1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 國際事務學院
  3. 戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51498
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor曹雄源zh_TW
dc.contributor.author黃國揚zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Kuo Yingen_US
dc.creator黃國揚zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Kuo Yingen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-07T06:17:34Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-07T06:17:34Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-07T06:17:34Z-
dc.identifierG0097922010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51498-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description97922010zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract美國柯林頓總統於1995、1996年所提出《擴大與交往的國家安全戰略》報告指出：「美國國家安全戰略基礎在於擴大市場、民主社群，同時嚇阻與圍堵對我們國家、盟邦與我們利益的廣泛威脅。」。為了這一廣泛目的，美國須維持一個強大的防衛力量與運用有效的外交政策，以提升合作性的安全措施；致力打開外國市場與激勵全球成長；助長海外的民主並促進區域的合作安全等。\r\n　　小布希總統2002年《美國國家安全戰略》報告也將「透過自由市場和自由貿易開啟全球經濟發展的新時期」列為國家安全戰略的一環。2006年的「美國國家安全戰略」重申自由且公平的貿易政策是第一支柱的一部份，透過自由市場和自由貿易來啟動一個全球經濟成長的新時代是其整體戰略之一；另一方面為了終結暴政和促進有效率的民主，工具之一就是締結自由貿易協定，鼓勵各國加強法治、打擊腐敗、落實民主責任。\r\n　　美國的東亞政策可說重回「新現實主義」與「新自由主義」的雙軌路線。東亞經貿的發展與區域經濟的整合，更是讓美國看到延長霸權經濟命脈的新金礦。未來區域內的主導地位，將會取決於中國與美國相互競爭，這個競爭也許會是良性的，各取所需、各有所獲，但是過程中將會顯示這兩個大國經濟發展將在區域內的產生權力消長。\r\n　　美國認為，中國在地緣戰略上是具有實力引起國際權力分配產生重大轉變，因此美國政策必須調和改變去掌控中國，以便維持及促進美國重大利益。但是隨著國際局勢變化，美國對中國的態度趨於務實，摒除與中國聯盟對抗蘇聯的思維，轉為全面性交往，但是強化其與日本等國的軍事同盟關係。\r\n　　推展民主制度雖然不一定是美國的優先要務，但只要機會，美國總是鼓勵各國走向民主，因為美國人普遍認為，民主政體有能力抵擋極權擴張、便於美國行使權利、減少軍事衝突的風險。此論點乃基於民主國家比非民主國家更不願意發動戰爭之想法。在某些菁英人士心目中，保障及推展民主乃是美國重要的道德目標。\r\n　　美國為確保國家利益及國家安全戰略總體指導，後冷戰時期美國在東亞區域經濟、軍事、政治安全等領域維護將更為重視，並力求主導區域安全相關議題制定、運作機制和秩序規範。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract　　US president Clinton points out a topic “Enlargement and Engagement” in the National Security Strategy Report, it says “United States National Security Strategy is based on enlargement the market and diplomatic social groups, simultaneously deter and stop any threat that will disadvantage out nation and allied nations.” For this general purpose, United States has to sustain a strong defense power and utilize diplomatic to improve the cooperation of security measures, endeavor in open foreign market, incentive global economic growth, diplomatic nations growth, and area security cooperation, etc. \r\n　　President George Bush also point out “use free market and free trading to open the new growth of global economic era” from the National Security Strategy Report in 2002. It restated free and fair trading policy plays a big portion in 2006. Through free market and free trading to initiate a new era of global economic growth is part of the plan. The tool of terminating tyranny and effective the diplomatic is making a trade policy to encourage other nations stop crime and corruption. Play the role of democracy country.\r\n　　United States Eastern Asia policy is back to theory of “neo-realism” and “neo-liberalism” two axis. The development of Eastern Asia Trade and Integration of Area Economic are the new vault for United States to prolong his sovereign rule in economic. The future leading nation of the area depends on China and United States competition. It maybe positive, each gains his own benefits, but the process will show the grow or diminish of these two nations economic growth within the area.\r\n　　United States think that China’s regional strategy is very powerful which makes the change of international power distribution, so that U.S. has to adjust the policy to facilitate the U.S. key interests. But, along the change of international situation, the U.S. attitude with China turns out to be more practical. It changes the idea of allied with China against Soviet to fully engage with China in all perspectives. In addition, it strengths the military allied relationship with Japan and eastern Asia countries.\r\n　　To popularize the democracy is not the first priority of United States. If there is a chance, U.S. will always encourage all countries toward democracy. American think that democratic system can stop the extremity system expand, which ease U.S. use his privilege and reduce military conflict risk. This is based on democratic nation is more unwilling to start a war than any other nations. In certain elites’ mind, that the goal of U.S. ethics is to ensure and improve democratic.\r\n　　After cold war era based on U.S. interest, United States is more emphasize on the Eastern Asia’s economic, military, and political security, and endeavor on leading the area security.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents謝誌..............................................................................................................................Ⅰ\r\n摘要......................................................................................…....................................Ⅱ\r\nAbstract......................................................................................................................Ⅲ\r\n目錄.........................................................................................….................................Ⅳ\r\n圖目錄..........................................................................................................................Ⅶ\r\n表目錄..........................................................................................................................Ⅷ\r\n第一章　緒論................................................................................................................1\r\n　第一節　研究動機與目的........................................................................................1\r\n　　　一、研究動機....................................................................................................1\r\n　　　二、研究目的....................................................................................................2\r\n　第二節　文獻探討....................................................................................................2\r\n　　　一、文獻專書....................................................................................................3\r\n　　　二、研究期刊....................................................................................................5\r\n　第三節　研究方式與架構........................................................................................6\r\n　　　一、研究方式....................................................................................................6\r\n　　　二、研究架構..................................................................................................12\r\n　第四節　研究範圍與限制......................................................................................14\r\n　　　一、研究範圍..................................................................................................14\r\n　　　二、研究限制..................................................................................................15\r\n　第五節　章節安排..................................................................................................15\r\n第二章　美國東亞安全政策國際關係理論運用......................................................17\r\n　第一節　新現實主義、新自由主義......................................................................17\r\n　　　一、新現實主義..............................................................................................18\r\n　　　二、新自由主義..............................................................................................24\r\n　第二節　單邊主義、多邊主義與雙邊主義..........................................................32\r\n　　　一、單邊主義..................................................................................................32\r\n　　　二、多邊主義..................................................................................................35\r\n　　　三、雙邊主義..................................................................................................38\r\n　第三節　自由主義、保守主義與新保守主義......................................................39\r\n　　　一、自由主義與保守主義..............................................................................40\r\n　　　二、美國的自由主義、保守主義與新保守主義..........................................41\r\n　　　三、美國的自由主義、保守主義與新保守主義安全觀..............................44\r\n　第四節　小結..........................................................................................................48\r\n第三章　美國的東亞經濟政策..................................................................................51\r\n　第一節　美國與亞太經濟合作會議......................................................................52\r\n　　　一、美國與東亞地區之經貿關係..................................................................52\r\n　　　二、東亞地區多邊經濟合作之歷史..............................................................53\r\n　　　三、美國對亞太經濟合作會議之政策..........................................................55\r\n　第二節　東協形成與區域經貿協定發展..............................................................64\r\n　　　一、東協形成背景與對外經貿之擴張..........................................................64\r\n　　　二、東協加三對區域經濟合作發展之影響..................................................66\r\n　　　三、東協加三經貿合作發展與影響..............................................................70\r\n　第三節　美國東亞自由貿易協定..........................................................................74\r\n　　　一、柯林頓時期區域經貿參與作法與成效..................................................74\r\n　　　二、小布希時期貿易授權法推動與成效......................................................75\r\n　　　三、美國對東亞地區之雙邊自由貿易協定政策..........................................78\r\n　第四節　小結..........................................................................................................83\r\n第四章　美國的東亞軍事政策..................................................................................85\r\n　第一節　冷戰後美國政府東亞安全戰略..............................................................86\r\n　　　一、老布希政府的東亞軍事安全戰略..........................................................87\r\n　　　二、柯林頓政府的東亞軍事安全戰略..........................................................89\r\n　　　三、小布希政府的東亞軍事安全戰略..........................................................91\r\n　第二節　柯林頓時期美日同盟關係強化的工作..................................................93\r\n　　　一、美日同盟重新定義..................................................................................93\r\n　　　二、日本防衛計畫大綱與美日安保聯合宣..................................................98\r\n　　　三、美日防衛合作指導綱領內容與影響....................................................102\r\n　第三節　小布希時期美日同盟轉型與戰力重整................................................110\r\n　　　一、阿米塔吉報告提出的影響....................................................................111\r\n　　　二、日本防衛計畫大綱內容修定與影響 ..................................................112\r\n　　　三、美日安保軍力協商與重整....................................................................115\r\n　第四節　小結........................................................................................................121\r\n第五章　美國的東亞民主政策................................................................................123\r\n　第一節　從新世界秩序到提升民主與人權........................................................124\r\n　　　一、布希政府時期新世界秩序....................................................................125\r\n　　　二、柯林頓政府時期擴展市場民主............................................................126\r\n　　　三、小布希政府時期提升民主與人權........................................................128\r\n　第二節　美國對中國人權政策發展....................................................................129\r\n　　　一、美國傳統的人權觀與人權外交發展....................................................130\r\n　　　二、美國總統人權外交態度與制裁方式....................................................132\r\n　　　三、美國國會人權議題法案推動................................................................146\r\n　第三節　美國人權外交不同領域之角色............................................................152\r\n　　　一、美國國會與總統....................................................................................153\r\n　　　二、非政府組織與民間團體........................................................................155\r\n　　　三、官僚機構與戰略經濟對話....................................................................158\r\n　第四節　小結........................................................................................................159\r\n第六章　結論與建議................................................................................................161\r\n　第一節　回顧與發現............................................................................................161\r\n　第二節　政策建議................................................................................................163\r\n參考書目....................................................................................................................165\r\n　壹、中文部分........................................................................................................165\r\n　　一、政府出版品或官方文獻............................................................................165\r\n　　二、專書............................................................................................................165\r\n　　三、期刊文章....................................................................................................168\r\n　　四、碩博士論文................................................................................................171\r\n　　五、報紙............................................................................................................171\r\n　　六、網路資料....................................................................................................171\r\n　貳、英文部分........................................................................................................173\r\n　　一、政府出版品或官方文獻（Official Documents）....................................173\r\n　　二、專書（Books）..........................................................................................173\r\n　　三、期刊（Articles in Journals）.....................................................................177\r\n　　四、報紙（Newspaper）..................................................................................179\r\n　　五、網路資料（Internet）................................................................................179zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097922010en_US
dc.subject國家安全戰略zh_TW
dc.subject國家安全戰略zh_TW
dc.subject自由貿易協定zh_TW
dc.subject民主制度zh_TW
dc.subject安全政策zh_TW
dc.subjectNational Security Strategyen_US
dc.subjectFree Trade Agreementen_US
dc.subjectmilitary coalitionen_US
dc.subjectdemocracyen_US
dc.subjectSecurity Policyen_US
dc.title後冷戰時期美國東亞安全政策之研究zh_TW
dc.titlePost cold war study on US east asia security policyen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference壹、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　一、政府出版品或官方文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference日本防衛廳編著。《平成九年版防衛白書》。東京：大藏省印刷局，1997年9　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　二、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference丁連財等編。《現代用語百科》。台北：書泉，1997年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference于鐵軍。〈美國的東亞軍事同盟〉。收錄《中國學者看世界》，王緝思主編。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　北京：新世界圖書，2007年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大衛‧佛斯特（David P. Forsythe）著。《人權與國際關係》，高德源譯。台　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　北：弘智出版社，2002年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference小泉親司。《日米軍事同盟史研究》。東京：新日本出版社，2002年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference船橋洋一。《同盟漂流》。東京：岩波書局，1997年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳一新。《美台總統大選與國際情勢展望》。台北：遠景基金會，2005年6　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文賢。《柯林頓與布希政府的中、台政策》。台北：一橋出版社，2002年9　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳偉華。《軍事研究方法論》。桃園：國防大學，2003年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳毓鈞。《保守主義與美國政治》。台北：中國文化大學出版部，1989年7　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月）。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference麥可‧羅斯金（Michael G. Roskin）著。〈國家利益：從抽象觀念到戰略〉。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　收錄《美國陸軍戰爭學院戰略指南》，高一中譯。台北：國防部史政編譯　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference山姆‧薩克宣、約翰‧威廉斯、史蒂芬‧辛巴拉（Sam C. Sarkesian, John 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　局譯，2001年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference勞倫斯‧紐曼（W. Lawrence Neuman）著。《社會研究方法—質化與量化取　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　向》，朱柔若譯。台北：楊智文化，2000年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃奎博、蘇紫雲。〈「九一一事件」後美國全球戰略之調整〉。收錄《反恐戰　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　後的美中關係與台海局勢》，董立文主編。台北：大屯，2003年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃奎博。〈美國與亞太關係－反恐優先，穩定第一〉。收錄《2002-2003年亞　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　太情勢發展與展望》。台北：財團法人遠景基金會，2003年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference漢斯‧摩根索（Hans J. Morgenthau）著。《國際政治學》，張自學譯。台　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　北：幼獅，1976年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙全勝。《大國政治與外交－美國、日本、中國與大國關係管理》。台北：五　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Allen Williams, Stephen J. Cimbala）。《美國國家安全》，郭家琪等　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　南，2010年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉德海。〈冷戰與國際關係〉。收錄《國際政治》，李登科主編。台北：空中　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　大學，1996年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡政文。《當前國際關係理論發展及其評估》。台北：三民書局，1997年7　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference錢滿素。《美國自由主義的歷史變遷》。北京：新知三聯書店，2006年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛君度、陸忠偉。《顛簸的日本》。北京：時事出版社，2001年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邁克爾‧葛林、派屈克‧柯羅寧（Michael J. Green and Patrick M. 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Cronin）著。《美日聯盟－過去、現在與未來（THE U.S.-Japan Allance 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Past, Present,and Future）》，楊紫函、謝豐安等譯。台北：國防部史　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　譯。台北：國防部史政編譯局，2005年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　政編譯局，2001年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅伯特．尼斯貝（Robert Nisbet）著。《保守主義（Conservatism）》，邱辛　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　曄譯。台北：桂冠，1992年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅伯特‧吉爾平（Robert Gilpin）。《全球資本主義的挑戰－21世紀的世界　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　經濟》，楊宇光、楊炯等譯。臺北：桂冠，2004年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顧肅。《自由主義基本理念》。台北：左岸，2006年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　三、期刊文章zh_TW
dc.relation.reference卜大中。〈柯林頓政府與美國政治新思潮〉。《美國月刊》，第9卷第2期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　1994年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference方旗。〈美國國務院人權報告的制定與影響〉。《美國月刊》，第7卷第8　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference比爾‧艾摩特（Bill Emmott）著。《20/21：從20世紀出發的21世紀前瞻　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1992年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王良能。〈從最惠國待遇之爭看美中（共）的相互依存關係〉。《共黨問題研　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　究》，第20卷第10期。1994年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王思粵。〈美國與中國經貿關係的回顧與展望〉。《美歐月刊》，第11卷第4　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1996年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference巨克毅。〈當前美國的東亞戰略分析〉。《全球政治評論》，第21期。2008　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石源華、汪偉民。〈美日、美韓同盟比較研究-兼論美日韓安全互動與東北亞安zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　全〉。《國際觀察》，第1期。2006年5月）。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任曉、劉星漢。〈論二十世紀九十年代的美日同盟〉。《美國研究》，第4　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　（20/21 Vision: The Lessons of the Twentieth Century for the 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2000年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江啟臣。〈亞太自由貿易區（FTAAP）之評析〉。《戰略安全研析》，第20　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2006年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江敏華。〈美國與東南亞關係進展之研究〉。《戰略安全研析》，第51期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2009年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江敏華。〈從「東協加三」到「東協加六」發展趨勢之研析〉。《戰略安全研　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　析》，第49期。2009年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳安家。〈論小布希的對華政策〉。《遠景基金會季刊》，第3卷第3期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2002年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳東野。〈美日安保合作與東北亞安全情勢〉。《戰略安全研析》，第1期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Twenty-First）》，林添貴譯。台北：雅言文化，2003年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2005年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玲君。〈中國與東亞區域經貿合作：區域主義與霸權之間關係〉。《問題與　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　研究》，第44卷第5期。2005年9-10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玲君。〈東協國家與東亞經濟合作：從「東協加三」到「東亞高峰會」〉。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　《問題與研究》，第46卷第2期。2007年3-4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玲君。〈美國與亞太經濟合作會議：經濟與政治的互動關係〉。《美歐月　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　刊》，第10卷第7期。1995年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳懷中。〈日美「再編」與日本安全戰略調整〉。《日本學刊》，第4期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2006年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋國誠。〈人權問題與美國和中國的外交關係〉。《美國月刊》，第5卷第10　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王公龍。《保守主義與冷戰後美國對華政策》。上海：上海辭書出版社，2006　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1990年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李登科。〈亞太經濟合作會議之回顧與展望〉。《問題與研究》，第32卷第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　11期。1993年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李登科。〈美國對華政策新趨勢〉。《展望與探索》，第2卷第11期。2004　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李瓊莉。〈再談我國APEC策略〉。《戰略安全研析》，第20期。2006年12　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李瓊莉。〈東亞高峰會後台灣在東亞的進退〉。《戰略安全研析》，第9期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2006年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李瓊莉。〈當前美國亞太政策中的經濟安全〉。《問題與研究》，第36卷第4　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1997年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李曉東。〈「妖魔化」現象與中日關係之省思〉。《中國大陸研究》，第50卷　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　第1期。2007年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周季華。〈日美安保體制的強化與東亞的安全〉。《日本學刊》，第4期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　1996年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周敦仁。〈美國國內政治和 PNTR投票〉。《國際觀察》，第4期。2000年4 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林正義。〈美國因應「九一一恐怖攻擊事件」的危機處理〉。《戰略與國際研　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　究》，第4卷第1期。2002年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄。〈中國對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成〉。《東亞研　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王少普。〈東亞多邊合作中的日本因素〉。收錄《變化中的世界與中國因　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　究》，第35卷第2期。2004年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金榮勇。〈形成中的東亞共同體〉。《問題與研究》，第44卷第3期。2005　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年5-6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋興洲。〈國際合作理論與亞太區域經濟〉。《問題與研究》，第36卷第3　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1997年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金熙德。〈日美同盟「再定義」及其未來趨勢〉。《世界經濟與政治》，第7　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2000年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金熙德。〈冷戰後日本對外戰略論爭〉。《世界經濟與政治》，第11期。2001　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施閔豪。〈美國國家安全戰略對中共一致性之分析〉。《中華戰略學刊》。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　素》，劉傑主編。北京：時事出版社，2006年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2001年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪財隆。〈美國選擇「自由貿易協定」對象的考慮因素〉。《台灣經濟論　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　衡》，第3卷第3期。2005年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪德欽。〈美國對外簽署自由貿易協定之研究〉。《貿易調查專刊》，第9　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2003年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青。〈多邊主義研究：理論與方法〉。《世界經濟與政治》，第10期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2001年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference荊元宙。〈美日安全協商會議聯合聲明對我國的影響〉。《戰略安全研析》，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　第1期。2005年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張大林。〈評日美安全保障聯合宣言〉。《國際問題與研究》，第4期。1996　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王玉民。《社會科學研究方法原理》。台北：洪葉文化，1999年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉國。〈同盟困境與美日同盟－日本的同盟政策分析〉。《日本學術論　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　壇》，第3期。2004年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張佩珍。〈美國眾院通過對未來美「中」台關係之影響〉。《經濟前瞻》，第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　70期。2000年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莫大華。〈安全研究論戰之評析〉。《問題與研究》，第37卷第8期。1998　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莫大華。〈美國全球軍力部署調整計畫與亞太地區安全的發展〉。《遠景基金　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　會季刊》，第6卷第4期。2005年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許志嘉。〈九一一事件後美國對中國政策的調整〉。《問題與研究》，第42卷　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王高成。《交往與促變－柯林頓政對中國的外交戰略》。台北：五南，2006　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　第3期。2003年5-6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭承天。〈單邊主義、區域主義、與多邊主義〉。《美歐季刊》，第12卷第1　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。1997年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳一新。〈『911』以後中美關係的趨勢與展望〉。《21世紀中國》，第1　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　卷。2002年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文生。〈布希政府反恐安全戰略及其挑戰：伊拉克經驗的檢討〉。《政治科　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　學論叢》，第25期。2005年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳勁。〈歐盟與拉丁美洲經貿及區域合作關係〉。《問題與研究》，第43卷第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　4期。2004年7-8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference柯玉枝。〈論新世紀中共拉丁美洲政策及其影響〉。《中國大陸研究》，第50　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　卷第3期。2007年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳瑞隆。〈美國通過中國永久正常貿易關係待遇法案對兩岸經貿的影響〉。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　《共黨問題研究》，第26卷第6期。2000年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊永明。〈美國亞太安全戰略之理論分析〉。《美歐季刊》，第12卷第4期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　1997年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊伯江。〈「日美安全保障聯合宣言」意味著什麼〉。《現代國際關係》，第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　6期。1996年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊伯江。〈日美修改「防衛合作指針」中期報告初析〉。《現代國際關係》，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　第7期。1997年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄒念祖。〈聯合國國際人權外交—中國的認知與政策〉。《問題與研究》，第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王逸舟。《國際政治學－歷史與理論》。台北：五南，1999年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　38卷第8期。1999年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙丹。〈淺析日美安保體制嬗變的原因〉。《理論學刊》，第6期。2004年6　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙文衡。〈區域貿易協定與東亞國際政經體系之重組〉。《問題與研究》，第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　41卷第6期。2002年11-12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉世龍。〈當前日美安保體制的三個特點〉。《日本學刊》，第4期。1996年　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉復國。〈綜合性安全與國家安全：亞太安全概念適用性之檢討〉。《問題與　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　研究》，第38卷第2期。1999年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉泰英。〈亞太經濟合作之回顧與展望－兼論PBEC, PECC及APEC的關係〉。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王逸舟。《當代國際政治析論》。上海：人民出版社，1995年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　《問題與研究》，第31卷第3期。1992年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉棟。〈冷戰後的美日同盟與中國一種博弈論的分析〉。《世界經濟與政治論　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　壇》，2005卷第4期。2005年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference歐陽承新。〈東南亞金融危機問題：從東南亞金融危機評IMF的救援指導方　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　針〉。《經濟前瞻》，第70期。2000年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘國政。〈評美日主流學派之美日同盟觀〉。《東北亞論壇》，第2期。2003　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡增家。〈美日同盟新關係與日本國家正常化〉。《戰略安全研析》，第14　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2006年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡緯。〈克里斯多福的大陸之行：美國人權外交的困境〉。《美歐月刊》，第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王緝思。《冷戰後美國的全球戰略和世界地位》。台北：生智，2001年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　9卷第5期。1994年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭瑞耀。〈綜合性安全與國家安全〉。《問題與研究》，第36卷第12期。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　1997年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭端耀。〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉。《問題與研究》，第44卷第1　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2005年1-2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧中堅、吳孟峰。〈剖析柯林頓政府的人權政策〉。《美國外交》，第9卷第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　8期。1994年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魯燕、孫界麗。〈美日關係的變化對中日關係的影響—以中美日三角關係為中　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　心的考察》。《現代日本經濟》，第2006卷第2期。2006年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧業中。〈論國際關係理論之新自由制度主義〉。《問題與研究》，第41卷第　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference卡羅拉‧麥克吉福特（Carola Mcgiffert）著。《美國政治印象的中國（China 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2期。2002年3-4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭晞、王立名。〈冷戰後美日同盟：從「漂流」到強化〉。《現代日本經　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　濟》，第2006卷第3期。2006年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴宗男、王央城。〈美、日部長級「二加二會談」的意涵〉。《戰略安全研　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　析》，第7期。2005年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴怡忠。〈「日美高峰會」戰略意涵及對台影響〉。《戰略安全研析》，第15　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　期。2006年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference荊元宙。〈美日安全協商會議聯合聲明對我國的影響〉。《戰略安全研析》，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　第1期。2005年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　四、碩博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　in the American Political Imagination）》，陳孝燮譯。台北：國防部　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張廣量。《「美日安保防衛指針再定義」對台海安全影響之研究》。中國文化　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　大學政治學研究所碩士論文2002年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃介正。〈九一一事件後美國亞太安全戰略：「布希主義」初探〉。收錄《九　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　一一事件後的亞洲情勢與經濟展望－台日論壇2002學術研討會》，中華歐　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　亞基金會主編。台北：致良出版社，2003年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙國材。〈美日安保條約體系下之非作戰軍事行動〉。收錄《東北亞發展的回　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　顧與展望（國際學術討論會論文選）》，胡春蕙、宋成有主編。台北：正zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中書局，2003年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　五、報紙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳鴻瑜。〈注意東亞峰會〉。《中國時報》，2005年11月30日，版A15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　史政編譯局，2005年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊永明。〈日本防衛計畫大綱解析〉。《青年日報》，2005年1月，版3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　六、網路資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference巨克毅。〈東協「10+3」與「10+1」合作機制之分析〉。中興大學全球與戰略　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://cgpss.nchu.edu.tw/modules/wfsection/article.php? articleid=253 (accessed 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　November 27, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周學佑。〈後冷戰時期美日同盟發展新趨勢〉。《雅虎部落格》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!BNU37mOZHwBqjhFxOMYhbLc-　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　/article?mid=352 (accessed December 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林正義。〈台美關係的限制與改進〉。《財團法人台灣新世紀文教基金會》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石原慎太郎、盛田昭夫。《日本可以說不－新日美關係的對策》。東京：光文　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.taiwanncf.org.tw/seminar/20000408/20000408-4.pdf (accessed April 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金熙德。〈冷戰後日本對外戰略論爭〉。《知識戰略與防務研究所》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.defence.org.cn/Article-5-14731.html (accessed November 27, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐遵慈。〈重新思考我國參與APEC的策略與功能－從APEC納入安全議題談　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　起〉。《亞太經濟合作評論》，第8期。2001年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.ctasc.org.tw/02publication/review08_01.pdf (accessed October 17, 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉復國。〈美國與東南亞〉。《國立政治大學國際關係研究中心》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://iir.nccu.edu.tw/attachments/journal/add/5/2006report-1-2.pdf (accessed 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　社，1989年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　November 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新浪新聞網。〈「新總統磨合期」的蹉跎往事〉。《新浪新聞網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://magazine.sina.com.tw/magazine/article/1349-2.html (accessed March 12, 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大紀元網路報。〈美國媒體評論北京的捉人放人計〉。《大紀元網路報》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/1/7/28/n113929.htm (accessed April 24, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大紀元網路報。〈美國108屆國會提近百涉中國議案〉。《大紀元網路報》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/12/23/n756807.htm (accessed April 24, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大紀元網路報。〈國務院說美關切言論宗教自由立場不曾改變〉。《大紀元網　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　路報》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任曉、沈丁立。《保守主義理念與美國的外交政策》。上海：上海三聯，2003　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/2/8/14/n208389.htm (accessed April 24, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國網。〈解讀日本防衛政策新變化：執意走向軍事大國〉。《中國網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/junshi/678040.htm (accessed December 5, 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference日本防衛省。〈平成15年版防衛白書〉。《日本防衛省》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.clearing.mod.go.jp/hakusho_data/2003/w2003_00.html (accessed 　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　December 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台灣婦女資訊網。〈希拉蕊．柯林頓女士於第四屆世婦會非政府組織論壇的發　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　言〉。《台灣婦女資訊網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://taiwan.yam.org.tw/womenweb/file3_1.htm (accessed April 23, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference美國在台協會。〈柯林頓對北京大學師生講話〉。《美國在台協會》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.ait.org.tw/zh/officialtext-bg9818.html (accessed April 23, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference美國國務院國際資訊局。〈布希總統在同江澤民主席舉行聯合記者會時的演講　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　及答記者問摘要〉。《美國國務院國際資訊局》。　　　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://usinfo.org/mgck/usinfo.state.gov/regional/ea/mgck/archive01/1019bush.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　htm(accessed April 24, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference華夏經緯網。〈揭秘台灣在美公關攻略：掏錢找說客五管齊下〉。《華夏經緯　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://big5.huaxia.com/la/jwgc/2007/00672381.html (accessed March 12, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference維基百科。〈保守主義〉。《維基百科》。　　　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱明權。《領導世界還是支配世界？－冷戰後的美國國家安全戰略》。天津：　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%88%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　 (accessed February 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference學術中華。〈防衛懇談報告勾勒日本未來安全戰略〉。《學術中華》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://www.xschina.org/show.php?id=2139 (accessed December 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBBC中文網。〈中國指美人權報告雙重標準〉。《BBC中文網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/chinese/news/newsid_1855000/18554452.stm (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　February 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBBC中文網。〈中國對日本新軍事戰略表示關注〉。《BCC中文網》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/simp/hi/newsid_4080000/newsid_4087700/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4087703.stm (accessed December 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　人民出版社，2005年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference貳、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　一、政府出版品或官方文獻（Official Documents）zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited States, Clinton Ties MFN for China To Human Rights Gains, Congressionalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuarterly Weekly Report , May 29, 1993,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited States. Renewal of China’s MFN Status Angers Some Lawmakers,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCongressional Quarterly Weekly Repor , May 28, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited States. Ways and Means Rejects Bill To Revoke MFN for China.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCongressional Quarterly Weekly Report, July 2, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited States. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 Trade Policy Agenda and 2000 Annual Report of the President of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱鋒。《人權與國際關係》。北京：北京大學出版社，2000年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited States on the Trade Agreements Program, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLooking Toward the 21st Century: Report to Congress. Washington D.C., Aprilzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, A Strategic Framework for the Asian Pacific Rim:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReport to Congress. Washington D.C., 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington D.C.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, United States Security Strategy for the East Asia-Pacificzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRegion. Washington D.C., February, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference克里斯多福‧休斯（Christopher W. Hughes）著。《日本安全議題－軍事、經　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House, A National Security Strategy For A New Century. Washington D.C.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecember, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House, A National Security Strategy For A New Century. Washington D.C.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecember, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House, National Security Strategy of the United States. Washington D.C.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAugust, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House , The National Strategy of the United States of America. Washingtonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD.C., 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States. Washingtonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD.C., March, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　濟與環境（Japan`s Security Agenda-Milltary, Economic & 　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWashington D.C., 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　二、專書（Books）zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAggarwal, Vinod K., and Kun-Chin Lin. “Strategy without Vision: The US and Asia-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Economic Cooperation.” in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC):zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe First Decade, ed. J. Ruland, E. Manske, and W. Draguhn, 101. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoutledge Curzon, August, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAxelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStrategies and Institutions.” in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporaryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDebate, ed. David A. Baldwin, 86-97. New York: Columbia University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Environmental Dimenions）》，李育慈譯。台北：國防部史政編譯局，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaker, Richard W. “The United States and APEC Regime Building.” in Asia-Pacificzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrossroad: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Charles E. Morrison, 180. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism :The Contemporary Debate. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBolton, John R. “Unilateralism is not Isolationism.” in Understanding Unilateralismzh_TW
dc.relation.referencein American Foreign Relations ed. Gwyn Prins, 50-82. London: The Royalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInstitute of International Affairs, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2008年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStructural Realism. New York: Columbia University, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaporaso, James A. “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Searchzh_TW
dc.relation.referencefor Foundations.” in Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of anzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Form, ed. John G. Ruggie, 53. New York: Columbia Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePress, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton, William J. “Liberal Internationalism: American and Global Economy.” in Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton Foreign Policy Reader: Presidential Speeches with Commentary, ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlvin Z. Rubinstein et al, 8-13. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCossa, Ralph A. “U.S.-Japan Security Relations: Separating Fact from Fiction.” In Restructuring the U.S.-Japan Alliance: Toward a More Equal Partnership. ed. Ralph A. Cossa, 33.Washington D.C.: Institute for National Strategic Studies, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCronin, Patrick M, and Michael J. Green. Redefining the U.S.-Japan Alliance: Tokyo`szh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳東林。《巨變中的強權政治－體系變遷與美、中、台三角關係》。台北：時　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNational Defense Program. Washington D.C.: National Defense University,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovember, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeng, Yong. Promoting Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation: Perspectives from Eastzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAsia. London: MacMillan, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeRosa, Dean A. “US Free Trade Agreements with ASEAN.” in Free Tradezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAgreements: US Strategies and Priorities, ed. Jeffrey J. Schott, 141. Washingtonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD.C.: Institute For International Economics, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff. Contending Theories of Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRelations: A Comprehensive Survey 5th ed. New York:Addison Wesley Longman,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　英，2002年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEckes, Alfred E. Jr. “U.S. Trade History.” in U.S. Trade Policy:History, Theory, Andzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe WTO, ed. William A. Lovett, 58-81. Armonk NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, Graham, and Jeffrey Newnham. The Penguin Dictionary of Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRelations. London: Penguin Group, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFedder, Edwin H. “The Concept of Alliance.” in The Theory and Practice ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Relations, ed. David S. McLellan, William C. Olson and Fred A.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSndermann, 376. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1974.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFunabashi, Yoichi. Alliance Adrift. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGaddis, John L. Surprise, Security and the American Experience. Harvard Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玲君。〈九一一事件後美國對東亞區域經濟合作的政策〉。收錄《國際反恐　zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePress, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGarrett, Banning. Strategic Strightjacket: The United States and China in the 21stzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCentury. Newport, Naval War College Press, November, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrieco, Joseph. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencenewest Liberal Institutionalism.” in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceContemporary Debate, ed. David A. Baldwin, 122. New York: Columbiazh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaass, Richard N. Intervention: The Use of American Military Force in the Post-Coldzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWar World. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　與亞太情勢》，邱稔壤主編。台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaass, Richard N. The Reluctant Sheriff: The United States after the Cold War. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: The Council on Foreign Relations, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHass, Ernst B. “Words Can Hurt You; or, Who Said What to Whom About Regimes.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencein International Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner, 38-49. Ithaca, New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCornell University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHastedt, Glenn P. American Foreign Policy: Past, Present, Future. New Jersey:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrentice Hall, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHiggott, Richard. Richard Leaver, and John Ravenhill. Pacific Economic Relations inzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict? Boulder Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2004年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHudson, Michael. Super Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York: Holt, Rinehart Winston, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHunt, Michael. Ideology and US Foreign Police. New Haven: Yale University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKagan, Robert. Of Paradise and Powe: American and Europe in the New World Orde.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York: Alfred A. Knopf Published, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaplan, Lawrence F., and William Kristol. The War over Iraq:Saddam’s Tyranny andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerican’s Mission. San Francisco: Encounter Books Published, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKegley, Charles W. Jr., and Eugene R. Wittkopf. American Foreign Policy: Patternzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Process. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋興洲。《動態的東亞經濟合：理論性爭辯與實踐》。台北：鼎茂，2005年5　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKennan, George F. The Realities of American Foreign Policy. New Jersey: Princetonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press, 1954.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. “International Liberalism Reconsidered.” in The Economic Limitszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof Politics, ed. John Dunn and Port Chester, 172. Cambridge: Cambridgezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. “The demand for international regimes.” in International Regimes,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceed. Stephen D. Krasner, 141-171. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePress,1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the world Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. Power and Interdependence: World politicszh_TW
dc.relation.referencein Transition. Boston: Little Brown and Co., 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. International Institutions and State Power: Essays onzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKhalilzad, Zalmay M. et al. The United States and a Rising China: Strategic andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilitary Implications. Santa Monica: RAND, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoh, Tommy T. B. “The USSFTA: A personal perspective.” in The United States-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSingapore Free Trade Agreement: Highlights and Insights, ed. Tommy Koh andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang Li Lin, 8. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies and World Scientificzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublishing, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李連江。《新保守主義》。台北：揚智，1994年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes aszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIntervening Variables.” in International Regimes, ed.Stephen D. Krasner, 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIthaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKristol, William, and Robert Kagan. “Introduction: National Interest and Globalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceResponsibility.” in Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForeign and Defense Policy, ed. William Kristol and Robert Kagan, 3-24. Sanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFrancisco, Calif.: Encounter Books, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLasater, Martin L. The New Pacific Community: U.S. Strategic Options in Asia.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoulder, col.: Westview Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiao, Guangsheng. Politics of Economic Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周琪。《美國人權外交政策》。上海：上海人民出版社，2001年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLincoln, Edward. East Asian Economic Region. Washington D.C.: Brookingszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInstitution Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalone, David M, and Yuen Foong Khong. Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Perspectives. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgenthau, Hans J. Politics Among Nation’s: the struggle for power and peace. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYork: McGraw-Hill college, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeher, Clark, and Ross Marlay. Democracy and Development in Southeast Asia: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWinds of Change. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNye, Joseph S. Jr. Understanding International Conflicts:An Introduction to Theoryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference周煦。《冷戰後美國的東亞政策》。台北：生智，1999年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand History. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman Published, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOsgood, Robert E. Alliances and American Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johnszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHopkins Press, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePatman, Robert G. Universal Human Rights? London: Macmillan Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePigman, Geoffrey Allen. “Continuity and change in US trade policy, 1993-2003.” inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrade Poltics, eds. Brian Hocking and Steven McGuire, 309-311. Oxford,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoutledge, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePillar, Paul R. Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washing D.C.: Brookingszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInstitution Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePuchala, Donald J., and Raymond F. Hopkins. “International Regimes: Lessons fromzh_TW
dc.relation.reference岡本幸治。〈邁向「正常國家」的日本：軌跡與動向〉。收錄《變動中的東亞　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInductive Analysis.” in International Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner, 63-121.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIthaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRavenhill, John. APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism. Cambridge:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCambridge University Press, June, 2009.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenau, James N. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. New York: Nocolas, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoumasset, James, and Susan Barr. The Economics of Cooperation: East Asianzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDevelopment and the Case for Pro-Market Intervention. Boulder: Westviewzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePress, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John G. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForm. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　國際關係》，蔡瑋、蔡增家主編。台北：國立政治大學國關中心，2006年　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. “Unilateralism in Historical Perspective.” inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnderstanding Unilateralism in American Foreign Relations ed. Gwyn Prins, 50-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference82. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchott, Jeffery J. “Assessing US FTA Policy.” in Free Trade Agreements: USzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStrategies and Priorities, ed. Jeffery J. Schott, 365-366. Washington D.C.:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInstitute for International Economics, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSoesastro, Hadi. “Pacific Economic Cooperation: the History of an Idea.” in Asiazh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Regionalism: Readings in International Economic Relations, ed. Rosszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGarnaut and Peter Drysdale, 83. Harper Educational/Canberra: The Australia-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJapan Research Centrel, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpero, Joan E., and Jeffery A. Hart. The Politics of International Economic Relations.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSutter, Robert, and Peter Nitchener. China: Interest Groups and Recent US Policy: Anzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIntroduction. Washington D.C.: penny hill press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTeles, Steven. “Public Opinion and Interest Groups in the Making of US-Chinazh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolicy.” in The Domestic Sources of US-China Policy, ed. Robert Ross, 42–45.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArmonk New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalt, Stephen M. “Keeping the World ‘Off-Balance’: Self-Restraint and U.S. Foreignzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolicy.” in America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power, ed. G. Johnzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, 132. New York: Cornell University Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference易君博。《政治理論與研究方法》。台北：三民書局，2002年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalt, Stephen M. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. New York: Mcgraw-hill, Inc.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaltz, Kenneth N. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1959.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWan, Ming. Human Rights in Chinese Foreign Relations. Philadelphia: University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePennsylvania Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWinters, Alan L. “Regionalism vs. multinationalism.” in Market Integration,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRegionalism and the Global Economy, ed. Richard E. Baldwin, Daniel Cohen,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndré Sapir and Anthony Venables, 7-49. Cambridge: CEPR, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北：五南，2006年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoung, Oran R. “Regime Dynamics: the Rise and Fall of International Regimes.” inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Regimes, ed. Stephen D. Krasner, 93-98. Ithaca, New York: Cornellzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoung, Oran R. International Cooperation: Building Resources for Naturalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceResources and the Environment. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　三、期刊（Articles in Journals）zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBergsten, C. Fred. “A Renaissance for U.S. Trade Policy?” Foreign Affairs Vol. 81, No.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6 (Nov/Dec 2002), pp. 86-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaker, III. James A. “America in Asia: Emerging Architecture for a Pacificzh_TW
dc.relation.reference林嘉誠、朱浤源，《政治學辭典》。台北：五南，1992年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommunity.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 70, No. 5 (Winter 1991), pp. l-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBergsten, C. Fred. “Towards a Tripartite World.” The Economist (July 13, 2000), pp.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBjorkdahl, Annika. “Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMethodological Reflections.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 15,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNo. 1 (2002), pp. 9-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlair, Dennis C., and John T. Hanley Jr. “From Wheels to Web: Reconstructing Asia-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Security Arrangement.” The Washington Quarterly Vol. 24, Issue 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Winter 2001), pp. 7-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrainard, Lael, and Michael E. O’Hanlon. “The Heavy Price of America’s Going Itzh_TW
dc.relation.reference近藤重克。〈日美安全保障關係的加強與亞洲太平洋的安全保障〉。收錄《變　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlone.” Financial Times (August 6, 2003), pp. 1-2.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCastro, Renato Cruz De. “Politics in Command: The Case of the US Proposal for anzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFTA with the Philippines.” Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 27, No. 3 (2005),zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 457.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChanda, Nayan. “Storm Warning.” Far Eastern Economic Review (Dec 1, 1994), pp.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChanda, Nayan. “Winds of Change.” Far Eastern Economic Review (June 22, 1995),zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 14-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, Wen-Hsien. “Regional Institution in East Asia after the Financial Crisis:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChallenges and Opportunity.” Issues & Studies Vol. 36, No. 3 (May/June 2000),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　動中的東亞國際關係》，蔡瑋、蔡增家主編。台北：政治大學國關中心，　zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 103-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCheng, Yu-shek. “The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area: genesis and implication.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAustralian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 58, No . 2 (June 2004), pp. 257-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference277.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChu-Kwang, Chin. “The U.S.-Japan Joint Declaration: Strategic Implications forzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaiwan Security.” World Affairs Vol. 160, No. 3 (Winter 1998), pp. 153.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton, William J. “Building a New Pacific Community.” U.S. Department of statezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDispatch Vol. 4, No. 28 (July 12, 1993), pp. 485-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, Roberta. “People’s Republic of China: The Human Rights Exception.” Humanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRights Quarterly Vol 9, No. 4 (November 1987), pp. 447-459.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2006年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrone, Donald. “Does Hegemony Matter? The Reoraganization of the Pacific Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomy.” World Politics Vol. 45, No. 4 (July 1993), pp. 517; 501-525.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCronin, Patrick M. “Pacific Rim Security: Beyond Bilateralism.” The Pacific Reviewzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVol. 5, No. 3 (1992), pp. 209-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoot, Rosemary. “Bush and Human Rights.” Survial (Summer 2003), pp. 176-177.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFukuyama, Francis. “Asian values and the Asian crisis.” Commentary Vol. 105, No. 2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(February 1998), pp. 23-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreen, Michael J., and Benjamin L. Self. “Japan’s Changing China Policy: Fromzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommercial Liberalism to Reluctant Realism.” Surviva Vol. 38, No.2 (Summerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996), pp. 44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference哈里‧哈汀（Harry Harding）著。《脆弱的關係－1972年以來的美國和中　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarding, Harry. “Asia Policy to the Brink.” Foreign Policy No. 96 (Fall 1994), pp. 71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHirsb, Michael. “Bush and the World.” Foreign Affair Vol. 81, No. 5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(September/October 2002), pp. 32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, G. John. “The End of the Neo-Conservative Moment.” Survival Vol. 46, No.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1 (2004), pp. 8.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, G. John. “American Imperial Ambition.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 81, No. 5zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Sep/Oct 2002), pp. 92-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKasper, Sara, Minxin Pei. “Lessons From the Past: The American Record on Nation-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuilding.” Carnegie Endowment Policy Brief No. 24 (May 2003) , pp. 4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. “International Institution: Two Approaches.” Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　國》，袁瑾等譯。香港：三聯書店，1993年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStudies Quarterly Vol. 32, No. 4 (1988), pp. 370-396.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane, Robert O. “Alliances, Threats, and the Uses of Neorealism.” Internationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSecurity Vol. 13, No. 1 (Summer 1988), pp. 174-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeohane. Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. “Power and Interdependence in thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInformation Age.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 77, No. 5 (September/October 1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrauthammer, Charles. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 70, No. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(1990/1991), pp. 25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrauthammer, Charles. “The Neoconservative Convergence.” Commentary Vol. 120,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNo. 1 (2005), pp. 21-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLampton, David M. “America’s China Police in the Age of the Finance Minister:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姜琳，《美國保守主義及其全球戰略》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社，2008　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton Ends Linkage.” The China uarterly Vol. 139 (Sep 1994), pp. 605.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLord, Winston. “A New Pacific Community: Ten Goals for American Policy.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDispatch Vo1. 47, No. 36 (September 6, 1993), pp. 612-614.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalik, Mohan. “The East Asia Summit.” Australian Journal of International Affairszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVol. 60, No. 2 (June 2006), pp. 207-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManning, Robert. “Split Personality: US Congress Contradicts Official Rhetoric onzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChina.” Far Eastern Economic Review (November 27, 1997), pp. 18-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMauzy, Diane K., and Brian L. Job. “U.S. Policy in Southeast Asia: Limitedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReengagement after Years of Benign Neglect.” Asian Survey Vol. 47, No. 4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(July/August 2007), pp. 622-641.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNye, Joseph S. “The Nye Report: Six years later.” International Relations of the Asia-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Vol. 1, No. 1 (January 2001), pp. 95-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePowell, Colin L. “A Strategy of Partnerships.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 83, No. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(January/February 2004), pp. 22-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePutnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Levelzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGames.” International Organization Vol. 42, No. 3 (Summer 1988), pp. 427-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRapkin, David P. “The United States, Japan, and the power to block: the APEC andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAMF cases.” The Pacific Review Vol. 14, No. 3 (September 2001), pp. 373-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReeve, Simon. “Thanks, But No Thanks.” Far Eastern Economic Review (June 27,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995), pp. 3-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference柯林頓（William J. Clinton）著。《希望與歷史之間─迎接21世紀的挑zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRice, Condoleezza. “Promoting the National Interest.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 79, No. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(January/February 2000), pp. 54; 56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScalapino, Robert A. “The United States and Asia in 1998: Summitry amid Crisis.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAsian Survey Vol. 39, No. 1 (January/February 1999), pp. 1-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, Glenn H. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics?” World Politics Vol.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference36, No. 4 (July 1984), pp. 461–95.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWesley, Michael. “APEC’s Mid-Life Crisis? The Rise and Fall of Early Voluntaryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSectoral Liberalization.” Pacific Affairs Vol. 74, No. 2 (Summer 2001), pp. 185-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference204.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　四、報紙（Newspaper）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　戰》，許玉珍、蕭秋屏譯。台北：聯經出版社，1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaryl, Christian. “Building Blocks.” Newsweek December 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGedda, George. “Powell Says China Differences Narrowed.” The Washington Postzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJuly 28 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurns, Robert. “Army Shifting Equipment to Asia.” The Washington Post August 30zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　五、網路資料（Internet）zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAPEC, “1997 Leaders` Declaration Vancouver Declaration - Connecting the APECzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommunity,” apec,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-eclarations/1997/1997_aelm.aspxzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(accessed October 16, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference約瑟夫‧奈伊（Joseph S. Nye,Jr.）著。《美國霸權的矛盾與未來》(The 　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAPEC, “2006 Leaders` Declaration Ha Noi Declaration - Towards a Dynamiczh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCommunity for Sustainable Development and Prosperity,” apec,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2006/2006_aelm.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceaspx (accessed October 17, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAsia Pacific Parliamentary Forum(APPF), “Resolution on ASEAN+3 submitted byzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe U.S. delegation (at 9th Annual Meeting of the Asia Pacific Parliament inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceValparaíso),” appf,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.appf.org.pe/meeting/ninth/r22.htm (accessed October 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASEAN, “Forging closer ASEAN-China economic relations in the twenty-firstzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecentury (A Report Submitted by the ASEAN-China Expert Group on Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Paradox of American Power: Why the World`s only superpower can`t 　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooperation October 2001),” aseansec,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.aseansec.org/asean_chi.pdf (accessed October 17, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASSEN, “Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit Kuala Lumpur,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceaseansec,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.aseansec.org/18098.htm (accessed October 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceASSEN, “Chiang Mai Initiative as the Foundation of Financial Stability in East Asia,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAseansec,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.aseansec.org/17902.pdf (accessed October 17, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBergsten, C. Fred. “Competitive Liberalization and Global Free Trade: A Vision forzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe Early 21st Century (Working Paper of Institute of International Economics No.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　go it alone)，蔡東杰譯。台北縣：左岸文化，2002年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference96-15),” iie,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.iie.com/publications/wp/wp.cfm?researchid=171 (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovember 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBergsten, C. Fred. “The Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific Is the Next Step Forwardzh_TW
dc.relation.referencefor APEC and for the World Trading System),” iie,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=687 (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOctober 17, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBolle, Mary Jane. “RS20582: China and the WTO: Labor Issues,” cnie,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cnie.org/NLE/CRS/abstract.cfm?NLEid=1362 (accessed April 2,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡利平、楊韻琴編譯。《預防性防禦：一項美國新安全戰略》。上海：人民出　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrahney, Kathleen J. “MFN FOR CHINA: ECONOMIC PRAGMATISM?” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/news/china/1997/97052201_rmr.htm (accessed March 12,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurns, Robert. “Army Shifting Equipment to Asia (The Washington Post, August 30,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001),” nucnews,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://nucnews.net/nucnews/2001nn/0108nn/010831nn.htm#330 (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovember 20, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush, George W. “A Distinctly American Internationalism,” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/news/usa/1999/11/991119-bush-foreignpolicy.htm (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovember 20, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　版社，2000年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBushlibrary, “The President`s News Conference (1989-06-05),” bushlibrary,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/public_papers.php?id=494&year=1989&zh_TW
dc.relation.referencemonth=6 (accessed February 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCESNUR, “Powell Urged Bush to Back Resolution on China Human Rights,” cesnur,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cesnur.org/2001/falun_feb13.htm#Anchor-35882. (accessed April 24,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton, William J. “Excerpts From President`s Inaugural Address,” dosfan,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/dispatch/1993/html/Dispatchv4no04.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(accessed March 19, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCLINTON, “Permanent normal trade relations for China: An historic moment for U.S.-China relations,” clinton5,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北：五南，2006年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://clinton5.nara.gov/WH/new/html/Tue_Oct_3_164420_2000.html (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceApril 2, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCNN, “Condoleezza Rice Discusses Importance of Missile Defense System; Whatzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWill Become of Bush`s $1.6 Trillion Tax Cut in Congress?” cnn,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/04/le.00.html (accessed April 24,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCNN, “Opposition To MFN Status For China Defeated In The House,” cnn,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/07/22/china.trade.status/ (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarch 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDumbaugh, Kerry. “98018: China-U.S. Relations (Foreign Affairs and Nationalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference埃茲拉‧沃格爾（Ezra F. Vogel）著。《二十一世紀的美國與中國關係》，吳　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDefense Division),” CRS Issue Brief, fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/crs/crs98018.htm (accessed March 12, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDieter, Heribert. “Asia’s monetary regionalism,” feer,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.feer.com/2000/0007_06/p30.html (accessed October 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFAS, “Text: Rep. Levin May 10 Remarks on China Commission to House Panelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Levin proposes Congressional-Executive Commission on China) (1810),” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/news/china/2000/000511-prc-usia05.htm (accessed March 26,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFAS, “Transcript: President Clinton on Trade Relations with China (Grantingzh_TW
dc.relation.referencepermanent normal trade relations tatus top task) (1530),” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　福生譯。台北：國防部史政編譯局，2000年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/news/china/2000/000110-prc-usia1.htm (accessed March 26,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGLOBALPOLICY, “U.S. military bases world wide 2001-2003,” globalpolicy,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/intervention/index.htm (accessed Novemberzh_TW
dc.relation.reference20, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceINQUIRER, “Main points of Asian summit declarations,” inquirer,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view_article.php?article_zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceid=43639 (accessed October 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKing, John, Ann Curley, and Steve Glasser. “Clinton proposes Renewing China’szh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMost-Favored Trade Status,” cnn,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference海伍德（Andrew Heywood）著。《政治學新論（Politics）》，楊日青、李培　zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/06/03/china.trade/ (accessed Marchzh_TW
dc.relation.reference26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrueger, Anne O. “Government, Trade, and Economic Integration,” jstor,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.jstor.org/pss/2117385 (accessed November 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLake, Anthony. “From Containment to Enlargement,” dosfan,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/dispatch/1993/html/Dispatchv4no39.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(accessed February 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarson, Charles R. “A Comerstont of Cooperative Engagement,” disam,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.disam.dsca.mil/Pubs/Indexes/Vol%2015_4/Larson.pdf (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNovember 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　元等譯。台北：韋伯文化，1999年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalik, Mohan. “The East Asia Summit: More Discord than Accord,” December 14,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005, aph,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.aph.gov.au/library/intguide/FAD/eastasia_summit.htm (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOctober 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarshall, Andrew. “Southeast Asian integration lacks key factor: unity,” Reuters,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.iie.com/publications/chapters_preview/345/3iie3381.pdf (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOctober 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMOFA, “Japan-U.S. Joint Declaration on Security-Alliance for the 21st Century,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencemofa,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/security.html (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦亞青。《權力．制度．文化：國際關係理論與方法研究文集》。北京：北京　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecember 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMOFA, “Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary on the Signing of the Agreement,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencemofa,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/announce/2010/5/0519_02.html (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecember 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOffice of the U.S. Trade Representative, “Enterprise for ASEAN Initiative,” ustr,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ustr.gov/trade-greements/other-initiatives/asean-initiative (accessedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOctober 9, 2010)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOwen, Elizabeth. “House passes MFN,” time,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.time.com/time/search/article/0,8599,8352,00.html (accessed Marchzh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　大學出版社，2005年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePregelj, Vladimir N. “92094: Most-Favored-Nation Status of the People`s Republic ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChina,” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/man/crs/92-094.htm (accessed March 12, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSoesastro, Hadi. “Dynamics of Competitive Liberalization in RTA Negotiations: Eastzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAsian Perspectives,” pecc,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.pecc.org/publications/papers/trade-papers/1_SII/7-soesastro.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(accessed November 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSCMP, “Powell vows robust ties with China,” scmp,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.scmp.com/News/Front/Article/FULLTEXT-asp-ArticleID-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁明賢、吳建德、王瑋琦、張蜀誠主編。《新戰略論》。台北：五南，2007　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20001218014755948.asp (accessed April 23, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSENATE, “On Passage of the Bill (H.R. 4444 )H.R. 4444 (U.S. Senate Roll Call Voteszh_TW
dc.relation.reference106th Congress-2nd Session),” senate,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?zh_TW
dc.relation.referencecongress =106&session=2&vote=00251 (accessed April 2, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSullivan, Mark P. “CRS Report for Congress (Argentina: Background and U.S.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRelations),” fas,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34734.pdf (accessed April 24, 2011)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTyson, Laura D`Andrea. “Future Directions for U.S. Economic Policy Toward Japan,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencecfr,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Economic_Policy_zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceToward_Japan.pdf (accessed December 5, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTYPEPAD, “trade-in-the-asiapacific,” typepad,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://asiagander.typepad.com/asia_gander/2009/03/maritime-security-and-trade-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencein-the-asiapacific-the-ten-commandments.html (accessed November 6, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Census Bureau, “U.S. Trade in Goods (Imports, Exports and Balance) byzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCountry,” census,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/ (accessed October 9, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, “Quadrennial Defense Review Report,” defense,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/qdr2001.pdf (accessed October 9, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference茲比格扭‧布里辛斯基（Zbigniew Brzezinski）。《實力與原則》。北京：新　zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, “Quadrennial Defense Review Report,” defense,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/qdr2001.pdf (accessed November 20, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, “United States Security Strategy for the East Asia-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Region,” defense,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://osdhistory.defense.gov/docs/1995%20DoD%20Annual%20Report.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(accessed November 20, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense, “United States Security Strategy for the East Asia -zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacific Region,” defense,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.osdhistory.defense.gov/docs/1995%20DoD%20Annual%20zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReport.pdf (accessed November 20, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　華出版社，1997年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of State, “Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor,” state,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.state.gov/g/drl/index.htm (accessed February 26, 2011)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUS. Department of State, “China Country Report on Human Rights Practices,” state,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.state.gov/ (accessed February 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. National Defense University, “The United States and Japan Advancing Toward azh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMature Partnership: INSS Special Report,” ndu,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ndu.edu/inss/strforum/SR_01/SR_Japan.htm (accessed December 5,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Trade Balance with China, “foreign-trade,” census,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　http://landview.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html (accessed April 23,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference茲比格紐‧布里辛斯基（Zbigniew Brzezinski）。《大棋盤－全球戰略大思　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSHISTORY, “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceushistory,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm (accessed February 26,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSHISTORY, “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceushistory,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm (accessed February 26,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSINFO, “Text: Bereuter, Levin Offer \"Legislative Framework\" for China PNTRzh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　考》，林添貴譯。台北：立緒文化，2003年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Commission on China modeled after Helsinki Commission) (860),” usinfo,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2000/000511/epf405.htm (accessed March 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSINFO, “Text: Three Former U.S. Presidents Advocate PNTR for China (Chinazh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWTO membership/PNTR will serve U.S. national interest) (770),” usinfo,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2000/000509/epf206.htm (accessed March 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSINFO, “Transcript: President Clinton Hails Bipartisan Effort on China PNTRzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Signs historic China trade bill in White House ceremony) (5340) ,” usinfo,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2000/001011/epf303.htm (accessed April 2, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUSINFO, “Transcript: President Clinton on U.S.-China Trade Relations (America haszh_TW
dc.relation.referencea profound stake in what happens in China) (4670) ,” usinfo,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郝思悌（K. J. Holsti）著。《國際分析架構（International Politics, A 　zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://usinfo.org/wf-archive/2000/000308/epf302.htm (accessed March 26, 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVaughn, Bruce. “East Asia Summit: Issues for Congress (CRS Report for Congress),”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencefpc,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/58236.pdf (accessed October 30,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZoellick, Robert B. “How the U.S. Can Promote Greater Free Trade in Asia,” heritage,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/hl480nbsp-how-the-us-can-promote-greater-free-trade (accessed October 30, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　Framework for Analysis〉》，譚溯澄、李偉成譯。台北：幼獅，1988年　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張亞中。《國際關係總論》。台北：揚智，2007年11月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《布希政府時期反恐國家戰略》。桃園：國防大學，2008年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《布希政府時期國家安全戰略》。桃園：國防大學，2008年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《柯林頓政府時期全球時代的國家安全戰略》。桃園：國防大學，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2007年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《柯林頓政府時期接觸與擴大的國家安全戰略》。桃園：國防大學，　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　2008年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《柯林頓政府時期新世紀的國家安全戰略》。桃園：國防大學，2007　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　年12月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《戰略透視：冷戰後美國層級戰略體系》。台北：五南，2011年3　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference　　月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹雄源。《戰略解碼：美國家安全戰略的佈局》。台北：五南，2009年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference畢恆達。《教授為什麼没有告訴我》。台北：學富文化，2005年。zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.