Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36764
題名: 高科技標竿政策因素之初探
An Exploratory Study on High-Tech Industry Benchmark Policy
作者: 張宗凱
Chang, Chung-Kai
貢獻者: 諶家蘭
Seng, Jia-Lang
張宗凱
Chang, Chung-Kai
關鍵詞: 標竿
高科技產業
科技政策
指標
Benchmark
High-tech Industry
Science and Technology Policy
Indicator
日期: 1998
上傳時間: 18-Sep-2009
摘要: 為了面對日益激烈的科技競爭,台灣多年來致力於高科技產業培育和技術能力的提升,期望提升我國全面競爭力,以面對21世紀的挑戰。在面對來自國際科技產業的競爭與國際市場日趨自由化的壓力,台灣希望在世界的科技舞台扮演舉足輕重的地位,則需要提升科技競爭力,而提升科技競爭力則有賴於完整結合了產業發展、國家資源、以及國家發展目標的高科技政策。\r\n本研究首先以國家競爭力的觀點切入,研讀並分析主要的國際競爭力指標,並藉由競爭力指標歸納出科技先進國家的發展趨勢,以及台灣應加強的部分。並搜集科技先進國家的科技政策、目前政經情形,以及社會人文狀況,經過研讀後整理出構成高科技標竿政策之因素。並且,以新竹科學園區的六大類高科技產業為對象,進行問卷調查工作,以驗證本研究所提出之因素是否為產業界所接受,以及是否有其他意見。\r\n研究結果顯示,在本研究所提出的31項因素中,多半皆獲得新竹科學園區經理人的認同,僅有少部分因素在不同產業或不同規模公司間,產生些微的差異。因此,本研究所提出之構成高科技標竿政策的因素,可以做為政策制定時之參考。在最後一章中,列出本研究之建議,希望對國內高科技標竿政策的制定以及科技發展有所助益。
Taiwan had devoted to fostering the high-tech industry and promoting the technology ability to face the increasingly competition of science and technology in the coming of 21 century. To confront the competition from the international high-tech industry and the pressure of the liberalization of market, Taiwan needs to improve the competitiveness of science and technology if she wants to play an important role on the worldwide science and technology stage. Besides, Taiwan needs to integrate the development of industry, national resource, and the national goals of science and technology policy.\r\nThis research uses the concept of national competitiveness first, and studies the main international competitiveness indicators. We want to derive the development trends of those advanced countries, and realize what parts we need to improve. Second, we collect the science and technology policy, the political and economical status of those countries we selected. And we sum up the benchmark factors of the high-tech industry policy. Third, we conduct a survey to verify the acceptability of the high-tech industry benchmark policy. The research results reveal that almost the benchmark principles and factors we sum up are accepted by the industry leaders.
參考文獻: 1.丁錫鏞,圖解科技政策學─21世紀新科技時代贏的戰略,嵐德出版社,民國81年。
2.王健全,”歐美日產業科技政策及其對我國之啟示”,歐美月刊,第十一卷,第四期,民國85年4月。
3.左峻德,國內外科技指標分析與建立我國競爭力指標,台灣經濟研究院,國科會會議研究報告,民國86年。
4.左峻德、尤敏君,”國家科技競爭力指標之研究”,科技發展政策報導。
5.行政院國家科學委員會,中華民國科技白皮書,行政院國家科學委員會,民國87年。
6.行政院國家科學委員會,中華民國科學技術統計要覽,行政院國家科學委員會,民國86年。
7.吳青松,科技政策制定之策略管理分析架構,國科會研究結案報告,民國79年。
8.周文欽等三人,研究方法概論,國立空中大學,民國87年。
9.林富松,我國現行高科技政策之形成與檢討,行政院國科會科資中心,民國85年。
10.林富松,高科技廠商創新過程與技術政策形成之研究,交通大學管理科學系,民國82年。
11.林慶宏,”台灣經濟發展所面臨的問題以及今後努力的方向”,台灣經濟金融月刊,第32卷,第3期,民國85年。
12.翁明祥,“企業技術策略、政府鼓勵企業研發政策與企業技術創新績效之研究”,中山管理評論,第二卷,第四期,民國83年。
13.陳井星,科技政策發展論文集,台灣經濟研究院,民國75年。
14.陳永裕,台灣產業技術研發之現況與政策分析,中山大學社會科學研究所,民國87年。
15.曾信超、李隆生,”我國科技政策的現況和未來發展方向的探討”,1998中華民國科技管理年會暨論文研討會論文集,民國87年。
16.蕭峰雄,“高科技技術密集產業之定義”,工業簡訊,第十四卷,第三期,PP. 9-11。
17.諶家蘭,企業標竿的制定與企業再造的關係,兩岸管理科學研討會,中國上海,民國84年。
18.Bogan, C. and English, M. , Benchmarking for Best Practice , McGraw-Hill Inc. , 1994。
19.Branscomb, Lewis M. and Keller, James H. (eds.) , Investing in Innovation , MIT Press , 1997。
20.Camp, Robert C. , Benchmarking the Search for Industry Best Pratice that Lead to Superior Performance , ASQC Quality Press , 1991。
21.Chen, C.F. and Graham, S. ,“Strategies for Technological Development in South Korea and Taiwan : The Case of Semiconductors”, Research Policy , Vol.25 , No.5 , pp.759-783 , 1996。
22.Davis, L.A. , Technology Intensity of U.S. Output and Trade , Office of Trade and Investment Analysis U.S. Department , 1982。
23.Gray, J. , Benchmark Handbook , Morgan Kaufmann Inc., San Mateo , CA , 1983。
24.Hal, B. ,“U.S. Technology Policy in the Information Age” , Communication of The ACM , Vol.39 , No.6 , pp.15-18 , 1996。
25.Hillis, W.D. ,“Technology Policy : Is American on the Right Track ?”, HBR , Vol.70 , No.3 , pp.140-157 , 1992。
26.IMD , The World Competitiveness Yearbook, IMD , 1998。
27.Mansfield, E. ,“Academic Research and Industrial Innovation”, Research Policy , Vol.28 , No.7-8 , pp.773-776 , 1998。
28.Michel, J. ,“Performance measurement and performance management”, International Journal of Production Economics , Vol.41 , No.1-3 , pp.23-35 , 1995。
29.Mowery, D. , Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies , Kluwer Academic Publishers , 1994。
30.National Science Foundation , Science &Engineering Indicators 1998 , NSF , 1998。
31.Noori , H. and Munro H. and Deszca G. ,“Managing the P/SDI process:best-in-class principles and leading practices”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol.13 , No.3 , pp.245-268 , 1997。
32.OECD, Science , Technology and Industry scoreboard of indicators 1997 , OECD , 1997。
33.Porter, M. , The Competitive Advantages of Nations , The Fress Press , 1990。
34.Radosvic, S.,“Technology Policy for the 90s: 25 Tips for a Policy Maker”, Science and Public Policy , pp.251-258 , 1991。
35.Roessner, J. D. , Indicators of Technological Competitiveness, NSF , 1989。
36.Roessner, J.D. and Porter, Alan L. ,Implementation and Further Analysis of Indicators of Technology-based Competitiveness , NSF , 1995。
37.Roessner, J.D. and Proter, A.L. and Newman, N. , 1996 Indicators of Technology-Based Competitiveness of Nations─Summary Report , TPAC , Georgia Institute of Technology , 1997。
38.Roessner, J.D. and Proter, A.L. and Newman, N. and Cauffiel, D. ,“Anticipating the Future High-Tech Competitiveness of Nation:Indicators for Twenty-Eight Countries”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Vol.51 , No.1 , pp.133-149 , 1996。
39.Roessner, J.D. and Proter, A.L. and Newman, N. and Cauffiel, D. ,“Indicators of high technology competitiveness of 28 countries”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol.12 , No.1 , pp.1-32 , 1996。
40.Rothwell and Zegveld , Industrial Innovation and Public Policy , Frances Printer , 1992。
41.Schoening, N.C. and Souder, W.E. and Lee, J. and Cooper, R. ,“The influence of government science and technology policies on new product development in the USA , UK , South Korea and Taiwan”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol.15 , No.8 , pp.821-835 , 1998。
42.Science and Technology Agency , Japanese Government , White Paper on Science and Technology 1997 , Japan Science and Technology Corporation , 1997。
43.Simpson, B. and Craig, J. ,“A Policy for Science Innovation:The New Zealand Experience”, Science and Public Policy , Vol.24 , No.2 , pp.70-78 , 1997。
44.Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. ,“The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization in Academic Science and Technology”, Science , Technology and Human Values , Vol.21 , No.3 , pp.303-339 , 1996。
45.Stevens, C. ,“Mapping Innovation”, OECD Observer , Vol.207 , pp.16-19 , 1997。
46.WEF , Global Competitiveness Report 1998 , WEF , 1998。
47.Yang, C. and Tarng, M. Y. and Lai, C. S. and Lin, Z.B. ,“The performance indicators for science and technology projects in Taiwan”, International Journal of Materials and Product Technology , Vol.12 , No.4-6 , pp.307-319 , 1997。
48.Yoichi , Tanaka and Ryo , Hirasawa ,“Features of Policy-Making Process in Japan’s Council for Science and Technology” , Research Policy , Vol.25 , 1996。
49.http://www.hitehouse.gov/OSTP.html
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理研究所
86356017
87
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001645
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.