Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38764
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor施能傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShih, N.-Jayen_US
dc.contributor.author吳曜竹zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWu,Yao-Chuen_US
dc.creator吳曜竹zh_TW
dc.creatorWu,Yao-Chuen_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T09:08:39Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-09T09:08:39Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-09T09:08:39Z-
dc.identifierG0952560291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38764-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description95256029zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract創新帶來的影響,隨著二十一世紀的全球化潮流,開始衝擊世界各地,各國政府因應各式各樣的創新競爭、民主選舉與全球化潮流,為了政府績效與成果,我國在資通訊政策的發展,更注入諸多資源建置新計畫、新科技與新政策,藉以達成政府的設定願景目標。本研究透過政策創新過程來分析資通訊政策創新在行政體系內部的形成因素,探究我國E台灣到U台灣的資通訊發展之創新過程,透過次級資料分析與深度訪談的方式,從政策創新過程的三個階段:議程設定階段、採納說服階段與採納決策階段,分析各階段的影響因素,藉以探討資通訊政策創新過程,及此過程裡阻礙創新之問題。研究結果顯示我國資通訊政策創新乃透過多種管道得到創新資訊來源,諸如內部智庫幕僚、支援部會與外部專家學者、資通訊龍頭產業與國外顧問公司。議程設定主要來自於相關專業社群,諸如行政院科技顧問組與SRB會議的共識,以及科技政務委員的政治理念,並根據國內產業發展問題而觸發的政策創新議程。在說服階段,體系內部創新倡議者與外部支援管道彼此針對資通訊創新的理念與預算競和,篩選出可行的政策創新方案,決策階段則因資通訊政策的集權化現象,因此決策者本身的領導特質與對創新的支持、風險承擔,會對資通訊政策創新的產生影響。然而此創新過程裡,資通訊官僚組織的運作問題會發生官僚組織文化、創新疊床架屋、溝通協商費時、創新的民意基礎與管道薄弱以及之智庫團隊獨佔性等阻礙問題,甚至外部關鍵人士專業獨大、執政輪替與預算問題都會阻礙政策創新。蓋因創新過程之制度與專家社群對於創新形成的限制,建議政府在政策創新過程上,需有制度化的培育人才與建立創新倡議管道,且決策者需具備支持創新提案的心態。由於本研究屬於初探性研究,未來建議針對外部政策企業家、不同創新類型與各國資通訊創新過程等議題分析比較,加強我國政策創新過程的研究發現與經驗累積。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究問題與研究目的 8\n第三節 研究方法 14\n第四節 政策創新與相關名詞概念 20\n第二章 理論基礎與文獻檢閱 27\n第一節 政府創新意涵與創新類型 27\n第二節 組織創新研究途徑 33\n第三節 創新採納階段與政策創新過程 39\n第四節 創新採納過程的整體因素 44\n第五節 政策創新的各階段之影響因素 52\n第六節 研究架構 62\n第三章 台灣資通訊政策發展的個案介紹 65\n第一節 E台灣計畫 66\n第二節 M台灣計畫 70\n第三節 U台灣計畫 78\n第四章 台灣資通訊政策創新的總體影響因素 85\n第一節 影響創新採納的環境層面因素 85\n第二節 政府資通訊的組織結構因素 97\n第三節 綜合發現 112\n第五章 台灣資通訊政策創新過程之各階段影響因素 119\n第一節 議程設定階段 119\n第二節 說服採納階段 142\n第三節 採納決策階段 152\n第四節 綜合發現 161\n第五節 資通訊政策創新過程的問題 168\n第六章 結論 189\n第一節 研究發現 189\n第二節 理論對話 200\n第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 203\n參考文獻 210\n附錄一 訪談大綱 216\n \n表 次\n表1-1 深度訪談名單 19\n表1-2 創新於政策研究上的定義 22\n表2-1 組織創新研究流派 34\n表2-2 擴散模型、組織創新與過程理論的研究區別 38\n表2-3 組織的創新採納過程 40\n表2-4 政策的創新採納過程 43\n表3-1 數位台灣計畫執行面向與內涵 70\n表3-2 我國資通訊計畫推動負責單位 84\n表5-1 資通訊政策的議程設定 165\n表5-2 資通訊政策創新過程的政策形成比較 187\n表6-1 政府進行資通訊政策創新的主要動機與資訊來源 192\n \n \n圖 次\n圖1-1 我國資通訊發展過程 2\n圖2-1 本研究架構 63\n圖3-1 M台灣計畫的經費配置與定位 74\n圖3-2 優質網路社會核心概念 80\n圖3-3 政府資通訊政策發展歷程 83\n圖5-1 SRB會議議題與挑戰2008國家重點發展計畫 141\n圖5-2 資通訊創新的政策圖像匯成之內部場域 167\n圖5-3 資通訊創新的外部溝通管道 174\n圖5-4 資通訊政策創新的預算經費運作情形 180\n圖6-1 我國資通訊政策創新過程的互動情形 193\n圖6-2 資通訊政策創新採納過程的運作情形 200\n圖6-3政策形成因素與我國資通訊政策創新之形成因素的對照 201zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0952560291en_US
dc.subject資通訊政策zh_TW
dc.subject政策創新zh_TW
dc.subject創新採納過程zh_TW
dc.subjectICT policyen_US
dc.subjectpolicy innovationen_US
dc.subjectinnovation adoption processen_US
dc.title資通訊政策規劃過程的創新採納zh_TW
dc.titleInnovation adoptions in ITC’s Policy formulationen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference丘昌泰(2004)。公共政策,台北市:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王季家(2007)。 Web 2.0創新應用於政府線上服務之研究 ,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林子倫(2008)。台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。公共行政學報,第 28 期,頁153-175。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林水波(1999)。公共政策新論,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林水波、莊文忠(1998)。政策論述與議程設定,立法院院聞,第 26 卷第 4 期,頁9-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林劍秋(2007)。發展優質網路社會。國家菁英,第 3 卷第 3 期,頁 1-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫智麗(2001)。國家創新系統─知識經濟體系下創新政策的新思維。發表於國家發展學術研討會─知識經濟社會與國家發展論文集,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊文忠(2003)。政策體系與政策變遷之研究:停建核四政策個案分析,政治大學公行所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊順斌、張旨華、吳素華、資訊工業策進會(2008)。2008主要國家科技化服務政策案例研究報告,經濟部編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究,台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳昭靜(2005)。影響電子化政府線上資訊服務之因素探討-政策創新觀點,世新大學行政管理學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳啟光、陳玉真、于長禧、蔡政和(2006)。「政府機關之間為民服務創新作為擴散過程之探討」。品質學報,第 13 卷第 3 期,頁 329-343。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳欽春(1993)。公共政策創新擴散模式之研究:台北市『國中生自願就學方案』之個案分析,國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃東益(2002)。城市外交與政策學習:台北、香港「雙城論壇」的個案探討。戰略與國際研究季刊,第 4 卷第 3 期,頁 102-125。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference______(2004)。全球治理下政府知識管理新面向:府際政策學習。國家政策季刊,第 3 卷第 1 期,頁 135-154。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference溫肇東、許牧彥(2004)。創新機制在政府部門之應用。行政院研考會編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉至誠、葉立誠(2002)。研究方法與論文寫作。台北市,商鼎文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧惠平(1993)。創新擴散模型在縣市政府業務電腦化之驗證。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴沅暉(2005)。新興科技發展中的民主與治理:基因科技政策過程中的風險圖像。台北:韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇偉業(2007)。政策行銷:理論重構與實踐。中國行政評論,第 16 卷第 1 期,頁 1-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇登呼(2000)。政府官僚組織內部創新傳佈之研究:以台北市戶政事務所與高雄市衛生局為例,中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAgnew, J. A. (ed.). (1980). Innovation Research and Public Policy. Dept. of Geography, Syracuse University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAiken, M. & J. Hage (1971). The Organic Organization and Innovation. Sociology, 5: 63–82.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAngle, H. L., & A. H. Van de Ven (2000). ‘Suggestions for Managing the Innovation Journey’. In: A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle and M. S. Poole (eds), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, 663–697. Oxford University Press, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaumgartner, F. R., & B. D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennett, C. (1991). How States Utilize Foreign Evidence. Journal of Public Policy, 33:4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning. Public Administration Review, 54(4)322-9zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerry, F. S., & W. D. Berry (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoushey, G. T., (2004). The Transmission of Policy Innovations through Initiatives: Issue Networks, Policy Frames and the Diffusion of Ideas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Marriott Hotel, Portland, Oregon Online <.PDF>. 2008-10-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p88214_index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoyne, G. A., J. S. Gould-Williams., J. Law & R. M. Walker (2005). `Explaining the Adoption of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Public Management Reform`, Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 23 (3): 419–435.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurns, T., & G. Stalker (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBusch, P. & H. Jorgens (2005). The International Sources of Policy Convergence: Explaining the Spread of Environmental Policy Innovations. Journal of European Public Policy, 12 : 860-884.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCobb, R. W., & C. D. Elder (1972). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDaft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory and Design. South- Western, Cincinnati, OH.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDamanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors, Journal of Management, 13: 675-688.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference___________. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta- Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators, Academy of Management Journal, 34: 555–590.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference___________. (1992). Organizational Size and Innovation, Organization Studies, 13: 375–402.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference___________. (1996a). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and Testing Multiple Contingency Models, Management Science, 42: 693–716.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference___________. (1996b). Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited: Effects of Contingency Factors, Industrial Sectors, and Innovation Characteristics, Journal of High Technology Innovation Management, 7: 149–173.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDamanpour, F., & M. Schneider (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3): 215-236zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDamanpour, F., & W. J. Daniel (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. J. Eng. Technol. Manag, 23: 4, 269-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDamanpour, F., & W. M. Evan (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 392-409.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiMaggio P. J., & W. W. Powell (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDolowitz, D. (2000). Policy Transfer and British Social Policy. Basingstoke, England: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEttlie, J. E., W. P. Beidges & R. D. O’Keefe (1984). Organization strategy and structure differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30: 682-695.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHage, J., & M. Aiken (1970). Social Change in Complex Organizations. Random House, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHambrick D. C., & P. A. Mason (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9: 193-206.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHass, P. M. (1992) Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organozation, 46(1):1-35zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHogwood B. W., & B. G. Peters (1983). Policy dynamic, New York: st. Martin,s. Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJones, B. D., & F. R. Baumgartner (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKimberly, J. R., & M. J. Evanisko (1981). Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4): 689-713.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. (2nd ed.) New York: Harper Collins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeyer, A. D., & J. B. Goes, (1988). ‘Organizational Assimilationof Innovation: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis’, Academy of Management Journal, 31: 897–923.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMintrom, M., & K. Mossberger, (2008). The Politics of Ideas and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2008-12-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p279414_index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of Innovation in Organizations. American Political Science Review, 63(1): 111-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference__________(1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMumford, M. D., G. M. Scott., B. Gaddis & J. M. Strange (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review 10: 313–351.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMytelka, L. K., & K. H. Smith (2003). Interactions between policy learning and innovation theory. In: Innovation, Competence Building and Social Cohesion in Europe. New Horizons in the Economics of Innovation(pp. 24-44). Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNewmark, A. (2002). An Integrated Approach to Policy Transfer and Diffusion. Review of Policy Research. 19:151-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNice, D. C. (1994). Policy Innovation in State Government. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNystrom, P. C., K. Ramamurthy, & A. L. Wilson (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19: 221-247.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Toole, Laurence J. Jr. (1997). Implementing Public Innovations in Network Settings. Administration and Society, 29(2):115-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePage, E. (2006) How Policy Is Really Made, Public Management and Policy. Retrieced June 10, 2009, Association from http://personal.lse.ac.uk/Pagee/Papers/PMPA%20Ed%20Page%202006.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeters, B. G., & B. W. Hogwood (1985). In search of the issue-attention cycle, Journal of Polital. 47: 239–253.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePierce, J. L. & A. L. Delbecq (1977). Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation The Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 27-37 Published by: Academy of Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolsby, N. (1984). Political Innovation in America. New Haven, cT: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation( 4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 2 (1): 3-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference____________(2003). Diffusion of Innovation(5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colo.; Oxford: Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchön, D. A., & M. Rein (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Bookszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStone, D. (2002). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. revised ed., New York: Norton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVan de Ven, A. H., H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. New York: Harper & Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVan de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & S. Venkataraman, (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalker, J. (1969). The Diffusion of Innovation Among the American State. American Political science Review, 63: 880-899.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: An empirical analysis of local government, Public Administration, 84: 311-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference___________. (2007). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: towards a configuration framework, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18: 591-615.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework, Annual Review of Sociolog, 28: 297-326.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, J. Q. (2000). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique, and Suggested Research Directions, Journal of Management Studie. 31: 405–431.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYin, R. K. (1994). Case study research : design and methods, Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 2nd ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoung, G.J., M. P.Charns., & S. M. Shortell, (2001). Top manager and network effect on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system, Strategic Management Journa, 22: 935-951.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZaltman, G.., R. Duncan., & J. Holbek (1973). Innovations and organizations. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, Time and Multiple Streams, In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process(pp. 73-93), Boulder, CO: Westview Press.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.