Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51379
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor葉浩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author黃培維zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Pei Weien_US
dc.creator黃培維zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Pei Weien_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T06:49:13Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T06:49:13Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-05T06:49:13Z-
dc.identifierG0097252009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51379-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description97252009zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文從個人、國家和世界三個層面來重新建構約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論。其公眾參與理論包含了公民精神和公民參與這兩個部份。公民精神主要強調合作的精神,天才和菁英組成的知識階級公民必須和其他大眾階級的公民合作,才可以減少痛苦得到快樂,唯有合作才能讓每個人可以充分運用到自己的能力,享受到高級樂趣,得到個人的幸福,也讓社會獲得更多的效益。合作的精神必須透過實際的參與才可以學習,因此參與本身具有教育的功能。彌爾認為公民精神必須透過國家內部的地方和中央雙軌式的參與才可以培養,由知識階級擔任引導的角色,在參與過程中協助大眾階級的學習。這種方式擴展到世界上就是文明國家對野蠻國家的帝國主義干預。殖民地不適用於不干預原則,因為他們必須透過和統治者的合作,才能學習如何運用自己的能力來得到幸福。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study tries to reconstruct John Stuart Mill’s theory of public participation from three perspectives: individual, national and international. This theory consists of an account of citizenship as well as an account of citizen participation. At the core of Mill’s idea of citizenship is cooperation between intelligent citizens, which include geniuses and elites, and the masses. By cooperation, people can make best use of their capacities, and attain their own higher pleasures and ultimately happiness. This citizen spirit can only be cultivated through political participation, and thus it has implications on education policy. The purpose of educating the masses is to help them develop and use their intellectual ability, and to do so intelligent citizens must assume the role of leading their fellow citizens with regard to political participation. And only from this perspective can we truly understand Mill’s theory of international intervention – or liberal imperialism, according to which civilized states are allowed to intervene the barbarian ones. Colonized population must cooperate with and learn from their rulers – that is to say, to conduct their own experiments in living under their colonizer’s tutelage.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機與目的 1\n第二節 Mill的思想背景 5\n第三節 文獻回顧 7\n第四節 研究架構與章節安排 14\n第貳章 Mill論人的幸福 18\n第一節 Mill的心理學 18\n第二節 Mill的幸福觀 28\n第三節 自由主義與幸福 36\n第四節 小結 42\n第參章 Mill的公民精神思想 44\n第一節 公民品質的分類 45\n第二節 Mill的公民精神 53\n第三節 小結 63\n第肆章 Mill論參與的教育功能 65\n第一節 Mill的教育思想 65\n第二節 地方政治的參與 78\n第三節 代議制政府的參與 84\n第四節 小結 93\n第伍章 帝國公民的世界參與 95\n第一節 Mill的世界觀 95\n第二節 Mill的帝國主義:從不干預理論的角度出發 105\n第三節 帝國主義的參與準則 113\n第四節 小結 122\n第陸章 結論:重構與應用 124\n第一節 總結與評論 124\n第二節 未來與展望 129\n附錄 132\n參考書目 134zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097252009en_US
dc.subject約翰彌爾zh_TW
dc.subject效益主義zh_TW
dc.subject公民精神zh_TW
dc.subject公民參與zh_TW
dc.subject帝國主義zh_TW
dc.subjectJohn Stuart Millen_US
dc.subjectUtilitarianismen_US
dc.subjectidea of citizenshipen_US
dc.subjectcitizen participationen_US
dc.subjectImperialismen_US
dc.title個人、國家與世界:論約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(一)中文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺。2001。《自由民主的理路》,台北市:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李酉潭。1999。《自由、平等與民主 : 約翰彌勒與孫中山的政治思想》,台北市:國立編譯館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林玉体。1999。《西洋教育史》,台北市:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尚杰。2005。《西方哲學史第五卷:啟蒙時代的法國哲學》,江蘇:人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張明貴。1986。《約翰彌爾》,台北市:東大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference浦興祖等。2009。《西方政治學說史》,上海:復旦大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(二)期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺。2005。<公民理念與公民的教育>,《通識教育季刊》,12(1):27-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳俊宏。1998。<永續發展與民主:審議式民主理論初探>,《東吳政治學報》,9:85-122。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference梁福鎮。2009。<全球化脈絡下台灣公民教育的挑戰與回應>,《教育科學期刊》,8(1):63-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張福建。2005。<參與和公民精神的養成:彌爾《代議政府論》的一種解讀>,《東吳政治學報》,21:41-61。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃俊龍。2003。<民主社會的菁英統治:對密爾《論代議政府》的一個詮釋>,《政治科學論叢》,18:217-240。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡英文。1999。<公民德性、市民社會與主權國家:現代市民社會論述之探討>,《政治科學論叢》,10:83-112。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧倩儀。2004。<審議式超國家主義>,《問題與研究》,43:53-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅新陽。2007。<解讀幸福指數>,《寧波廣州電視大學學報》,5(1):97-101。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(三)會議論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李酉潭。2010。<生態主義與台海兩岸的發展—從約翰彌勒綠色自由主義的觀點談起>,「中國政治學會年會暨『能知的公民?民主的理想與實際』研討會」。高雄:中山大學,11月6-7日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(四)學位論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬仲民。2000。《約翰.密爾論民主公民的品質及其條件》,台北市:國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊富源。2006。《轉變中的臺灣公民社會與公民教育 : 有關學校公民教育問題靣向及其發展趨勢之硏究》台北市:國立政治大學中山人文社會科學硏究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(五)翻譯著作zh_TW
dc.relation.reference克柏萊。1981。《西洋教育史》,楊亮功譯,台北市:協志。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬克福森。1993。《自由民主的經驗與時代》,張明貴譯,台北市:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬秋德爾。1981。《印度通史》,李志夫譯,台北市:國立編譯館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅勃茲。1986。《英國史》,賈士蘅譯,台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧梭。1989。《愛彌兒》,李平漚譯,台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彌爾。1990。《論自由及論代議政治》,郭志嵩譯,台北市:協志工業叢書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彌爾。2007。《功利主義》,劉富勝譯,上海:光明日報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彌爾。2007。《我的知識之路:約翰彌爾自傳》,吳衡康、吳良健譯,台北市:網路與書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彌爾。2009。《政治經濟學原理》,金謫、金熠譯,北京:華夏出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彌爾。2009。《精神科學的邏輯》,李滌非譯,杭州:浙江大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(一)英文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. London; New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerger, Fred R. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: the Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBowen, James. 1981. A History of Western Education. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCook, Ian. 1998. Reading Mill: Studies in Political Theory. Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 1991. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill`s moral and political philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFine, Robert .2007. Cosmopolitanism. London; New York, N.Y.: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty : A Defence. London; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGray, John and Smith, G.W.(ed.). 1991. J.S. Mill, On liberty in Focus. London; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis.2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?.N.J.: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHimmelfarb, Gertrude. 1990. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. New York: Knopf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolbraad, Carsten. 1970. The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, 1815-1914. Harlow: Longmans.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevin, Michael. 2004. J.S. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMill, James. 1992. Analysis of The Phenomena of The Human Mind. Vol. 1 & Vol. 2. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMill, John Stuart. 1963-91. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. ed. John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNussbaum, Martha C. 1997.Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParekh, Bhikhu C. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRyan, Alan. 1970. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmart, Paul. 1991. Mill and Marx : Individual Liberty and The Roads to Freedom. New York: Manchester University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, G.W.(ed.) .1998. John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. London ; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkorupski , John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkorupski, John (ed.). 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSkorupski , John. 2006. Why Read Mill today?. London; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTen, C.L. (ed.). 1999. Mill`s Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTen, C.L. (ed.). 2008. Mill`s On Liberty: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThompson, Dennis F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUrbinati, Nadia .2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUrbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (ed.). 2007. J.S. Mill`s Political Thought : A Bicentennial Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios. 2002. Mill on Nationality. London ; New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios and Schultz ,Bart(ed.). 2005. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalzer, Michael. 2006. Just and Unjust Wars : a moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWest, Henry R. (ed.). 2006. The Blackwell Guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZastopuil, Lynn. 1998. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(二)多作者論文集中之論文zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill`s utilitarianism” in “The Cambridge companion to Mill” edited by John Skorupski. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 2006. “Mill`s theory of value” in “The Blackwell guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism” edited by Henry R. West. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 2007. “John Stuart Mill on education and democracy” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 2008. “Autonomy, tradition, and the enforcement of morality” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldberg, David Theo. 2005. “Liberalism`s limits: Carlyle and Mill on the negro question” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolmes, Stephen. 2007. “Making Sense of Liberal Imperialism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, J. Joseph. 2005. “Chairing the Jamaica Committee: J. S. Mill and the limits of colonial authority” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNussbaum, Martha C. 2005. “Mill on happiness: the enduring value of a complex critique” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Brink, David. 2008. “Mill`s liberal principles and freedom of expression” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios. 2005. “Empire, race, euro-centrism: John Stuart Mill and his critics” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios. 2007. “Cosmopolitan Patriotism in J.S. Mill’s Political Thought and Activism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalzer, Michael. 2007. “Mill’s ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(三)期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, Elizabeth S. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living” Ethic 102(1): 4-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerger, Fred R. 1978. “Mill’s Concept of Happiness” Interpretation 7:95-117.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBell, Duncan. 2006. “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought” The Historical Journal 49(1): 281-298.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBell, Duncan. 2010. “John Stuart Mill on Colonies” Political Theory 38(1): 34-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoyle, Michael.2010. “A few words on Mill, Walzer, and Nonintervention” Ethics & International Affairs 23(4): 349-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonner, Wendy. 1993. “John Stuart Mill’s Liberal Feminism” Philosophical Studies 69: 155-166.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiamond, Larry. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation” Journal of Democracy, 5(3): 4–17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiamond, Larry. 2006. “Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States Lessons and Challenges” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(2): 93-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGibbs, Benjamin. 1986. “Higher and Lower Pleasures” Philosophy 61(235): 31-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGray, John. 1981. “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Utility, and Rights” Nomos 23: 80-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarris, Abram L. 1964. “John Stuart Mill: Servant of the East India Company” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30(2): 185-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeld, David. 2002. “Globalization, Corporate Practice and Cosmopolitan Social Standards” Contemporary Political Theory 1:59-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolliger, David. 2001. “Not Universalist, Not Pluralists:the new cosmopolitans find their own way” Constellations 8(2): 236-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMartin, Rex. 1972. “A Defense of Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism” Philosophy 42: 140-151zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, Kenneth E. 1961. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of International Relations” Journal of the History of Ideas 22(4): 493-514.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Brink, David. 1992. “Mill`s Deliberative Utilitarianism” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21: 67-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrager, Carol A. L. 2005. “Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations” Political Studies 53: 621-640.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRiley, Jonathan. 1991. “One Very Simple Principle” Utilitas 3:1-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRees, J.C. 1977. “The Thesis of the Two Mills” Philosophical Studies 25(3): 369-382.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSen, Amartya. 1983. “Liberty and Social Choice” Journal of Philosophy 80 (1): 5-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSullivan, Eileen P. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J.S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire” Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 599-617.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios. 1998. “John Stuart Mill on Race” Utilitas 10(1): 17-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVarouxakis, Georgios. 1999. “Guizot’s Historical Works and J. S. Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville” History of Political Thought 20(2): 292-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(四)會議論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉浩。2009。 “Experiments in Living Progressive Being and Liberal Imperialism: An Interpretation of J. S. Mill’s International Political Thought”,中華民國國際關係學會第二屆年會暨「國際新情勢與兩岸新紀元:機會與挑戰」國際學術研討會議。zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
200901.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.