Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48950
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor劉惠美<br>陳麗霞zh_TW
dc.contributor.author李昭儀zh_TW
dc.creator李昭儀zh_TW
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-07T17:53:54Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-07T17:53:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-07T17:53:54Z-
dc.identifierG0097354018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48950-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description統計研究所zh_TW
dc.description97354018zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究探討評價一籃子信用商品有效率的估計方法,所謂有效率是指計算簡單、快速且能達到變異數縮減,Chiang, Yueh, and Hsieh (2007)提出一個有效演算法,模型中將系統性風險因子與非系統性風險因子視為常態分配,但考慮現實情況系統性風險因子未必為對稱分配,因此本文系統性風險採用偏斜常態分配,而非系統性風險為常態分配。根據Chiang, Yueh, and Hsieh (2007)所提之演算法,並將其延伸至多個系統性風險因子,探討此方法在系統風險為偏斜常態分配下變異數縮減的效果。以不同的投資組合計算其違約給付金額,並與蒙地卡羅法模擬結果比較,由於此方法皆在至少有k個違約發生的事件下抽樣,因此所需模擬次數較少,計算時間也較短,且可達到變異數縮減。\r\n單一系統性風險因子模型,當 ρ 值高,變異數縮減效果越好,且變異數縮減的效果也隨著 k 值越大效果越好。在二個系統性風險因子模型,變異數縮減的效果也是隨著 k 值越大效果越好。就各因子的權重而言,變異數縮減的效果原則上對權重較大的因子做重點抽樣,變異數縮減效果較顯著,但是此方法對於極為右偏的分配時,對權重較大的因子做重點抽樣效果不彰,此時反而針對對稱分配做重點抽樣的效果較佳。此方法就到期時間做探討,發現到期時間越長變異數縮減效果越差。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第二章 文獻探討 2\r\n第三章 違約時間模型 5\r\n3.1存活時間函數(survival time function) 5\r\n3.2風險機率函數(hazard rate function) 5\r\n3.3關聯結構函數(copula function) 6\r\n3.4.聯合違約時間模型 7\r\n第四章 第 k 家違約型一籃子信用商品之評價 9\r\n4.1蒙地卡羅模擬 10\r\n4.2 一籃子信用商品評價之有效演算法 10\r\n第五章 研究方法 14\r\n5.1 偏斜常態分配的性質 14\r\n5.2 單一系統性風險因子模型 15\r\n5.3 二系統性風險因子模型 17\r\n第六章 模擬分析及比較 21\r\n第七章 結論 28\r\n參考書目 29\r\n附錄 30zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097354018en_US
dc.subject一籃子信用違約交換zh_TW
dc.subject變異數縮減zh_TW
dc.subject偏斜常態分配zh_TW
dc.title一籃子信用違約交換評價之有效演算法zh_TW
dc.titleEfficient algorithms for basket default swap valuationen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1. Anderson, Eric C. (1999). “Monte Carlo Methods and Importance Sampling.” Lecture Notes for Stat 578C, Statistical Genetics.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Chiang, M.H., Yueh, M.L. and Hsieh, M.H. (2007). “An Efficient Algorithm for Basket Default Swap Valuation.” Journal of Derivatives, pp. 8-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Chen, Zhiyong and Paul Glasserman (2008). “Fast Pricing of Basket Default Swaps.” Operations Research, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 286-303.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Gupta, Arjun K., Nguyen, Truc T. and Sanqui, Jose Almer T. (2004). “Characterization of the Skew-normal Distribution.” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, pp. 351-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Glasserman, Paul and Jingyi Li (2005). “Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk.” Management Science, Vol. 51, pp. 1643-1656.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. Hull, J. and A. White (2001). “Valuing Credit Default Swap II: Modeling Default Correlation.” Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 3, pp. 12-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. Hull, J. and A. White (2004). “Valuation of a CDO and an nth to Default CDS without Monte Carlo Simulation.” Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 2, pp. 8-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. Laurent, J. P. and J. Gregory (2005). “Basket Default Swaps, CDO’s and Factor Copulas.” Journal of Risk, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 103-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. Li, D.X. (2000). “On Default Correlation:A Copula Approach.” Journal of Fixed Income, Vol. 4, pp. 43-54.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.