Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49922
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蕭乃沂zh_TW
dc.contributor.author呂羿潔zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLu, Yi Chiehen_US
dc.creator呂羿潔zh_TW
dc.creatorLu, Yi Chiehen_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-09T05:47:54Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-09T05:47:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-09T05:47:54Z-
dc.identifierG0962560151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49922-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description96256015zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract透過電子治理的推行與應用,來促成政府資訊公開、服務傳遞、民主參與以及跨域整合為當前政府公共事務管理的重要趨勢;然相較於電子治理應用於公共服務的討論,對於電子治理應用於環境管制行政的檢視與探討卻相對缺乏,但管制政策實為影響社會與民眾深遠的重要政策類型,針對其進行檢視乃當前刻不容緩之議題。是以本研究旨在透過文獻檢閱、深度訪談與實物分析,建構電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效評估架構,希冀藉此提供後續研究一系統性成效評估檢視基礎,來協助評估電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效檢視,並進一步協助管制目的的達成。\n本研究結果發現,電子治理應用於環境管制行政應是包含開始的資源投入到結果產出的一系統性之評估,以呈現整體環境管制行政的電子治理應用過程,是以本研究提出包含功能面向(使用易用性、系統整合性、統計功能完整性、系統穩定性、資訊品質)、使用行為面向(使用者感知、使用者類型)、與效益面向(效能、即時性、效率、回應性、正當性)此三大構面的電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效評估架構,並針對各評估次構面進行指標操作化與提出評估設計之建議。\n基於前述研究過程與結果,本研究認為應提升對電子治理應用於管制政策的成效評估關注,並透過系統性的評估來探討當前使用情形與待改進之面向,同時,也應重視環境管制行政有別於公共服務而具有的強制性特質,並具有達成重要公共利益的管制目的任務;本研究更針對後續研究,提出透過資訊公開角度、民眾公開參與規劃等角度來檢是電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效,以臻進電子治理的應用討論以及管制目的與公共利益的達成。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n1.1 研究背景與動機 1\n1.2 研究問題與目的 4\n1.3 研究流程 5\n第二章 文獻回顧 7\n2.1 電子治理影響評估 7\n2.2 管制政策與電子化政府 12\n2.3 管制性G2B電子治理成效影響評估構面與指標 21\n第三章 研究方法 27\n3.1 初步影響評估架構 27\n3.2深度訪談法 28\n3.3文獻與實物分析法 34\n第四章 台灣事業廢棄物管制的電子治理應用 36\n4.1 事業廢棄物管制電子治理應用分類與研究範圍 36\n4.2 事業廢棄物管制相關資訊系統功能簡介 37\n第五章 電子治理應用於管制行政的成效評估指標建立 52\n5.1 修正後之初步成效評估架構 52\n5.2 功能構面 55\n5.3 使用行為構面 64\n5.4 效益構面 67\n5.5 評估架構綜合比較分析 78\n第六章 結論與建議 83\n6.1 研究結論與實務建議 83\n6.2 後續研究建議 91\n參考文獻 94\n\n \n圖次\n圖 1 本研究流程圖 6\n圖 2 電子治理評估重點 9\n圖 3 HEEKS價值鏈模型 10\n圖 4 D&M 模型 10\n圖 5電子治理應用管制政策影響之交集圖 22\n圖 6 初步影響評估架構 27\n圖 7 事業廢棄物管制相關資訊系統 37\n圖 8 事業廢棄物管制資訊網介面 38\n圖 9 廠商申報流程 39\n圖 10 聯單管理流程 40\n圖 11各年度累計申報率 41\n圖 12 全國事業廢棄物管制系統介面 43\n圖 13 勾稽作業項目與統計 44\n圖 14 GPS即時追蹤示意圖 46\n圖 15 GPS 路線追蹤 46\n圖 16 GPS系統介面功能 47\n圖 17 EEMS系統介面 49\n圖 18 EEMS 系統功能 49\n圖 19 EMS系統介面 51\n圖 20本研究評估架構與指標建構過程示意圖 53\n圖 21 修正後之成效評估架構 54\n\n表次\n表 1環保單位業務人員與稽查人員訪談名單與執行過程 29\n表 2 業者訪談名單與執行過程 31\n表 3 環保團體訪談名單與執行過程 31\n表 4 環保單位業務人員與稽查人員訪談大要設計 32\n表 5 業者訪談內容大要設計 33\n表 6 環保團體訪談大要設計 33\n表 7 實物資料編碼表 35\n表 8 功能構面操作化與評估設計 62\n表 9 使用行為構面操作化與評估設計 66\n表 10 效益構面操作化與評估設計 75\n表 11 前後架構比較分析 80zh_TW
dc.format.extent2987471 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962560151en_US
dc.subject電子治理zh_TW
dc.subject環境管制行政zh_TW
dc.subject事業廢棄物管制zh_TW
dc.subjectE-governanceen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental regulatory administrationen_US
dc.subjectRegulation of industrial wasteen_US
dc.title電子治理應用於環境管制行政成效評估指標之建立-以環保機關事業廢棄物管制為例zh_TW
dc.titleEstabilishing evaluation indices for the performance of e-governance applied in environmental regulatory administration-a case study of regulation of industrial wasteen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference王若馨、黃郁清、夏微婷、李怡芳(譯)(2007)。Matthew David & Carole D. Suttonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference著。研究方法的基礎,台北:韋伯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference古晏菁(1999)。企業面對廢棄物上網申報制度施行後應有之認知與省思。工業污zh_TW
dc.relation.reference染防治報導,138,6-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂育誠、陳恆鈞、陳菁雯、劉淑惠(譯)(2007)。David, H. Rosenbloom著。公共zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政學:管理、政治、法律觀點,台北:學富。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂鴻光、楊慶熙(2001)。事業廢棄物管制中心介紹。工業污染防治,78,115-138。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修、陳定銘、陳秋政(2009)。我國公共服務滿意度調查之研究。行政院研考zh_TW
dc.relation.reference會委託研究報告 (報告編號 RDEC-RES-097-018),台北市:行政院研考會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱斌妤,李鳳梧、林岳嶙(2003)。政府採購電子化效率評估。發表於第三屆zh_TW
dc.relation.reference政制與資訊研討會,佛光大學主辦,宜蘭。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱雨其、黃素梅、連志誠(2008)。服務導向之政府資訊系統整合架構:以污染源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference管理資訊系統為例。資料擷取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://163.14.22.134/EcampusFile/AAS/ityuhmfr5iurfq55hzw32ybf_132008113.pdf, 擷取日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference期:2010年6月1日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院環保署(2009)。事業廢棄物建置基線資料及申報流向勾稽管制專案工作計zh_TW
dc.relation.reference畫,台北:行政院環保署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院環保署(2010)。空水廢毒許可基線資料確認及網路申報作業操作說明,台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北:行政院環保署。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林柏碩(2007)。RFID預埋於營建廢棄物流向追蹤之可行性研究。國立中央大學營zh_TW
dc.relation.reference建管理研究所,未出版,中壢。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林純如(2004)。電子化政府公共服務評估之探討。國立政治大學圖書資訊學與檔zh_TW
dc.relation.reference案學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳幸娟(1999)。行政院環保署事業廢棄物電子連線申報制度介紹,工業污染防治zh_TW
dc.relation.reference報導,130,6-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周海濤、李永賢、張蘅(譯)(2009)。Robert K.Yin著。個案研究:設計與方法,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周思伶(2009)。政府網站服務品質指標建構之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究zh_TW
dc.relation.reference所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡至沛(2005)。管制治理模式之研究,歐美運作經驗與對我國的啟示。國立政治zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大學公共行政研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference柯欣雅(2002)。近十年台灣兒童讀經教育的發展(1991-2002)。國立花蓮師範學zh_TW
dc.relation.reference院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫國祥(2001)。電子治理:治理的新技術應用,立法院院聞,29 (8),27-45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施信民(2006)。台灣環保運動史料彙編。台北縣:國史館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃朝盟(2007)。我國電子化政府之影響評估。行政院研究會委託研究報告,台北zh_TW
dc.relation.reference市,行政院研考會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃朝盟、朱斌妤、黃東益(2008)。電子治理成效調查評估與分析報告。行政院研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference考會委託研究報告(報告編號:09640D002503),台北市,行政院研考會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃東益、朱斌妤、蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理成效調查指標與評估:G2C與G2B。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院研考會委託研究報告(報告編號:0972461313),台北市:行政院研考zh_TW
dc.relation.reference會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張其祿 (2007)。管制行政:理論與經驗分析,台北:商鼎zh_TW
dc.relation.reference項靖(2008)。電子治理關係之調適。行政院研考會委託研究報告(報告編號:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference0964D002503),台北市:行政院研考會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊明壁、詹淑文(2005)。電子化政府服務品質及民眾滿意度分析-以台北市電子化zh_TW
dc.relation.reference政府入口網為研究對象。顧客滿意學刊,1(1),117-144。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊慶熙(2002)。由事業廢棄物管制探討電子化政府之推動。國立台灣大學商學研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭乃沂(2003)。政府採購電子化的成效評估:透明化觀點的指標建立。發表於倡zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廉反貪污與行政透明學術研討會,台灣透明組織主辦,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭乃沂、羅晉(2007)。電子化政府計畫評估架構之建立與應用:以數位台灣分項zh_TW
dc.relation.reference計畫為例,資料擷取自:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://web.thu.edu.tw/g96540001/www/taspaa/pdf/057.pdf,檢索日期:2010年4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference月3日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理對誰產生了影響?論電子治理的績效迷思。發表於電子zh_TW
dc.relation.reference化政府與電子治理發展趨勢研討會,電子治理研究中心主辦,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝培仁(2001)。電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究--以電子化政府入口zh_TW
dc.relation.reference網站為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭宏德、歐敏銓(1999)。台灣地區是葉廢棄物之問題與前瞻。工業污染防治報導,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference136,11-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarnes, S. & Vidgen, R. (2004). Interactive e-Government: Evaluating the Website of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUK Inland Revenue, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1), 42-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, M. M., & Brundney, J. L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic governmentzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceservices: An examination of obstacles and implications from an internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceperspective. Paper presented at National Public Management Research Conference,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBloomington, IN.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarbara Roberts & Mark Toleman (2007). One-Size e-business Adoption Mode does notzh_TW
dc.relation.referencefit all. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(3),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference49-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerstein, M. (1995). Regulating Business by Independent Regulatory Commission. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJersy: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChevallerau, F. X. (2005). The Impact of E-government on Competitiveness, Growth andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJobs. Brussels: European Communities.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeloitte (2003). Citizen Advantage: Enhancing Economic Competitiveness Throughzh_TW
dc.relation.referencee-Governmentm. Canada: Deloitte Research Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone amd McLean Model ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInformation System Success: A ten-year Update. Journal of Managementzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInformation Systems, 19(4): 9-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceeGEP (2006). Measurement Framework Final Version, e-Government Economicszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceProject. Bruessels: European Commission.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFrancis, J. G. (1993) The Politics of Regulation: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlackwell Publishers Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinger, Matthias, & Pecoud, Gaëlle (2003). From e-government to e-governance?zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTowards a model of e-Governance, 3rd European Conference on e-government,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrinity College Dublin, Ireland 3rd - 4th. July.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraafland-Esers, I. & Ettedgui, E. (2003). Benchmarking E-Government in Europe andzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe US. Santa Monica: Rand.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHead, B. & McCoy, E. (ed). (1991). Deregulation or Better Regulation? Southzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMelbourne: Macmilian Education Australia PTY Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeeks, R. (2001). Reinventing Government in the Information age, R. B. Heeks (ed),zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLondon: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeeks, R (2006). Benchmarking eGovernment: Improving the national and internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referencemeasurement, evaluation and comparison of eGovernment. IDPM i-Governmentzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWorking Paper no. 18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKooiman, J. (1999). Social - Political Governance: Overview, Reflections and Design.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublic Management, 1(1), 67-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaufmann, Daniel & Krray, A (2003). Government and Growth. World Bank Workingzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaper.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJackson, P. M. and C. Price (eds). (1994). Privatisation and Regulation: A Review of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIssues. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLoughlin, M. & Scott, C. (1997). The Regulatory State.in Dunleacy, Holliday & Peekezh_TW
dc.relation.reference(eds). Development in British Politics 5. London: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMajone, G. (1996). Regulation Europe. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMomentum Research Group (2004). Net Impact: From Connectivity to Productivity.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTexas:Momentum Research Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMontagna, J. M. (2005). A framework for the assessment and analysis of electroniczh_TW
dc.relation.referencegovernment proposal. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4, 204-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNick Malyshev (2006). Regulatory Policy: OECD Experience and Evidence. Oxfordzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReview of Economic Policy, 22, 274-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (1997). The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform: Synthesis. Paris: OECDzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2002).Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism tozh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRegulatory Governance. Paris: OECD Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2003). From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECDzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCountries. Paris: OECD Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD(2006).Cutting Red Tape: National Strategies for Administrative Simplification.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParis: OECD Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD (2006). Proposed Outline for Assessing E-government Benefits. OECDzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE-government Expert Meeting on the Cost and Benefit Analysis of E-Government,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParis 6th Februrary.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOECD(2007). .Cutting Red Tape: Comparing Adminstrative Burdens across Countries.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParis: OECD Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOgus, A. (2001). Regulatory Institutions and Structures. Center on Regulation andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCompetition, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManchester.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePongsiti, N. (2001). Regulation and Public-Private Partnerships. Center on Regulationzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Competition, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManchester.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParker, D. (2002). Economic Regulation: A Review of Issues. Annals of Public andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooperative Economics, 73(4) , 493-519.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStigler, G. J. (1975). The Citizen and the state. Chicago: The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSwann, D. (1993). “ Privatisation, Degulation, and the New Right. In J. Grant and N,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAshford (eds) Public Policy and the Impact of the New Right. New York: Printerzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublshers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchneider, V. (2003). Regulatory Governance and the Modern Organizational State: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePlace of Regulation in Contemporary State Theory, workshop for “ The Politics ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRegulation”, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 29-30zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited Nations & American Society for Public Administration (2002). Benchmarkingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE-government: A Global Perspective. New York: U.N. Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVietor, R. H. K. (1996). Contrived Competition: Regulation and Deregulation inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerica. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
015101.pdf2.92 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.