Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51425
題名: 以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響
The effects of idea-centered knowledge building on group creativity
作者: 張宇慧
Chang, Yu Hui
貢獻者: 洪煌堯
Hong, Huang Yao
張宇慧
Chang, Yu Hui
關鍵詞: 想法中心
知識翻新
團隊創造力
idea-centered
knowledge building
group creativity
日期: 2010
上傳時間: 5-Oct-2011
摘要: 在知識社會裡,想法的生成是創新的原動力。如何培養學生提想法與翻新想法的能力、以及與他人協作並共構知識以激發團隊創造力,將是產生創新思考人才與促進未來社會進步的重要關鍵。本研究的目的在探究知識翻新學習對團隊創造力的影響。為協助學生進行協作與共創,本研究運用知識翻新(knowledge-building)教育理念(Scardamalia, 2002),並輔以「知識論壇」(knowledge Forum™)線上學習平台,作為教學與研究的環境。研究對象為某國立大學修習生活科技課程之大學生(N=30)。資料來源包括: (1) Besemer (1998)所編的創意產品分析量表(Creative Product Analysis Matrix);(2)平台互動資料;(3)線上協作的討論內容;(4)創意氛圍量表(Creative Climate Questionnaire )(吳靜吉和曾敬梅,2002);與(5) 創意生活經驗量表(吳靜吉、陳淑惠、李慧賢、郭俊賢、王文中和劉鶴龍,1996)。\n研究結果如下: (1)在團隊產品上,本研究比較學生在課程中所共創的十項產品與坊間有類似屬性之產品,結果發現學生普遍能提出有趣的創新構想。這些構想亦多能反應知識翻新的理念;(2)在協作歷程上,本研究發現學生均能在平台上進行密集的貼文、閱讀、與回文。顯示學生在社群裡並非只是被動閱讀文章,也能在平台上主動進行想法的分享、交流與激盪;內容分析—使用修改自Gunawardena, Lowe 和 Anderson (1997) 的互動分析模式(Interaction Analysis Model) 編碼—亦發現想法交流在知識共構階段上有顯著成長;(3)在團隊氛圍上,本研究也與台灣研究生(N=703)及瑞典中小企業員工(N=245)在創意氛圍量表的施測成績上進行比較,結果發現本研究的研究對象有六項因素優於上述二個參照團體的常模平均值。此六項因素分別為「玩興/幽默」、「想法支持」、「生動活潑」、「辯論」、「信任/開放」、和「自由」。此結果顯示,作為一個以想法為中心的知識翻新學習環境,知識論壇確實有助於提供學生較開放自在的討論環境,促使學生表達多元觀點,並透過知識分享以翻新彼此的看法。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of knowledge building pedagogy and Knowledge forum (KF) technology on groups’ collaborative and creative processes in a college class. Participants were 30 college students who took a university course about living technologies. Data sources and analyses included: (1) students’ online activities, recorded in a KF database, which was assessed using descriptive statistics, (2) students’ online discourse data which were content-analyzed using Interaction Analysis Model (Gunawardena, Lowe & Anderson, 1997); (3) groups’ technology products which was peer-assessed using a survey called “Creative Product Analysis Matrix” (Besemer, 1998); and (4) “Creative Climate Questionnaire (CCQ)” (Tseng & Wu, 2000; Ekvall, 1987) which was adopted to evaluate the characteristics of Knowledge Forum being a creative learning environment. After 18 weeks of knowledge building, the findings indicated enhanced performance in terms of three dimensions of group creativity (i.e., product, process, and place): (1) first, in terms of product, in this study, students developed ten technology products by means of initially proposing original ideas and then progressively improving them, with the guidance of a set of 12 knowledge building principles. The results showed that students were able to propose novel and useful technology products; (2) in terms of process, findings based on content analysis showed that students could creatively work with their ideas while opportunistically collaborating with others both within and beyond groups; and (3) in terms of place, the results based on the CCQ suggested that, of all 10 factors that characterize a creative environment, six of them, including playfulness/humor, idea support, liveliness, debate, trust/openness, and freedom, were rated much superior than the means of two other reference/comparison groups—Taiwanese graduate students (n=703) and Swedish company employees (n=245). To conclude, the results showed that an idea-centered knowledge-building environment was helpful for students to become more engaged in generating, exchanging, and co-elaborating ideas while debating, collaborating and discussing with one another in an environment that is conducive to group creativity.
參考文獻: 天下雜誌(2010)。培育未來夢想家,點亮未來。民99年5月31日,取自http://www.cw.com.tw/event/ad/futureschool/page01.htm。
邱浩政(2005)。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育資料集刊第三十輯。民99年1月5日,取自http:// search.nioerar.edu.tw/ edu_paper/data_image/ g0000218/ 0n30/20051200/p0000267.pdf。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。
葉玉珠(2006)。創造力教學-過去、現在與未來。台北:心理。
吳靜吉、陳淑惠、李慧賢、郭俊賢、王文中和劉鶴龍(1996)。「創意生活經驗量
表」之修訂。未出版。
吳靜吉(2003)。創造力的評量—4P觀點。民99年3月18日,取自http:// www. creativity.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/download.php?fileid=436
吳靜吉(2002)。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究,15,17-42。
吳靜吉(2004)。創意氛圍與創造力培育。瀋陽創造教育國際學術研討會。中國瀋陽:東北大學。
教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書。民99年5月20日,取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0039/92.03創造力教育白皮書.pdf。
教育部(2008)。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書。民100年五月九日,取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0039/97.08教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書.pdf。
教育部(2010)。未來想像與創意人才培育計畫。民100年五月九日,取自http://hss.edu.tw/plan_detail.php?class_plan=174
國科會(2011)。想像力與科技實作能力培育整合型研究計畫。民100年五月九日,取自http://web1.nsc.gov.tw/newwp.aspx?act=Detail&id=402881d02f0ed f63012f10 3eeaa10021&ctunit=31&ctnode=42&mp=1。
楊朝祥、徐明珠(2006)。創意經濟與人才培育。民99年五月二十四日,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/1871。
楊智先(2002)。教師工作動機、選擇壓力、社會互動與創造力之關係。政大教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
溫肇東(2009)。想像未來的能力,現在就應準備。民99年5月20日,取自http://newideas.cc/magazine/article.php?AKEY=1043。
曾敬梅(2002)。研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度、所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力之關係。政大教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(2000)。影響創意發展的個人特質, 家庭及學校因素量表之發展。創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發研討會,台北市。
劉慶聰(2010)。2010TiC100創新公共平台。民99年五月三十一日,取自http://www.tic100.org.tw/tic100/page?m/1。
新北市工商展覽中心接駁車。民100年5月1日。取自http:// www. tcwtc. com. tw /photo/tcwtc/2007travel/image005.jpg。
章記e衛廚-馬桶產品。民100年5月1日。取自http://shopmanager.hiwinner. hinet.net/hipershop/gzcy1/store/F1/K-3499T-0-5.jpg。
章記e衛廚-蓮蓬頭產品。民100年5月1日。取自http://www.cbk.tw/ gzcy1 /Store/bImages/SH335-360.jpg。
twdeco台灣裝潢網。民100年5月1日。取自http://www.savesafe. com.tw/ Twdeco/sf/sf-img/01/01c003.jpg。
雅虎電視專賣區商品。民100年5月1日。取自http://buy.yahoo.com.tw /res/gdsale/st_pic/1161/st-1161972-1.jpg。
阿甘賺錢及有用資訊部落格-發票收納。民100年5月1日。取自http://img. epaper.com.tw/img/collection/20060907/1.jpg。
Alex, Osborn (1963). Applied Imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd Edition) . Creative Education Foundation.
Argote, L. & Kane, A.A. (2003). Learning from direct and indirect experience in organizations. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds). Group creativity: innovation through collaboration. (pp.277-303). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
Ammer, J. J. (1998). Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14(3), 263-276.
Beaudoin, M. -N. & Taylor, M. (2004). Creating A Positive School Culture: How principals and teachers can solve problems together. CA: Corwin press.
Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Kirschner, P. (2004). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. In P. A. Kirschner (Chair), Learning in innovative learning environments. Symposium conducted at the AERA, San Diego, California, USA.
Besemer, S. (1998). Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the Model Structure and a Comparison Among Products--Three Novel Chairs. Creativity Research Journal. 11(4), 333 -346.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper`s world 3. Educational Researcher, (23)7. pp21-23.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York : BasicBooks.
Charles, E.S., & Shumar, W. (2007). Creativity, Collaboration and Competence:Agency in Online Synchronous Chat Environment. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning.
Dennis & Williams (2003). Eletronic brainstorming: theory, research, and future directions. In P. Paulus., & B. Nijstad (Eds). Group Creativity: innovation through collaboration (pp.277-303). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Drucker (2009). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. HarperCollins.
Eisenhardt, K. & Tabrizi, B. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 84-110.
Ekvall, G. (1991). The Organizational Culture of idea-management: A creative for the management ideas. In J. Henry & D. Walker, Management innovation (pp.73-79). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ensor, J., Cottam, A., & Band, C. (2001). Fostering Knowledge management through the creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 147-155
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
European Commission. (2009). European Year of Creativity and Innovation. Retrieved from http://create2009.europa.eu/.
Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
Fischer, G. (2007). Designing Socio-Technical Environments in Support of Meta-Design and Social Creativity. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning.
Gardner H. (2004). Changing Minds: the art and science of changing our own and other people`s minds. Harvard Business School Press.
Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.
Gloor, P.A. (2006) Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. New York : Oxford University Press.
Gunawardena , Lowe, & Anderson (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Educational Computing Research. 17(4). 397-431.
Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego : Robert R Knapp
Hong, H.-Y. (in press). Beyond group collaboration: Facilitating an idea-centered view of collaboration through knowledge building in a science class of fifth-graders. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptive use of technology for building community knowledge. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner, & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2008, Vol. 1 (pp. 374-381). Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2006). Strong ties, weak ties: Exploring patterns of collaboration and knowledge-interaction for knowledge advancement in the Knowledge Society Network. Paper presented at the tenth Knowledge Building Summer Institute. Toronto, Canada.
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology (1). Retrieved December 24, 2010, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/579.
Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(5), 613-627.
Hoppe, H. (2007). Educational information technologies and collaborative learning. In Hoppe, H. , Ogata, H. & Soller A. (2007). The Role of Technology in CSCL: Studies in Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning. (pp.1-9). NY: Springer.
Hutchins E. (1995). How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds. Cognitive Science (19), 265-288.
Johansson, F. (2004). The Medici Effect. Client Distribution Services.
Kao, J.J. (1997). The art and discipline of business creativity. Strategy and Leadership,25(4),6-11.
Kelley, T., Littman, J., & Hill, D. (2001). The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America`s Leading Design Firm. Brilliance Audio
Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL, theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Liang, J.C., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 242-237.
Leonard, D. A. & Swap, W.C. (1999). When sparks fly: igniting creativity in groups. Harvard Business School Press.
Lund (2004). Human Support in CSCL. In Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner P.A., & Martens R.L., (eds.), What we know about CSCL, (pp167-198). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ma, W.W. (2008) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Social Creativity: A Case Study of Fashion Design. Journal of Information (3). Information Technology and Organizations.
Mamykina, L., Candy, L, & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communication of the ACM, 45(10), 96-99.
Matthew C. & Sternberg R. (2010, May 20th). Leading innovation through collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.Com/10.1016 /S1572-0977(06)12002-6
New Media Consortium & Educase. (2009, Dec 18th). The 2008 horizon report. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium. Retrieved from www.nmc.org/pdf/ 2008-horizon-report.pdf.
Nooteboom B. (2004). Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An integrated approach. London: Routledge.
Palloff, R.M. & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community. CA: Jossey-Bass.
Peppler, K.A. & Kafai, Y.B. (2007). Collaboration, Computation, and Creativity: Media Arts Practices in Urban Youth Culture. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford University Press, London
Ramaswamy, V. & Gouillart, F. (2010). The Power of Co-Creation: Build It with Them to Boost Growth, Productivity, and Profits. Simon and Schuster.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan,42, pp305-310.
Richards, R. (1999). Four Ps of Creativity. In Runco M. & Pritzker S. (1999). Encyclopedia of creativity. (pp.33-43). Academic Press.
Robinson, A. & Schroeder, D. (2003). Ideas Are Free: How the idea revolution is liberating people and transforming organizations. CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Rosen, E. (2007). The Culture of Collaboration: Maximizing time, talent and tools to create value in the global economy. CA: Red Ape Publishing.
Runco, M. & Albert, R. (1990). Theories of Creativity. Retrieved May 19, 2010 from http://drrobertepstein.com/downloads/Epstein-Generativity_Theory_and_Creativity-Theories_of_Creativity-1990.pdf
Sarmiento, J.W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Group Creativity in Virtual Math Teams: Interactional Mechanisms for Referencing, Remembering and Bridging. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition.
Sawyer, K.R. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Sawyer, K. (Ed.). (2006). The Schools of the Future. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, K.R. (2007). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. Perseus Books Group. Retrieved Dec 19, 2009, from http://www.bizbriefings.com/ BizBriefings%20--%20Group%20Genius.pdf
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building Communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of
knowledge. In B.Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp.
67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. Education and technology: An encyclopedia . pp.183-192.
Scardamalia, M., Hong, H.Y., & Zhang, J. (2006). Knowledge Society Network and knowledge innovation. Paper presented at the annual Conference of the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (STLHE). Toronto, Canada.
Simonton, D. (1997). Creative Productivity: A Predictive and Explanatory Model of Career Trajectories and Landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66-89.
Srinivas, H. (2008) What is Collaborative Learning? Retrieved Dec 20, 2009, from http://www.gdrc.org/kmgmt/c-learn/what-is-cl.html
Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition: The collaborative locus of agency in CSCL. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sternberg, R. & Lubart, T. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press.
Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Handbook of Creativity. NY: Cambridge.
Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner P.A., & Martens R.L. (2004). What we know about CSCL. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stahl (2004). Building Collaborative Knowing. In Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner P.A., & Martens R.L., (eds.), What we know about CSCL, (pp53-85). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK
Syrett, M. & Lammiman, J. (2002). Successful Innovation: how to encourage and shape profitable ideas. London: The Economist Newspaper.
Tu, C. (2004). Online collaborative learning communities: Twenty-one designs to building an online collaborative learning community. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
West, J.A. & West, M.L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration: the power of the read-write web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Yin R. (2001). Case study research: Design and methods. MS: Sage Publications.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
97152006
99
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097152006
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
200601.pdf1.8 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.