Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51179
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳百齡zh_TW
dc.contributor.author嚴曉翠zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYen, Hsiao-Tsuien_US
dc.creator嚴曉翠zh_TW
dc.creatorYen, Hsiao-Tsuien_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T06:28:31Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T06:28:31Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-05T06:28:31Z-
dc.identifierG0093941009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51179-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description93941009zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究根據對公共關係實務工作者訪談,瞭解實務工作者認為大學公共關係本科畢業生應具備那些公關核心知識與技能,以及實務工作者對本科教育是否能達成實務專業任用標準的看法。並透過對同時在相關科系兼任授課的實務工作者深度訪談,整理這些具備公關產學雙重身份的受訪者對目前公共關係相關科系在課程目標及課程規劃安排上的看法與建議。\n\n本研究發現,組織及商業管理知識是被較常提及的必備知識,媒體生態及議題建構的知識是所有的受訪者都會提到而且獨立強調的核心知識。研究方法、寫作技巧及語文能力則是最常被受訪者提及的重要必備技能。受訪者者也認為應該要讓學生知道公共關係有那些特定領域(「領域知識」),以及會遭遇那些溝通情境。應以各類公共關係個案情境(情境知識)來讓學生瞭解工具策略的多元性而不是生硬的學習SOP操作程序。\n\n另外,公關本科生並未有就業優勢,但在校任教的實務工作者會更支持本科教育及人才任用。受訪者認為公關課程目標、課程基礎配套資訊以及課程銜接等相關問題都不清楚,業界老師對公共關係教育的付出並未被善用。而學生的學習地圖也並未能被做一個更好的規劃安排,學生無法掌握學習目標及學習策略。\n\n本研究提出的建議為,1.對公關教育及課程任務與規劃應有明確的管理指標,以利教師授課、學生學習及實務業界溝通。2.應善用業界師資資源強化公關領域知識及情境知識教育。3.應鼓勵學生參與實習及實作課程並透過參與校外相關競賽瞭解教學實力。4.應務實面對科系現況補足重要核心知識課程。\n\n \n關鍵詞:公共關係、公共關係教育、核心知識技能、課程目標、領域知識、情境知識zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to learn public relations professionals’ 1) perspectives on core knowledge and skills that students majoring in public relations should be equipped with; and 2) viewpoints on whether current university public relations education has been sufficient to assist public relations graduates for related job qualification. Through in-depth interviews with public professionals who currently teach public relations-related courses in universities, I probe their philosophies of teaching, perspectives on course objectives, strategies and plans of teaching. \n\nThe results of the study indicate that organization theory and business administration were the frequently mentioned as essential knowledge. Meanwhile, getting to know of ever-changing media environment and ability of agenda setting among various communication contexts were essential capability that had been particularly emphasized by all interviewees. On the other hand, research methods, writing skills, and language proficiency were skills frequently addressed by interviewees. Interviewees point out the importance of advancing public relations students’ ‘domain knowledge’ as well as communication scenarios in public relations education. In other words, for the purpose of understanding the strategies and tools of public relations, ‘knowledge of contexts’ in public relations case studies, instead of knowledge of standard operating procedures of public relations practices, should be provided to students during teaching cases. \n\nThis study also shows that public relations graduates have not owned advantages in competing for public relations job applications. However, professionals who also teach in universities tend to value public relations education more and favor recruiting public relations majors than those who haven’t had the experiences of teaching. Interviewees also expressed their concern of lacking of the public relations course objectives, basic course supplement information, and curriculum linkage, it is why they tend to think public relations education still have much room to improve. They stated that students will not be able to grasp the meaning of learning if they have not developed a knowledge map of public relations. In addition, public relations educators’ contributions to the learning of public relations should be better leveraged. \n\n Based on the study, the author offers the following suggestions.\n1. Instructors should make teaching objectives and class management strategies clear, as well as course assignments and project arrangement logical. This will benefit lecturers in teaching, students in learning, and public relations professionals, who may serve as guest speakers in class.\n2. Department should make the best use of the resources of lecturers from public relations practicum to strengthen the education of both domain and contextual knowledge in the public relations industry.\n3. Department should encourage students to take the opportunities of internship programs and to compete for off-campus public relations contests so that students will have chances to reflect what they have learned in classroom.\n4. Departments should provide core public relations courses based on what public relations has to offer.\n\n\nKey words: public relations,education,core knowledge and skills, course objectives, domain knowledge, knowledge of contextsen_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究源起 1\n第二節 對大學公共關係教育的探索之旅 3\n一、預設認為公共關係教育一定有問題,但問題會是什麼? 3\n二、大學公共關係教育教不出具備從事公共關係工作基本能力的人才嗎?4\n三、問題是公共關係實務工作者不夠支持公共關係教育嗎? 6\n第三節 研究問題的發展 7\n一、回歸公共關係的良好雙向溝通本質 7\n二、研究問題: 8\n第二章 文獻探討 10\n第一節公共關係核心概念與知識元素 10\n第二節 公共關係教育及公共關係課程研究 15\n一、國外的大學公共關係教育及課程研究 15\n二、台灣的大學公共關係教育及課程研究 18\n三、公共關係教育研究文獻回顧小結 20\n第三節 從知識觀看公共關係教育知識範疇 22\n第四節 大學公共關係教育與實務的認知落差及其研究設計探討 29\n本章小結 32\n第三章 研究方法 33\n第一節 研究設計 33\n一、關於調查目的: 34\n二、關於調查方法: 35\n第二節 資料的蒐集 36\n一、資料蒐集方法 36\n二、資料蒐集的步驟 36\n第三節 前測 39\n本章小結 40\n第四章 研究結果 42\n第一節 公共關係必備的核心知識與技能是什麼? 42\n一、關於知識與技能的說明 42\n二、本章節中主要的分析整理框架 44\n三、受訪者對公共關係核心知識技能的認知輪廓 48\n四、小結 52\n第二節 那些公共關係知識技能適合在學校學習?那些應該在職場學習? 55\n一、受訪者對於公共關係教育在學與術的分工看法 55\n二、小結 58\n第三節 實務工作者對公共關係教育的認知與建議 61\n一、實務工作者對公共關係本科生的看法 61\n二、實務工作者對大學公共關係教育的建議 63\n本章小結 67\n第五章 結論與建議 69\n第一節 公關核心知識技能如何清楚定位? 70\n一、「議題建構、媒體研究及訊息產製」高分的背後思維 70\n二、「公關操作能力RACE」重要性的背後支撐 71\n三、「公關核心知識理論」及「公關領域知識」是成功關鍵 71\n四、小結 72\n第二節 對公關教育的建議 75\n結語 78\n第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 79\n一、研究限制 79\n二、未來研究建議 80\n參考書目 84\n一、中文部份 84\n二、英文部份 85\n附錄 87zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093941009en_US
dc.subject公共關係zh_TW
dc.subject公共關係教育zh_TW
dc.subject核心知識技能zh_TW
dc.subject課程目標zh_TW
dc.subject領域知識zh_TW
dc.subject情境知識zh_TW
dc.subjectpublic relationsen_US
dc.subjecteducationen_US
dc.subjectcore knowledge skillsen_US
dc.subjectcourse objectivesen_US
dc.subjectdomain knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectknowledge of contextsen_US
dc.title公關實務工作者如何看待大學公關課程zh_TW
dc.titleA study of public relations professionals` views on public relations curriculums in universitiesen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李湘君(1996)。〈21世紀世界公關教育之挑戰〉,《公關雜誌》,16:37-40。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李湘君(2004)。《當代公共關係》。台北:亞太。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈介文(2002)。〈公關人員對專業核心能力認知之研究〉《新聞學研究》。72:119-145zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂之蕙(2006)。〈台灣公共關係道德教育的初探研究〉。《傳播與管理研究》,6(1):101-130。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳宜蓁(1995)<美國公關教育之定位與課程規劃> 《公關雜誌》,8:34-40zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳宜蓁(2002)。〈台灣公共關係教育之現況分析〉,《通訊》,32:37-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference政大新聞系(1995)。<傳播學門現況與發展研討會記錄>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(1997)。《公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例》。台北:正中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(2007)。〈變動中的媒體環境對於公關教育課程規劃的影響〉,《台灣廣告教育》。145-170zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁秀琪(1997)。〈對台灣「傳播學正當性危機」的一些想法〉,《新聞學研究》,54: 1-2。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁秀琪(2001)。<台灣傳播教育的回顧與願景>《新聞學研究》。69期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁秀琪(2004)。〈台灣傳播教育的回顧與願景〉,《台灣傳播學的想像》。85-111zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國科會(1986)。<新聞與大眾傳播學><學門規劃資料>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳世敏(1999)。<傳播學自筆者的(再)發現>《新聞學研究》。59: 133-137zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳世敏(2000)。<傳播學入門科目的現實與理想>《新聞學研究》。65期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳韜文(1999)。<傳播教育的知識結構問題>《新聞學研究》。59: 137-143zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳百齡 (2004) 。<從國科會傳播專題計畫提案看學門發展生態>。《新聞學研究》。67期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃懿慧(1999)。西方公共關係理論學派之探討--90 年代理論典範的競爭與辯 論。廣告學研究,12,1-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃懿慧(2002)。〈90年代台灣公共關係研究之探討─版圖發展、變化與趨勢〉。《新聞學研究》67:51-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃懿慧(2004)。〈台灣公共關係學門及研究〉,《台灣傳播學的想像》。442-478zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張在山(1997)。〈大起大落的台灣公共關係-台灣公關史〉,《公關雜誌》,19:19-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張在山.吳宜蓁(1998)<公關教育專題><公關雜誌>27期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張在山 (2004)。《公共關係學》。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference須文蔚、陳世敏(1996)。〈傳播學發展現況〉。《新聞學研究》。53: 9-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮建三編(2005)。<自反縮不縮?:新聞系七十年>台北:政大新聞系zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙雅麗 (2005)。<認識的困境與結構:傳播學門之自筆者認同的病理學還原探索><新聞學研究>。84:119-161zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘家慶、羅文輝、臧國仁(1994)。〈21世紀傳播核心課程前程規劃報告>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘家慶、羅文輝、臧國仁(1996)。〈傳播教育核心課程規劃〉,《新聞學研究》,53: 85-106。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧國仁、鍾蔚文(1997)。〈框架概念與公共關係策略〉,《廣告學研究》,9: 99-130。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧國仁(2001)。〈公共關係研究的內涵與展望〉,《廣告學研究》,17: 1-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臧國仁/方念萱(2003)。〈筆者們需要新的新聞傳播理論〉,《新聞學研究》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴祥蔚 (2004) 。<公共關係學想像:社群主義觀點>《新聞學研究》。80期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文、臧國仁 (1994)。〈記者如何問問題〉,《新聞學與術的對話》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳百齡 (1996)。〈傳播教育應該教些什麼〉,《新聞學研究》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference53:107-129。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾榮凱(1999) )<美國最新公關課程><公關雜誌>34:44-46zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(2007)。〈變動中的媒體環境對於公關教育課程規劃的影響:以「公共關係理論專題:網路傳播」課程為例〉,《廣告學研究》,27:1-23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉健順、漆梅君(2000)。〈中美大學公共關係課程之比較研究〉,《中國廣告學刊》,5:89-126。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱淑華(2007)。《公關專業的知識累積與傳承》。世新大學傳播研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳宜蓁(1998)。〈台灣公關教育的現況與問題〉,《公關雜誌》,27:9-11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference梁在平(1973)。〈現階段筆者國公共關係問題與公共關係教育途徑的商榷〉,《新聞學報》,1:38-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference褚家玲(1972)。〈公共關係教育的趨勢〉。《新聞連繫月刊》,8(2):7-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張依依(2007)。《公共關係理論的發展與變遷》。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference嚴曉翠(2007)。〈大學公關教育核心課程探討〉,《台灣廣告教育》。190-222zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、 英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGriffiths, David (1996).Teaching journalism skills courses to new public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Eduator. Vol 51(1) , Spring ,82-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJon White(2002). Reality and education for public relations and communication management . Journal of Communication Management ,Vol 7(1) 6-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKevin Moloney (1997). Teaching organizational communication as public relations in UK universities . Coporate Communications. Vol 2(4) 138-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonald F. Schwartz,J. Paul Yarbrough, M. Therese Shakra (1992). Does Public Relations Education Make the Grade? Public Relations Journal/September, 18-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXifra, J. (2008). Undergraduate public relations education in Spain: Endangered species? Public Relations Review, 33(2), 206-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAldoory, L. & Toth, E. L. (2000). An Exploratory Look at Graduate Public Relations Education. Public Relations Review, 26(1), 115-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommission on Public Relations Education.(1999, October). A port of entry:Public relations education for the 21stst century.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Public Relations Association(Jan.,1982). A Model for Public Relations Education for Professional Pratice.Gold paper No.4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Public Relations Association(Sept.,1990). Public Relations education-Recommendations and Standards.Gold paper No.7.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaywood, C. L. (1997). Introduction: Twenty-first century public relations: the strategic stages of integrated communications. In C. L. Caywood (Ed.). (1997). The handbook of strategic public relations and integrated communications (pp. xi-xxvi). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClark, G. & Hanna, N. (1986). An analysis of the source of articles in the “Journal of Marketing Education” since its founding in 1979. Journal of Marketing Education, 8, 71-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHallahan, K. (1993). The paradigm struggle and public relations practice. Public Relations Review, 19(2), 197-205.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHutton, J. G. (1996). Integrated marketing communications and the evolution of marketing thought. Journal of Business Research, 37, 155-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHutton, J. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(2), 199-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchultz, D., Tannenbaum, S., Lauterborn, R. (1993). Integrated marketing communications. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceToth, E. L., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (1992). Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
94100901.pdf2.26 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.