Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38781| 題名: | 高科技廠商的存活風險分析：以竹科廠商為例 Survival Analysis of the Hi-Tech Firms: A Case Study of the Hsinchu Science Park |
作者: | 王盈智 Wang, Ying Chih |
貢獻者: | 林佳瑩 王盈智 Wang, Ying Chih |
關鍵詞: | 風險 廠商存活 新竹科學園區 事件史分析 risk firm survival Hsinchu science park event history analysis |
日期: | 2007 | 上傳時間: | 9-四月-2010 | 摘要: | 新竹科學園區對我國的社經發展有著卓越的貢獻，就2006年的統計數據來看，年營業額佔全國工業生產毛額的比率約35%，佔台灣GDP的比率則將近10%，佔全國出口貿易總值的8%，就業人數則約佔全國就業者的1.2%，其實質重要性可見一般，所以竹科廠商的存活是與全國、地方的社經發展緊密交織無可劃分，竹科廠商的退出可能會造成經濟成長停滯、工作機會短少、政策資源錯置等問題。\n 既有研究多半強調竹科成功的要素，但往往會使我們將目光只放在成功廠商，而忽視廠商退出竹科的現象，又或者未正視高科技產業的特質之一：高風險，因此本研究將試圖運用事件史分析來捕捉在竹科特殊的產業生態中，高科技產業其風險的真正面貌，並運用資源基礎、資源依賴以及組織生態學的觀點來探討竹科的不同廠商所涉風險之影響因素。 The Hsinchu science park has made remarkable contributions to Taiwan’s development, so far as statistics in 2006, the annual sales volume takes up 35% of the national industrial production volume, nearly 10% of Taiwan’s GDP, it also accounts for 8% of the national export trade. The employment of the Hsinchu science park takes up 1.2% of the total employment of Taiwan. Its significant importance is easy to be understood fully at a glance, so the survival of firms in the Hsinchu science park interweaved with Taiwan’s society and development. Firm exit not only makes the working opportunity deficient, but also affect the usage of policy resources and the socio-economic development of Taiwan.\n Academic researches about the Hsinchu science park only emphasized the successful element, placed sight on the successful manufacturer, and ignored the phenomenon that some firms have exited from the Hsinchu science park. Actually, one characteristic of the Hi-Tech industry was high risk. So this research will attempt to use the event history analysis to realize firm survival in the Hsinchu science park, catch the real risk of Hi-Tech industry and understand the important factor that effect firm exit from the Hsinchu science park through resource-based theory, resource dependency theory, and organizational ecology perspective. |
參考文獻: | 王振寰、高士欽，2000，〈全球化與在地化：新竹與台中的學習型區域比較〉。《台灣社會學刊》24: 179-237。 王德睦、王仕圖、蔡勇美，2001，〈貧窮持續時間的動態分析：以嘉義縣1990-1998 年之低收入戶為例〉。《台灣社會學刊》26: 211-250。 台積公司，2000，〈台積公司順利完成合併德碁及世大公司大步邁入台積新紀元〉。台積電新聞稿，7月7日。 吳孟玲、林月雲，2002，〈台灣自行車產業之組織死亡率分析－組織生態觀點〉。 《管理評論》21(3): 115-136。 吳忠吉，2003，〈全球化視野下的兩岸「三通」〉。《國家政策論壇》92年春季號: 51-75。 吳思華，2000，《策略九說 : 策略思考的本質》。台北市：臉譜。 林亦之、熊瑞梅，2005，〈高科技產業組織技術結盟之邏輯與技術發展軌跡：以台灣加工出口區和科學園區半導體和光電產業為例〉。論文發表於「2005年台灣社會學年會－台灣社會與社會學的反思」，台北：國立台北大學，民國94年11月19至20日。 科學工業園區管理局，2000，《新竹科學工業園區二十週年紀念專刊》。新竹市：科學工業園區管理局。 徐進鈺，1997，〈流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》35: 75-118。 馬維揚，2002，〈竹科IC產業群聚成功實例之探討〉。《產業論壇》4(1): 256-271。 張苙雲，1986，《組織社會學》。台北市：三民。 陳正倉等，2003，《產業經濟學》。台北市：雙葉書廊。 陳明祺，2002，〈從空間經濟學到地方社會學：台灣自行車產業廠商存活率的事件史分析1980-1996〉。論文發表於「2002年社會學年會－重訪東亞：全球、區域、國家、公民」，台中：東海大學，民國91年12月14至15日。 陳東升，1997，〈高科技產業組織間關係的權力分析：以台灣積體電路產業設計公司為例〉。《台大社會學刊》25: 47-104。 —，2003，《台灣高科技產業的社會學分析：積體網路》。台北：群學。 陳端容、范國棟，2007，〈醫師生涯路徑選擇相關因素的事件史分析─醫師職場階層化的效應〉。《臺灣社會學刊》38: 105-133。 楊丁元、陳慧玲，1996，《業競天擇：高科技產業生態》。台北市：工商時報。 楊維楨、李文雄，1999，〈台灣高科技產業營運績效之探討－新竹科學園區經驗〉，《台北銀行月刊》29(5): 22-38。 經濟部，1999，《1998大陸經濟情勢評估》，台北市：經濟部。 鄧美貞、吳世英、朱博湧，2005，〈影響高科技廠商存活的相關因素－新竹科學園區廠商實證研究〉。《臺灣經濟金融月刊》41: 86-100。 薛承泰，2000，〈台灣地區已婚婦女再就業時機的初步分析〉。《人口學刊》21: 77-99。 薛琦、張祥憲，1999，〈我國高科技產業與經濟發展〉。《自由中國之工業》 89(2): 13-34。 瞿宛文，2003，《全球化下的台灣經濟》。台北市：唐山。 瞿宛文、安士敦，2003，《超越後進發展：台灣的產業升級策略》，台北市：聯經。 Aldrich, Howard E. et al., 1994, “Minimalism, Mutualism, and Maturity: The Evolution of American Trade Association Populations in the 20th Century.” in Evolutionary Dynamics Organizations, edited by J. Baum and J. Singh. New York: Oxford University Press. Audretsch, D., and T. Mahmood, 1995, “New-Firm survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 97-103. Barnett, William P., and Glenn R. Carroll, 1993, “How Institutional Constraints Affected the Organization of Early U.S. Telephony.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 9: 98-126. Barney, J., 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17: 99-120. Barron, David N., 1999, “The Structuring of Organizational Populations.” American Sociological Review 64(3): 421-445. Baruch, Yehuda, 1997, “High Technology Organization - What It Is, What It Isn`t.” International Journal of Technology Management 13(2): 179-195. Baum, J., and Stephen J. Mezias, 1992, “Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 580-604. Brocheler, Vera, Steven Maijoor, and Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2004, “Auditor Human Capital and Audit Firm Survival: The Dutch Audit Industry in 1930–1992.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 29: 627-646. Brüderl, Josef, Peter Preisendörfer, and Rolf Ziegler, 1992, “Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations.” American Sociological Review 57(2): 227-242. Burke, Andrew, Holger Görg, and Aoife Hanley, 2007, “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on New Firm Survival in the UK: Evidence for Static Versus Dynamic Industries.” Small Business Economics Working Paper Series: 1-13. Carroll, Glenn R., 1983, “A Stochastic Model of Organizational Mortality: Review and Reanalysis.” Social Science Research 12: 303-329. —, 1993, “A Sociological View on Why Firms Differ.” Strategic Management Journal 14(4): 237-249. Carroll, Glenn R., and Michael T. Hannan, 1989a, “Density Dependence in the Evolution of Newspaper Populations.” American Sociological Review 54: 524-541. —, 1989b, “Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests.” Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 411-430. Carroll, Glenn R., and Yangchung Paul Huo, 1988, “Organizational and Electoral Paradoxes of the Knights of Labor.” Pp. 175-194 in Ecological Models of Organizations, edited by Glenn R. Carroll. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger. Carroll, Glenn R., and Albert C. Y. Teo, 1996, “Creative Self-Destruction among Organizations: An Empirical Study of Technical Innovation and Organizational Failure in the American Automobile Industry, 1885-1982.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 619-644. Cefis, Elena, and Orietta Marsili. 2003. “Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms` Survival.” in Discussion Paper Series: Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute. Disney, R., J. Haskel, and Y. Heden, 2003, “Entry, Exit and Establishment Survival in UK Manufacturing.” Journal of Industrial Economics 51: 91-112. Esteve, Silviano, and Juan Mañez, 2008, “The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm and Firm Survival.” Small Business Economics 30: 231-249. Fichman, Mark, and Daniel A. Levinthal, 1991, “Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Depencedence in Social and Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 16: 442-468. Freeman, John, Glenn R. Carroll, and Michael T. Hannan, 1983, “The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates.” American Sociological Review 48: 692-710. Görg, H , and Eric Strobl. 2004. “Foreign Direct Investment and Local Economic Development: Beyond Productivity Spillovers.” in The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Development: New Measurements, New Outcomes, New Policy Approaches. Institute for International Economics Workshop on Washington DC. Hannan, Michael T., Glenn R. Carroll, Elizabeth A. Dundon, and John C. Torres, 1995, “Organizational Evolution in Multinational Context: Entry of Automobile Manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy.” American Sociological Review 60: 509-528. Hannan, Michael T., Laszlo Polos, and Glenn R. Carroll, 2007, Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman, 1977, “The Population Ecology of Organizations.” The American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929-964. —, 1984, “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49: 149-164. —, 1989, Organizational Ecology. Massachusetts: Havard University Press. Haverman, H., 1995, “The Demographic Metabolism of Organizations: Industry Dynamics, Turnover, and Tenure Distributions.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 586-618. Jensen, Paul H., Elizabeth Webster, and Hielke Buddelmeyer. 2006. “Innovation, Technological Conditions and New Firm Survival.” Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. McClelland, David C., 1961, The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. Ortega-Argiles, R., and R. Moreno, 2007, “Product and Process Innovations and the Likelihood of Surivival.” in Entrepreneurship, Industrial Location and Economic Growth, edited by J. M. Arauzo and M. C. Manjon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald Salancik, 1978, The External Control of Organizations : A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Ranger-Moore, J., 1997, “Bigger May be Better but is Older Wiser?” American Sociological Review 62: 903-920. Saxenian, AnnaLee. 2001. “Taiwan`s Hsinchu Region: Imitator and Partner for Silicon Valley.” Standford, CA: Standford Institute for Economic Policy Research. Saxenian, AnnaLee, and Jinn-Yuh Hsu, 2001, “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 893-920. Segarra, A., and M. Callejon, 2002, “New Firms’ Surivival and market turbulence: New Evidence from Spain.” Review of Industrial Organization 20(1): 1-14. Singh, Jitendra V., and Charles J. Lumsden, 1990, “Theory and Research in Organization Ecology.” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 161-195. Stinchcombe, Arthur L., 1965, “Social Structure and Organizations.” Pp. 142-93 in Handbook of Organizations, edited by James G. March. Chicago: Rand McNally. Thompson, James D., 1967, Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill. Thornhill, Stewart, and Raphael Amit. 2003. “Learning from Failure: Organizational Mortality and the Resource-Based View.” in Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Yamaguchi, Kazuo, 1991, Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage. |
描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 社會學研究所 95254001 96 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095254001 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400110.pdf | 305.49 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400109.pdf | 296.02 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400108.pdf | 435.27 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400107.pdf | 379.66 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400106.pdf | 314.82 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400105.pdf | 326.17 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400104.pdf | 212.41 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400103.pdf | 119.48 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400102.pdf | 132.53 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open | |
| 400101.pdf | 94.24 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.