Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51468| 題名: | 高中職校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策影響之研究 Research on the influence of information use environments on principals’data-driven decision-making in senior high schools |
作者: | 彭文彬 Peng, Wen Pin |
貢獻者: | 張奕華 Chang, I Hua 彭文彬 Peng, Wen Pin |
關鍵詞: | 資訊使用環境 資料導向決策 information use environment data-driven decision-making |
日期: | 2010 | 上傳時間: | 5-Oct-2011 | 摘要: | 本研究旨在探討高中職校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策之影響，剖析不同背景變項與學校變項知覺高中職校長資訊使用環境與資料導向決策的差異情形，探討資訊使用環境對資料導向決策的關係，並根據研究結論，提出建議供有關單位參考。為達上述研究目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，以全國513 所高中職校長為研究對象，共寄發問卷327 份，回收有效問卷272 份，有效回收率為83.18％。本研究採用SPSS 18.0 for Windows 和LISREL 8.80 統計套裝軟體進行分析，獲得以下結論：\n\n一、高中職校長知覺資訊使用環境和資料導向決策為中高程度。\n二、不同性別、年齡、校長年資、學校規模和學校歷史之高中職校長在知覺資訊使用環境及運用資料導向決策上，並無顯著差異。\n三、不同學校類別之高中職校長運用資料導向決策上，沒有顯著差異。\n四、不同教育程度之校長知覺資訊使用環境及運用資料導向決策上，具有顯著差異。\n五、不同學校類別之校長知覺資訊使用環境上，具有顯著差異。\n六、不同學校歸屬之校長知覺資訊使用環境及運用資料導向決策上，具有顯著差異。\n七、本研究建構之模式經過結構方程模式檢定獲得支持，高中職校長資訊使用環境對資料導向決策具有正向顯著的影響。\n\n最後依據上述研究結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、高中職校長行政參考運用。\n\n關鍵詞：資訊使用環境、資料導向決策 This study aims to discuss the effects of the information use environment of high school principals on data-driven decision-making. This study analyzed variables with different backgrounds and school-related variables to perceive the different situations of the information use environment of high school principals and their data-driven decision-making, and discussed the relationship between information use environment and data-driven decision-making. Based on the results, suggestions are proposed for relevant departments as the references. To achieve the research purposes, the study adopted questionnaire survey, and treated 513 high school principals as the research subjects. A total of 327 questionnaires were distributed, and 272 effective samples were retrieved, with a valid return rate of 83.18%. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 for Windows and LISREL 8.80. The results are as follows:\n1. The perception level of the information use environment of the principals and their data-driven decision-making are medium-high. \n2. The gender, age, seniority, school size or school history of the principals makes no significant difference of the perception of the information use environment of the principals and their application of data-driven decision-making. \n3. Among the principals of different school types, there is no significant difference of the principals’ application of data-driven decision-making. \n4. Among the principals with different educational levels, there are significant differences of the perception of the information use environment of the principals as well as their application of data-driven decision-making. \n5. Among the principals of different school types, there are significant differences of the perception of the information use environment of the principals. \n6. Among the principals from different schools, there are significant differences of the perception of the information use environment of the principals and their application of data-driven decision-making.\n7. The study was verified by Structural Equation Modeling and the effects of the information use environment of the high school principals on data-driven decision-making appear to be positive and significant.\n\nBased on results, the study provides practical suggestions as the administrative references and application for educational and administrative departments, as well as high school principals. \n\nKeywords: information use environment, data-driven decision-making |
參考文獻: | 壹、 中文部分 內政部戶政司（2010）。歷年育齡婦女一般生育率、年齡別生育率及總生育率。取自http://www.ris.gov.tw/ch4/static/yhs709800.xls 尤克強（2001）。知識管理與創新。臺北市：天下文化。 王如哲（2000）。知識管理與學校教育革新。教育研究集刊，45，35-54。 吳宗立（2005）。學校行政決策。高雄市：麗文。 吳明隆（2009）。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市：五南。 吳清山（2002）。知識經濟與教育發展。臺北市：師大書苑。 吳清山（2004）。學校行政（第六版）。臺北市：心理。 吳清山、林天祐（2006）。資料驅動決定。教育研究月刊，143，140。 吳清山、黃旭鈞（1995）。提升教育品質的一股新動力：談全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。教育資料與研究，2，74-83。 吳清基（1983)。賽蒙決定理論及其對教育行政之啟示。師大學報，28，263-310。 吳毓琳（2001）。國民中學學校行政運用知識管理之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。 李弘輝（2003）。知識經濟下的領導新思維。臺北市：聯經。 林其賢（2009）。學校層級資料導向決策系統資料內容之研究：臺北市國民小學校長之意見調查（未出版之碩士論文）。私立淡江大學，臺北市。 林其賢、高熏芳 （2009）。資料導向決策系統之設計：校長決策領導的新思維。學校行政雙月刊，62，80-97。 邱皓政（2008）。結構方程模式的檢定力分析與樣本數決定。量化研究學刊，2（1），139-173。 秦夢群（2008）。教育行政－理論部分。臺北市：五南。 秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市：五南。 張明輝 (2005)。優質學校教育指標－行政管理、領導與學校文化。校長的專業發展。取自https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://203.71.239.20/mediafile/fdownload/366/139/2007-1-12-14-17-25-139.pdf。 張芳全（2008）。統計就是要這樣跑。臺北市：心理。 張芳全（2010）。論文就是要這樣寫。臺北市：心理。 張奕華（2007）。學校科技領導與管理：理論及實務。臺北市：高等教育。 張奕華（2010a）。校長科技領導－模式、指標與應用。臺北市：洪葉文化。 張奕華（2010b）。國民中小學校長資料導向決策（DDDM）及影響因素之分析：以資訊使用環境為前置變項。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫（NSC 99-2410-H-004-025-MY2）。 張奕華、張敏章（2009）。數位時代中提升學校效能新途徑：科技領導與資料導向決策模式。教育研究月刊，188，112-122。 張家宜、李怡禛（2002）。全面品質管理應用於高等教育行政之實證研究。教育研究資訊，10 (1)，29-54。 張善楠（1999）。教育研究與教學政策：臺灣地區教育研究與教育決策不連結性之分析。教育行政論壇，4，228-239。 陳木金（2001）。從發展型管理看校長的學校經營。學校行政雙月刊，16，68-84。 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2009）。多變量分析方法—統計軟體應用（五版）。臺北市：五南。 陳紹賓（2009）。資料導向決定在國民小學校長願景領導應用之研究－以臺北縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 黃芳銘（2009）。結構方程模式理論與應用（第五版）。臺北市：五南。 黃昆輝（1988）。教育行政學。臺北市：東華。 劉名峯（2006）。國民小學校長應用資料導向決定之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 鄭君仲（2005，10月）。決策四力模型。經理人月刊，11，42。 謝文全（1999）。中小學校長培育、任用、評鑑制度。教育資料與研究，28，1-5。 謝文全（2004）。教育行政學。臺北市：高等教育。 劉文章（2010）。臺北縣國民小學分散式領導對教師學術樂觀影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 貳、 外文部分 Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94. Baker, B. D., & Richards, C. E. (2004). The ecology of educational systems: Data, models, and tools for improvisational leading and learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Bernhardt, V. L. (1998). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Bernhardt, V. L. (2003). Using data to improve student learning in elementart school. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Bernhardt, V. L. (2007). Translating data into information to improve teaching and learning. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Bernhardt, V. L. (2009). Data use: Data-driven decision making takes a big-picture view of the needs of teachers and students. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 24-27. Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for School Improvement: Factors for designing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 210. Choo, C. W. (2002). Information management for the intelligence organization: The art of scanning the environment (3rd ed.). Medford, NJ: Information Today. Consortium for School Networking. (2010). From vision to action: How school distiects use data to improve performance executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.cosn.org/Initiatives/3DDataDrivenDecisionMaking/3DResourceCenter/tabid/5065/id/118/Default.aspx Educational Leadership Constituent Council. (2002). Standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors, and supervisors. Washington, DC: National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Gerstenberger, P. G., & Allen, T. J. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 272-279. LaFee, S. (2002). Data-driven destricts. School Administrator, 59(11), 6-15. Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603-634. Luo, M., & Childress, M. (2009). Data-driven decision making: The development and validation of an instrument to measure principals’ practices. Retrieved from http://www.academicleandership.org/emprical_research/566.shtml Ｍandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006). A theoretical framework for data-driven making. Retrieved from http://www.cct.edc.org/admin/publications/speeches/Dataframe_AERA06.pdf Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/2006/RAND_OP170.pdf Mathews, C. V. F. (2002). Principals and data-driven decision making . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia. Ｍattei, G. J. (2005). Data-deriven decision making within the contemporary architecture of accountability. Unpubished doctoral dissertation, Immaculata University, Pennsylvania. McClure, C. R. (1978). The information rich employee and information for decision making: Review and comments. Information Processing and Management, 14, 381-394. McColskey, W. H., Altschuld, J. W., & Lawton, R. W. (1985). Predictors of principals’ reliance on formal and informal sources of information. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(4), 427-436. McLeod, S. (2009). Data Driven Teachers, Tech & Learning, 30(1), 18. Means, B., Gallagher, L., & Padilla, C. (2007). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/teachers-data-use/teachers-data-use.doc NCREL. (2004). Guide to using data in school improvement efforts. Retrieved from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/datause/guidebook.pdf Noyce, P., Perda, D., & Traver, R. (2000). Creating data-driven schools. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 52-56. O’Reilly, C. A. (1983). The use of information in organizational decision making: A model and some propositions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-139. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driver decision-making. School Leadership and Management, 29(5), 477-494. Parsons, B. A. (2003). A tale of two schools’data. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 66-68. Rosenbaum, H. (1993). Information use environments and structuration: Toward an integration for Taylor and Giddens. In S. Bonzi ( Ed.), Proceedings of the 56th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science.Columbus, OH: Learned Information. Rosenbaum, H. (1996). Structure and action: Towards a new concept of the information use environment. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/1804/wp96-04B.html?sequence=1 Swan, G. (2009). Tools for data-driven decision making in teacher education: Designing a portal to conduct field observation inquiry. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 107-113. Taylor, R. S. (1982). Value-added processes in the information life cycle. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 33(5), 341-345. Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added process on information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Thornton, B., & Perreault, G. (2002). Becoming a data-based leader: An introduction. NASSP Bulletin, 86(630), 86-96. Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-driven decision-making: Using computere data systems to support inquiry and reflection. Journal for Education of Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 1-14. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55. Zmuda, A., Kuklis. R., & Kline, E. (2004). Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. |
描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 學校行政碩士在職專班 97911019 99 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097911019 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101901.pdf | 2.81 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.