Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51179
題名: 公關實務工作者如何看待大學公關課程
A study of public relations professionals` views on public relations curriculums in universities
作者: 嚴曉翠
Yen, Hsiao-Tsui
貢獻者: 陳百齡
嚴曉翠
Yen, Hsiao-Tsui
關鍵詞: 公共關係
公共關係教育
核心知識技能
課程目標
領域知識
情境知識
public relations
education
core knowledge skills
course objectives
domain knowledge
knowledge of contexts
日期: 2009
上傳時間: 5-十月-2011
摘要: 本研究根據對公共關係實務工作者訪談,瞭解實務工作者認為大學公共關係本科畢業生應具備那些公關核心知識與技能,以及實務工作者對本科教育是否能達成實務專業任用標準的看法。並透過對同時在相關科系兼任授課的實務工作者深度訪談,整理這些具備公關產學雙重身份的受訪者對目前公共關係相關科系在課程目標及課程規劃安排上的看法與建議。\n\n本研究發現,組織及商業管理知識是被較常提及的必備知識,媒體生態及議題建構的知識是所有的受訪者都會提到而且獨立強調的核心知識。研究方法、寫作技巧及語文能力則是最常被受訪者提及的重要必備技能。受訪者者也認為應該要讓學生知道公共關係有那些特定領域(「領域知識」),以及會遭遇那些溝通情境。應以各類公共關係個案情境(情境知識)來讓學生瞭解工具策略的多元性而不是生硬的學習SOP操作程序。\n\n另外,公關本科生並未有就業優勢,但在校任教的實務工作者會更支持本科教育及人才任用。受訪者認為公關課程目標、課程基礎配套資訊以及課程銜接等相關問題都不清楚,業界老師對公共關係教育的付出並未被善用。而學生的學習地圖也並未能被做一個更好的規劃安排,學生無法掌握學習目標及學習策略。\n\n本研究提出的建議為,1.對公關教育及課程任務與規劃應有明確的管理指標,以利教師授課、學生學習及實務業界溝通。2.應善用業界師資資源強化公關領域知識及情境知識教育。3.應鼓勵學生參與實習及實作課程並透過參與校外相關競賽瞭解教學實力。4.應務實面對科系現況補足重要核心知識課程。\n\n \n關鍵詞:公共關係、公共關係教育、核心知識技能、課程目標、領域知識、情境知識
This study aims to learn public relations professionals’ 1) perspectives on core knowledge and skills that students majoring in public relations should be equipped with; and 2) viewpoints on whether current university public relations education has been sufficient to assist public relations graduates for related job qualification. Through in-depth interviews with public professionals who currently teach public relations-related courses in universities, I probe their philosophies of teaching, perspectives on course objectives, strategies and plans of teaching. \n\nThe results of the study indicate that organization theory and business administration were the frequently mentioned as essential knowledge. Meanwhile, getting to know of ever-changing media environment and ability of agenda setting among various communication contexts were essential capability that had been particularly emphasized by all interviewees. On the other hand, research methods, writing skills, and language proficiency were skills frequently addressed by interviewees. Interviewees point out the importance of advancing public relations students’ ‘domain knowledge’ as well as communication scenarios in public relations education. In other words, for the purpose of understanding the strategies and tools of public relations, ‘knowledge of contexts’ in public relations case studies, instead of knowledge of standard operating procedures of public relations practices, should be provided to students during teaching cases. \n\nThis study also shows that public relations graduates have not owned advantages in competing for public relations job applications. However, professionals who also teach in universities tend to value public relations education more and favor recruiting public relations majors than those who haven’t had the experiences of teaching. Interviewees also expressed their concern of lacking of the public relations course objectives, basic course supplement information, and curriculum linkage, it is why they tend to think public relations education still have much room to improve. They stated that students will not be able to grasp the meaning of learning if they have not developed a knowledge map of public relations. In addition, public relations educators’ contributions to the learning of public relations should be better leveraged. \n\n Based on the study, the author offers the following suggestions.\n1. Instructors should make teaching objectives and class management strategies clear, as well as course assignments and project arrangement logical. This will benefit lecturers in teaching, students in learning, and public relations professionals, who may serve as guest speakers in class.\n2. Department should make the best use of the resources of lecturers from public relations practicum to strengthen the education of both domain and contextual knowledge in the public relations industry.\n3. Department should encourage students to take the opportunities of internship programs and to compete for off-campus public relations contests so that students will have chances to reflect what they have learned in classroom.\n4. Departments should provide core public relations courses based on what public relations has to offer.\n\n\nKey words: public relations,education,core knowledge and skills, course objectives, domain knowledge, knowledge of contexts
參考文獻: 一、 中文部份
李湘君(1996)。〈21世紀世界公關教育之挑戰〉,《公關雜誌》,16:37-40。
李湘君(2004)。《當代公共關係》。台北:亞太。
沈介文(2002)。〈公關人員對專業核心能力認知之研究〉《新聞學研究》。72:119-145
呂之蕙(2006)。〈台灣公共關係道德教育的初探研究〉。《傳播與管理研究》,6(1):101-130。
吳宜蓁(1995)<美國公關教育之定位與課程規劃> 《公關雜誌》,8:34-40
吳宜蓁(2002)。〈台灣公共關係教育之現況分析〉,《通訊》,32:37-39。
政大新聞系(1995)。<傳播學門現況與發展研討會記錄>
孫秀蕙(1997)。《公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例》。台北:正中。
孫秀蕙(2007)。〈變動中的媒體環境對於公關教育課程規劃的影響〉,《台灣廣告教育》。145-170
翁秀琪(1997)。〈對台灣「傳播學正當性危機」的一些想法〉,《新聞學研究》,54: 1-2。
翁秀琪(2001)。<台灣傳播教育的回顧與願景>《新聞學研究》。69期
翁秀琪(2004)。〈台灣傳播教育的回顧與願景〉,《台灣傳播學的想像》。85-111
國科會(1986)。<新聞與大眾傳播學><學門規劃資料>
陳世敏(1999)。<傳播學自筆者的(再)發現>《新聞學研究》。59: 133-137
陳世敏(2000)。<傳播學入門科目的現實與理想>《新聞學研究》。65期
陳韜文(1999)。<傳播教育的知識結構問題>《新聞學研究》。59: 137-143
陳百齡 (2004) 。<從國科會傳播專題計畫提案看學門發展生態>。《新聞學研究》。67期
黃懿慧(1999)。西方公共關係理論學派之探討--90 年代理論典範的競爭與辯 論。廣告學研究,12,1-37。
黃懿慧(2002)。〈90年代台灣公共關係研究之探討─版圖發展、變化與趨勢〉。《新聞學研究》67:51-86。
黃懿慧(2004)。〈台灣公共關係學門及研究〉,《台灣傳播學的想像》。442-478
張在山(1997)。〈大起大落的台灣公共關係-台灣公關史〉,《公關雜誌》,19:19-22。
張在山.吳宜蓁(1998)<公關教育專題><公關雜誌>27期
張在山 (2004)。《公共關係學》。台北:五南。
須文蔚、陳世敏(1996)。〈傳播學發展現況〉。《新聞學研究》。53: 9-37。
馮建三編(2005)。<自反縮不縮?:新聞系七十年>台北:政大新聞系
趙雅麗 (2005)。<認識的困境與結構:傳播學門之自筆者認同的病理學還原探索><新聞學研究>。84:119-161
潘家慶、羅文輝、臧國仁(1994)。〈21世紀傳播核心課程前程規劃報告>
潘家慶、羅文輝、臧國仁(1996)。〈傳播教育核心課程規劃〉,《新聞學研究》,53: 85-106。
臧國仁、鍾蔚文(1997)。〈框架概念與公共關係策略〉,《廣告學研究》,9: 99-130。
臧國仁(2001)。〈公共關係研究的內涵與展望〉,《廣告學研究》,17: 1-20。
臧國仁/方念萱(2003)。〈筆者們需要新的新聞傳播理論〉,《新聞學研究》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所。
賴祥蔚 (2004) 。<公共關係學想像:社群主義觀點>《新聞學研究》。80期
鍾蔚文、臧國仁 (1994)。〈記者如何問問題〉,《新聞學與術的對話》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所。
鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳百齡 (1996)。〈傳播教育應該教些什麼〉,《新聞學研究》。
53:107-129。
鍾榮凱(1999) )<美國最新公關課程><公關雜誌>34:44-46
孫秀蕙(2007)。〈變動中的媒體環境對於公關教育課程規劃的影響:以「公共關係理論專題:網路傳播」課程為例〉,《廣告學研究》,27:1-23。
劉健順、漆梅君(2000)。〈中美大學公共關係課程之比較研究〉,《中國廣告學刊》,5:89-126。
邱淑華(2007)。《公關專業的知識累積與傳承》。世新大學傳播研究所博士論文。
吳宜蓁(1998)。〈台灣公關教育的現況與問題〉,《公關雜誌》,27:9-11。
梁在平(1973)。〈現階段筆者國公共關係問題與公共關係教育途徑的商榷〉,《新聞學報》,1:38-41。
褚家玲(1972)。〈公共關係教育的趨勢〉。《新聞連繫月刊》,8(2):7-8。
張依依(2007)。《公共關係理論的發展與變遷》。台北:五南。
嚴曉翠(2007)。〈大學公關教育核心課程探討〉,《台灣廣告教育》。190-222
二、 英文部份
Griffiths, David (1996).Teaching journalism skills courses to new public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Eduator. Vol 51(1) , Spring ,82-89.
Jon White(2002). Reality and education for public relations and communication management . Journal of Communication Management ,Vol 7(1) 6-8.
Kevin Moloney (1997). Teaching organizational communication as public relations in UK universities . Coporate Communications. Vol 2(4) 138-142.
Donald F. Schwartz,J. Paul Yarbrough, M. Therese Shakra (1992). Does Public Relations Education Make the Grade? Public Relations Journal/September, 18-25.
Xifra, J. (2008). Undergraduate public relations education in Spain: Endangered species? Public Relations Review, 33(2), 206-213.
Aldoory, L. & Toth, E. L. (2000). An Exploratory Look at Graduate Public Relations Education. Public Relations Review, 26(1), 115-125.
Commission on Public Relations Education.(1999, October). A port of entry:Public relations education for the 21stst century.
International Public Relations Association(Jan.,1982). A Model for Public Relations Education for Professional Pratice.Gold paper No.4.
International Public Relations Association(Sept.,1990). Public Relations education-Recommendations and Standards.Gold paper No.7.
Caywood, C. L. (1997). Introduction: Twenty-first century public relations: the strategic stages of integrated communications. In C. L. Caywood (Ed.). (1997). The handbook of strategic public relations and integrated communications (pp. xi-xxvi). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Clark, G. & Hanna, N. (1986). An analysis of the source of articles in the “Journal of Marketing Education” since its founding in 1979. Journal of Marketing Education, 8, 71-74.
Hallahan, K. (1993). The paradigm struggle and public relations practice. Public Relations Review, 19(2), 197-205.
Hutton, J. G. (1996). Integrated marketing communications and the evolution of marketing thought. Journal of Business Research, 37, 155-162.
Hutton, J. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 199-214.
Schultz, D., Tannenbaum, S., Lauterborn, R. (1993). Integrated marketing communications. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing Group.
Toth, E. L., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (1992). Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
93941009
98
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093941009
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
94100901.pdf2.26 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.