Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50709
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor許炳煌zh_TW
dc.contributor.author羅文卿zh_TW
dc.creator羅文卿zh_TW
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T08:23:29Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-29T08:23:29Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-29T08:23:29Z-
dc.identifierG0945510201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50709-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description94551020zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討使用閱讀網絡圖對於臺灣高中生閱讀理解能力的影響,並分析學習者對於使用閱讀網絡圖後的態度觀感。\r\n根據研究目的,所採用的實驗工具為閱讀理解測驗以及態度問卷。實驗對象為台中市某私立高中的92名學生。實驗進行前,實驗組與對照組的學生們接受閱讀理解前測。在為期六週的教學期間,實驗組接受閱讀網絡圖教學訓練,而對照組則接受傳統的教師講述閱讀教學方式。實驗後,兩組學生接受閱讀理解後測;實驗組另在後測結束後填寫問卷。資料分析透過描述性統計、T檢定、與ANOVA檢視閱讀網絡圖教學的效益;問卷旨在瞭解學生對於閱讀網絡圖輔助閱讀理解的態度和看法。\r\n研究主要結果如下:\r\n1.閱讀網絡圖有助於學生閱讀理解。此外,閱讀網絡圖對於學生在回答克漏字網絡圖題型有助益,但其顯著差異並未反映在選擇題的作答表現上。\r\n2.學生對於閱讀網絡圖抱持正面的態度。第一,他們給予網絡圖正面回饋;第二,他們肯定網絡圖對於閱讀理解及文章架構的助益;第三,他們表示有意願在未來應用閱讀網絡圖於英語文章或其他學科的學習上。\r\n綜合研究結果,本研究透過瞭解閱讀網絡圖在閱讀教學上的效益,期能提供教師對於閱讀網絡圖的使用有更一步的瞭解,以充分幫助學生的英語閱讀學習。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to investigate the effects of graphic organizer instruction on Taiwanese senior high school students’ reading comprehension. Also, it explored students’ attitudes toward the use of graphic organizers. \r\nBased on the purpose of this study, instruments included reading comprehension tests and an attitude questionnaire. Two intact classes of 92 private senior high school second-grade female students in Taichung City participated in the study. The classes were first divided into the experimental group and the control group. Before the treatment, the reading comprehension pre-test was administrated. During the six-week instruction, the experimental group received graphic organizer instruction, while the control group received the traditional reading instruction. After that, the effects of graphic organizer instruction were evaluated through measures of reading comprehension post-test. The attitude questionnaire was distributed to the experimental group right after the post-test. The quantitative analysis of the mean scores on comprehension tests was conducted through descriptive statistics, t-Tests, and two-way ANOVA to indicate the effects of graphic organizers. In addition, the data of the questionnaire were analyzed for students’ attitudes toward and perceptions of graphic organizers. \r\nThe major findings of the study were listed below:\r\n1. The results of comprehension tests showed a significant effect of graphic organizer instruction on reading comprehension of senior high school students. Besides, the graphic organizer instruction positively affected students’ performance on answering cloze graphic organizer questions, while its effect on students’ answering multiple-choice questions was not salient.\r\n2. Information gathered from the questionnaire indicated students’ positive attitudes toward the facilitation of graphic organizers. First, the students expressed positive feedbacks toward the use of graphic organizers. Second, they confirmed the benefits of graphic organizer instruction like increasing their reading comprehension and familiarizing themselves with text structure. Third, they generally showed their willingness to apply the use of graphic organizers to future learning while reading English articles or studying other subjects. \r\nTo conclude, this study may be of importance in understanding the effectiveness of graphic organizers in its application of reading instruction, as well as in providing English teachers with a better understanding of how to use graphic organizers so as to offer learners with best help.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements......................................................................................................iii\r\nTable of Contents………………………………………………………………….….iv\r\nList of Tables and Figures……………………………………………………….…....ix\r\nChinese Abstract……………………………………………………………..….…..xiii\r\nEnglish Abstract……………………………………………………………………...xv\r\nChapter \r\n1. Introduction……………………………………………………………..…01\r\n 1.1 Background and Motivation………………………………….………..01 \r\n 1.2 Purpose and Research Questions of the Study………………………...04 \r\n 1.3 Definition of Terms…………………………………………………....04 \r\n1.4 Significance of the Study……………………………………………...05 \r\n 1.4.1 An alternative solution to reading comprehension problem………06 \r\n 1.4.2 Fill up the gaps in the previous studies…………………………...06\r\n 1.5 Overview of the Thesis……………………………….………………..07 \r\n2. Literature Review…………………………………….……………………08 \r\n 2.1 Reading…………………………………..…………………………….08 \r\n 2.1.1 Reading Models………………….………………………………..08 \r\n 2.1.1.1 The bottom-up model………………………………….......09\r\n 2.1.1.2 The top-down model………………...…………………….09 \r\n 2.1.1.3 The interactive model………………….…………………..10 \r\n 2.1.2 Reading Instructions………………………………………………11\r\n 2.1.2.1 Extensive reading instruction…………………...…………11\r\n 2.1.2.2 Intensive reading instruction……………………...……….12 \r\n2.2 Graphic Organizers in Reading Classroom…………………………....13\r\n 2.2.1 Concept of Graphic Organizers………………………………...…14 \r\n 2.2.2 Theories of Graphic Organizers…………………………………..15 \r\n 2.2.2.1 Ausubel’s (1968) meaningful learning theory…………….15\r\n 2.2.2.2 Schema theory……………………………………………..16\r\n 2.2.2.3 Vykotsky’s theory on scaffolding…………………...…….17\r\n 2.2.3 Types of Graphic Organizers………………………………..……18\r\n 2.2.3.1 Sequence map………………………………………….…..19\r\n 2.2.3.2 Theme map……………………………………………...…19 \r\n 2.2.3.3 Compare/contrast map…………………………………….20\r\n 2.2.3.4 Classification map…………………………………………20\r\n 2.2.4 Instructional Procedures of Graphic Organizers………….………22\r\n 2.2.4.1 Hanf’s (1971) study technique……………….……………22\r\n 2.2.4.2 Heimlich and Pittleman’s (1986) classroom application of graphic organizers…………………………...……………..23\r\n 2.2.4.3 Baumann’s (1988) and Sinatra’s (2000) direct instruction..24\r\n 2.2.5 Benefits of Graphic Organizers………………….………………..26\r\n 2.2.5.1 Enhance the activation of prior knowledge………………..26\r\n 2.2.5.2 Raise the awareness of text structure……………………...27 \r\n2.3 Related Studies on Graphic Organizers in Reading Instruction……….29\r\n2.3.1 Studies in the L1 Context……………………………………...….29\r\n 2.3.2 Studies in the L2 Context…………………………………………32\r\n 2.3.3 Critiques on the Previous Research…………………………….…34\r\n 2.3.3.1 Lack of including intermediate-level students as research subjects…………………………………….……………….34\r\n 2.3.3.2 Lack of the effectiveness of classification map in the L2 context………………………….…………………………..35\r\n 2.3.3.3 Insufficient information of graphic organizer instruction…35\r\n 2.3.3.4 Single test design…………………………………………..36\r\n3. Methodology…………………………………………………………...….38 \r\n3.1 Research Design……………………………………….………………38\r\n 3.2 Participants……………………….……………………………………39\r\n 3.2.1 Students………………………………...…………………………39 \r\n 3.2.2 Teacher……………………………………………………………40 \r\n 3.2.3 Researcher…………………….…………………………………..40 \r\n 3.3 Instruments…………………………………………………………….41\r\n 3.3.1 Reading Comprehension Tests……………………………………41\r\n 3.3.2 Questionnaire……………………………………………………..43\r\n 3.4 Pilot Test...………………………………….………………………….45 \r\n 3.5 Main Study………………………………….…………………………47 \r\n 3.5.1 Control Group………………………….…………………………47 \r\n 3.5.2 Experimental Group………………………………………………48 \r\n 3.5.2.1 Instructional procedures…….……………………………..49\r\n 3.5.2.2 Instructional materials……………….…………………….53\r\n 3.6 Procedure………………………...…………………………………….56 \r\n 3.7 Data Analysis……………………………….…………………………58\r\n4. Results and Discussion………………….…………………………………59 \r\n 4.1 Results…………………………………………………………………59 \r\n4.1.1 The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension…59\r\n4.1.2 Students’ Attitudes toward Graphic Organizer Instruction….…….63\r\n 4.1.2.1 The feedbacks of using the graphic organizers……………63\r\n 4.1.2.2 The efficacy of using the graphic organizers……….….…..66\r\n 4.1.2.3 The willingness of using the graphic organizers……….….70\r\n 4.2 Discussion……………………………………………………………..73 \r\n4.2.1 The Effects of Graphic Organizers on Reading Comprehension....73\r\n4.2.2 Students’ Attitudes toward Graphic Organizer Instruction………..77 \r\n 4.2.2.1 The feedbacks of using the graphic organizers……………77\r\n 4.2.2.2 The efficacy of using the graphic organizers………………79\r\n 4.2.2.3 The willingness of using the graphic organizers…………..81\r\n5. Conclusions………………………………………………………………..83 \r\n 5.1 Research Findings……………………………………………………..83\r\n5.2 Pedagogical Implications………………………...……………………86\r\n5.3 Limitations of the Study……………………………………….………87\r\n5.4 Suggestions for Further Research……………………………………..88\r\nReferences……………………………………………………………………………92\r\nAppendixes..………………………………………………………………….……..100 \r\n A. English Reading Comprehension Test……………….…………………....100\r\nB. Attitude Questionnaire……………………………………………….……115 \r\n C. Guiding Worksheet…………………………………………...…………...116zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0945510201en_US
dc.subject閱讀網絡圖zh_TW
dc.subject閱讀理解zh_TW
dc.subject閱讀態度zh_TW
dc.subject閱讀教學zh_TW
dc.subjectgraphic organizeren_US
dc.subjectreading comprehensionen_US
dc.subjectattitude toward readingen_US
dc.subjectreading instructionen_US
dc.title閱讀網絡圖對臺灣高中生閱讀理解成效之研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn investigation into the effects of graphic organizers on reading comprehension of senior high school students in Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceREFERENCESzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAdams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. NY: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAjideh, P. (2003). Schema theory-based pre-reading tasks: A neglected essential in the ESL reading class. The Reading Matrix, 3(1), 1-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlvermann, D. E. (1981). The compensatory effect of graphic organizers on descriptive text. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), 44-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, N. J. (1999b). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAntonacci, P. A. (1991). Students search for meaning in the text through semantic mapping. Social Education, 55(3), 174-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArmbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1991). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 331-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAusubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. NY: Grune & Stratton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAusubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAvery, P. G., Baker, J., & Gross, S. H. (1997). “Mapping” learning at the secondary level. The Clearing House, 70(5), 279-285.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood (Ed.). Understanding reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarron, R. F. (1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In H. L. Herber & P.L. Sander (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report (pp. 29-39). NY: Syracuse University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaumann, J. F. (1983). Direct instruction reconsidered. Journal of Reading, 31(8), 712-718.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaxendell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative: The 3 C`s of graphic organizers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(3), 46-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBernard, R. M. (1991). Effects of processing instructions on the usefulness of a graphic organizer and structural cueing in text. Instructional Science, 19, 207-216.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerkowitz, S. J. (1986). Effects of instruction in text organization on sixth-grade students memory for expository reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(2), 161-179.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language pedagogy, 2nd, 298-316. New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrell, P. L. (1984). The effect of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 41zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrell, P. L.(1988a). Introduction: Interactive approaches to second language reading. In P. L. Carrel, J. Devine, D. E. Eskey, Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, pp. 1-8. Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrell, P. L. (1988b). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In P. L. Carrel, J. Devine, D. E. Eskey, Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, pp. 101-113. Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarrell, P. L. & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang, K. E., Sung, Y.T., & Chen, I.D (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCho, K. S. & Krashen, S. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: Adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37, 662-667.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCziko, G. A. (1978). Differences in first and second language reading: the use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 473-489.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDay, R. R. & Bamford, J. (1998) Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDechant, E. (1991). Understanding and teaching reading: An interactive model. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiCecco, V. M. & Gleason, M. M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 306-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoyle, C. S. (1999). The use of graphic organizers to improve reading comprehension of learning disabled students in social studies. (Eric Reproduction Service No. ED 427313)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDrafke, M. (1993). Graphic Organizers. Retrieved from December 20, 2008 from http://www.cod.edu/people/facult/drafke/graphic%20organizes.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEarle, R. A. (1969). Use of the structured overview in mathematics classes. In H. L. Herber & H. L. Sander (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas: First year report (pp. 49-58). NY: Syracuse University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the bottom: an interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, D. E. Eskey, Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading, pp. 93-100. Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpiegel, G. F., & Barufaldi, J. P. (1994). The effects of a combination of text structure awareness and graphic postorganizers on recall and retention of science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9),913-932.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrabe, W. (1999). Developments in reading research and their implications for computer-adaptive reading assessment. In M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.), Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency, pp.111-147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGriffin, C. C., Malone, L. D. & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(2), 98-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHanf, M. B. (1971). Mapping: A technique for translating reading into thinking. Journal of Reading, 14(4), 225-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeimlich, J., & Pittelman, S. D. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, L. Y. (2003). Using concept mapping as a strategy to improve the English reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, C. Y. (2006). The effects of story mapping on picture writing for EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHudson, T. (1982). The effect of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32(1), 1-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJiang, X. Y., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(1), 33-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, L. L. (1989). Learning across the curriculum with creative graphing. Journal of Reading, 32(6), 509-519.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKennedy, C., & Bolitho, R. (1984). English for specific purposes. London: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatayama, A. & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim, A. H., Vaughn, S, Wanzek, J., & Wei, S.J. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrashen, S. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuo, P. C. (2003). Effects of semantic maps on reading comprehension: A post-reading design. The Twentieth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 231-249). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLao, C. Y., & Krashen, S. (2000). The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: More evidence for the power of reading. System, 28, 261-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLipson, M. (1995). The effect of semantic mapping instruction on prose comprehension of below-level college readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 34(4), 367-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiou, M. C. (2005). Concept mapping as a small group task on reading comprehension of EFL senior high students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLu, L. S. (2006). The effects of semantic mapping strategy on EFL high school students’ reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMason, B. & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25, 91-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMautone, P. D. & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Cognitive aids for guiding graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 640-652.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 30-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMerkley, D. M., & Jefferies, D. (2001). Guidelines for implementing a graphic organizer. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 350-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoore, D. W., & Readence, J. E. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78(1), 11-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science,19, 29-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParan, A. (2003). English teaching essential—Intensive reading. English Teaching Professional, 28, 40-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeresich, M. L., Meadows, J. D., & Sinatra, R. (1990). Content area cognitive mapping for reading and writing proficiency. Journal of Reading, 33(5), 424-432.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaymond, E. (2000). Cognitive Characteristics. Learners with Mild Disabilities (pp. 169-201). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Pearson Education Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReutzel, D. R. (1986). Investigating a synthesized comprehension instructional strategy: The cloze story map. Journal of Educational Research, 79(6), 343-349.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobb, T. N. & Susser, B. (1989). Extensive reading vs. skills building in an EFL context. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5(2), 239-251.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobinson, D. H. (1998). Graphic organizers as aids to text learning. Reading Research and Instruction, 37(2), 85-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 179-189.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSharp, A. (2002). Chinese L1 schoolchildren reading in English: the effects of rhetorical patterns. Reading in Foreign Language, 14(2), 111-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheu, S. P. H. (2004). The effects of extensive reading on learners’ reading ability development. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 17(2), 213-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSinatra, R. C. (2000). Teaching learners to think, read, and write more effectively in content subjects. Clearing House, 73(5), 266-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSinatra, R. C., Stahl-Gemake, J., & Morgan, N. W. (1986). Using semantic mapping after reading to organize and write original discourse. Journal of Reading, 30(1), 4-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSturm, J. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 124-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTeng, H. C. (1994). The Effects of Visual Cues on the EFL Listening Comprehension by Technology College Students in Taiwan. Papers from the 9th T. V. E. Conference of R. O. C., 247-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTang, G. M. (1992). The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structure on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 177-195.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, B. M. (1992). Text structure, comprehension, and recall. In S. J. Samuels, & A. E. Farstrup, (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 220-235). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, T. H. (2002). Comparing the senior high school ESL curriculum in four Asian countries. The Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on English Teaching/Fourth Pan-Asian Conference, 592-598. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co. Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZipprich, M. A. (1997). Web-making: An easy but critical step to better writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13(4), 391-395.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.