Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38526
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor耿曙zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorkeng, Shuen_US
dc.contributor.author陳威仰zh_TW
dc.creator陳威仰zh_TW
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T06:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-09T06:49:15Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-09T06:49:15Z-
dc.identifierG0094260008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38526-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description東亞研究所zh_TW
dc.description94260008zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract民進黨的執政並未改減緩台商西進大陸的現象,如今政黨再次輪替,兩岸關係更是日益密切,但台灣與大陸畢竟因為長期的政治對立造成社會隔閡,彼此之間在許多層面都存在著差異。當越來越多台灣人前進大陸的同時,台灣人在當地社會融入不及經濟融入的現象也屢見不鮮,其中又以台商「抱團群聚」為具體行為。面對這樣一群存有差異,甚至曾經敵對的一群人,既像自己人又像是外人,在當地獲取經濟利益時,卻刻意與當地社會保持距離的情形,一般大陸人會有怎樣的感受?\n\n 「社會認同理論」主張,族群的產生,會因為自尊的需求,不斷進行族群間的比較,當低群體成員無法像高群體進行身分移動時,會轉向自身的群體尋求提高自尊,於是族群間的偏見、對立,乃至衝突是不可避免的。「群際接觸假說」認為,族群間的偏見是因為對彼此的不熟悉,或因為資訊不足、或因為負面的訊息,透過正向條件下的接觸是可以消除彼此雙方的偏見,族群間的對立和衝突是可以避免的。\n\n 認同研究認為,人的認同會因為時間和地點的不同而改變,所以「上海」反而成為此次研究的關鍵因素,在上海的外來大陸人認為台灣人就以在上海來說,相對上海人而言反而比較像是「我群」的成員,所以對台灣人在上海抱團群聚的行為並不感到反感,甚至本身也是這種行為的成員之一。對上海人而言,台灣人抱團群聚的現象根本就是見怪不怪,由於上海特殊的移民文化,使得上海人的認同反而多元共存,甚至認為台灣人在某些層面比起其他大陸人更接近上海人的「我群」成員,特殊的移民多元文化創造上海不斷的進步、繁榮,而後者又不斷吸引新的移民進入。\n\n 不同群際接觸假說,上海獨特的移民歷史,改變了前者對「接觸」的定義,在多元文化的社會中,人們對其他族群和文化的包容力會變大,不一定要經過實質的接觸,或是正面的訊息傳遞。不以「同化」為目的,而是一種包容「差異」的能力,而上海本身便是把多元文化形成可能的一個場域,這或許就是上海獨特其它中國城市的原因,也是她迷人的所在。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUnder the increasingly frequent exchanges between Taiwan and China, Taiwanese people tend to congregate and inhabit certain regions of Shanghai. In face of immigrants who look both familiar and alien, how will most Mainlanders react, especially when social inclusion lags behind economic inclusion of these people? The contact theory proposes that positive contacts or reception of positive messages between ethnic groups can help iron out mutual biases. However, this study discovers the unique history of Shanghai about immigrants in foreign concessions and thus further extends this theory. A multi-cultural environment may affect one ethnic group’s tolerance of another group even without positive contacts or reception of positive messages between them. This is not any kind of assimilation but a phenomenon of people’s tolerance of minor differences. In addition to positive contacts and reception of positive messages, mutual tolerance among different ethnic groups may also be affected by the culture of the “field” they reside in.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents壹、 導論\n一、 前言……………………………………………………………1\n二、 相關文獻………………………………………………………3\n三、 研究設計………………………………………………………7\n四、 研究方法………………………………………………………10\n貳、 相關背景\n一、 族群意涵 ……………………………………………………12\n二、 兩岸差異與台商抱團群聚 …………………………………16\n參、 態度與認同\n一、 態度研究 ……………………………………………………23\n二、 認同的多樣性 ………………………………………………34\n三、 上海移民認同,我群抑或他群?……………………………39\n肆、 文化解釋\n一、 都市理論與文化研究 ………………………………………53\n二、 上海獨特的移民歷史 ………………………………………58\n伍、 結論\n一、 理論回顧 ……………………………………………………70\n二、 多元與繁榮 …………………………………………………72\n參考書目 ……………………………………………………………………76\n附錄一 訪談案例 …………………………………………………………82\n附錄二 訪談題綱 …………………………………………………………83zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094260008en_US
dc.subject上海zh_TW
dc.subject移民文化zh_TW
dc.subject認同研究zh_TW
dc.subject群際接觸zh_TW
dc.subjectShanghaien_US
dc.subjectimmigrant cultureen_US
dc.subjectintergroup contacten_US
dc.subjectidentity researchen_US
dc.title上海移民文化下的多元認同:以台商「抱團群聚」為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe multi-cultural identity of immigrants in Shanghai:behavior of Taiwan businessmen`s livesen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference上海證大研究所編,新上海人(香港:三聯書店有限公司,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王佳煌,都市社會學(台北市:三民,2005年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石之瑜、姚源明,「社會科學研究認同的幾個途徑」,東亞研究,第三十五卷第一期(2004)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference冷則剛,「中國與『全球城市』:上海市發展的政治經濟分析」,何思因、陳德昇、耿曙編,中國大陸研究方法與成果(台北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心,2003),頁283-314。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference冷則剛,資訊產業全球化的政治分析-以上海市發展為例(台北:印刻,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳圳義,清末上海租界社會(台北:文史哲出版社,1978)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明,重購兩岸與世界圖像(台北:生智,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李惠斌主編,全球化與公民社會(桂林:廣西師範大學出版社,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李廣均,「從過客到定居者—戰後台灣『外省族群』形成與轉變的境況分析」,社會文化學報,第三期(1996),頁369-371。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference佟新,「全球化下的國際人口遷移」,中國人口科學(北京市:中國人口科學編輯部),第5期(2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周大鳴,「外來工與『二元社區』:珠江三角洲的考察」,中山大學學報(社會科學板),第40卷第2期(2000年),頁108-113。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周振華、陳向明、黃建富編,世界城市:國際經驗與上海發展(上海:上海社會科學院出版社,2004)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尚宇晨,「上海與紐約移民的來源與動力」,文教資料(江蘇省南京市:南京師範大學),下旬刊(2006年5月),頁210-211。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林廣,「移民與紐約城市發展」,城市問題(北京市:北京市社會科會院),第2期,總第88期(1999),頁62-63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡幼慧編,質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(台北市:巨流圖書,1996)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡蘇雲,「上海台灣人的社會融入分析」,社會科學,第8期(2006),頁125-135。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference倪志娟,「全球化時代的文化交往與文化整合」,青海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)(青海省西寧市),第4期,總第117期(2006),頁43-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference唐振常主編,上海史(上海:上海人民出版社,1989)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫嘉明、王勛編,全球社會學:跨國界現象的分析(北京:清華大學出版社,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐甡民,上海市民社會史論(上海:文匯出版社,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐雪筠等編,上海近代社會經濟發展概況1882-1931—海關十年報告(上海:上海社會科學院,1985)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference耿曙,「『連綴社群』:WTO背景下兩岸民間互動的分析概念」,載許光泰主編,世貿組織與兩岸發展(台北:政治大學國際關係研究中心,2003),頁457- 487。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference耿曙,「『資訊人』抑或『台灣人』?:大上海地區高科技台商的國家認同」,發表於第二屆「政治與資訊」研討會(宜蘭:佛光人文社會學院政治研究所主辦,2002年4月11~12日)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉文,「歐洲反移民情緒高漲」,遠見雜誌,第194期(2002年8月),頁84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張亞中,兩岸統合論(台北:生智,2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張建成,「獨石與巨傘:多元文化主義的過與不及」,教育研究期刊,第53輯第2期(2007年6月),頁129-143。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張瑩瑞、佐斌,「社會認同理論及其發展」,心理科學進展(武漢),第14卷第3期(2006),頁475-480。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張靜主編,身份認同研究(上海:上海人民出版社,2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明,社會科學質的研究(台北市:五南圖書出版社,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳晶、佐斌,「群際接觸理論介評」,心理學探新(江西),第24卷第1期(2004),頁74-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳朝政,「大陸台商的認同變遷:理論的歸納與推論」,東亞研究,第三十六卷第一期(2005),頁227~274。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳朝政,「台商在兩岸的流動與認同:經驗研究與政策分析」,東吳大學政治學系博士論文(2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference斯蒂芬‧卡斯爾斯著,黃語生譯,「全球化與移民:若干緊迫的矛盾」,國際社會科學雜誌,第2期(1999),頁23-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游姵瑜,「移民時代來臨轉動地球新經濟」,卓越雜誌,第227期(2007年9月),頁94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference費孝通,鄉土中國,第一版(香港:三聯書店有限公司,1991)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃生,「乞丐與廟公」,科學月刊,第36卷第12期(2005),頁945。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃惠娟、周啟東,「三十萬台灣人移居上海大調查」,商業周刊,第723期(2001),頁94-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊伯淑,全球化:起源、發展和影響(北京:人民出版社,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊瑪利,「上海,重回世界中心」,天下雜誌,第243期(2001),頁122-138。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference聖‧胡安著,肖文燕編,「全球化時代的多元文化主義癥結」,馬克思主義與現實(雙月刊)(北京市),第1期(2003),頁45-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄒依仁,舊上海人口變遷的研究(上海:上海人民出版社,1980)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖楊,「全球化與族群社會變遷」,黑龍江民族叢刊(雙月刊)(黑龍江省哈爾賓市:黑龍江省民族研究所),第4期,總第87期(2005),頁81-85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference熊月之、周武主編,上海:一座現代化都市的編年史(上海:上海書店出版社,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蒯世勛編著,上海公共租界史稿(上海:上海人民出版社,1980)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廣田康生著、馬銘譯,移民和城市(北京:商務印書館,2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉志山主編,移民文化與市場理論(北京:中國婦女出版社,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡禾主編、張應祥副主編,城市社會學:理論與視野(廣州:中山大學出版社,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭新煌、龔宜君,「台商的歷史、性格與未來發展」,蕭新煌、王宏仁、龔宜君主編,台商在東南亞:網絡、認同與全球化(台北:中央研究院亞太研究計畫,2002),頁1-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魏立華、閻小培,「中國經濟發達地區城市非正式移民聚居區--『城中村』的形成與演進--以珠江三角洲諸城市為例」,管理世界(北京),2005年8月,頁48-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅蘇文,近代上海—都市社會與生活(北京:中華書局,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAronson, Elliot & Timothy D. Wilson & Robin M. Akert著,李茂興、余伯泉譯,社會心理學(台北:揚智文化,1995)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrehm, Kassin, Fein著,王慶福、洪光遠等譯,社會心理學,第六版(台北:雙葉書廊,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFriedman, Jonathan著、郭建如譯,文化認同與全球性過程(北京:商務印書館,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJenks, Chris著、吳淑燕、俞智敏、陳光達譯,文化(台北:巨流圖書,1998)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKymlicka, Will著,鄧紅風譯,少數的權力:民族主義、多元文化主義和公民(上海:上海譯文出版社,2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarger, Martin N.著,祖力亞提.司馬義譯,族群社會學,第六版(北京:華夏出版社,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParker, Simon著,王志弘、徐苔玲譯,遇見都市:理論與經驗(台北:群學出版,2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSassen, Saskia著、黃克先譯,客人?外人?遷移在歐洲(1800~)(台北:巨流圖書,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTimlinson, John著、鄭棨元、陳慧慈譯,全球化與文化(台北:韋伯文化,2001)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWarnier, Jean-Pieree著、吳德錫譯,文化全球化(台北:麥田出版社,2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaters, Malcolm著、徐偉傑譯,全球化(台北:弘智文化事業,2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodward, Kathryn著、林文琪譯,認同與差異(台北:韋伯文化,2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZachary, G. Pascal著,徐源豐譯,繁榮的秘密:全球化浪潮的黃金律(台北:先覺出版社,2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlbo, Gregory, “The World Economy, Market Imperatives and Alternatives,” Monthly Review (1996), Vol.12, pp.6-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllport G. W., The Nature of Prejudice (Mass: Addison- Wesly, 1954).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlauner, Bob, “Talking Past Each Other: Black and White Languages of Race,” The American Prospect,vol.10 (Summer,1992), pp. 55~64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarpenter, Edmund S. & Marshall McLuhan eds., Explorations in Communication (Boston: Beacon, 1970).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrites S. L., Jr., L. R. Fabrigar & R. E. Petty, “Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1994), Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 619~634.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunning, John, Alliance Capitalism and Global Business (London: Routledge, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFirey, W. Land Use in Central Boston (Westport Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1975).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFriedman, John, “The World City Hypothesis,” Development and Change(1986), Vol.17, No.1, pp. 69~84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFriedman, John, “Where We Stand: a Decade of World City Research,” in P. L. Knox & P. J. Taylor eds., World Cities in a World-System(Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp.21-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeertz. Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures(New York: Basic Books, 1973) .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Anthony Modernity and Self-Identity:Self and society in the late modern age (Cambridge: Polity Press,1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Anthony, Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and society in the late modern age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiddens, Anthony, The Consequence of Modernity(Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1990).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHannerz, Ulf, “Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture,” In Mike Featherstone ed., Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity: A Theory, Culture & Society Special Issue( London & Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990), pp. 237-251.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHouston D M, “Andreopoulou: A Test of Both Corollaries of Social Identity Theory’s Self-esteem Hypothesis in Real Group Settings,” British Journal of Social Psychology, No. 42 (2003), pp. 357~370.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHughes, C. Everett & H. M. Hughes, Where Peoples Meet: Racial and Ethnic Frontiers. Glencoe, (Illinois:Free Press, 1952).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatznelson, Ira, Marxism and the City (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevine R. & D. Campbell, Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior (New York: Wiley, 1972).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLyman, Stanford. M. , “Interactionism and the Study of Race Relations at the Macro-Sociological Level,” Symbolic Interaction(1984), Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 107-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMagnussen, Warren , The Search for Political Space: Globalization, Social Movement, and the Urban Political Experiences(Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMassey, Douglas & Denton, Nancy , “Trends in the Residential Segregation of. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians,” American Sociological Review(1987), Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 802-825.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcLuhan, Marshall, Explorations in Communication: An Anthology ( Boston: Beacon Press, 1960).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media (London: Routledge, 1964) .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNielsen, Francois, “Toward a Theory of Ethnic Solidarity in Modern Societies,” American Sociological Review(1985), 50 (April), pp. 133-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlzak, Susan, “Contemporary Ethnic Mobilization,” Annual Review of Sociology(1983), Vol. 9, pp. 355-374.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePettigrew, Thomas P. “Intergroup Contact Theory,” Annual Review of Psychology (1998), vol. 49, pp. 65~85.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePetty, R. E., & J. A. Krosnick, Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceR. H. Fazio, “On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility,” A. R. Partkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald ed(s)., Attitude structure and function (Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum ,1989), pp. 153~179.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobertson, Roland, Globalization (London: Sage, 1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSassen, Saskia , “On Concentration and Centrality in the Global City,” in P. L. Knox and P. J. Taylor eds., World Cities in a World-System(Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995) , pp. 63-78,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSassen, Saskia, Cities in A World Economy (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSassen, Saskia, Globalization and Its Discontent (New York: The New Press, 1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSassen, Saskia, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSherif, M. Group Conflict and Co-operation (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSherif, M. O. J. Harvey et al., Intergroup conflict and cooperation : The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman,( OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange, 1961).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSimon, Robert, “Refugee Families Adjustment and Aspirations: A Comparison of Soviet Jewish and Vetnamese Immigrants,” Ethnic and Racial Studies (1983), Vol.6. No. 4, pp. 492-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSklair, Leslie, The Sociology of the Global System (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, A. David and Michael Timberlake. “Conceptualising and Mapping the Structure of the World System’s City System,” Urban Studies (1995),vol.32, no.2, pp. 287~302.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTajfel, Henri, Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of intergroup Relations,Chapters 1-3(London: Academic Press,1978).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, Peter J., “World Cities and Territorial States under Conditions of Contemporary Globalization II: Looking Forward, Looking Ahead,” Earth and Environmental Science(2002), Vol. 52, No. 2 (Oct.), pp. 57-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTodorov T., The Fragility of Goodness: Why Bulgaria’s Jews Survived the Holocaust (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTumin, M. Melvin, “Ethnic Group,” Julius Gould and William L. Kolb eds., Dictionary of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1964).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalker I. & H. J. Smith, Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. New (York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System (New York: Academics Press, 1974).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeber, Max. The City (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliams R. M. Jr, “The Sociology of Ethnic Conflicts: Comparative International Perspectives,” Annual Review of Sociology,vol.20 (1994), pp. 49~79.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZukin, Sharon, “Urban Lifestyles: Diversity and Standardisation in Spaces of Consumption,” Urban Studies (1998),vol.35, no. 5-6, pp. 825~839.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.