Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51451
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor朱新民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳漢祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Han Hsiangen_US
dc.creator陳漢祥zh_TW
dc.creatorChen, Han Hsiangen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T06:56:05Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T06:56:05Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-05T06:56:05Z-
dc.identifierG0094981011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51451-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description94981011zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract自二十世紀四○年代末期以來,菲律賓對中共的外交政策與菲中關係經歷了戲劇性的變化,大致可以分為4個時期:從二十世紀四○年代末到六○年代末和七○年代初的近20年,親美主義與反共的意識形態形成了這一時期菲律賓的對外政策,意識形態與國家安全則是菲國對中共政策的主要考量,菲律賓奉行對中共完全「隔離」的冷戰政策;從七○年代初到九○年代初的近20年中,隨著冷戰體系的逐漸坍塌,菲律賓對外政策從重意識形態和政治轉向為發展外交,從而決定與中共建交,而國家安全在菲中關係中的作用則下降;從九○年代初到二十一世紀初,菲中關係由於後冷戰時期東亞地區格局的變動,以及菲中在南海的爭端,菲國再次評估中共對其國家安全的影響,從而又一次調整與美國的關係,希望借助美國的力量來制衡中共;而自2001年亞羅育總統上台以來,開啟了菲中關係的新時代,雙方建立了戰略合作伙伴關係,步入了雙邊關係的「黃金時期」,並延續至現任總統艾奎若三世。\n 在菲中關係的4個歷史時期,意識形態、美國因素、共產黨活動、歷史遺產、華僑華人、領海爭端、臺灣問題、政治結構、經濟關係等一系列因素從國內與國際的層面相互關聯和作用,此消彼長,共同影響了菲律賓的對中共外交政策。\n 就菲中關係發展的未來趨勢而言,菲中關係將主要受菲國國內政治的影響,傳統的美國因素仍不容忽視,同時,雙方在南海上的爭端儘管暫時擱置,但仍充滿不確定性,這些因素都限制了菲中關係的發展,但中共仍然可以在很大程度上利用菲律賓國內的政治、經濟需求來主導未來菲中關係的發展。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPhilippines’ China Policy and Philippines-Sino relations have undergone dramatic changes since the World WarII., and can be divided into four phrases. During the first period, from the late 1940s to the late 1960s and early 70s, the Pro-U.S. principal and anti-communist ideology, two factors formed the Philippines’ foreign policy. Ideology and national security were Philippines’ prime considerations, Philippines pursued a fully isolation Policy towards China. During the second phrase, from the early 1970s and the early 1990s, with the gradual collapse of the Cold War system, Philippines’ foreign policy has shifted from ideology-centric to politics-centric, the development of diplomacy has become the leading foreign policy thought, the above policy based on national security and ideology was declined, in this context, Philippines finally opened its door to People Republic of China. The third phrase started from the early 1990s and ended at the beginning of the21st century, during which Philippines’ idea on national security was reshaped the new structure of East Asia in the post-Cold War times, and the dispute between Philippines and PRC, Philippines re-evaluated PRC’s influence to her national security. Philippines hoped to introduce USA’s power to balance China in this region. A new time for Philippines-Sino was activated since President Arroyo came into power in 2001, in this period, both sides agreed to establish strategic partner relations in 2004. The Philippine-Sino relation has reached the “Golden Era” and continued up to now the president Aquino III.\n In the four stages of Philippines-Sino relations, ideology, the United States, the Communist Party of the Philippines and its rebellion, historical heritage, and overseas Chinese, territorial dispute, Taiwan issue, Philippines’ political structure, economic relations and other factors, interact and intersect from the international level and national level, and finally decide Philippines’ China Policy. \n As far as the future of bilateral relations between Philippines and PRC is concerned, though mostly decided by domestic politics, Philippines-Sino relations cannot yet break away from historic factors like America. And even though the two sides have put away the South China Sea dispute, it still remained so many uncertainties. All these factors have limited the developments of Philippines-Sino relations. Anyway, China still can, to great extend, lead the to-be relations through its strong economic and political power.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\n第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1\n第二節 文獻回顧 4\n第三節 研究途徑與方法 8\n第四節 研究範圍與限制 11\n第五節 章節安排 12\n\n第二章 菲律賓與中共關係之回顧 \n第一節 菲律賓與中共建交前之雙邊關係 14\n第二節 菲律賓與中共建交 23\n第三節 七○年代中期至冷戰結束期間菲中關係 30\n第四節 小結 36\n\n第三章 後冷戰時期菲律賓與中共關係 \n第一節 羅慕斯政府時期 40\n第二節 埃斯特拉達政府時期 46\n第三節 亞羅育政府時期 49\n第四節 小結 53\n\n第四章 菲律賓改善與中共關係之因素\n第一節 菲律賓對國際局勢與中共影響力的認知 55\n第二節 菲律賓國家內部因素 62\n第三節 菲律賓與中共關係之華僑議題 67\n第四節 小結 73\n\n第五章 菲律賓與中共關係發展之前瞻與限制\n第一節 菲律賓與中共政治關係 76\n第二節 菲律賓與中共經濟關係 78\n第三節 菲律賓與中共的南海衝突 81\n第四節 小結 99\n\n第六章 結論 102\n\n參考書目 119\n附錄 126zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094981011en_US
dc.subject菲中關係zh_TW
dc.subject外交政策zh_TW
dc.subject南海爭端zh_TW
dc.subjectPhilippine-Sino relationsen_US
dc.subjectforeign policyen_US
dc.subjectSouth China Sea disputeen_US
dc.title後冷戰時期菲律賓對中共外交政策之研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe research of Philippines` China policy of post cold war eraen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.艾倫˙柯林斯著,東南亞的安全困境,(國防部史政編譯室譯印,2004年)。2.朱新民等著,中國大陸研究,1992,(台北市:五南出版社,1992年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.朱浤源主編,撰寫博碩士論文實戰手冊,(台北:中華科際整合研究會,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.宋鎮照,臺海兩岸與東南亞—三角政經關係之解析,(台北:五南出版社,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.呂亞力,政治學方法,(台北:三民書局,1994 年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.杜乃濟,增進中菲實質關係之研究,(台北:商務印書館,1986年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.林添貴譯,Zbigniew Brzezinski著,大棋盤,(台北:立緒文化事業有限公zh_TW
dc.relation.reference司,1998年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.陳烈甫,菲律賓對外關係,(台北:正中書局,2001年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.陳鴻瑜,南海諸島主權與國際衝突,(台北:幼獅文化事業公司,1988年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.陳鴻瑜,東南亞各國的政治與外交政策,(台北:渤海文化公司,1992年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.陳鴻瑜,東南亞政治論衡,(台北:翰蘆圖書出版公司,2001年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.陳鴻瑜,東南亞各國政府與政治,(台北:翰蘆出版公司,2006年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.陳欣之,東南亞安全,(台北:生智文化事業有限公司,1999年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.陳佩修,東南亞文化教學參考手冊,(暨南大學東南亞研究中心主編,教zh_TW
dc.relation.reference育部編印,2006年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.張式琦彙編,地略學參考論文選輯,(台北:中華戰略學會大陸研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference編印,1982年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.葉至誠,社會科學概論,(台北:揚智文化公司,2000 年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.程畢凡、謝陳秀瑜編,中國與東盟國家經濟關係現狀和發展趨勢,(北京:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國社會科學出版社,1988年)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.黃朝瀚,中國與亞太地區變化中的政治經濟關係,(暨南文學出版社,1990zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.蔡百銓譯,東南亞史(上),(台北:麥田出版社,2001年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.楊志恆等著,我國應有的南海戰略,(台北:業強出版社,1996年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.潘明宏譯,David Nachmias著,社會科學研究方法(上冊),(台北:韋zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伯文事業出版社,1999年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.劉芝田,中菲關係史,(台北:正中書局,1979年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.歐信宏、胡祖慶合譯,Joshua S. Goldstein原著,國際關係(Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRelations),(台北:雙葉書廊有限公司,1993年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.蕭曦清,中菲外交關係史,(台北:正中書局,1996年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25.韓振華主編,我國南海諸島史料匯編,(台北:東方出版社,1988年版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26.懷靜如,菲律賓外交政策(1946-1984),(台北:台灣商務印書館,1986zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.亢升,「艾斯特拉達上台伊始的菲律賓」,東南亞研究(1998年6月),頁zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.宋燕輝,「東協與中共協商南海區域行為準則及對我可能影響」,問題與研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究,第39卷第4期(2000年4月),頁17-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.宋燕輝,「南海地區安全戰略情勢之發展與現況」,亞太研究論壇,第19期(2003年3月),頁3-17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.沈紅芳,「亞洲金融危機對菲律賓經濟的影響」,南洋問題研究,第3期(1998zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年),頁8-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.林蘋蘋,「美國柯林頓政府對中(共)菲『美濟礁』爭議事件之立場與反zh_TW
dc.relation.reference應(1993-1996)」,東南亞季刊,第2卷第2期(1997年4月),頁45-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.林正義,「東協區域論壇與南海信心建立措施」,戰略與國際研究,第2卷zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第1期(2000年1月),頁21-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.莫大華,「澳洲參與『五國防禦安排』對東南亞區域安全的影響」,問題與zh_TW
dc.relation.reference研究,第37卷第9期(1998年9月),頁19-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.陳鴻瑜,「南海之石油資源開發與政治衝突」,東南亞季刊,第1卷第3期(1996年7月),頁19-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.陳鴻瑜,「後冷戰時期東南亞之區域安全」,戰略與國際研究,第1卷第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1期(1999年1月),頁16-58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.郭梁,「戰後菲律賓的華僑政策和華僑同化」,東南亞研究, 8月號(1997年),頁25-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.楊志恆,「美日安保之沿革及其對台海安全之影響」,戰略與國際研究,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2卷第2期,2000年4月,頁1-30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.楊志恆,「中共東南沿海軍事集結對東亞安全之影響」,全球政治評論,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5期(2004年1月),頁77-92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.楊永明,「美國亞太戰略之理論分析」,美歐季刊,第12卷第3期(1997zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年秋季號),頁35-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.蔡增家,「日本與東協關係的轉變」,問題與研究,第44卷第2期(2005zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年3、4月),頁103-129。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.蔡鵬鴻,「試論東亞峰會:制度安排、進程與問題」,國際觀察,第3期(2005zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年),頁49-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.衛和世,「菲律賓的外交政策及其與中國和東盟的關係」,當代亞太,第5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference期(2002年),頁3-5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.謝福進,「後冷戰時期中共與東協安全戰略關係之研究」,戰略與國際研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究,第3卷第4期(2001年10月),頁56-79。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.藍佩嘉,「跨越國界的生命地圖:菲籍家務移工的流動與認同」,台灣社會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference研究季刊,第48期(2002年12月),頁169-218。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.顧長永,「美軍撤離菲律賓事件的決策分析」,歐美研究,第25卷第1期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(1995年3月),頁37-64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.「菲律賓共和國與大不列顛暨北愛爾蘭聯合王國國防合作諒解備忘錄zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(1996年1月3日,於馬尼拉)」,東南亞季刊,第1卷第3期(1996年7zh_TW
dc.relation.reference月),頁113-117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.「1995年5月10日美國國務院代理發言人雪莉所發表『南海聲明』之譯zh_TW
dc.relation.reference文」,東南亞季刊,第2卷第1期(1997年1月),頁131-132。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、中文文集之篇章zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.于有慧,「國際反恐情勢下的中美外交:轉機與矛盾」,國際反恐與亞太情zh_TW
dc.relation.reference勢,(台北:政治大學國際關係研究中心,2004年7月),頁113-136。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.宋燕輝,「『南海會議』」與中華民國之參與:回顧與展望」,我國應有的南zh_TW
dc.relation.reference海戰略,(台北:業強出版社,1996年8月,初版),頁161-215。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.吳玲君,「九一一事件後美國對東亞區域經濟合作的政策」,國際反恐與亞zh_TW
dc.relation.reference太情勢,(台北:政治大學國際關係研究中心,2004年7月),頁31-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.邱稔壤,「美國與菲律賓反恐策略之成型與發展」,國際反恐與亞太情勢,(台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北:政治大學國際關係研究中心,2004年7月),頁179-206。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.柯玉枝,「日本安保政策與日美同盟」,新世紀亞太情勢與區域安全,(台北:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference政治大學國際關係研究中心,2003年6月),頁139-164。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.Christopher A. Mcnally and Charles E. Morrison編,「菲律賓」,2001亞太安zh_TW
dc.relation.reference全觀,(國防部史政編譯室譯印,2002年3月),頁175-185。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference肆、英文專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1. Abueva, Jose V. The Ramos Presidency and Administration Record andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLegacy(1992-1998), Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998, Institute of Southeast Asia Studies, Singapore.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Buss, A. Claude. Cory Aquino and the People of the Philippines, Stanfordzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlumni Association Stanford, California, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Easton, David. A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs:N.J.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrentice-Hall, 1965.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Hosti, K.J. International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, Englewoodzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCliffs:N.J. Prentice-Hall, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Timberman, David G.. The Philippines: New Directions in Domestic Policyzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Foreign Relations. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伍、英文期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1. Abud.Samad Paridah and Bakar Darusalam Abu. “Malaysia-Philippines: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIssue of Sabah”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXXII, No.6, (June 1992), pp. 554-567.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Acharya, Amitav. “Southeast Asia’s Democratic Moment”, Asian Survey, Vol.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXXXIX, No. 3, (May/June 1999), pp. 418-432.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Acharya, Amitav. “The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: Security Community or Defense Community”, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 64, No. 2, (Summer 1991), pp. 159-177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Almonte, T. Jose. “New Directions and Priorities in Philippine Foreign Relations”, Asia Society, Edited by David G. Timberman, Institute of Southeast Asia Studies, Singapore, pp. 137-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Banlaoi, C. Rommel. “The Role of Philippine-American Relations in the Global Campaign Against Terrorism: Implications for Regional Security”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 24, No. 2, (August 2002), pp. 294-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. Bert, Wayne. “Chinese Policy toward Democratization Movements: Burma and Philippines”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXX, No. 11, (November 1990), pp. 1066-1083.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. Bertrand, Jacques. “Peace and Conflict in the Southern Philippines: Why the 1996 Peace Agreement is Fragile”, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp. 37-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. Bolongaita Emil. “The Philippine in 1999: Balancing Restive Democracy and Recovering Economy”, Asian Survey, Vol. X, No.1, (January/February 2000), pp. 67-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. Buszynski, Leszek. “Southeast Asia in the Post-Cold War Era, Regionalism and Security”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXXII, No. 9, (September 1992), pp. 830-847.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. Buszynski, Leszek. “Realism, Institutionalism, and Philippine Security”, Asian Survey, Vol. XII. No.3, (May/June 2002), pp. 483-501.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11. Buszynski, Leszek. “ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, No. 3, (2003), pp. 343-362.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12. Caballero-Anthony, Mely. “Mechanisms of Dispute Settlement: The ASEAN Experience”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 20, No. 1, (April 1998), pp.38-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13. Castro, Renato Cruz De. ”Special Relations and Alliance Politics in Philippine-U.S. Security Relations 1990-2002”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 27,No. 1, (2003), pp. 137-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14. Castro, Renato Cruz De. “The Revitalized Philippine-U.S. Security Relations: A Ghost from the Cold War or an Alliance for the 21th Century”, Asian Survey, Vol. XIII, No.6, (November/ December, 2003), pp. 971-988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15. Castro, Cruz De Renato. “Addressing International Terrorism in Southeast Asia: A Matter of Strategic or Functional Approach?”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, No. 2, (2004), pp. 193-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16. Cheng, Y. S. Joseph. “Sino-ASEAN Relations in the Early Twenty-First Century”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 23, No. 3, (December 2001), pp. 420-451.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17. Chow, T. Jonathan. “ASEAN Counterterrorism Cooperation Since 9/11”, Asian Survey, Vol. XV, No. 2, (March/April 2005), pp. 302-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18. Corning, P. Gregory.“The Philippine Bases and U.S. Pacific Strategy”, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 63, No.1, (Spring 1990), pp. 6-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19. Emmerson, Donald K.“ASEAN as an international regime”, Two Decade of ASEAN: Prospects for Regionalism, held in Boston at the annual meeting of Association for Asian Studies, 11 April 1987, pp. 1-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20. Er Peng Lam.”Japan and the Spratlys Dispute: Aspirations and Limitations”, Asian Survey Vol. XXXVI, No. 10, (October 1996), pp. 995-1010.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21. Fontaine, W. Roger. “The Philippines: After Aquino”, Asian Affairs, Vol. 19, No 3, (Fall 1992), pp. 170-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22. Ganesan, N. “Rethinking ASEAN as a Security Community in Southeast Asia”, Asian Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 4, (Winter 1995), pp. 210-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23. Hedman, E. Eva-Lotta. “The Philippines in 2005: Old Dynamics, New Conjuncture”, Asian Survey, Vol. XVI, No. 1, (January/February 2006), pp. 187-193.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24. Hernandez, G. Carolina. “The Philippines in 1995: Growth Amid Challenges”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXXVI, No. 2, (February 1996), pp. 142-151.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25. Indorf, H. Hans. “The 1988 Philippine Base Review”, Asian Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 1, (Spring 1988), pp. 21-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26. Islam, Syed Serajul. “The Islam Independence Movements in Patani of Thailand and Mindanao of the Philippines”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXXVIII, No.5, (May, 1998), pp. 441-456.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27. Jr, E. Berry, William. “The Effects of the U.S. Military Base on the Philippine Economy”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 12, No. 4, (March 1990), pp. 306-333.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28. Katsumata, Hiro. “Reconstruction of Diplomatic Norms in Southeast Asia: The Case for Strict Adherence to the ASEAN Way”, Vol. 25, No. 1, (April 2003), pp. 104-121zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29. Katsumate, Hiro. “Why is ASEAN Diplomacy Changing? From Non-Interference to Open and Frank Discussions”, Asian Survey, Vol. XIV, No. 2, (March/April 2004), pp. 237-254.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30. Kim, Poon Shee. “The South China Sea in China’s Strategic Thinking”, Contemporary Southeast Asia,, Vol. 19, No. 4, (March 1998), pp. 369-387.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31. Labrador, C. Mel. “The Philippines in 2000: In Search of a Silver Lining”, Asian Survey, Vol. XI, No.1, (January/February 2001), pp. 221-229.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32. Labrador, C. Mel. “The Philippines in 2001: High Drama, a New President, and Setting the Stage for Recovery”, Asian Survey, Vol. XII, No.1, (January/February 2002), pp. 141-149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33. Limaye, P. Satu. “Minding the Gaps: The Bush Administration and U.S.-Southeast Asia Relations”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, No. 1,(2004), pp. 73-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference34. Marlay, Ross. “China, the Philippines, and the Spratly Islands”, Asian Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 4, (Winter 1997), pp. 195-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference35. Moller, Kay. “Cambodia and Burma, The ASEAN Way Ends Here”, Asian Survey, Vol. XXXVIII, No.12, (December 1998), pp. 1087-1104.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference36. Morrison, Charles E. “Asia Pacific Security outlook 2003, Philippines”, Japan Center for International Exchange, 2003, pp. 129-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference37. Odgaard, Liselotte. “Deterrence and Co-operation in the South China Sea”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 23, No. 2, (August 2001), pp. 292-306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference38. Ringuet Joseph Daniel and Estrada Elsa. “Understanding the Philippines’ Economic and Politics since the Return of Democracy in 1986”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 25, No. 2, (August 2003), pp. 233-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference39. Snyder, Craig A. “Building Multilateral Security Cooperation in the South China Sea”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 21, No. 1, (1997), pp. 5-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference40. Storey, James Ian. “Creeping Assertiveness: China, the Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21, No. 1, (April 1999), pp. 95-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference41. Thompson, R. Mark. “The Decline of Philippine Communism: A review of essay”, South East Asia Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, July 1998, pp. 105-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference42. Tow, Shannon. “Southeast Asia in the Sino-U.S. Strategic Balance”, No. 3 (2004), pp. 434-459.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference43. Turner, Mark. “Terrorism and Secession in the Southern Philippines: The Rise of the Abu Sayaf”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 17, No. 1,(June 1995), pp. 1-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference44. Yang, Jian. “Sino-Japanese Relations: Implications for Southeast Asia”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 25, No. 2, (August 2003), pp. 306-327.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference45. Yong Leng, Lee. “The Malaysian-Philippine Maritime Dispute”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 11, No.1, (June 1989), pp. 61-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference46. Young, Kun and Hwi Lee, Park Wang. ”The Financial Crisis of 1997-1998 and its Impact on Security Relations in East Asia”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 23, No. 3, (1999), pp 129-151.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference47. YU, C K Samuel. “Political Reforms in the Philippines: Challenges Ahead”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, No. 2, (2005), pp. 217-235.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101101.pdf750.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.