Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51128
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor劉小蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author莊信賢zh_TW
dc.creator莊信賢zh_TW
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T10:57:05Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-29T10:57:05Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-29T10:57:05Z-
dc.identifierG0098926011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51128-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description98926011zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to investigate the eighth graders’ English learning difficulty in the Shi-Shi Junior High School. Based on the previous researchers’ similar points of view, it is concluded that students’ learning difficulty is associated with three dimensions, including the school factors, personal factors, and family factors. The three dimensions were related to students’ English learning difficulty.\r\n The research methods incorporated qualitative such as in-depth interviewing and quantitative methods such as descriptive statistics and T-test. 120 students participated in the survey, and ten students and three teachers took part in the in-depth interviewing. According to the result, such factors as the teachers’ teaching and explaining ways and their shortage of interest in English have led to students’ English learning difficulty. Female students are bombarded with more English learning difficulty associated with emotional problems such as their bias toward their English teachers and parents’ expectation. Students retrogressing in the junior high school encounter more English learning difficulty, including the gap between their English learning in the elementary school and that in the junior high school and their parents’ expectation. Too many exams, the usage of the present English textbook, the learning gap, students’ shortage of interest in English learning, their previous learning experience of failure, and their learning pressure contributed to the English learning difficulty of students with lower achievement. \r\nSuggestions are offered based on the research consequence.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS\r\nABSTRACT....................I\r\nTABLE OF CONTENTS...........II\r\nLIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES...........V\r\nCHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION...........1\r\n1. INTRODUCTION OF THE BACKGROUND...........1\r\n1.1 The importance of learning English...........1\r\n1.2 The background of the English education in Taiwan...........1\r\n1.3 My research motivation...........5\r\n2. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS RESEARCH...........7\r\n3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS...........7\r\nCHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW...........9\r\n1. THE DEFINITION OF THE SPECIFIC TERMS...........9\r\n1.1 The definition of learning...........9\r\n1.2 The definition of learning difficulty...........10\r\n1.3 Theories related to learning difficulty...........10\r\n2. PREVIOUS RELATED RESEARCH...........27\r\nCHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODS...........31\r\n1 PARTICIPANTS...........31\r\n2 LEARNING DIFFICULTY...........33\r\n3 RESEARCH METHOD AND TOOL...........33\r\n3.1 In-depth interviewing:To gather information from the survey candidates...........34\r\n3.2 Descriptive statistics...........34\r\n3.3 Sampling frame...........34\r\n3.4 Independent Sample T-test...........35\r\n4 PROCEDURE OF THIS RESEARCH...........35\r\nCHAPTER FOUR RESULTS...........37\r\n1. RESULTS FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRES...........37\r\n1.1 Results related to students’ personal background...........37\r\n1.2 Reasons responsible for students’ learning difficulties...........40\r\n1.3 The difference of English learning difficulty between male and female students...........45\r\n1.4 What kind of English learning difficulty have those students whose English retrogress in the junior high school encountered?...........51\r\n1.5 Do the students with different English academic performance suffer from different English learning difficulty?...........55\r\n2. RESULTS FROM INDEPENDENT SAMPLE T-TEST...........66\r\n3. RESULT FROM THE IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........71\r\n3.1 Results from the in-depth interviewing with the teachers...........71\r\n3.2. Results from the in-depth interviewing with the students...........79\r\n4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURVEY CONSEQUENCE AND IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........92\r\n4.1 Reasons behind the factors contributing to students’ English learning difficulty...........92\r\n4.2 REASONS BEHIND THE FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR FEMALE STUDENTS’ ENGLISH LEARNING DIFFICULTY...........95\r\n4.3 Reasons behind the factors responsible for students retrogressing in the junior high school...........97\r\n4.4 Reasons behind the factors responsible for students’ with different academic achievement English learning difficulty...........99\r\nCHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION...........104\r\n1 RESEARCH CONSEQUENCE...........104\r\n1.1 Discussion and finding of the first research question...........105\r\n1.2 Discussion and finding of the second research question...........106\r\n1.3 Discussion and finding of the third research question...........107\r\n1.4 Discussion and finding of the fourth research question...........108\r\n1.5 Discussion and finding of the fifth research question...........110\r\n2 SUGGESTIONS FOR THE ENGLISH EDUCATION IN TWELVE-YEAR INTEGRATED CURRICULUM AND FOR ENGLISH TEACHERS’ TEACHING...........111\r\n2.1 Suggestions for English teachers...........111\r\n2.2 Suggestions for the Twelve-Integrated Curriculum...........112\r\n2.3 Suggestions for the textbook compilation...........113\r\n3 LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY...........114\r\n4 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDY...........115\r\nREFERENCES...........117\r\nAPPENDIX 1 QUESTIONNAIRE...........123\r\nAPPENDIX 2 INTERVIEWING QUESTIONS FOR ENGLISH TEACHERS...........124\r\nAPPENDIX 3 INTERVIEWING QUESTIONS FOR STUDENTS...........125\r\nAPPENDIX 4 CONSEQUENCE OF TEACHER A’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........126\r\nAPPENDIX 5 CONSEQUENCE OF TEACHER B’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........128\r\nAPPENDIX 6 CONSEQUENCE OF TEACHER C’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........130\r\nAPPENDIX 7 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT A’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........133\r\nAPPENDIX 8 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT B’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........136\r\nAPPENDIX 9 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT C’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........138\r\nAPPENDIX 10 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT D’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........140\r\nAPPENDIX 11CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT E’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........142\r\nAPPENDIX 12 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT F’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........143\r\nAPPENDIX 13 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT G’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........144\r\nAPPENDIX 14 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT H’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........145\r\nAPPENDIX 15 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT I’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........146\r\nAPPENDIX 16 CONSEQUENCE OF STUDENT J’S IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWING...........149zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098926011en_US
dc.subject英文學習困難zh_TW
dc.subjectEnglish learning difficultyen_US
dc.titleShi-Shi國中八年級學生英文學習障礙分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe evaluation of the eighth graders` english learning difficulty in Shi-Shi Junior High Schoolen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference【1】Briton B, Fujiki M, Motague E, and Hanton J. (2000). Children with language impairment in cooperative work groups: A pilot study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 31: 252-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【2】Carroll J. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistic, 2, 5-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【3】Denzin, N.K., V Lincoln , Y.S. (1998). The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issue. London : Sage Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【4】Ferrari M. and Palladino, P. (2007). Foreign Language Learning Difficulties in Italian Children: Are They Associated with Other Learning Difficulties? Journal of learning disabilities. 40 (3), 256-269.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【5】Gagne, R.M.(1985). The Conditions of learning and theory of instruction(4th ed.).New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【6】Ganschow L., Sparks R., Anderson R., Javorsky J., Skinner S. and Patton J. (1994). Differences in anxiety and language performance among high and low anxious college foreign language learners. Modern Language Journal, 78, 41-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【7】Ganshow L., Myer B., and Roger K. (1989). Foreign language policies and procedures for students with specific learning disabilities. Learning disabilities focus, 5, 50-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【8】Ganshow L., Sparks R., Javorsky J., Pohlman J., and BishopMaebury A. (1991). Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 530-541.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【9】Ganschow L., Sparks R., and Javorsky J. (1998). Foreign language learning difficulties: An historical perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 31(3), 248-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【10】Naparstek, N.(1995). The learning solution. New York, New York: Aron Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【11】Skehan P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3,188-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【12】Sparks R. and Ganschow. L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern language journal, 75, 3-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【13】Sparks R., Ganschow L., Artzer M., Siebenhar D., and Plageman M. (1997). Anxiety and proficiency in a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 185, 559-562.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【14】Tutty, M. L., Rothery, M., &Grinnell R. M. (eds.), (1996). Qualitative Research for social workers. London : Ally and Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChinese work citedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference【15】王文琪(1995)。國中生學習困難、學習壓力、社會支持與生活適應的關係。國立政治大學教育學習碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【16】王克先(1996)。學習心理學。台北市:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【17】王連生(1991)。教育輔導原理與技術。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【18】王國成 (2004)。高一學生字彙學習困難之研究。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【19】江莉儀(2007)。兒童早期的英語學習經驗對國小三年級正式英語學習影響之研究-以台北縣某國小為例。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【20】邱皓政 (2002)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南圖書出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【21】杜佳安(2008)。高職學生英語學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【22】吳武典(1987)。青少年問題與對策。台北市:張老師。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【23】朱敬先(1986)。學習心理學。台北市:千華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【24】余鴻穎(2006)。高職學生數學學習困擾與學習態度之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【25】林生傳(2007)。教育心理學。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【26】林志展(2004)。臺北市綜合高中學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【27】林明美(1988)。英文科學習困擾調查研究。 輔導通訊,12,21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【28】林美靖(2004)。高職商業類科學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【29】林俊德(2006)。高職實用技能班學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【30】林朝夫(1993)。偏差行為輔導與個案研究。臺北:心理出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【31】林進材(2000)。有效教學:理論與策略。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【32】林奮穗(2003)。平地學校原住民兒童學習困擾之研究─以香草國民小學為例。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【33】胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究 理論、方法及本土女性研究實力。台北市:巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【34】施良方(1996)。學習理論。高雄市:麗文文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【35】計儒皓(1985)。學業低成就學生之認識與輔導。輔導通訊,5,120-122。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【36】袁方(2002)。社會學研究方法。台北:五南圖書出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【37】許定邦(2002)。高中職多元入學方案後國中生學習困擾學習態度之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【38】陳向明(2007)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【39】陳李綢(1991)。個案研究。台北:心理出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【40】陳昱洲(1992)。青少年的學習困擾。父母親月刊,93,66-72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【41】陳瑞洲 (2002)。我國高中職汽修科多元入學管道學生實習課程學習態度、學習困擾與學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【42】陳榮輝(2002)。我國職業學校實用技能班學生學習困擾之研究。國立臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【43】莊聯品(1985)。低成就學生學習態度之調查研究。輔導通訊,5,116-117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【44】張永宗(2001)。台北市高職免試多元入學學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【45】張志銨(2002)。高職新課程實施後汽車科學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【46】張武昌(2006)。臺灣的英語教育:現況與省思教育。資料與研究,69,129-144。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【47】張秋明(1997)。臺北市試辦學年學分制高職學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【48】張春興、林清山(1981)。教育心理學。台北市:文景書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【49】張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【50】張春興、吳武典、洪有義 (1979)。學習困難訊息的回饋對國中生英語科成就的影響之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學系教育心理學報,12,69-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【51】張春興(2007)。教育心理學。台北市:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【52】曾丹 (2008)。學習困難學生的心理障礙、成因及對策。重慶科技學院學報,5,184-185。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【53】黃昌誠(1990)。空中大學學生學習行為與學習困擾之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【54】黃思芸(2005)。高職學生國文科學習態度與學習困擾之研究。雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【55】楊式美(2002)。墨西哥文化節慶教學。敦煌英語教學雜誌,32,32-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【56】楊淑雯 (2007)。科技大學學生英語學習態度與學習困擾之研究。雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【57】楊惠娟(2005)。高職廣告設計科學生學習行為困擾及其因應策略之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【58】詹雨薇(2003)。台南縣國中英文教師對新英文教科書的看法。國立高雄師範大學英文系教學碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【59】詹惠春(民79)。學習困難學生的輔導。輔導通訊,18,10-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【60】葉玉珠(2010)。教育心理學。台北市:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【61】廖佳紅(2004)。綜合高中學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【62】廖珮泠(2004)。工業設計系學生學習態度與學習困擾之研究。國立雲林科技大學工業設計系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【63】歐源榮(1995)。國中學生學習困擾與輔導策略。學生輔導,38,76-83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【64】鄭麗玉(2006)。教育心理學精要。台北市:考用。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【65】戴維揚(2002)。國小英語課程的沿革與展望。中等教育,53(2),32-51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【66】朱正庭(2005,1 月9 日)。全民英檢各大學認同紛列畢業門檻。星報,C4 版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【67】蘇莉雯 (2004)。高職學生英語學習困擾與因應解決方法之研究-以國立台南高商為例。國立成功大學外國語文學系碩士班論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【68】嚴琦 (2008)。探究我國海事科系學生之英語能力與英語學習困難:大一新生之個案研究。國立台灣海洋教育大學教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWebsite resourceszh_TW
dc.relation.reference【69】ETS Representative in Taiwan(2007)。TOEIC Newsletter No.13。網址:http://www.toeic.com.tw/pdf/2006_statistics_wwd.pdf。檢索日期:2010年8月11日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference【70】王彩鸝 (2009)。臺灣人學英語小時了了 大未必佳。聯合星聞網,網址:http://data.udn.com/data/titlelist.jsp。檢索日期:2010年8月11日。zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.