Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49192
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王振寰zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Jenn-Hwanen_US
dc.contributor.author曾聖文zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Sheng-Wenen_US
dc.creator曾聖文zh_TW
dc.creatorTseng, Sheng-Wenen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-07T18:01:16Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-07T18:01:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-07T18:01:16Z-
dc.identifierG0892615021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49192-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國家發展研究所zh_TW
dc.description89261502zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract台灣IC設計產業的技術並非是最尖端的,也不具有低人力成本與低價格的優勢,並且夾擠在先進的「創新領導型聚落」(例如:美國矽谷)與低成本優勢的「製造成本控制型聚落」(例如:中國大陸上海)之間發展。但台灣新竹的IC設計產業聚落卻仍能在知識快速流動的空間趨勢中,持續且擴大地理群聚效應,成為全球IC/半導體產業的重要節點。因此,本論文旨在回答以下的研究問題:在知識快速流動的空間趨勢中,為什麼台灣IC設計產業仍鑲嵌在台灣的經濟社會環境中持續群聚與成長? \r\n本論文有以下主要研究結論:(一)IC設計廠商在台灣形成新竹與台北兩個產業聚落,新竹產業聚落包含「快速跟隨型」與「專業化型」兩種台灣IC設計廠商,台北則是「專業化型」廠商群聚。「快速跟隨型」IC設計廠商採取「次進市場」時間策略,「專業化型」IC設計廠商則以「市場區隔」時間策略切入產品生命週期;(二)新竹地區廠商的快速跟隨策略,由速度、彈性與成本控制的制度環境所支撐,其群聚效應與成長速度高於台北產業聚落;(三)本論文驗證了知識的快速流動空間,有助於地方空間的快速技術學習與產業群聚效應。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTaiwan’s IC design industry, located mainly in the Taipei-Hsinchu corridor, has important status in the global value chain of the world semiconductor industry. Nevertheless, it neither has cutting edge technology nor has the lowest cost advantage; it is besieged between leading innovative cluster (eg. Silicon Valley) and catch-up cluster that is based on production cost (eg. Shanghai). Most significantly, it still continues to grow in the age in which place is said to be meaningless due to the tendency of space of flows. This study thus aims to answer the following question: why does IC design industry still continue to embed in and to grow in the northern part of Taiwan?\r\nMy research findings can be summarized as follows. First of all, it is found that there are two major IC design clusters in the northern part of Taiwan: Hsinchu and Taipei. Secondly, it is found that firms in Hsinchu cluster have both “fast follower” and “specialist” characteristics, whereas IC design firms in Taipei has only “specialist” features. Fast follower firms adopt “second-to-market” strategy and specialist firms adopt “market-segmentation” strategy to enter the product market in the product-life-cycle. Thirdly, due to the fact that fast follower firms in Hsinchu are supported by institutionalized features that can sustain speed, flexibility, and cost-control which Taipei lacks, Hsinchu thus has better agglomeration effect and growth rate. Finally, this study concludes that current tendency of space of flows in which knowledge can be transmitted through space is contributive to Taiwan’s fast technological learning and clustering effect.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 前言與研究問題\r\n1-1 研究問題\r\n1-2 產業聚落布局的演變\r\n一、 外商與本國廠商共構的台北產業聚落\r\n二、 本國廠商主導的新竹產業聚落\r\n三、 產業聚落的發展與成長:新竹與台北的比較\r\n1-3 理論回顧與研究方法 \r\n一、 產業是否仍需群聚?\r\n二、 理論分析架構與研究假設\r\n三、 研究方法\r\n1-4 章節結構安排\r\n\r\n第貳章 產業歷史分期與國家角色\r\n2-1 全球IC產業結構變遷與發展歷程\r\n2-2 台灣半導體/IC產業發展與國家機器任務定位的改變\r\n一、 台灣半導體/IC產業發展與政策推動歷程\r\n二、 台灣IC設計產業發展歷程\r\n三、 國家機器任務定位的改變\r\n2-3 產業結構特性:大/小雙元結構與虛擬垂直整合\r\n2-4 小結\r\n\r\n第參章 追趕的時間策略\r\n3-1 時間與技術策略:快速跟隨與專業化導向\r\n一、 快速跟隨廠商的技術策略\r\n二、 專業化廠商的技術策略\r\n3-2 全球價值鏈的移動:技術水準與產品市場定位\r\n3-3 案例:聯發科技(MEDIATEK)\r\n一、 國際規格制定權的競逐\r\n二、 聯發科晶片與山寨手機:MTK inside, Taiwan inside!\r\n3-4 小結\r\n\r\n第肆章 開放的鑲嵌:跨界學習與在地異業研發網絡\r\n4-1 跨界技術學習網絡\r\n一、 垂直面的生產網絡\r\n二、 廠商內部跨界網絡\r\n三、 國際標準會議(組織)\r\n四、 知識特性與跨界技術學習\r\n4-2 跨界連結對廠商技術學習與創新能力之影響\r\n一、 跨界連結與廠商技術學習\r\n二、 跨界連結與廠商創新能力\r\n4-3 在地異業研發網絡\r\n一、 垂直面的生產網絡\r\n二、 水平面的技術學習網絡\r\n三、 產學合作與公共研發機構\r\n四、 地理鄰近、知識特性與在地技術學習\r\n4-4 集體技術學習對廠商創新能力之影響\r\n4-5 小結\r\n\r\n第伍章 制度環境的建構:趕工文化\r\n5-1 有效的趕工激勵制度:員工分紅配股\r\n一、 員工分紅配股的治理機制\r\n二、 員工分紅配股的成效:趕工超人\r\n三、 股票分紅費用化的衝擊與因應\r\n5-2 技術開發的工匠傳統:趕工團隊\r\n一、 重視開發技術不重視尖端技術研究的文化\r\n二、 重視新技術快速學習與解決問題的訓練\r\n三、 重視產品快速開發不重視技術文件傳承\r\n5-3 「彈性」專精的決策機制\r\n5-4 小結\r\n\r\n第陸章 結論:持續群聚與創新\r\n6-1 研究發現與貢獻\r\n一、 主要研究發現\r\n二、 新產業聚落發展模式的提出\r\n三、 論點貢獻與限制\r\n6-2 持續邁向創新與限制\r\n\r\n附錄一 重要IC設計廠商在台灣地理佈局與產品定位\r\n附錄二 質化訪談一覽表\r\n\r\n參考文獻zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0892615021en_US
dc.subject快速跟隨zh_TW
dc.subject產業聚落zh_TW
dc.subject社會鑲嵌zh_TW
dc.subject台灣zh_TW
dc.subjectIC設計產業zh_TW
dc.subjectFast Followeren_US
dc.subjectIndustrial Clusteren_US
dc.subjectSocial Embeddednessen_US
dc.subjectTaiwanen_US
dc.subjectIC Design Industryen_US
dc.title快速跟隨、產業聚落與社會鑲嵌:以台灣IC設計產業為例zh_TW
dc.titleFast Follower, Industrial Cluster, and Social Embeddedness: An Inquiry into IC Design Industry in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCastells, Manuel著,夏鑄九與王志弘校譯,2000,《網絡社會之崛起》。台北:唐山。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi著,楊子江與王美音譯,1997,《創新求勝:智價企業論》。台北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolanyi, Michael著,許澤民譯,2004,《個人知識:邁向後批判哲學》。台北:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolanyi, Michael著,許澤民譯,2004,《個人知識:邁向後批判哲學》。台北:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference工業技術研究院電子工業研究所,1998-2001,《半導體工業年鑑(1998-2001年)》。新竹:工業技術研究院電子工業研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國產業地圖編委會與中國經濟景氣監測中心,2007,《中國IT產業地圖2007-2008》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王振寰,2007,〈空間再尺度化的角力 全球化下的台灣資通產業與國家機器〉。《地理學報》 49:39-54。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田畠真弓,2006,〈網絡結構與跨國高科技知識的擴散:台灣積體電路與面板的比較分析〉。《東吳社會學報》 20:109-148。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田畠真弓,2007,《台灣高科技產業的跨國技術學習創新網絡機制-積體電路與液晶顯示器產業的比較》。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所博士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江逸之,2008,〈新Taiwan inside傳奇:台商搶攻五千億手機市場〉。《天下雜誌》 411:104-116。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsu, J. and L.-L. Cheng, 2002, “Revisiting Economic Development in Post-war Taiwan: the Dynamic Process of Geographical Industrialization.” Regional Studies 36(8): 897–908.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsu, J.-Y., 2005, From Transfer to Hybridisation? The Changing Organisation of Taiwanese PC Investments in China. In Linking Industries across the World: Processes of Global Networking, edited by C. G. Alvstam and E. W. Schamp, Aldershot, Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate. Pp. 173- 195.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsu, J.-Y. and A. Saxenian, 2000, “The Limits of Guanxi Capitalism: Transnational Collaboration between Taiwan and the USA.” Environment and Planning 32(11): 1991-2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHumphrey, J and H. Schmitz, 2001, “Governance in Global Value Chains.” IDS Bulletin 32(3): 19-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHumphrey, J. and H. Schmitz, 2002, “How does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading Industrial Clusters?.” Regional Studies 36: 1017-1027.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHung, S. C., 2000, “Institutions and Systems of Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Taiwan’s Computer Competitiveness.” Technology and Siciety 22:175-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHwang, J. and S. Hoo, 2000, “Characteristics and Development of Industrial Districts: The Case of Software Clusters in Seoul.” Presented for Conference on Knowledge, Industry, and Environment. Dongguan, China: IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space, August 8-11, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJessop, B., 1990, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJou, S.-C. and D.-S. Chen, 2001, “Keeping the High-Tech Region Open and Dynamic: The Organizational Networks of Taiwan’s Integrated Circuit Industry.” GeoJournal 53:81-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeeble, D. and F. Wilkinson, 2000, High-Technology Clusters, Networking and Collective Learning in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李君偉,2000,〈台積電成立IC設計服務聯盟:結合元件資料庫、IP等設計服務,提供全方位支援,以加值服務爭取客戶〉。工商時報(台北),2000年3月22日,第14版。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim, L, 1997, Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea`s Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLane, P. J. and M. Lubatkin, 1998, “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning.” Strategic Management Journal 19: 461-477.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLawson, C. and E. Lorenz, 1999, “Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity.” Regional Studies 33: 305-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeonard, D. and S. Sensiper, 1998, “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Grouop Innovation.” California Management Review 40(3): 112-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLundvall, B. -Å., 1992, Introduction. In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, edited by B. -Å. Lundvall, London: Printer. Pp. 1-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLundvall, B. -Å. and Maskell, P., 2000, Nation States and Economic Development - From National Systems of Production to National Systems of knowledge creation and learning. In The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, edited by G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. S. Gertler, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 353-372.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaidique, M. A. and P. Patch, 1988, Corporate Strategy and Technological Policy. In Readings in the Management of Innovation, edited by M. L. Tushman and W. L. Moore, Cambridge, M. A.: Ballinger Publishing Company, Pp. 236-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalmberg, A. and P. Maskell, 2002, “The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of Spatial Clustering.” Environment and Planning A 34: 429-449.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarkusen, A., 1996, “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts.” Economic-Geography 72(3): 293-313.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarshall, A., 1920, The Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.〔Marshall, A. 著,廉運傑譯,2005,《經濟學原理》。北京:華夏。〕zh_TW
dc.relation.reference卓怡君,2003,〈惠普、創意 聯手打造全球首座矽智財交易中心〉。自由電子報網站(引用日期2006年9月12日),http://w ww.libertytimes.com.tw/2003/new/aug/7/today-e7.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaskell, P. and A. Malmberg, 1999, “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 167-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaskell, P., 2001, “The Firm in Economic Geography.” Economic Geography 77: 329-344.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaskell, P., 2005, “Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of the Geographical Cluster.” In Clusters, Networks, and Innovation, edited by S. Breschi and F. Malerba, Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press. Pp. 411-432.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMathews, J. A., 1995, High-technology Industrialization in East Asia: The Case of the Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and Korea. Taipei: Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeaney, C. S., 1991, Created A Competitive Niche: State Policy and Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry. Paper presented to center for Chinese studies, University of California, Berkeley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeaney, C. S., 1991, Creating a Competitive Niche: State Policy and Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry. Paper presented at the Center for Chinese studies, University of California, Berkeley, April 27, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgan, K., 2004, “The Exaggerated Death of Geography: Learning, Proximity and Territorial Innovation Systems.” Journal of Economic Geography 4: 3-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMowery, D. S., J. E. Oxley, and B. S. Silverman, 1996, “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer.” Strategic Management Journal 17: 77-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNelson, R. ed., 1993, National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company. London: Oxford University Press, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周志龍,2002,《全球化、台灣國土再結構與制度》。台北:詹氏書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorth, D. C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Brien, R., 1992, Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOhame, K, 1995, The End of the Nation State: the Rise of Regional Economy. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePiore, M. and C.F. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolanyi, M., 1958, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePoon, J. P. H., J.-Y. Hsu, and S. Jeongwook, 2006, “The Geography of Learning and Knowledge Acquisition among Asian latecomers.” Journal of Economic Geography 6(4): 541-559.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePorter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuinn, J. B., P. Anderson, and S. Finkelstein, 1996, “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best.” Harvard Business Review 74(2): 71-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaxenian, A., 1994, Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaxenian, A., 1999, “The Silicon Valley - Hsinchu Connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading.” SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 99-10, Stanford Institute of Economic Policy Research, September.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference拓墣產業研究所半導體研究中心,2006,《迎接數位生活-啟動IC設計商機無限》。TRI產業專題報告59,台北:拓墣產業研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaxenian, A. and J.-Y. Hsu, 2001, “The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 893-920.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitz, H., 1999, “Global Competition and Local Co-operation: Success and Failure in the Synos Valley, Brazil.” World Development 27(9): 1627-1650.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitz, H. and K. Nadvi., 1999, “Clustering and Industrialization: Introduction.” World Development 27(9):C1503-1514.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScott, A. J., 1980, The Urban Land nexus and the State. London: Pion.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStorper, M., 1997, The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStorper, M., 1995, “The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: the Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependence.” European Urban and Regional Studies 2 (3): 191-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStorper, M., 1989, “The Transition to Flexible Specialization in the US Film Industry.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13: 273-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSturgeon, T. J., 2002, “Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3): 451-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTSIA, 2009, Overview on Taiwan Semiconductor Industry (2009 Edition). Hsinchu: TSIA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTzeng, R.-L., 2004, “Utilizing Multiethnic Resources in Multinational Corporations: Taiwan-based Firms in Silicon Valley.” Taiwanese Journal of Siciology 32: 103-147.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林上祚,2009,〈晶圓版圖洗牌 聯電收購聯日應戰〉。中時電子報網站(引用日期2009年10月30日), http://tech.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/Inc/2007cti-news-Tech-inc/Tech-Content/0,4703,12050902+112009102900658,00.html。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVernon, R., 1966, “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190 - 207.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, I., 1974, The modern world-systemⅠ. New York : Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, I., 1980, The modern world-system Ⅱ. New York : Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallerstein, I., 1989, The modern world-system Ⅲ. New York : Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, J.-H. and S.-W. Tseng, 2008, “The Besieged Fast Follower Innovation: The Development Model of Taiwan’s IC Design Industry.” Presented for The 5th East Asian Regional Conference in Alternative Geography. Seoul, Korea: Seoul National University, December 13-16, 2008.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeber, A., 1929, Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeiss, L. and J. M. Hobson, 1995, State and Economic Development: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWolfe, D. A. and M. S. Gertler, 2004, “Clusters from the Inside and Out: Local Dynamics and Global Linkages.” Urban Studies 41: 1071-1093.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZahra S. A. and G. George, 2002, “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review 27: 185-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZander, U. and B. Kogut, 1995, “Knowledge and the Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organization Abilities: An Empirical Test.” Organization Science 6(1): 76-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林宜文,2000,《高科技產業技術學習進程與策略聯盟學習機制-以台灣半導體產業製造部門為例》。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、網站zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlobal Semiconductor Alliance: http://www.gsaglobal.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心網頁:http://www.iek.itri.org.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference工研院產業學院網頁:http://college.itri.org.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會網站:http://www.sfi.org.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference公開資訊觀測站:http://newmops.tse.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部工業局半導體產業推動辦公室:http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/sipo/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部智慧財產局中華民國專利資料檢索系統:http://twpat.tipo.gov.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference柯力心,2005,〈明年台灣IC設計產值,仍為中國5倍〉。自由電子報網站(引用日期2006年9月12日),http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2005/new/mar/15/today-stock4.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪士灝,2005,《IC設計產業》。國立台灣大學資訊工程系未出版講義。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪正明,2007,〈以社會網絡觀點探討網絡集中度對技術創新之影響 -兼論專屬資產之調節效果〉。《人力資源管理學報》 7(1):87-108。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪昆裕,2002,〈產品創新與知識移轉機制之初探-以IC設計公司為例〉。發表於「2002年創新與管理學術研討會」,台北:銘傳大學主辦,2002年11月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡太山、林建元與張素莉,2002,〈科技廠商聚群與創新生產網絡形塑之探討-以新竹與台南地區為例〉。《環境與世界》 6:1-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡太山、林建元與錢學陶,2005,〈產業創新群聚浮現與科技社群互動對創新活動影響之探討-以新竹科學園區及周邊為例〉。《建築與規劃學報》 6(1):43-61。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐作聖、唐迎華與朱玫黛,2005,《高科技產業個案分析》。台北:全華科技。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐作聖、曾國雄、吳皇輝與奚國華,2002,〈我國IC設計公司屬性分析之研究〉。發表於「2002中華決策學會研討會」,台北:中華決策科學學會與國立交通大學主辦,2002年6月29日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐作聖與賴賢哲,2005,《科技政策理論與實務》。台北:全華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐美雯,2001,《從IC設計支援廠商間的合縱連橫,瞭解未來趨勢與探究其所造成之影響》。台北:資訊工業策進會市場情報中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐美雯,2002,《全球SIP產業發展現況以及台灣之發展機會》。台北:資訊工業策進會市場情報中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐進鈺,1999,〈流動的鑲嵌:新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》 35: 75-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐進鈺,2000,〈流動的鑲嵌:新竹科學園區的勞力市場與高科技發展〉。《台灣社會學研究季刊》 35:75-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐進鈺,2005,〈從移植到混血:台商大陸投資電子業的區域網絡化〉。收錄於陳德昇編,《經濟全球化與台商大陸投資:策略、佈局與比較》。台北:晶典文化。27- 44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference財訊出版社,2007,《IC設計投資版圖》。台北:財訊出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference財訊出版社,2007,《IC設計產業版圖》。台北:財訊出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張如心與潘文淵文教基金會,2006,《矽說台灣:台灣半導體產業傳奇》。台北:天下遠見。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張琳一,2006,〈營收與毛利逐季攀升、IC設計業景氣觸底反彈:類比IC、多媒體IC、LCD驅動IC前景持續看好〉。電子時報網站(引用日期2006年9月18日),http://tech.digitimes.com.tw/ShowNews.aspx?zCatId=513。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許月瑛,1998,《精密機械業產品創新與組織知識流通之研究》。台北:國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳東升,2003,《積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳東升,2008,《積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析(增訂版)》。台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳恆鈞、黃婉玲,2004,〈台灣半導體產業政策之研究:政策工具研究途徑〉。《中國行政》 75:1-28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳雅美,2002,〈產業合作網絡形成原因的探討-以台灣半導體產業為例〉。《運籌研究集刊》 1:125-152。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賀力行、謝玲芬與林玉珠,2001,〈IC設計公司對委外側市場管理之研究---應用層級分析法〉。發表於「中國工業工程學會九十年度年會暨學術研討會」,高雄:中國工業工程學會主辦,2001年12月8日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊友仁,1999,〈全球經濟中的區域再結構:新竹新工業空間與區域發展的個案研究〉。《城市與設計學報》 7/8:93-131。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference溫啟宏,2001,《渾沌中開創新局-談全球半導體產業景氣、商機與我國產業前景》。台北:資訊工業策進會市場情報中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部工業局半導體產業推動辦公室,2008,《半導體產業推動辦公室專刊 No. 30》。台北:經濟部工業局半導體產業推動辦公室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫(ITIS),1997,《1997年半導體年鑑》。台北市:經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫(ITIS),2003,《2003年半導體年鑑》。台北市:經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫(ITIS),2009,《2009年半導體年鑑》。台北市:經濟部技術處產業技術知識服務計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference資訊工業策進會,2001-2009,《資訊工業年鑑(2001-2009年)》。台北:資訊工業策進會市場情報中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference電子工程專輯,2006,〈2005年10大IC設計公司排名 聯發科名列第九〉。電子工程專輯網址(引用日期2006年9月12日), http://www.eettaiwan.com/ART_8800410128_480102.HTM。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖國寶,2002,〈威盛併購美國一家CDMA標準產品設計中心〉。Career News網站(引用日期2007年3月21日), http://media.career.com.tw/epaper/enews/center_news.asp?no3=8474。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉孟俊與陳信宏,2002,〈知識經濟下台灣資訊與IC產業之生產網路化〉。《產業論壇》 3(2):165-191。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉念琪與韓君豪,2002,〈探索知識工作者專業知識之取得-以新竹科學園區工業工程專業人員為例〉。《管理學報》 19(6):1045-1071。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉國棟,2007,《電子產業:懂這些就夠了!》。台北:大是文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉常勇,1998,《科技產業-投資經營與競爭策略》。台北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭伃君,2003,〈IP Qualification Guidelines為SIP品質把關〉。《零組件雜誌》145:71-76。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭紹辰與王麗華,2004,〈高科技外包印度,好壞各有說辭〉。《理財周刊》 207:78- 79。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕃薯藤理財,2005,〈IC設計明日之星-類比IC設計產業〉。蕃薯藤理財網站(引用日期2006年9月18日), http://fineprint.yam.com/?url=http%3A//stock.yam.com/rsh/article.php/364032&channel_id=fnnews1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴昱璋,2002,《兩岸IC設計業者合作新模式》。台北:資訊工業策進會市場情報中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference錢思敏,2003,〈搭起製造業與研發服務業創新之橋〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》 6(10):36- 41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference聯華電子,2005,《UMC 25th Celebration:晶藝圓融》。新竹:聯華電子。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝武昌,1998,《台灣地區積體電路產業空間分佈及其區為因素之研究》。中國文化大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference瞿宛文與安士敦,2003,《超越後進發展-台灣產業的升級策略》。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅騎瑩,2007,〈台灣半導體產業發展新思維〉。發表於「半導體產業技術與消費市場趨勢研討會」,新竹:台灣SoC推動聯盟、Cadence與工研院系統晶片科技中心主辦,2007年7月10日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmin, A., 1999, “An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economic Development.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23(2): 365-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmin, A., 2002, “Spatialities of Globalization.” Environment and Planning A 34(3): 385-399.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmin, A. and P. Cohendet, 2005, “Geographies of Knowledge Formation in Firms.” Industry and Innovation 12: 465-486.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmsden, A. H. and F. T. Tschang, 2003, “A New Approach to Assessing the Technological Complexity of Different Categories of R&D (with Examples from Singapore).” Research Policy 32:553-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmsden, A. H. and W.-W. Chu, 2003, Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Mass.: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAppleyard, R., 1989, The Impact of International Migration on Developing Countries. Paris: OECD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAugier, M. and M. T. Vendelo, 1999, “Networks, Cognition and Management of Tacit Knowledge.” Journal of Knowledge Management 3(4): 252-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBacattini, G., 1990, The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-conomic Notion. In Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy, edited by F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger. Geneva, Switzerland: Internation Institute for Labor Studies. Pp.37-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBagnasco, A., 1977, Tre Italie. La Problematica Territoriale dello Sviluppo Economico Italiano. Il Mulino: Bologna.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaldwin, C. Y. and K. B. Clark, 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell, 2004, “Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 28: 31-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBecattini G., 1979, Scienza Economica e Trasformazioni Sociali. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBell, M. and M. Albu, 1999, “Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries.” World Development 27: 1715-1734.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennett, R. and H. Gabriel, 1999, “Organisational Factors and Knowledge Management within Large Marketing Departments: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Knowledge Management 3(3): 212-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBramanti, A. and M. A. Maggioni, 1997, The Dynamics of Milieux:The Network Analysis Approach. In The Dynamics of Innovative Regions:The GREMI Approach, edited by Patti R., Bramanti A., and R. Gordon, London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Pp. 321-343.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBreschi, S. and Malerba F., 2001, “The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4): 817- 833.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBreznitz, D., 2005, “Development, Flexibility and R&D Performance in the Taiwanese IT industry: Capability Creation and the Effects of State-industry Co-evolution.” Industrial and Corporate Change 14: 153-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, C. and G. Linden, 2005, Offshoring in the Semiconductor Industry: Historical Perspectives. Institute of Industrial Relations Working Paper Series, University of California, Berkeley, No. IIRWPS-120-05.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCastells, M., 1996, The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, P.-L. and C.-T. Tsai, 2002, “Finding the Niche- Competition Strategy of Taiwan’s IC Design Industry.” Technovation 22(2): 101-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristopherson, S. and M. Storper, 1986, “The City as Studio; The World as Back Lot: The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4: 305-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, S. S. and G. Fields, 1999, “Social Capital and Capital Gains in Silicon Valley.” California Management Review 41(2): 108-130.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal, 1990, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavenport, T. H. and V. Grover, 2001, “Special Issue: Knowledge Management.” Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1): 3-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavenport, T. and L. Prusak, 1998, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. New York: Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceErnst, Dieter, 2004, Internationalisation of Innovation: Why is Chip Design Moving to Asia?. East-West Center Working Papers, No. 64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFleck, J., 1997, “Contingent Knowledge and Technology Development.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 9(4): 383-397.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiuliani, E., 2002, “Cluster Absorptive Capacity: An Evolutionary Approach for Industrial Clusters in Developing Country.” DRUID Summer conference on Industrial Dynamics of the New and Old Economy-Who is Embracing Whom?, Copenhagen and Elsinore: DRUID.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiuliani, E., 2005, “Cluster Absorptive Capacity: Why do Some Clusters Forge Ahead and Others Lag Behind, European.” Urban and Regional Studies 12: 269-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiuliani, E., C. Pietrobelli, and R. Rabellotti, 2005, “Upgrading in global value chains: lessons from Latin American clusters.” World Development, 33: 549-573.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGolder, P. and G. Tellis, 1993, “Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?.” Journal of Marketing Research 30: 158-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, I. and P. McCann, 2000, “Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?.” Urban Studies 37: 513-532.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGranovetter, M., 1985, “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481- 510.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaldin-Herrgard, T., 2000, “Diffusion in Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge in Organization.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(4): 357-365.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolthouse, D., 1998, “Knowledge Research Issues.” California Management Review 43(3): 277-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHowells, J., 1996, “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer.” Technoligy Analysis & Strategic Management 8(2): 91-106.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.