Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51462
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王冠雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Dustinen_US
dc.contributor.author莫伊塞斯zh_TW
dc.creator莫伊塞斯zh_TW
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-05T06:56:30Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-05T06:56:30Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-05T06:56:30Z-
dc.identifierG0979240182en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51462-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description97924018zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis thesis aims to describe the two dynamics present in the maritime disputes of the South China Sea: the negotiation dynamic and the military dynamic. This thesis will focus on two aspects: first, the history of the confidence building measures in the South China Sea; and second, analysis of each relevant nations’ motivation for the current stage of the Southeast Asian military dynamic. The role of ARF in this process and the characteristics of the Track I and Track II diplomatic tools are analyzed along with its difficulties in progressing from the CBMs to preventive diplomacy (PD). The effects of the CBMs’ lack of progress on the current military power acquisitions of the South China Sea claimant states are objects of analysis as well. Within of the analysis of the confidence-building measures, this thesis also contemplates the role of China as the most important variable in the dispute. \nThe second part of this thesis works with the connections between the developments of the South China Sea and the current military buildup in Southeast Asia. Aiming to identify the causes of the military dynamic, the thesis describe the current military capabilities of the main actors of the South China Sea disputes; namely China, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines. Moreover, it provides a detailed description of the new equipment acquisitions and the impacts, in terms of the power capabilities, of these actors. A final analysis of the current panorama of the disputes is conducted, analyzing the key events between 2009 and 2010. This thesis concludes that the CBM’s efforts suffer from structural bottlenecks as the adamant adherence to the concept of sovereignty impedes the bloc’s advancement in the establishment of solutions for the maritime territorial disputes. The absence of diplomatic solutions has directly influenced the momentum of militarization in the Southeast Asia.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsABSTRACT\nINTRODUCTION 09\nRESEARCH PURPOSE 12\nRESEARCH QUESTION 12\nMETHODOLOGY 13\nLITERATURE REVIEW 13\nCHAPTER 1 – THE SOUTH CHINA SEA: BACKGROUND 22\n1.1 – The Strategic aspects of the SCS’ Disputes 24\n1.2 – The importance of the sea lanes of communication(SLOCs) 26\n1.3 – The UNCLOS III and its impacts in the South China Sea disputes 29\n1.4 – The claimants and demands.......……………………………………………………………….…… 31\n1.5 – The United States interests 41\n1.6 – The Japan interests 48\n1.7 – Diplomacy and clashes. 49\n1.8 – The living and non-living resources question 57\n1.9 –The dilemma of common interests and the dilemma of common aversion: the two dynamics in the South China Sea 62\n1.10 – Chapter Summary: Analysis 64\n \nCHAPTER 2 – THE NEGOTIANTING DYNAMIC : THE CBMS IN THE SCS ISSUE 68\n2.1 –Confidence Building Measures (CBM): Definition of Term 70\n2.2 – The CBMs efforts in the South China Sea 75\n2.4 –The preventive diplomacy 86\n2.5 –Sovereignty concepts and ASEAN Way: independent variables 88\n2.6 – The China factor 91\n2.7 –Perceptions and Outcomes 92\n2.8 – Chapter Summary: analysis 99\n\nCHAPTER 3 – THE MILITARY DYNAMIC: THE ARMS BUILD UP IN THE SOUTHEAST ASIA 103\n3.1 – The Source of Military Dynamic in the Southeast Asia 111\n3.2 – The SCS’ Claimants’ Military Modernization and Capabilities 118\na) China 120\nb) Malaysia 124\nc) Vietnam 125\nd) Philippines 129\n3.3 – Chapter Summary: Analysis 130\n\nCHAPTER 4 – LATEST DEVELOPMENTS (2009-2010): AN ANALYSIS 136\na) The Malaysia-Vietnam joint-submission at the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf 137\nb) New Philippine Border Law: the baselines question 140\nc) The Chinese submarine harbor building 141\nd) China’s naval exercises in the South China Sea 142\ne) The Vietnam-Russia Arms deal and Military Cooperation with US 145\n4.1 –Chapter Summary: Analysis 147\nCONCLUSION 151\nBIBLIOGRAPHY\n\nTABLE OF FIGURES\nFig.1 - Maritime claims 32\nFig. 2 – Nine-Dotted Line (Taiwan) 37\nFig. 3 – U-Shaped Line (China) 37\nFig. 4 - China’s naval exercises (2010) 114\n\nINDEX OF TABLES\nTable 1- Summary of Territorial Claims Basis and Occupation in South China Sea 39\nTable 2- Incidents South China Sea 54 \nTable 3- Types of Confidence Building Measures 74 \nTable 4- Military Expenditure of SCS’s States claimants 106\nTable 5- China’s Naval Forces 122\nTable 6- The Flotillas Deployed by China from its North, East and South Sea Fleets 123\n \nTable 7- The Malaysian’s Air and Maritime Arms Acquisitions and Capabilities (2003-2004). 124\nTable 8-The Vietnam’s Air and Maritime Arms Acquisitions and Capabilities (2003-2004) 126\nTable 9-The Philippine’s Air and Maritime Arms Acquisitions and Capabilities (2003-2004) 130zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0979240182en_US
dc.subjectASEANen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectSouth China Seaen_US
dc.subjectCooperationen_US
dc.subjectConflicten_US
dc.title合作背後的矛盾:南海爭議下的東協與中國關係之探討zh_TW
dc.titleThe contradictions behind cooperation: ASEAN-China relations under the South China Sea disputesen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceBOOKSzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBUCHHOLZ, Hanns J. Law of the Sea Zones in the Pacific Ocean. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCABALLERO-ANTHONY, Mely. Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN Way. Singapore: ISEAS,2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCAPIE, David, and EVANS, Paul. The Asia-Pacific Security Lexicon. Singapore: ISEAS, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCHEMMILIER-GENDREAU, Monique, Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCHINKIN, Christine. Third Parties in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDASSA, Dalia Kaye. Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia. Pittsburgh: Rand Corporation, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEMMERS, Ralf. Geopolitics and Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia New York: Routledege Press, 2010.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFISCHER, Richard D. The China’s Military Modernization: Building for Regional and Global Reach. USA: Praeger Security International, 2008.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGREENFIELD, Jeanette, China and the Law of the Sea, Air, and Environment. The Netherlands: Sijthoff & Noordhoff International Publishers, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHAMMOND, Grant. The Plowshares into Swords: Arms Race in International Politics. Columbus: University of South Carolina Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHERRING, Eric. The Arms Dynamics in World Politics. USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJUNWU, Pan. Toward a New Framework for Peaceful Settlement of China’s Territorial Boundary Disputes. The Netherlands: Martinus Nihoff Publishers, 2008.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKREPON, Michael. Conflict Avoidance, Confidence-Building, and Peacemaking” in Handbook of Confidence-Building Measures for Regional Security, edited by The Henry L. Stimson Center,1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLO, Chi-kin, China’s Policy Towards territorial Disputes. London: Routledege, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMEARSHEIMER, John. Anarchy and the Struggle for Power. New York: Norton Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMATTLI, Walter. The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMINGJIANG, Li. “China’s South China Sea Dilemma: balancing sovereignty, development, and security” in Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Toward a Cooperative Management Regime, edited by Sam Bateman and Ralf Emmers. New York; Routledge Press, 2009.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePERCIVAL, Bronson. The Dragon Looks South: China and Southeast Asia in the New Century Singapore: Praeger Security International, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQUILOP, Raymund Jose G. Institution Building in the Asia-Pacific: The ARF Experience . Manila: Office of Strategic and Special Studies, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Military Balance 2009. The International Institute of Strategic Studies. United Kingdon, Routledge Press,2009.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceARTICLESzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWENDT, Alexander. “Anarchy is what States make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2 (Spring, 1992), pp. 391-425.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBITZINGER, Richard A. “A new Arms Race? Explaining Recent Southeast Asia Military Acquisitions”, Contemporary Southeast Asia vol.32, no. 1 (2010):pp. 50-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBITZINGER, Richard. “The China Syndrome: Chinese Military Modernization and the Rearming of Southeast Asia”, RSIS Working Papers no. 126 (2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCHAO, John K.T. “South China Sea: Boundary Problems Relating to the Nansha and Hsisha Islands”. Chinese Yearbook of International Law and Affairs (1989-1990) vol.9 (1991): pp.66-156.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEMMERS, Ralf. and TAN, See Seng. “The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: A failure in Practice”, RSIS Working Paper, no.189 (2009).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEVANS, Paul M. “Building Security: The Council for Security Cooperation in Asia-Pacific (CSCAP)”, The Pacific Review, vol.7, no. 2 (1994).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFINNEGAN, Michael. “Managing Unmet Expectations in the U.S.-Japan Alliance”. NBR Special Report, (November 2009).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGRAY, Colin S. “The Arms Race Phenomenon”. World Politics, Vol. 24, no. 1 (1971).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGREENWALD, Alyssa. “THE ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA): a legal response to china’s economic rise? Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law .Vol. 16:193 (2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJACOBS, Keith. “ASEAN Navies: facing the South China Sea Challenge”. Naval Forces, no. II, Vol. XXI (2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJIABAO, Wen. “Carrying Forward the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence in the Promotion of Peace and Development”, Chinese Journal of International Law Vol. 3, no 2 (2004).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMAK, JN. “Sovereignty in ASEAN and the Problem of Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea”, RSISS Working Paper, no. 156 (2008).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMINGLIANG, Zhang. & FANG, Yang. “South China Sea: Reconciling Chinese-US Interests”. RSIS Commentaries. (July, 22 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceROWAN, Joshua P. “The US.-Japan Security Alliance, ASEAN, and the South China Sea Dispute”. Asian Survey,vol. 45, Issue 3, (2005).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceROY, Denny. “Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoning?” Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 27 (2005).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSNYDER, Scott. GLOSERMAN, Brad. And COSSA, Ralph A. “Confidence Building Measure in the South China Sea”, Issues & Insights no 2 (2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSONG, Yann-Huei. “Cross–strait interactions on the South China Sea issues: a need for CBMs”, Marine Policy, vol. 29, Issue 3 (2005).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSONG, Yann-huei.“United States and Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: A Study of Ocean Law and Politics”. Maryland Series in Contemporary Studies, no 1 (2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTAN. Andrew. “Force Modernization Trends in Southeast Asia”, RSIS Working Paper no. 59 (2004).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTHAO, Nguyen Hong. “The 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea: A Note”, Ocean Development & International Law, no 34 (2003). pp. 279–285.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWANG, Kuan-Hsiung. “Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Fisheries Cooperation as a Resolution to the South China Sea Conflicts”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 14 no. 4 (2001)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceETHERNET ARTICLESzh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Renewing the Regional Security Architecture”. Sixth Plenary Session, the 9th IISS Asia Security Summit The Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore, 06 June 2010. Available: http://www.iiss.org/conferences/the-shangri-la-dialogue/shangri-la-dialogue-2010/plenary-session-speeches/sixth-plenary-session/ (Access : June, 16 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Satellite pictures reveal massive Chinese nuclear submarine base, says Pentagon”. Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-563405/Satellite-pictures-reveal-massive-Chinese-nuclear-submarine-base-says-Pentagon.html (Access: Julho,3 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChina Builds Secret Nuclear Submarine Base in South China Sea” – Fox News - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353961,00.html (June, 18 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Chinese nuclear submarine base” – Daily Telegraph - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/1917167/Chinese-nuclear-submarine-base.html(Access: June, 18 2010)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Chinese navy`s new strategy in action”. ISS Strategic Comment. Available: http://www.iiss.org/publications/strategic-comments/past-issues/volume-16-2010/may/chinese-navys-new-strategy-in-action/ (June, 20 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Alchemy for a New World order: Overselling Preventive Diplomacy”, Council of Foreign Relations, May/June 1995 available: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/50968/stephen-john-stedman/alchemy-for-a-new-world-order-overselling-preventive-diplomacy . (Access: August, 17 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“The Military transparency and defense cooperation in the Asia-Pacific”. Plenary session 4. The 9th IISS Asia Security Summit, the Shangri-La Dialogue, in Singapore. June 2010. Avaialble: http://www.iiss.org/conferences/the-shangri-la-dialogue/shangri-la-dialogue-2010/plenary-session-speeches/fourth-plenary-session/ (Access, June 18 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Underrating Preventive Diplomacy”, Council of Foreign Relations, July/August 1995, available: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/51214/michael-s-lund/underrating-preventive-diplomacyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Access: June, 18 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Vietnam receive 8 Sukhoi Su-30KM2 fighters in 2010” http://www.armybase.us/2009/08/vietnam-to-recieve-8-sukhoi-su-30km2-fighters-in-2010/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Access: July 12, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Vietnam sings major Russian arms deal” http://vietnam.suite101.com/article.cfm/vietnam_signs_major_russian_arms_dealzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASEAN Regional Forum ASEAN Regional Forum List Of Track I Activities from 1994 to 2009. Available: http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/PublicLibrary/ARFActivities/ListofARFTrackIActivities/tabid/93/Default.aspx. (Access: August, 06 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASEAN Regional Forum. Available: http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/AboutUs/tabid/57/Default.aspx. (Access: June, 14 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCORDENILLO, Raul L. “The Economic Benefits to ASEAN of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA). Available: http://www.aseansec.org/17310.htm. (Access: July, 15 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCouncil for Security Cooperation Asia-Pacific (CSCAP) available: http://www.cscap.org/index.php?page=about-uszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlobal Security Organization: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/spratly-clash.htm .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJIANGLIN, Zhao.“Recent Development of China-ASEAN Trade and Economic Relations: From Regional Perspective” in Asean-China Trade Relations: 15 Years of Development and Prospects\", Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, CASS, Available: http://iaps.cass.cn/english/Articles/showcontent.asp?id=1131 (May, 12 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMAIESEB, Michele. “Confidence-Building Measures” Beyond Intractability. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Available:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTANG, Yihong and WANG, Weiwei. “An Analysis of Trade Potential between China and Asean within China-ASEAN FTA”. Available: http://faculty.washington.edu/karyiu/confer/beijing06/papers/tang.pdf (Access: May, 13 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSNYDER, Scott. ”The South China Sea dispute: Prospects for Preventive Diplomacy”. United States Institute of Peace Special Report, [August, 1996], Available: http://www.usip.org/files/resources/SR18.pdf (Access: May 28, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASEAN Regional Forum Annual Security Outlook 2009. Available: http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/Default.aspx?tabid=327 (Access : July, 18 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSWANSTROM, Niklas. “Conflict Management and Negotiations in the South China Sea: The ASEA?” in Perspective on the Conflict in the South China Sea: Workshops Proceedings edited by SNIDAL, Knut. Workshop on the Conflict in the South China, University of Oslo. Sea 24-26 April, 1999, Oslo, Norway.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S Energy Information available: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/South_China_Sea/TablesMaps.html (Access July, 22 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Offering to Aid Talks, U.S. Challenges China on Disputed Islands”. The New York Times. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/world/asia/24diplo.html (Access: August, 02 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLindsey, Forrest R. “Sea Lines of Communication Control: A Marine Mission”, War in the Modern Era Seminar. Marine Corps Command and Staff College Quantico, Virginia 9 May, 1988. Available: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1988/LFR.htm (Access: August, 26 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOFFICIAL DOCUMENTSzh_TW
dc.relation.reference“An Agenda for Peace, Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping” Report of the UN Secretary-General, Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992.part.II.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChairman`s Statement the Second ASEAN Regional forum Brunei Darussalam, 1st. August 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChina`s National Defense White Paper 2008.Chapter 1. Available: http://www.china.org.cn/government/whitepaper/2009-01/21/content_17162891.htm .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDepartment of Defense of United States of America “Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2009” - Annual Report to Congress –.3.Available: http://faculty.law.ubc.ca/scs/cats.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaw of the People`s Republic of China on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone. Adopted at the 24th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People`s Congress on February 25, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinistry of Defense of Singapore. Defending Singapore in the 21th Century. Available: http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/about_us/defence_policy.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinistry of Defense of Vietnam “National Defense 2009”. White Paper released in December 2009. Available: fhttp://admm.org.vn/sites/eng/Pages/vietnamnationaldefence%28vietnamwhitepapers-nd-14440.html?cid=236zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrganization for Security Cooperation in Europe – available: http://www.osce.org/about/19298.html .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRecent Developments in the South China Sea [18 March 1995]. ASEAN. Available http://www.aseansec.org/5232.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe National Australia Military Strategy and the Defense. White Paper 2008 Available: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2008-07.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTreaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. Available: http://www.aseansec.org/1217.htm.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - Part IX. Enclosed or Semi-Enclosed Areas available : http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part9.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUS Department of Defense - Quadrennial Defense Review Report, September, 30 2001. Available: http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/qdr2001.pdf Access: August, 05 2010.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNEWSPAPERzh_TW
dc.relation.reference““Foreign analysts misread China`s strategic golden rule”. Xinhua News –08 June 2010.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Gates on China: Speaking the truth makes the Pacific a safer place”. Wall Street Journal, 08 june,2010.zh_TW
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
018201.pdf2.47 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.