Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49922
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭乃沂 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | 呂羿潔 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Yi Chieh | en_US |
dc.creator | 呂羿潔 | zh_TW |
dc.creator | Lu, Yi Chieh | en_US |
dc.date | 2009 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-09T05:47:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-09T05:47:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-12-09T05:47:54Z | - |
dc.identifier | G0962560151 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49922 | - |
dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 公共行政研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 96256015 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 98 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | 透過電子治理的推行與應用,來促成政府資訊公開、服務傳遞、民主參與以及跨域整合為當前政府公共事務管理的重要趨勢;然相較於電子治理應用於公共服務的討論,對於電子治理應用於環境管制行政的檢視與探討卻相對缺乏,但管制政策實為影響社會與民眾深遠的重要政策類型,針對其進行檢視乃當前刻不容緩之議題。是以本研究旨在透過文獻檢閱、深度訪談與實物分析,建構電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效評估架構,希冀藉此提供後續研究一系統性成效評估檢視基礎,來協助評估電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效檢視,並進一步協助管制目的的達成。\n本研究結果發現,電子治理應用於環境管制行政應是包含開始的資源投入到結果產出的一系統性之評估,以呈現整體環境管制行政的電子治理應用過程,是以本研究提出包含功能面向(使用易用性、系統整合性、統計功能完整性、系統穩定性、資訊品質)、使用行為面向(使用者感知、使用者類型)、與效益面向(效能、即時性、效率、回應性、正當性)此三大構面的電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效評估架構,並針對各評估次構面進行指標操作化與提出評估設計之建議。\n基於前述研究過程與結果,本研究認為應提升對電子治理應用於管制政策的成效評估關注,並透過系統性的評估來探討當前使用情形與待改進之面向,同時,也應重視環境管制行政有別於公共服務而具有的強制性特質,並具有達成重要公共利益的管制目的任務;本研究更針對後續研究,提出透過資訊公開角度、民眾公開參與規劃等角度來檢是電子治理應用於環境管制行政的成效,以臻進電子治理的應用討論以及管制目的與公共利益的達成。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1\n1.1 研究背景與動機 1\n1.2 研究問題與目的 4\n1.3 研究流程 5\n第二章 文獻回顧 7\n2.1 電子治理影響評估 7\n2.2 管制政策與電子化政府 12\n2.3 管制性G2B電子治理成效影響評估構面與指標 21\n第三章 研究方法 27\n3.1 初步影響評估架構 27\n3.2深度訪談法 28\n3.3文獻與實物分析法 34\n第四章 台灣事業廢棄物管制的電子治理應用 36\n4.1 事業廢棄物管制電子治理應用分類與研究範圍 36\n4.2 事業廢棄物管制相關資訊系統功能簡介 37\n第五章 電子治理應用於管制行政的成效評估指標建立 52\n5.1 修正後之初步成效評估架構 52\n5.2 功能構面 55\n5.3 使用行為構面 64\n5.4 效益構面 67\n5.5 評估架構綜合比較分析 78\n第六章 結論與建議 83\n6.1 研究結論與實務建議 83\n6.2 後續研究建議 91\n參考文獻 94\n\n \n圖次\n圖 1 本研究流程圖 6\n圖 2 電子治理評估重點 9\n圖 3 HEEKS價值鏈模型 10\n圖 4 D&M 模型 10\n圖 5電子治理應用管制政策影響之交集圖 22\n圖 6 初步影響評估架構 27\n圖 7 事業廢棄物管制相關資訊系統 37\n圖 8 事業廢棄物管制資訊網介面 38\n圖 9 廠商申報流程 39\n圖 10 聯單管理流程 40\n圖 11各年度累計申報率 41\n圖 12 全國事業廢棄物管制系統介面 43\n圖 13 勾稽作業項目與統計 44\n圖 14 GPS即時追蹤示意圖 46\n圖 15 GPS 路線追蹤 46\n圖 16 GPS系統介面功能 47\n圖 17 EEMS系統介面 49\n圖 18 EEMS 系統功能 49\n圖 19 EMS系統介面 51\n圖 20本研究評估架構與指標建構過程示意圖 53\n圖 21 修正後之成效評估架構 54\n\n表次\n表 1環保單位業務人員與稽查人員訪談名單與執行過程 29\n表 2 業者訪談名單與執行過程 31\n表 3 環保團體訪談名單與執行過程 31\n表 4 環保單位業務人員與稽查人員訪談大要設計 32\n表 5 業者訪談內容大要設計 33\n表 6 環保團體訪談大要設計 33\n表 7 實物資料編碼表 35\n表 8 功能構面操作化與評估設計 62\n表 9 使用行為構面操作化與評估設計 66\n表 10 效益構面操作化與評估設計 75\n表 11 前後架構比較分析 80 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 2987471 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962560151 | en_US |
dc.subject | 電子治理 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 環境管制行政 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 事業廢棄物管制 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | E-governance | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental regulatory administration | en_US |
dc.subject | Regulation of industrial waste | en_US |
dc.title | 電子治理應用於環境管制行政成效評估指標之建立-以環保機關事業廢棄物管制為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Estabilishing evaluation indices for the performance of e-governance applied in environmental regulatory administration-a case study of regulation of industrial waste | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference | 王若馨、黃郁清、夏微婷、李怡芳(譯)(2007)。Matthew David & Carole D. Sutton | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 著。研究方法的基礎,台北:韋伯。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 古晏菁(1999)。企業面對廢棄物上網申報制度施行後應有之認知與省思。工業污 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 染防治報導,138,6-7。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 呂育誠、陳恆鈞、陳菁雯、劉淑惠(譯)(2007)。David, H. Rosenbloom著。公共 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 行政學:管理、政治、法律觀點,台北:學富。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 呂鴻光、楊慶熙(2001)。事業廢棄物管制中心介紹。工業污染防治,78,115-138。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 江明修、陳定銘、陳秋政(2009)。我國公共服務滿意度調查之研究。行政院研考 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 會委託研究報告 (報告編號 RDEC-RES-097-018),台北市:行政院研考會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 朱斌妤,李鳳梧、林岳嶙(2003)。政府採購電子化效率評估。發表於第三屆 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 政制與資訊研討會,佛光大學主辦,宜蘭。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 朱雨其、黃素梅、連志誠(2008)。服務導向之政府資訊系統整合架構:以污染源 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 管理資訊系統為例。資料擷取自: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | http://163.14.22.134/EcampusFile/AAS/ityuhmfr5iurfq55hzw32ybf_132008113.pdf, 擷取日 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 期:2010年6月1日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 行政院環保署(2009)。事業廢棄物建置基線資料及申報流向勾稽管制專案工作計 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 畫,台北:行政院環保署。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 行政院環保署(2010)。空水廢毒許可基線資料確認及網路申報作業操作說明,台 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 北:行政院環保署。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 林柏碩(2007)。RFID預埋於營建廢棄物流向追蹤之可行性研究。國立中央大學營 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 建管理研究所,未出版,中壢。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 林純如(2004)。電子化政府公共服務評估之探討。國立政治大學圖書資訊學與檔 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 案學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 吳幸娟(1999)。行政院環保署事業廢棄物電子連線申報制度介紹,工業污染防治 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 報導,130,6-7。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 周海濤、李永賢、張蘅(譯)(2009)。Robert K.Yin著。個案研究:設計與方法, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 周思伶(2009)。政府網站服務品質指標建構之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 胡至沛(2005)。管制治理模式之研究,歐美運作經驗與對我國的啟示。國立政治 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 大學公共行政研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 柯欣雅(2002)。近十年台灣兒童讀經教育的發展(1991-2002)。國立花蓮師範學 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 院鄉土文化研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 孫國祥(2001)。電子治理:治理的新技術應用,立法院院聞,29 (8),27-45。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 施信民(2006)。台灣環保運動史料彙編。台北縣:國史館。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 黃朝盟(2007)。我國電子化政府之影響評估。行政院研究會委託研究報告,台北 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 市,行政院研考會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 黃朝盟、朱斌妤、黃東益(2008)。電子治理成效調查評估與分析報告。行政院研 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 考會委託研究報告(報告編號:09640D002503),台北市,行政院研考會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 黃東益、朱斌妤、蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理成效調查指標與評估:G2C與G2B。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 行政院研考會委託研究報告(報告編號:0972461313),台北市:行政院研考 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 張其祿 (2007)。管制行政:理論與經驗分析,台北:商鼎 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 項靖(2008)。電子治理關係之調適。行政院研考會委託研究報告(報告編號: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 0964D002503),台北市:行政院研考會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 楊明壁、詹淑文(2005)。電子化政府服務品質及民眾滿意度分析-以台北市電子化 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 政府入口網為研究對象。顧客滿意學刊,1(1),117-144。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 楊慶熙(2002)。由事業廢棄物管制探討電子化政府之推動。國立台灣大學商學研 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 蕭乃沂(2003)。政府採購電子化的成效評估:透明化觀點的指標建立。發表於倡 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 廉反貪污與行政透明學術研討會,台灣透明組織主辦,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 蕭乃沂、羅晉(2007)。電子化政府計畫評估架構之建立與應用:以數位台灣分項 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 計畫為例,資料擷取自: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | http://web.thu.edu.tw/g96540001/www/taspaa/pdf/057.pdf,檢索日期:2010年4 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 月3日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理對誰產生了影響?論電子治理的績效迷思。發表於電子 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 化政府與電子治理發展趨勢研討會,電子治理研究中心主辦,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 謝培仁(2001)。電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究--以電子化政府入口 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 網站為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 鄭宏德、歐敏銓(1999)。台灣地區是葉廢棄物之問題與前瞻。工業污染防治報導, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 136,11-12。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Barnes, S. & Vidgen, R. (2004). Interactive e-Government: Evaluating the Website of the | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | UK Inland Revenue, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1), 42-63. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Brown, M. M., & Brundney, J. L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic government | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | services: An examination of obstacles and implications from an international | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | perspective. Paper presented at National Public Management Research Conference, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Bloomington, IN. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Barbara Roberts & Mark Toleman (2007). One-Size e-business Adoption Mode does not | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | fit all. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2(3), | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | 49-61. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Berstein, M. (1995). Regulating Business by Independent Regulatory Commission. New | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Jersy: Princeton University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Chevallerau, F. X. (2005). The Impact of E-government on Competitiveness, Growth and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Jobs. Brussels: European Communities. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Deloitte (2003). Citizen Advantage: Enhancing Economic Competitiveness Through | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | e-Governmentm. Canada: Deloitte Research Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone amd McLean Model of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Information System Success: A ten-year Update. Journal of Management | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Information Systems, 19(4): 9-30. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | eGEP (2006). Measurement Framework Final Version, e-Government Economics | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Project. Bruessels: European Commission. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Francis, J. G. (1993) The Politics of Regulation: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Blackwell Publishers Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Finger, Matthias, & Pecoud, Gaëlle (2003). From e-government to e-governance? | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Towards a model of e-Governance, 3rd European Conference on e-government, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Trinity College Dublin, Ireland 3rd - 4th. July. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Graafland-Esers, I. & Ettedgui, E. (2003). Benchmarking E-Government in Europe and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | the US. Santa Monica: Rand. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Head, B. & McCoy, E. (ed). (1991). Deregulation or Better Regulation? South | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Melbourne: Macmilian Education Australia PTY Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Heeks, R. (2001). Reinventing Government in the Information age, R. B. Heeks (ed), | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Heeks, R (2006). Benchmarking eGovernment: Improving the national and international | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | measurement, evaluation and comparison of eGovernment. IDPM i-Government | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Working Paper no. 18. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Kooiman, J. (1999). Social - Political Governance: Overview, Reflections and Design. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Public Management, 1(1), 67-92. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Kaufmann, Daniel & Krray, A (2003). Government and Growth. World Bank Working | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Paper. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Jackson, P. M. and C. Price (eds). (1994). Privatisation and Regulation: A Review of the | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Issues. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Loughlin, M. & Scott, C. (1997). The Regulatory State.in Dunleacy, Holliday & Peeke | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | (eds). Development in British Politics 5. London: Macmillan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Majone, G. (1996). Regulation Europe. New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Momentum Research Group (2004). Net Impact: From Connectivity to Productivity. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Texas:Momentum Research Group. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Montagna, J. M. (2005). A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | government proposal. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4, 204-219. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Nick Malyshev (2006). Regulatory Policy: OECD Experience and Evidence. Oxford | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Review of Economic Policy, 22, 274-299. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD (1997). The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform: Synthesis. Paris: OECD | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD (2002).Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Regulatory Governance. Paris: OECD Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD (2003). From Red Tape to Smart Tape: Administrative Simplification in OECD | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Countries. Paris: OECD Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD(2006).Cutting Red Tape: National Strategies for Administrative Simplification. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Paris: OECD Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD (2006). Proposed Outline for Assessing E-government Benefits. OECD | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | E-government Expert Meeting on the Cost and Benefit Analysis of E-Government, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Paris 6th Februrary. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | OECD(2007). .Cutting Red Tape: Comparing Adminstrative Burdens across Countries. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Paris: OECD Publication. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Ogus, A. (2001). Regulatory Institutions and Structures. Center on Regulation and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Competition, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Manchester. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Pongsiti, N. (2001). Regulation and Public-Private Partnerships. Center on Regulation | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | and Competition, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Manchester. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Parker, D. (2002). Economic Regulation: A Review of Issues. Annals of Public and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Cooperative Economics, 73(4) , 493-519. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Stigler, G. J. (1975). The Citizen and the state. Chicago: The University of Chicago. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Swann, D. (1993). “ Privatisation, Degulation, and the New Right. In J. Grant and N, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Ashford (eds) Public Policy and the Impact of the New Right. New York: Printer | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Publshers. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Schneider, V. (2003). Regulatory Governance and the Modern Organizational State: The | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Place of Regulation in Contemporary State Theory, workshop for “ The Politics of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Regulation”, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 29-30 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | United Nations & American Society for Public Administration (2002). Benchmarking | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | E-government: A Global Perspective. New York: U.N. Publications. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | Vietor, R. H. K. (1996). Contrived Competition: Regulation and Deregulation in | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference | America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | thesis | - |
Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
015101.pdf | 2.92 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.