Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51455| 題名: | 台灣高等教育評鑑制度改進之研究 A study of improvements for higher education evaluation system in Taiwan |
作者: | 黃淑娥 Huang, Shu Er Aimee |
貢獻者: | 詹中原 Jan, Chung Yuang 黃淑娥 Huang, Shu Er Aimee |
關鍵詞: | 深度訪談 高等教育 評鑑 認證 In-depth Interview Higher Education Evaluation Accreditation |
日期: | 2010 | 上傳時間: | 5-十月-2011 | 摘要: | 在知識經濟發展的21世紀，高等教育的需求是世界性的趨勢。台灣在過去20年中，高等教育有急速的膨脹，因此高等教育的品質管制也成為重要的議題。高等教育評鑑中心 (HEEACT) 目前在台灣針對各類別的系所進行評鑑，其他非政府機構例如中華工程教育學會 IEET) ，以及國際機構AACSB也在台灣進行教育認證，目前教育部正擬定有關高等教育評鑑的國家政策。\n 國際化的衝擊，也是促進高等教育評鑑或認證的驅動力量。高等教育評鑑不僅提昇教學品質，也促進專業人員的國際流動性。在過去數年之中，對於高教評鑑中心執行之結果，各方有許多不同的觀點、爭議以及抱怨。本研究的目的，在於選擇高教評鑑相關之主要議題，收集專家學者的意見，並且討論受訪者對於這些議題具有共識或不同意見的結果。 \n 本研究採取深度訪談的研究方法，獲取專家們對於高等教育評鑑或認證的看法。本研究共有15位專家學者參與訪談，由訪談結果顯示，受訪者在三分之一的議題方面具有較明顯的共識。本研究將訪談結果整理分析，並與文獻上所取得的資料相互對應比較。本研究結果對於政府制訂未來高等教育品質管制的政策提供有用的資料。 The demand of higher education is a worldwide trend in the knowledge based economy of the 21st century. Taiwan has a rapid higher education expansion during the past two decades, and the quality control is becoming a highly concerned issue. The Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council (HEEACT) is conducting general evaluations for higher education programs in Taiwan. Non-governmental commissions like the Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET) and the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) are also conducting accreditations in Taiwan. A national policy for the effective evaluation of higher education is currently formulating by the Ministry of Education.\n The impact of globalization is another driving force for the evaluation and accreditation of higher education programs. Higher education evaluation and accreditation not only enhance the teaching quality, but also promote professional mobility. During the last several years, there were different opinions, arguments and complains for the evaluation conducted by HEEACT. The aim of this study was to select major issues of higher education evaluation, to find out opinions from related experts, and to discuss the differences and similarities of interview results. \n This research applied the in-depth interview method to collect the comments for higher education evaluation and accreditation in Taiwan. Fifteen professionals and administration leaders have been interviewed. The interviewees showed consensus on one third of the interview questions. Their opinions on various interview topics have been recorded, analyzed, and compared with literature evidences. The results of this study provide useful information to the future policy and improvement. |
參考文獻: | AACSB 2004, Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. http://www.accsb.edu/accred.html AACSB DataDirect, http://www.aacsb.edu/knowledgeservices/datadirect/dd-intro.asp AEF website, http://www.apecef.org APEC website, http://www.apec.org Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., Huff, A. S., Cognitive change strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal., 13, 15-36 (1992) Bologna with Student Eyes, the official Bologna Process website (2007-2010) (http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/) Bologna Process Stocktaking Report 2009, the official Bologna Process website (2007-2010), http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/ Chu, J. Y., Research report to the Public Construction Commission of the Executive Yuan, No. 950029 (in Chinese), December (2006). Contractor A., The Long Road to Bologna, The Australian (online newspaper of the year), January 29 (2009) (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au) Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, http//:www.edu.tw/statistics Dreyfack, M., Sony Walkman off to a running start. Marketing and Media Decision, 16 (10), 70-72 (1981) Guler, I., Guillen, M. F., MacPherson, J. M., Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207-232 (2002) HEEACT, http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ HEEACT, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Higher Education Evaluation, Taipei, Taiwan (2006) Hill, R. C., When the going gets tough: A Baldridge Award Winner on the line. Academy of Management Executive, 7 (3), 75-79 (1993). Hsu, L. A. and Lin, M. Y., Lessons of the implementation of outcomes-based education reform in the US (in Chinese), 教育政策論壇，8(2), 55-74 (2005). IEET website, http://www.ieet.org.tw ieet.org.tw/download/2009年IEET受認證系所研習會 Information Note, Policy Forum on Accreditation and the Global Higher Education Market. International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), Paris, June 13-14 (2005) JABEE website, http://www.jabee.org (2008). Julian, S. D. and Ofori-Dankwa, J. C., Is accreditation good for strategic decision making of traditional business schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 225-233 (2006). Kells, H. R., The universities in a time of increased regulations: responsibilities, opportunities and dangers. Proc. 2006 International Conference on Higher Education Evaluation, HEEACT, Taipei, Taiwan (2006). Kells, H. R., Self-study process: A guide for post-secondary institution, New-York, MacMillian Publishing, 1983. Kerby, D., Weber, S., Linking mission objectives to an assessment plan. J. Education for Business, 75 (4) 202-209 (2000) Konjic, T. and Sarajlic, N., Higher education structure at the faculty of electrical engineering, University of Tuzla: Influence of the Bologna agreement International J. of Electrical Engineering Education, 44 (2), 166-174 (2007). Lieven, M. and Martin, G., Higher education in a global market: the case of British overseas provision in Israel. Higher Education, 52, 41-68 (2006). Lin, C. H., Education expansion, educational inequality, and income inequality: edidence from Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 80, 601-615 (2007). Lin, W. C., Discours de la méthode（方法論） : Research method in Social Sciences (in Chinese), 工作坊寫真, Center for China Studies, National Cheng Chi University, p. 23-27, November (2005). Mok, K. H., Globalization and higher education reconstructing in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Higher Education Research, 22, 117-129 (2003). NCCU, Proceedings of Public Policy Forum: Evaluation and Accreditation of Professional Schools, Taipei, Taiwan (2007). Roller, R. H., Andrew, B. K., Bovee, S. L., Specialized accreditation of business schools: A comparison of costs, benefits, and motivations. Journal of Education of Business, 78 (4), 197-204 (2003) Romeo, E. I., AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7 (2) 245-255 (2008) Shearman, R., Bologna: Engineering the right outcomes. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 44, 97-100 (2007). Spady, W. G., Choosing outcomes of significance, Educational Leadership, 51, 18-22 (1994). The Future Projects: Policy for Higher Education in a Changing World. The universal impact of competition and globalization in higher education. Brown University, http://www.futureproject.org, (2000). Van Damme, D., Quality issues in the internationalism of higher education. Higher Education, 41, 415-441 (2001). Wang, R. J., From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: the problems faced. Higher Education, 46, 261-287 (2003). White Paper of University Education Policy, Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2001). Wikipedia Bologna Process, http://en.wikipedia/wiki/Bologna_process Yang, Y., Report on the Effect of the Bologna Process (in Chinese), Evaluation Bimonthly, No. 8, 55-59 (2007a). Yang, Y., The London Communiqué in the Bologna Process (in Chinese), Evaluation Bimonthly, No. 10, 57-60 (2007b). Zaheer, A. and Zaheer, S., Riding the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and performance in global electronic networks. Best Paper Proceedings, National Academy of Management Conferences, 72 (2005) Zammuto, R. F., Accreditation and the globalization of business. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 256-268 (2008). 王順民，關於大學評鑑與退廠機制，國政研究報告，財團法人國家政策研究基金會 (National Policy Foundation)，December 28 (2007). 王保進，大學自我評鑑，台北，正中書局，2002. 大學自我評鑑結果及國內外專業評鑑機構認可要點，評鑑雙月刊，19, 56-57 (2009) 方嘉麟，大學評鑑不瞭解科技整合，中國時報，時論廣場，一月九日，2009. 牟宗燦，CHEA監督力強，國內可借鏡，評鑑雙月刊，7, 61 (2007). 邱于貞，亞太地區高等教育評鑑與學生學習成果研討會，國立台灣大學教學發展中心電子報，6月30日 (2009). 林尚平，評鑑取向的觀點，評鑑雙月刊，14, 23-28 (2008). 林金定，嚴嘉楓，陳美花，質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究，3, No. 2, 122-136 (2005). 高教評鑑中心，系所評鑑回應，評鑑雙月刊，14, 28 (2008). 郭明政，資源共享，還是分割，高教評鑑譴責教部政策？聯合報，民意論壇，一月十二日，2009a. 郭明政，戕害學術，高教哀哀叫，聯合報，民意論壇，五月十三日，2009b. 陳振遠，從規劃、執行與回饋面看高教評鑑的專業分工，評鑑雙月刊，18, 17-19 (2009). 陳曼玲，結合評鑑制度，再造大學新局，專訪教育部政務次長呂木琳，評鑑雙月刊，10, 1-3 (2007). 經濟日報社論, 消滅競爭力從亂整高教起，經濟日報，一月二十一日，2009. 楊朝祥，徐明珠，台灣高等教育指標國際化之比較研究，國政研究報告，財團法人國家政策研究基金會 (National Policy Foundation)，August, 28 (2008). 劉維琪，管制干預或市場機制？從認可評鑑談大學招生政策，評鑑雙月刊，14, 4-5 (2008). 劉曼君，「成果導向」認證檢視畢業生核心能力，評鑑雙月刊，6, 30-31 (2007). 劉曼君，界定核心能力標準展現自我特色，評鑑雙月刊，11, 38-39 (2008). 潘慧玲，方案評鑑的緣起與概念，教師天地，117, 26-31 (2002). 盧增緒，論教育評鑑觀念之形成，中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑，台北，師大書苑，pp. 3-59 (1995). 戴曉霞，大學評鑑的興起、模式與問題，反思台灣的高等學術評鑑研討會，9月25-26日，台北 (2004). 嚴昆陽，再哀大學以及一些期待與建議，當前高教學術評鑑的並癥與解咒的可能，反思台灣的高等學術評鑑研討會，9月25-26日，台北 (2004). |
描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 95924006 99 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095924006 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400602.pdf | 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.