Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51160
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蕭宇超zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsiao, Yu Chau E.en_US
dc.contributor.author黃子權zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Tzu Chuanen_US
dc.creator黃子權zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Tzu Chuanen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T06:25:49Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T06:25:49Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-05T06:25:49Z-
dc.identifierG0097555007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51160-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description97555007zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文以優選理論探討上海話之入聲變調,試圖將文獻中所認為表現不規律之入聲變調納入與舒聲變調相容之分析中。本研究認為入聲變調與舒聲變調皆受制於ANCHOR-L(tσ1, Hd),因此其首音節之基底聲調在輸出值中皆出現於重讀音節。以此觀之,則入聲變調與舒聲變調的差異主要在於節律重音的位置:在舒聲變調中首音節重讀;在入聲變調中重音則後移──在陰入變調中係移至第二音節,在陽入變調中則移至末音節。\n\n本論文提出兩點假設:上海話中舒聲音節為重量音節,入聲音節為輕量音節;節律結構基本上為一位於左端之雙音節音步。據此,本研究提出COINCIDE (LightHd, FT-final),認為陰入變調中重音所以後移至第二音節是因為重讀之輕量音節傾向於由音步末音節核可(licensing)。另一方面,由於陽入的單字調為曲拱調,與陰入的水平調有別,是以本研究另外提出COINCIDE(Contour, PrWd-final),此制約顯示陽入變調中重音的遠距移位是為了遵行「曲拱調須由末音節核可」之普遍現象。\n\n綜述之,本論文提供了一個重量音節、節律重音、曲拱調以及邊際位置等韻律顯著位置間彼此對映的實例。此外,本研究亦顯示上海話的連讀變調涉及聲調與重音的互動,是以所提出之分析或許對相關類型之研究亦有所貢獻。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis offers an Optimality-theory approach to the tone sandhi of checked tones (TSC) in Shanghai, in an attempt to regulate its surface patterns which have long been considered anomaly as opposed to the tone sandhi of smooth tones (TSS). With a reanalysis in the present study, TSC and TSS arguably have in common that their process of tone mapping is both subject to ANCHOR-L(tσ1, Hd), by which the un- derlying tone of the initial syllable ends up at the stressed syllable in the output. It follows that TSC is different from TSS in the way that metrical head is assigned: all domains undergoing TSS are stressed on their initial syllable; only in domains of TSC does the stress move rightwards, either to the second place in the tone sandhi of Yinru (TSYI), or to the final syllable in the tone sandhi of Yangru (TSYA).\n\nGiven the assumption that checked syllables and smooth syllables in Shanghai are light and heavy, respectively, in terms of moraicity, and that foot-parsing is binary and left-aligned in general, the one-syllable shift of stress in TSYI can be accounted for by positing COINCIDE(LightHd, FT-final), which sets up the preference for light stress- bearing syllables to be licensed foot-finally. On the other hand, given that Yangru in the citation forms represents a rising contour, different from the level tone of Yinru, a licensing constraint, namely COINCIDE(Contour, PrWd-final), is further posited so that the long-distance movement of metrical head observed in TSYA emerges to satisfy the requirement for the retained rising contour to be licensed word-finally.\n\nTaken together, this thesis instantiates a remarkable case of the mapping among multiple prominent positions, including heavy syllables, metrical head, contour tones, and edge positions. Also, the present analysis demonstrates that Shanghai tone sandhi involves an interaction between tone and stress, thus a contribution to the general OT tone-prominence typology literature (cf. Zhang 2001, Barnes 2002, De Lacy 2002).en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v\nVITA vii\nTABLE OF CONTENTS ix\nCHINESE ABSTRACT xiii\nENGLISH ABSTRACT xv\nCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1\n1.1 Preliminaries 1\n1.2 Research Questions 2\n1.3 The Proposal 3\n1.4 Thesis Organizations 4\nCHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL AND TONAL BACKGROUND 5\n2.1 Optimality Theory 5\n2.1.1 Basics 5\n2.1.2 Alignment, Anchoring and Coincidence 7\n2.1.3 Local (Self-)conjunction 9\n2.1.4 Variation in OT 11\n2.2 Metrical Phonology 13\n2.2.1 Bracketed Grid 13\n2.2.2 Foot-parsing 15\n2.2.3 Quantity-sensitive Stress 16\n2.2.4 Stress Clash and Lapse 18\n2.3 Positional Prominence in Tone Mapping 19\n2.4 Previous Analyses of Shanghai Tone Sandhi 21\n2.4.1 Tonal Basics 21\n2.4.2 Autosegmental Approach 23\n2.4.2.1 Tone Sandhi of Smooth Tones as Deletion and Reassociation 23\n2.4.2.2 Yinru and Yinqu 24\n2.4.3 OT Approach 27\n2.4.3.1 A Different Ranking for TSC 28\n2.4.3.2 A Single Ranking for TSC and TSS 29\nCHAPTER 3 YINRU TONE SANDHI 31\n3.1 Prescriptive Basics of Shanghai Tone Sandhi 31\n3.1.1 TSS as Tone Spreading 32\n3.1.2 TSYI as Tone Movement 34\n3.2 (Non-)coincidence of Dual Prominence 37\n3.3 Formation of Metrical Structure 39\n3.3.1 Parsing of Metrical Feet 40\n3.3.2 Quantity Difference 45\n3.3.2.1 Against S-language Hypothesis 45\n3.3.2.2 Checked Syllables as Light 48\n3.3.3 Default to Opposite Edge 51\n3.4 Tone Mapping in Dual Prominence 54\n3.4.1 Tone-placement Constraints 54\n3.4.2 Contour Split in TSS 58\n3.5 Summary of This Chapter 62\nCHAPTER 4 YANGRU TONE SANDHI 63\n4.1 Patterns of TSYA 63\n4.1.1 Pattern A as TSS 64\n4.1.2 Pattern B as Long-distance Movement 66\n4.1.3 Age-based Variations 68\n4.2 Tone-driven Stress 70\n4.2.1 Unbounded Foot-parsing 70\n4.2.2 Contour-split Strategy 81\n4.3 Lapse Avoidance 85\n4.3.1 The Emergence of Pattern A 85\n4.3.2 Variable Thresholds of Pattern A 99\n4.4 Summary of This Chapter 105\nCHAPTER 5 CONCLUDING REMARKS 107\n5.1 Summary of the Thesis 107\n5.2 Theoretical Implications 110\n5.2.1 Autonomy of Checked Tones 110\n5.2.2 Subtler Interaction Between Tone and Stress 111\n5.3 Futher Issues 112\nBIBLIOGRAPHY 113zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097555007en_US
dc.subject優選理論zh_TW
dc.subject連讀變調zh_TW
dc.subject上海話zh_TW
dc.subject入聲zh_TW
dc.subject聲調與重音之互動zh_TW
dc.subject韻律顯著位置zh_TW
dc.subjectOptimality Theoryen_US
dc.subjectTone Sandhien_US
dc.subjectShanghaien_US
dc.subjectChecked Tonesen_US
dc.subjectTone-stress Interactionen_US
dc.subjectProminent Positionsen_US
dc.title以優選理論分析上海話之入聲變調zh_TW
dc.titleAn OT approach to the Tone Sandhi of checked syllables in Shanghaien_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAlber, Birgit. 1997. Quantity Sensitivity as the Result of Constraint Interaction. In Phonology in Progress: Progress in Phonology. HIL Phonology Papers III, eds. by G.E. Booij and J. van de Weijer, 1-45. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving Variation from Grammar. In Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, eds. by Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels, 35-68. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnttila, Arto. 2002a. Variation and Phonological Theory. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, eds. by Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 206-243. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., and Malden, Massachusetts.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnttila, Arto. 2007. Variation and Optionality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, eds. by Paul de Lacy, 519-536. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnttila, Arto and Cho, Young-mee Yu. 1998. Variation and Change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104: 31-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaker, Adam. 2003. A Formal Definition of Locality. ROA-614. 1-2.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBakovic, Eric. 1998. Unbounded Stress and Factorial Typology. In Rutgers Working Papers in Linguistics I, eds. by Ron Arstein and Madeline Holler, 15-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarnes, Jonathan. 2001. Domain-Initial Strengthening and the Phonetics and Phonology of Positional Neutralization. In Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society 32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeckman, Jill N. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBermúdez-Otero, Ricardo and Börjars, Kersti. 2006. Markedness in Phonology and in Syntax: the Problem of Grounding. In Linguistic Knowledge: Perspectives from Phonology and from Syntax, eds. by Patrick Honeybone and Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, 710-756. Special Issue of Lingua, 116(5).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCao, Jianfen and Maddieson, Ian. 1992. An Exploration of Phonation Types in Wu Dialects of Chinese. Journal of Phonetics.20: 77-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, Matthew Y. 2000. Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChiang, H.T. 1967. Amoy-Chinese Tones. Phonetica 17: 100-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDe Lacy, Paul. 2002. The Interaction of Tone and Stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology 19:1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuanmu, San. 1990. A Formal Study of Syllable, Tone, Stress and Domain in Chinese Languages. Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuanmu, San. 1993. Rime length, stress, and associationzh_TW
dc.relation.referencedomains. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2:1-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuanmu, San. 1994a. Against Contour Tone Units. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 555-608.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuanmu, San. 1994b. Syllabic Weight and Syllabic Duration: A Correlation Between Phonology and Phonetics. Phonology 11: 1-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFéry, Caroline. 2003. Markedness, Faithfulness, Vowel Quality and Syllable Structure in French. Journal of French Language Studies 13.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. MIT: Ph.D. Dissertation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, Matthew. 1999a. Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, and Typology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, Matthew. 2000. Re-Examining Default-To-Opposite Stress. BLS 26:101-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, Matthew and Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation Types: A Cross-Linguistic Overview. Journal of Phonetics 29:383-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGu, Qin. 2006. The Application of the Phonetic Software-Speech Analyzer and Praat in the Research of the Simplification of Nasal Vowels of Shanghai Urban Dialect. Computer Applications and Software 23.12: 81-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaas, Mary R. 1958. The Tones of Four Tai Dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 29:817-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHalle, Morris and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHammond, Michael (1984). Constraining Metrical Theory: a Modular Theory of Rhythm and Destressing. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. [Published 1988, New York: Garland Press.]zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHayes, Bruce. 1980. A Metrical Theory of Stress Rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. [Published 1985, New York: Garland Press.]zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHayes, Bruce. 2000. Gradient Well-formedness in Optionality Theory. In Optionality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition, eds. by J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer, 88-120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHombert, J. M. 1978. Consonant Types, Vowel Quality, and Tone. Tone: A Linguistic Survey, 77-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHombert, J. M., Ohala, J. J. and Ewan, W. G. 1979. Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones. Language 55:37-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsieh, Fengfan. 2007. Relational Correspondence in Tone Sandhi. Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceItô, Junko and Armin Mester. 1998. Markedness and Word Structure: OCP Effects in Japanese. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJin, Shunde. 1997. Toward a Systematic Account of Shanghai Tonal Phonology. In Studies in Chinese Phonology, eds. by Wang Jialing and Norval Smith. Mouton de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJones, Daniel. 1967. The Phoneme: Its Nature and Use. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKager, René. 1992a. Shapes of the Generalized Trochee. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 11, eds. by J. Mead, 298-311.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKager, René. 1992b. Are There Any Truly Quantity-Insensitive Systems? In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 18, eds. by L.A. Buszard-Welcher, L. Lee and W. Weigel, 123-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKager, René. 2001. Rhythmic Directionality by Positional Licensing. Handout of presentation given at HILP-5, University of Potsdam, 11 January, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKavitskaya, Darya. 2001. Compensatory Lengthening: Phonetics, Phonology, Diachrony. Ph. D. Dissertation. UC Berkeley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Blackwell: Oxford.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, P. Ren-kuei. 1966. Tones in Taiwanese. The Concentric 4: 55-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Zhiqiang. 2003. The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone Mapping in a Constrain-based Approach, Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Zhiqiang. 2005. Dual Prominence in Tone Mapping: A Case of Tone Movement. Paper presented at WCCFL 24, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiberman, Mark. 1975. The Intonational System of English. PhD dissertation, MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiberman, Mark & Alan Prince. 1977. On Stress and Linguistic Rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249-336.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLuo, Meizhen. 1988. Dui Hanyu he Dongdaiyu Shengdiao Qiyuan de Yizhong Shexiang [A Hypothesis on the Origins of Tones in Chinese and Tai-Kadai]. Zhongguo Yuwen 3: 212-218.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993a. Prosodic morphology: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Manuscript. (ROA#482)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993b. Generalized Alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 79-153. Dordrecht: kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1995a. Generalized Alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology, eds. by Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1995b. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, eds. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249-384. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1999. Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology. In The Prosody-Morphology Interface, eds. by René Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 2004a. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, ed. by John J. McCarthy, 483-494. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMyers, Scott. 1997. OCP Effects in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.4: 847-892.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagy, Naomi and Bill Reynolds. 1997. Optimality Theory and Variable Word-final Deletion in Faetar. Language Variation and Change 9: 37-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParadis, Carole & François Prunet. 2000. Nasal Vowels as Two Segments: Evidence from Borrowings. Language 76. 324-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePearce, Mary. 2006. Iambicity in a Tone Language: The Case of Kera. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, University of Oregon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePing, Yueling. 2001b. Shanghai shiqu fangyan shengdiao shiyan yanjiu [Experimental studies of Shanghai Chinese tonal system]. In Wuyu Shengdiao de Shiyan Yanjiu [Experimental studies of Wu Chinese Tonal systems], eds. by Yang Jianqiao, and You Rujie 17-38. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince, Alan. 1983. Relating to the Grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 19-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince, Alan. 1985. Improving Tree Theory. BLS 11: 471-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1991. Optimality. Paper presented at the Arizona Phonology Conference, Tucson.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePulleyblank, Douglas. 1986. Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQian, Nairung. 1992. Dangdai Wuyu Yanjiu [Studies in Contemporary Wu Dialects]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRen, Nianqi. 1992. Phonation Types and Stop Consonant Distinctions: Shanghai Chinese. University of Connecticut: Ph. D. Dissertation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoberts, T.H. and Li Ying-che. 1963. Problems in the Southern Min Dialects of Taiwan. Tunghai Journal 5: 95-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSelkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSelkirk, Elizabeth and Tong Shen. 1990. Prosodic Domains in Shanghai Chinese. In The Phonology-Syntax Connection, eds. by S. Inkelas, and D. Zec, 313-338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSilverman, Daniel. 2002. Laryngeal Complexity in Otomanguean Vowels. Phonology 14: 235-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmolensky, Paul. 1995. On the Structure of the Constraint Component CON of UG. Handout of Talk presented at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmolensky, Paul. 1997. Constraint Interaction in Generativezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrammar Ⅱ: Local Conjunction, or Random Rules in Universal Grammar. Handout from Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop/Maryland Mayfest ’97, Baltimore, MD.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmolensky, Paul. 2006. Optimality in Phonology Ⅱ: Harmonic Completeness, Local Constraint Conjunction, and Feature-domain Markedness. In The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality-Theoretic Grammar, Volume 2, eds. by Paul Smolensky and Géraldine Legendre, 27-160. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVaux, Bert. 2002. Iterativity and Optionality Rough Text of Oral Version read at NELS University of Wisconsin-milwaukee.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVaux, Bert. 2006. Why the Phonological Component Must be Serial and Rule-based. Rough draft. University of Wisconsin-milwaukee.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalker, Rachel. 1997. Mongolian stress, licensing, and factorial Typology. Ms., University of California at Santa Cruz.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Li. 1958. Hanyu Shigao [Manuscripts of A Historical Study of the Chinese Language]. Vol. 1. Hong Kong: Po Wen Book Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWright, Martha. 1983. A Metrical Approach to Tone Sandhi in Chinese Dialects. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXu, Baohua, Tang Zhenzhu, and Qian Nairong. 1981. Xinpai Shanghai fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone Sandhi in New Shanghai]. Fangyan 2: 145-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXu, Baohua, Tang Zhenzhu, You Rujie, Qian Nairong, Shi Rujie, and Shen Yaming. 1988. Shanghai Shiqu Fangyanzhi [Urban Shanghai Dialects]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chupanshe [Shanghai Education Press].zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 1980. The Tonal Phonology of Chinese. Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 1989. Feature Geometry and Co-occurrence Restrictions. Phonology 6.2: 349-374.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 1993. Tonal Register in East Asian Languages. In The Phonology of Tone: The Representation of Tonal Register, eds. by H. van der Hulst and K. Snider, 245-268. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, NewYork.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 1995. Tone in East Asian Languages. In Handbook of Theoretical Phonology, ed. by John Goldsmith, 476-494. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 1997. Dialect Variation in Nasalization: Alignment or Duration? In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol.5, eds. by V. Miglio and B.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoren, 176-200. Proceedings of the Hopkins Optimality Theory Conference (HOT).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYip, Moria. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZee, Eric, and Ian Maddieson. 1979. Tones and Tone Sandhi in Shanghai: Phonetic Evidence and Phonological Analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 45: 93-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, Jie. 2001. The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Distribution: Typological Survey and Formal Analysis. Ph. D. Dissertation. UCLA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, Jie. 2004. Contour Tone Licensing and Contour Tone Representation. Language and Linguistics 5.4: 926-968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZoll, Cheryl. 1996. Parsing Below the Segment in a Constraint Based Framework. Ph. D. Dissertation. UC, Berkeley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZoll, Cheryl. 1997. Conflicting Directionality. Phonology 14: 263-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZoll, Cheryl. 1997. A Note on Multiple Prominence and Tone Mapping. In PF: Papers at the Interface, eds. by Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, and Martha McGinnis, 97-111. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZoll, Cheryl. 1998. Positional Asymmetries and Licensing. Ms., MIT. Available at http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/282-0998/roa-282-zoll-4.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhu, Xiaonong Sean. 1995. Shanghai Tonetics. Ph. D. Dissertation. Australian National University, Canberra.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhu, Xiaonong Sean. 1999. Shanghai Tonetics. Munich: Lincom Europa.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
500701.pdf4.44 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.