Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38314
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor張奕華zh_TW
dc.contributor.author張雅惠zh_TW
dc.creator張雅惠zh_TW
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-07T13:57:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-07T13:57:59Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-07T13:57:59Z-
dc.identifierG0095152003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38314-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description95152003zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究鑒於行銷對非營利組織之重要性、文教類基金會為台灣基金會的主要類型、關係行銷的研究方興未艾、關係行銷對於非營利組織所能發揮之利益,以文教基金會或教育事務基金會為研究對象,探討其所採用的關係行銷策略、所知覺的關係行銷品質、關係行銷策略與品質之間的關係。研究者採用問卷調查法,以自編之「非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質調查問卷」為研究工具,以符合本研究目的之300家文教基金會或教育事務基金會為研究對象,共發出600份問卷,扣除無效問卷後,共回收453份,回收率為75.5%。。預試階段共回收123份預試問卷,正式施測共回收453份正式問卷。\n 本研究獲致結論如下:\n一、 我國非營利組織整體關係行銷策略之運用現況仍有待改進,就各層面而言,以「建立策略」與「維繫策略」運用現況較佳,而「提升策略」運用現況較差。\n二、 我國非營利組織整體關係品質介於「普通」及「經常如此」之間,就各層面而言,以「關係承諾」程度最高,「關係滿意」與「關係信賴」現況較差。\n三、 「宗教背景」及「治理與領導方式」是影響基金會關係行銷策略之重要環境因素。\n四、 「成立年限」與「服務項目」是影響基金會關係行銷策略與關係品質之重要環境因素。\n五、 基金會成員之「年齡」及「教育程度」是影響基金會關係行銷策略之重要人口因素。\n六、 基金會成員之「宗教信仰」、「職務性質」及「工作報酬」是影響基金會關係行銷策略與關係品質之重要人口因素。\n七、 非營利組織關係行銷策略能正向影響關係品質。\n 本研究對文教類基金會提出如下建議:\n一、 基金會領導者宜瞭解非營利行銷與營利導向行銷之根本性差異,並重視關係行銷對非營利組織之重要性。\n二、 基金會應主動提高服務或財貨的附加價值,使「正規服務」提升至「感動服務」。\n三、 基金會應重視並維護捐助者的權益,並使產品或服務符合捐助者期待,以增進捐助者對基金會的關係信賴及滿意。\n四、 無論何種特性的基金會,均應重視關係行銷策略及關係品質對非營利組織之重要性,以追求組織永續競爭力。\n五、 基金會宜體認到關係行銷策略的運用程度愈高,其關係品質也愈高。\n六、 教育行政機關可扮演文教基金會的交流平台,提供不同性質基金會之間對話與合作的機會,進而提高基金會之關係品質。\n 最後,本研究分別對後續研究就研究對象、研究變項與研究方法提出建議。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn this study, in view of the importance of marketing to non-profit organizations, cultural and educational foundations as the main types of Taiwan`s foundations, relationship marketing research in the ascendant, the interests developed by relationship marketing in regard to non-profit organizations, the researcher took cultural and educational foundations or educational matters foundations as the research objects to explore the relationship marketing strategies they use, the quality of relationship marketing they perceive, and the relationship between relationship marketing strategies and quality. The researcher used questionnaire survey methods, used self-designed \"the questionnaire of relationship marketing strategies and relationship quality of non-profit organizations\" as a research tool, used 300 cultural and educational foundations or educational matters foundations that meet the purpose of this study as the research objects. And the researcher issued a total of 600 copies of questionnaires, excluding invalid questionnaires, and 453 copies were recovered and the recovery rate is 75.5%. A total of 123 pre-test questionnaires were \nRecovered at the pre-trial stage, and a total of 453 formal questionnaires were recovered at the formally measuring stage.\n\n The researchers got the following conclusions in this study:\n1. The current use situations of the overall relationship marketing strategies of non-profit organizations in Taiwan are still to be improved. For each level, the current use situations of \"building strategy\" and \"maintaining strategy\" are better, but \"upgrading strategy\" is worse.\n2. The overall relationship quality of non-profit organizations in Taiwan is between \"common\" and \"often so\". For each level, the level of \"relationship commitment\" is the highest, but the current statuses of \"relationship satisfaction\" and \"relationship trust\" are worse.\n3. \"Religious background\" and \"ways of management and leadership\" are the important environmental factors that impact relationship marketing strategies of foundations.\n4. \"The fixed number of years of establishment\" and \"service items\" are the important environmental factors that affect relationship marketing strategies and quality of relationship of foundations.\n5. The \"age\" and \"educational level\" of the members of foundations are the important demographic factors that affect relationship marketing strategies of foundations.\n6. The \"religion,\" \"nature of the duties,\" and \"work remuneration\" of the members of foundations are the important demographic factors that affect relationship marketing strategies and quality of relationship of foundations.\n7. Relationship marketing strategies for non-profit organizations can positively affect relationship quality.\n\n This study brings up the following suggestion for cultural and educational foundations:\n1. Foundation leaders should understand the fundamental differences of non-profit marketing and profit-oriented marketing and value the importance of relationship marketing for non-profit organizations.\n2. Foundations should actively improve the added values of the services or currency and finances to make \"regular services\" upgrade to \"moving services.\"\n3. Foundations should value and maintain the interests of donors and make products or services meet the expectations of donors to enhance donors’ relationship trust and satisfaction to the foundations.\n4. No matter what kind of characteristics foundations belong to, they should value the importance of relationship marketing strategies and relationship quality for non-profit organizations to pursue the sustainable competitive power of organizations.\n5. Foundations should realize that if the use level of relationship marketing strategies is higher, the relationship quality will be also higher.\n6. Educational administrative authorities may play the roles of exchange platforms of cultural and educational foundations to provide opportunities of conversations and cooperation between different natures of foundations and thereby increase the quality of relationship between foundations.\n\n Finally, this study respectively brings up some recommendations for research objects, research variables, and research methods of the follow-up studies.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents目 次\n第一章 緒 論 1\n第一節 研究動機 1\n第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5\n第三節 名詞釋義 6\n第四節 研究方法與步驟 7\n第五節 研究範圍與限制 10\n第二章 文獻探討 13\n第一節 非營利組織之相關研究 13\n第二節 關係行銷策略之相關研究 33\n第三節 關係品質之相關研究 47\n第四節 關係行銷策略與關係品質之相關研究 56\n第三章 研究設計與實施 63\n第一節 研究架構 63\n第二節 研究對象 66\n第三節 研究工具 68\n第四節 實施程序 78\n第五節 資料處理與統計分析 79\n第四章 研究結果分析與討論 83\n第一節 非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質之現況分析 83\n第二節 不同基金會特性關係行銷策略關係品質差異分析 88\n第三節 不同人口變項關係行銷策略與關係品質之差異分析 109\n第四節 非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質之線性關係 126\n第五章 結論與建議 131\n第一節 研究結論 131\n第二節 研究建議 136\n參考文獻 141\n壹、中文部分 141\n貳、英文部分 145\n附 錄 151\n壹、非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質專家效度調查問卷 151\n貳、非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質預試問卷 159\n參、非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質調查問卷 163\n \n表 次\n表2-1 組織的分類 20\n表2-2 非營利組織的特徵 22\n表2-3非營利導向行銷與營利導向行銷 27\n表2-4 非營利組織與關係行銷 35\n表2-5 關係行銷的層次 38\n表3-1 專家效度審查名單一覽表 70\n表3-2 非營利組織關係行銷策略量表之專家內容效度審查統計表 72\n表3-3 非營利組織關係品質量表之專家內容效度審查統計表 73\n表3-4 非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質調查問卷信度分析摘要表 74\n表3-5樣本大小與因素負荷量之關係 75\n表3-6 關係行銷策略量表轉軸後因素分析摘要表 76\n表3-7 關係品質量表轉軸後因素分析摘要表 77\n表 4-1 基金會關係行銷策略及其因素之平均數與標準差 84\n表 4-2基金會關係行銷策略題目之平均數與標準差 85\n表 4-3 基金會關係品質及其因素之平均數與標準差 86\n表 4-4 基金會關係品質題目之平均數與標準差 87\n表 4-5 不同宗教背景基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 89\n表 4-6 不同宗教背景基金會關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 90\n表 4-7 不同成立年限基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 91\n表 4-8 不同成立年限基金會關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 92\n表 4-9 不同服務區域基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 92\n表 4-10 不同服務區域基金會關係行銷各向度之差異分析摘要表 93\n表 4-11 不同服務項目基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 94\n表 4-12 不同服務項目基金會關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 95\n表 4-13 不同資金來源基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 95\n表 4-14 不同資金來源基金會關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 96\n表 4-15 不同治理與領導方式基金會關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 96\n表 4-16 不同治理與領導方式基金會關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 97\n表 4-17 不同宗教背景基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 98\n表 4-18 不同宗教背景基金會關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 98\n表 4-19 不同成立年限基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 99\n表 4-20 不同成立年限基金會關係行銷各向度之差異分析摘要表 99\n表 4-21 不同服務區域基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 100\n表 4-22 不同服務區域基金會關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 100\n表 4-23 不同服務項目基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 101\n表 4-24 不同服務項目基金會關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 102\n表 4-25 不同資金來源基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 103\n表 4-26 不同資金來源基金會關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 103\n表 4-27 不同治理與領導方式基金會關係品質之差異分析摘要表 104\n表 4-28 不同治理與領導方式基金會關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 104\n表 4-29不同基金會特性在關係行銷策略之差異分析 108\n表 4-30不同基金會特性在關係品質之差異分析 108\n表 4-31不同性別基金會成員運用關係行銷策略各向度T考驗摘要表 109\n表 4-32 不同年齡成員運用關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 110\n表 4-33不同年齡成員運用關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 111\n表 4-34 不同教育程度運用關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 111\n表 4-35不同教育程度成員運用關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 112\n表 4-36 不同宗教信仰成員運用關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 113\n表 4-37不同宗教信仰成員運用關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 113\n表 4-38 不同服務年資成員運用關係行銷策略之差異分析摘要表 114\n表 4-39不同服務年資成員運用關係行銷策略各向度之差異分析摘要表 115\n表 4-40不同職務性質基金會成員運用關係行銷策略各向度T考驗摘要表 115\n表 4-41不同工作報酬成員運用關係行銷策略各向度T考驗摘要表 116\n表 4-42不同性別基金會成員知覺關係品質各向度T考驗摘要表 117\n表 4-43 不同年齡成員知覺關係品質之差異分析摘要表 117\n表 4-44不同年齡成員知覺關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 118\n表 4-45 不同教育程度成員知覺關係品質之差異分析摘要表 118\n表 4-46不同教育程度成員知覺關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 119\n表 4-47 不同宗教信仰成員知覺關係品質之差異分析摘要表 120\n表 4-48不同宗教信仰成員知覺關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 120\n表 4-49不同服務年資成員知覺關係品質之差異分析摘要表 121\n表 4-50不同服務年資成員知覺關係品質各向度之差異分析摘要表 121\n表 4-51不同職務性質基金會成員知覺關係品質各向度T考驗摘要表 122\n表 4-52不同工作報酬基金會成員知覺關係品質各向度T考驗摘要表 123\n表 4-53不同人口變項在關係行銷策略之差異分析 125\n表 4-54不同人口變項在關係行銷策略之差異分析 126\n表4-55模式適配度分析摘要表 128\n表4-56 估計值摘要表 129\n \n圖 次\n圖1-1 研究流程 9\n圖2-1 非營利組織、政府與企業對社會需求的回應 16\n圖2-2 非營利組織的範疇 19\n圖2-3 行銷組合 29\n圖2-4 策略性行銷規劃程序 (SMPP) 31\n圖2-5 關係行銷的顧客忠誠度階梯 37\n圖2-6 關係行銷的定義 41\n圖2-7 關係行銷與交易行銷的特性 42\n圖2-8 關係銷售架構 44\n圖2-9 關係品質模型 49\n圖2-10 關係行銷的KMV模型 50\n圖2-11 BTC關係行銷的結果集合 52\n圖2-12 關係品質模型 53\n圖3-1 研究架構圖 63\n圖3-2 問卷架構與題數 69\n圖4-1 非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質之假設模式 127\n圖4-2 非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質之路徑模式 128zh_TW
dc.format.extent91263 bytes-
dc.format.extent145502 bytes-
dc.format.extent135106 bytes-
dc.format.extent68694 bytes-
dc.format.extent202003 bytes-
dc.format.extent624335 bytes-
dc.format.extent533982 bytes-
dc.format.extent306759 bytes-
dc.format.extent421911 bytes-
dc.format.extent193933 bytes-
dc.format.extent185095 bytes-
dc.format.extent175055 bytes-
dc.format.extent162314 bytes-
dc.format.extent160066 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095152003en_US
dc.subject非營利組織zh_TW
dc.subject關係行銷策略zh_TW
dc.subject關係品質zh_TW
dc.subjectnon-profit organizationsen_US
dc.subjectrelationship marketing strategyen_US
dc.subjectrelationship qualityen_US
dc.title非營利組織關係行銷策略與關係品質之研究zh_TW
dc.titleResearch on the relationship between relationship marketing strategies and relationship quality of non-profit organizationsen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference方世榮(1997,3月)。關係品質的探討─旅行業的實證研究。載於國立政治大學企業管理學系舉辦之「第三界服務管理研討會」會議論文集(頁A4-1)。台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王怡惠(2008)。非營利事業的關係行銷─以某一社會福利組織捐款人為例。東海大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北市:天下遠見。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修(1994)。非營利組織領導行為之研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告(NSC82-0301-H-004-060)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修、陳定銘(1999)。我國基金會之問題與健全之道。載於江明修(主編),第三部門:經營策略與社會參與(頁215-267)。台北市:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修(譯)(2003)。A. C. Hudock(著)。非政府組織。台北市:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修、陳定銘(2006)。台灣基金會的法制規範。載於蕭新煌、江明zh_TW
dc.relation.reference修、官有垣(主編),基金會在台灣:結構與類型(頁123-146)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference回饋NPO聯合網(無日期)。97年度教育基金會終身學習列車。2009年3月5日取自http://www.meworks.net/meworksv2a/meworks/page.aspx?no=28011zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。台北市:高等教zh_TW
dc.relation.reference育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余佩珊(譯)(1994)。P. F. Druker(著)。非營利機構的經營之道。台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北市: 遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳明隆、涂金堂(2005)。SPSS與統計應用分析(第二版)。台北市:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳勇德(2001)。關係行銷方式對於顧客忠誠度的影響─以資訊教育業為例。國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference官有垣、王仕圖(2000)。非營利組織的相關理論。載於蕭新煌(主編),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference非營利部門 : 組織與運作(頁1-42)。台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱渝媗(2005)。船公司關係行銷對關係品質與行銷績效影響之研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國立海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文,未出版,基隆市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周逸衡(1986年6月)。服務業的行銷策略。卓越雜誌,22,24-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周逸衡、黃毓瑩、陳華寧(2005)。應用關係行銷於非營利組織之捐助者─以社會福利慈善事業基金會為例。行銷評論,2(1),1-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林裕堂(2002)。消費合作社關係行銷策略之研究。國立台北大學合作經濟學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference紀舒智(2003)。從關係行銷探討關係品質與顧客自發行為之研究─以國內某銀行應收帳款債權承購業務為例。銘傳大學管理科學研究所在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范揚松(1996)。暢銷A計畫:顧客滿意與關係行銷讀本。台北市:金台灣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許士軍(1980)。非營利事業行銷。國立政治大學學報,41,1-17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許士軍(2006年6月)。行銷下一步──關係行銷。經理人月刊,19,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許世芸、蔡進發、蕭至惠、李佳臻(2007)。關係行銷對服務品質、關係品質與顧客忠誠度影響之研究。管理實務與理論研究,1(1),144-166。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference畢宣銘(1999)。非營利組織關係行銷作為、關係行銷品質知覺與成員捐助意圖間關係之研究。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference財團法人喜馬拉雅研究發展基金會(2005)。台灣300家主要基金會名錄。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference教育部(2000)。全國文教基金會名錄。台北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳怡文(2004)。從關係行銷觀點研究影響關係品質與忠誠意願之因素─以證卷產業為例。輔仁大學管理學研究所在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳定銘(1998)。我國非營利組織基金會之研究。載於江明修(主編),非營利組織論叢:非營利組織管理之道(頁150-196)。台北市:國立政治大學公共行政學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳顯忠(1998)。非營利組織關係行銷策略之研究—以社會福利慈善事業基金會為例。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張在山(譯)(1991)。P. Kotler 與 A. R. Andreasen(著)。非營利事業的策略性行銷。台北市:授學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張奕華、許正妹(2008)。研究方法與軟體應用─概念及實例。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張淑鈴(2002)。社會福利基金會捐款人關係行銷應用之研究。南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張菀麟(2006)。網路購物關係行銷策略對關係品質與顧客忠誠度之影響研究。國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference喬木(譯)(2004)。D. J. Huffman(著)。行銷學之父:菲利浦.科特勒。台北市:海洋文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾光華(1995)。關係行銷與顧客資料庫。第二屆中小企業管理研討會論文集(下),129-138。台北市:經濟部中小企業處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃俊英(2004)。行銷學原理。台北市:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃愛玲(2007)。從關係行銷來探討非營利組織募款─以我國私立大學為例。東海大學行政管理暨政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮燕(2000)。導論:非營利組織之定義、功能與發展。載於蕭新煌(主zh_TW
dc.relation.reference編),非營利部門 : 組織與運作(頁247-289)。台北市 :巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference傅篤誠(2002)。非營利事業管理:議題導向與管理策略。台北縣:新文京開發。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊東震(2005)。非營利事業行銷。台北縣:新文京開發。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸宛蘋(2000)。非營利組織的行銷管理與募款策略。載於蕭新煌(主編),非營利部門 : 組織與運作(頁1-42)。台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸宛蘋、吳芝嫻(2006)。台灣的教育基金會。載於蕭新煌、江明修、官有垣(主編),基金會在台灣:結構與類型(頁234-285)。台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭文龍(2007)。多變量分析最佳入門實用書:SPSS + LISERL (SEM)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台北市:碁峰資訊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭新煌(2000)。台灣非營利組織的現況與特色。載於蕭新煌(主編),非營利部門 : 組織與運作(頁109-127)。台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛朝龍(1996)。服務業關係行銷策略運用程度之探討。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝福樹(2001)。從關係行銷探討關係品質之模式─以我國銀行業為例。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顧忠華(2000)。台灣非營利組織的公共性與自主性。台灣社會學研究,4,145-189。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference貳、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (1999). Management control in nonprofitzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrganizations (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBejou, D., Wray, B., & Ingram, T. N. (1996). Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural analysis. Journal of Business Research, 36, 137-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. T. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on services marketing (pp. 25-28). Chicago: American Marketing Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services: Growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1991). Marketing services: Competing through quality. New York: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrinckerhoff, P. C. (1997). Mission-based marketing: How your non-for-profit can succeed in a more competitive world. New York: John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrodie, R. J., Coviello, N. E., Brookes, R. W., & Little, V. (1997). Towardszh_TW
dc.relation.referencea paradigm shift in marketing? An examination of current marketingzh_TW
dc.relation.referencepractices. Journal of Marketing Management, 13, 383-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrinckerhoff, P. C. (2000). Mission-based management: Leading your not-for-profit in the 21st century. New York: John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCopulsky, J. R., & Wolf, M. J. (1990). Relationship marketing: Positioning for the future. The Journal of Business Strategy, 11(4), 16-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54, 68-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDwyer, F. R., & Oh, S. (1987). Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 347-358.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of marketing, 51, 11-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEgan, J. (2001). Relationship marketing: Exploring relationship strategieszh_TW
dc.relation.referencein marketing. New York: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, J. R., & Berman, B. (1995). Principles of marketing (3th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFriman, M., Gärling, T., Millett, B., Mattson, J., & Johnston, R. (2002). An analysis of international business-to-business relationships based on the commitment-trust theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 403-409.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGelatt, J. P. (1992). Management nonprofit organizations in the 21st century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, I. H. (1998). Relationship marketing: New strategies, techniqueszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand technologies to win the customers you want and keep them forever. New York: John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrönroos, C. (1990). Relationship approach to marketing in service contexts: The marketing and organizational behavior interface. Journal of Business Research, 20, 3-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrönroos, C. (1991). The marketing strategy continuum: A marketing concept for the 1990s. Management Decision, 29(1), 7-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrönroos, C. (1994). From marketing mix to relationship marketing: Toward a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32(2), 4-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGruen, T. W. (1995). The outcome set of relationship marketing in customer markets. International Business Review, 4(4), 447-469.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGummesson, E. (1991). Marketing-organization revisited: The crucial role of the part-time marketer. European Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 60-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGummesson, E. (1994). Making relationship marketing operational. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5), 5-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHannagan, T. J. (1992). Marketing for the non-profit sector. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIacobucci, D., & Hibbard, J. D. (1999). Toward an encompassing theory ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencebusiness marketing relationships and interpersonal commercialzh_TW
dc.relation.referencerelationships: An empirical generalization. Journal of Interactivezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarketing, 13(3), 13-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJackson Jr., D. W. (1994). Relationship selling: The personalization of relationship marketing [Electronic version]. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 2(1), 45-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames, E. (1990). Economic theories of the nonprofit sector: A comparativezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceperspective. In H. K. Anheier & W. Seibel (Eds.), The third sector:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComparative studies of nonprofit organizations (pp. 21-29). Berlin: dezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKa-shing, W., & Ennew, C. F. (2004). Business-to-business relationshipzh_TW
dc.relation.referencequality. European Journal of Marketing, 38, 1252-1271.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKotler, P., & Andreasen, A. R. (1987). Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations (3th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (1995). The effect of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Search, 32(1), 54-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLagace, R. R., Dahlstrom, R., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (1991). The relevance of ethical salesperson behavior on relationship quality: The pharmaceutical industry. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 11(4), 39-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevitt, T. (1986). The marketing imagination. New York: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCort, J. D. (1994). A framework for evaluating the relational extent of a relationship marketing strategy: The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Direct Marketing, 8(2), 53-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePalmer, A. (2000). Cultural influences on relationship marketing. In T.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHennig- Thurau, & U. Hansen (Eds.), Relationship marketing:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGaining competitive advantage through customer satisfaction andzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecustomer retention (pp. 271-278). Berlin: Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePalmer, A., & Bejou, D. (2005). The future of relationship marketing. In A. Palmer & D. Bejou (Eds.), The future of relationship marketing (pp. 1-10). Binghamton, New York: Best Business Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePayne, A., Christopher, M., Clark, M., & Peck, H. (1995). Relationship marketing for competitive advantage. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRados, D. L. (1981). Marketing for non-profit organizations (2th ed.). Westport, CT: Auburn House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRothschild, M. L. (1979). Marketing communications in nonbusiness situations or why it’s so hard to sell brotherhood like soap. Journal of Marketing, 43, 11-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSalamon, L. M. (1999). America’s nonprofit sector: A primer (2th ed.). New York: The Foundation Center.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSargeant, A. (1999). Marketing management for nonprofit organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaxe, R., & Weitz, B. A. (1982). The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 343-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShapiro, B. P. (1973). Marketing for nonprofit organizations. Havard Business Review, 51, 123-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSorce, P. (2002). Relationship marketing strategy. Retrieved November 25, 2008, from http://print.rit.edu/pubs/02_04_sorce.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, D. T. (1995). An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 335-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWolf, T. (1999). Management a nonprofit organization in the twenty-first century. New York: Fireside.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWray, B., Palmer, A., & Bejou, D. (1994). Using neural network analysis to evaluate buyer-seller relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 28(10), 32-48.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
200301.pdf89.12 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200302.pdf142.09 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200303.pdf131.94 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200304.pdf67.08 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200305.pdf197.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200306.pdf609.7 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200307.pdf521.47 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200308.pdf299.57 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200309.pdf412.02 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200310.pdf189.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200311.pdf180.76 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200312.pdf170.95 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200313.pdf158.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
200314.pdf156.31 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.