L. V. Carty, 2000,“RiskcalcTM For Private Companies,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKurbat, M. and I. Korablew, 2002, “Methodology for Testing the Level of the EDF Credit Measure,” KMV White Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMerton, R. C., 1974, “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOldrich, A. V.,1999, “Credit Valuation,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStein, R. M., 2005, “The Relationship Between Default Prediction and Lending Profits: Integrating ROC Analysis and Loan Pricing”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 29, pp1213-1236.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStein, R. M., A. E. Kocagil, J. Bohn and J. Akhavein, 2003, “Systematic And Idiosyncratic Risk In Middle-Market Default Prediction: A Study Of The Performance Of The RiskCale And PFM Model,” KMV corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaunders, A. and M. M. Cornett, 2003, Financial Institutions Management : A Risk Management Approach, 5th edition, Taipei:McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.