Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51608| 題名: | 電子採購影響評估因果模型之建構與驗證 A causal model of e-procurement impact assessment: theoretical development and empirical application |
作者: | 李洛維 Li, Luo Wei |
貢獻者: | 朱斌妤 Chu, Pin Yu 李洛維 Li, Luo Wei |
關鍵詞: | 電子治理 電子採購 影響評估 資訊系統成功模型 eGovernance e-Procurement impact assessment DeLone & McLean IS Success Model |
日期: | 2009 | 上傳時間: | 11-十月-2011 | 摘要: | 目前各國為了提升政府運作效能與國家競爭力，均將電子化政府視為重點發展策略。電子化政府的發展，從早期推動國家資訊基礎建設，到進一步運用資訊通訊科技提供各類政府服務，再到強調行政服務的效率與整合、網路公民參與等，目前已在世界各國形成風潮。電子化政府的普及應用，對於促成公民社會的發展、公義社會的追求及優質網路社會的建構，都帶來相當的影響，也因此當前電子化政府的最新發展為「電子治理」概念的提出。\n在電子治理的概念下，電子化政府的評估方式應該從以往的投入-產出之效率評估轉向強調公共目標實現與否的影響評估。然而當前在電子治理影響評估的研究方面仍十分缺乏，雖然目前的電子治理評估研究已經開始重視從使用者的角度進行評估，但評估的焦點還停留在使用者對電子化政府服務的感受，而非電子化政府服務實際對使用者產生何種影響，且尚未以因果模型的方式建構一個完整的電子治理影響評估架構，以找出造成公共目標實現的關鍵因素。\n本研究透過國際電子化政府評估研究、電子化政府評估架構、網路服務品質評估研究、電子治理影響評估四類文獻的整理，結合DeLone & McLean的資訊系統成功模型與Heeks的電子化政府價值鏈模型，提出了電子治理影響評估因果模型以及評估指標，同時介紹我國重要的電子化政府服務：「電子採購系統」的發展現況以及相關評估研究，並透過次級資料分析，針對我國電子採購系統進行因果模型的驗證。研究結果證實本研究所提出的電子採購因果評估模型確實具有一定的解釋能力，同時本研究也透過模型實證的結果針對電子採購的政策以及後續研究提出了相關建議。 eGovernment, as a popular government activity, has adopted by many countries in order to maximize the competitive advantage of nations. As eGovernment activity grows over time, the main issues of e-government change from e-infrastructure to e-service and to e-participation, and this change brings the concern about the impact of eGovernment. Therefore, the latest development of eGovernment is “eGovernance”.\nUnder the concepts of eGovernance, the focus of eGovernment evaluation should change form program evaluation to impact assessment. However, most of literature concerning eGovernance has focused on the supply side, which is the perspective of the government. Little has focused on the evaluation of actual use and its impact in e-government service. \nThis research reviews literatures and related reports, based on Heeks’ eGovernment Value Chain Model and DeLone and McLean’s Information System Success Model, proposes a causal model for the empirical examination of impacts of the e-Procurement System in Taiwan, this model is strongly supported by the empirical data. This research also makes some suggestions for the improvement of e-Procurement policy in Taiwan, and for futher researches. |
參考文獻: | 行政院研究發展考核委員會(1997)。電子化／網路化政府中程（八十七至八十九年度）推動計畫。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2004)。2003電子化政府報告書。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007a)。電子化政府報告書(96年度)。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。取自： http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4087193&ctNode=12862&mp=100 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007b)。優質網路政府計畫(97年-100年，行政院核定發展優質網路社會計畫項下)。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。取自： http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/data/94201283671.pdf 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007c)。政府e化服務10週年應用推廣專刊：台灣e起來。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。行政院第271次研考業務協調會報。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。取自： http://www.rdec.gov.tw/DO/DownloadControllerNDO.asp?CuAttachID=16866 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2009)。配合智慧台灣計畫之推動「電子化政府續階計畫－優質網路政府」修正規劃及推動重點。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。 行政院公共工程委員會(2002)。政府採購電子化計畫簡報。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。 行政院公共工程委員會(2008a)。行政院公共工程委員會（94-97年）中程施政計畫（97年第一季修正版）。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。取自： http://210.241.21.133/DOC/2427/PLAN_10_20080603160516835.htm 行政院公共工程委員會(2008b)。行政院公共工程委員會中程（98-101年）施政計畫。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。取自： http://www.rdec.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=12969&CtUnit=1672&BaseDSD=46&mp=100 行政院公共工程委員會(2008c)。2008年公共工程年刊。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。 行政院公共工程委員會(2009a)。2代電子採購系統。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。取自： http://edu.gp.gov.tw/gmstudent/class2/class_main.asp?ct=6 行政院公共工程委員會(2009b)。97年度政府採購法業務推動情形及執行績效。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。取自： http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/TMPLfronted/ChtIndex.do?site=002 行政院公共工程委員會(2010)。98年度政府採購法業務推動情形及執行績效。台北市：行政院公共工程委員會。取自： http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/FMGRfrontend/DownloadQuoteFile.do?fileCode=F2010050243 丘昌泰(2004)。公共政策：基礎篇。高雄市：復文出版社。 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論技術與應用。台北市：雙葉書廊。 朱斌妤、李洛維(2009)。電子治理的發展與挑戰。研習論壇月刊，107，1-13。 李傳彬(2007)。廠商電子領投標行為研究。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 吳裴妮(2007)。政府電子採購系統關鍵成功因素。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系硏究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 林岳嶙(2003)。以流程再造的觀點評估政府採購電子化之效率—以高雄市政府為例。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 紀人瑋(2010)。政府採購電子化成效評估指標建立。國立政治大學公共行政硏究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 陳慶瑜(2004)。電子化政府線上資訊系統服務品質衡量指標-以稅務訊息即時通為例。國立中正大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。 項靖(2008)。電子治理關係之調適。行政院研考會委託研究報告。台北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。 黃朝盟、朱斌妤、黃東益(2008)。電子治理成效調查評估分析報告：G2G與G2E（編號：09640D002503）。行政院研考會委託研究報告。台北市：行政院研究考核委員會。 黃東益、朱斌妤、蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理成效指標與評估：G2C與G2B（編號：0972461343）。行政院研考會委託研究報告。台北市：行政院研究考核委員會。 黃建國(2006)。政府為民服務網路申辦系統的服務品質：以「台北市民e點通」為例。世新大學行政管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 楊錫安(2001)。「政府採購電子化」之發展。《研考雙月刊》，25(1)，30-34。 楊菀菁(2004)。由服務品質缺口模式探討高雄市市長電子信箱服務品質與民眾滿意度。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 詹淑文(2002)。我國電子化政府民眾滿意度之研究─以台北市政府網站為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 陳冠竹(2003)。政府採購入口網站功能架構與關鍵成功因素之研究。國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 陳素汝(2006)。政府電子採購政策執行之評估研究：以新店市公所執行政府採購電子領投標為例。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 劉靖敏(2007)。以服務品質觀點探討電子化政府網站使用者與管理者之認知落差。中原大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。 謝培仁(2002)。電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究--以電子化政府入口網站為例。國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 謝玉粟(2002)。虛擬政府的服務品質探討。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 鐘玉科(2007)。台灣電子化政府使用滿意之因果模式。中華大學科技管理硏究所博士論文，未出版，新竹市。 蕭乃沂、羅晉(2009)。電子化政府計畫評估架構之建立與運用：以數位台灣分項計畫為例。2009年台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會（TASPAA）「全球化下新公共管理趨勢與挑戰：理論與實踐」研討會，高雄：國立中山大學。 Ahmedabad. (2007). Impact assessment study of e-government project in India. Ahmedabad: Center for e-Governance, Indian Institute of Management. Almutairi, H., & Subramanian, G. H. (2005). An empirical application of the DeLone and Mclean model in the Kuwaiti Private Sector. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 113-122. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. (2007). Interactive e-government: Evaluating the web site of the UK inland revenue. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(1), 19-37. Brown, S. W., & Swartz, T. A. (1989). A gap analysis of professional service quality, Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 92-98. Buckley, J. (2003). E-service quality and the public sector. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 453-462. Caldow, J. (2004). E-democracy: Putting down global roots. Washington DC: Institute for Electronic Government, IBM. Retrieved from: http://www-1.ibm.com/industries/government/ieg/pdf/e-democracy%20putting%20down%20roots.pdf. CAPS Research(2003). Benchmarking in an eprocurement environment. Tempe, Arizona: CAPS Research. Retrieved from: http://www.capsresearch.org Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, in Modern Methods for Business Research, George A. Marcoulides, Ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 295-336. Ciborra, C., & Navarra, D. D. (2005). Good governance, development theory, and aid policy: Risks and challenges of e-government in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 141-159. Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journalof Service Research, 8(3), 260-75. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(July), 55-68. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 14, 319-340. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. EU DG Information Society. (2004). Top of the web: User satisfaction and usage survey of e-government Services. Copenhagen,Denmark: European Commission. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/activities/egovernment_research/doc/top_of_the_web_report_2004.pdf Esteves, J., & Joseph, R. C. (2007). A comprehensive framework for the assessment of egovernment projects. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 118-132. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 55, 1-21. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 39-50. Freed, L. (2009). American customer satisfaction index: E-government satisfaction index. Ann Arbor, MI: ForeSee Results. Retrieved from: http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=27&Itemid=62 Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of E-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286-301. Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). E-government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information System, 16, 134-148. Gronholdt, L., Martensen, A., & Kristensen, K. (2000). The relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: Cross-industry differences. Total Quality Management, 11(4/5&6), 509-514. Grönlund, Å. (2002). Electronic government: Design, applications and management. (Ed.). Pennsylvania: IGI Global. Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services. Internet Research, 17(4), 378-401. Heeks, R. (2001). Building eGovernance for Development: A Framework for National Donor Action. EGovernment Working Paper Series, U.K: University of Manchester Press. Heeks, R. (2006). Benchmarking e-government: Improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-government. IDPM i-Government Working Paper, 18, 1-33. Heintzman, R., & Marson, B. (2005). People, service and trust: Is there a public sector service value chain. International Review of Administrative Science, 71(4), 549-575. Heskett, J. L., Sasser, W. E. Jr., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1997). The service profit chain: How leading compenies link profit and growth to loyalty, satisfaction and value. New York: Free Press. Holden, S. H., & Fletcher, P. D. (2005). The virtual value chain and e-government partnership: Non-monetary agreements in the IRS e-file program. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(7&8), 643-664. Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing user satisfaction of e-government services: Development and testing of quality-in-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information system (ATIS). Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Hawaii. Hsu, F. M., Chen, T. Y., & Wang, S. (2009). Efficiency and satisfaction of electronic records management systems in e-government in Taiwan. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 461-473. Iivarij, J. (2005). An empirical test of DeLone-McLean model of information systems success. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 36(2), 8–27. Islam, N. (2001). Democracy and governance in Pakistan’s fragmented society. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(12), 1335-1355. Jansen, A., & Ølnes, S. (2004). Quality assessment and benchmarking of norwegian public websites. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-government, 16-18 June 2004, Dublin. Janssen, D., Rotthier S., & Snijkers, K. (2004). If you measure it they will score: An assessment of international e-government benchmarking. Information Polity, 9(3-4), 121-130. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. Wu., J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and Mclean’s model. Information & Management, 43, 728-739. Jho, W. (2005). Challenges for e-governance: Protests from the civil society on the protection of privacy in e-government in Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 151-166. Kim, T. H., Im, K. H., & Park, S. C. (2005). Intelligent measuring and improving model for customer satisfaction level in e-government. Paper presented at the Electronic Government: 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005, Copenhagen. Retrived from: http://0rz.tw/RQvLM Klischewski, R., & Ukena, S. (2009). A value network analysis of automated access to e-government services. In: Hansen, H.R., Karagiannis, D., Fill, H.-G. (eds.): 9th International Conference on Business Informatics (Part 2). Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft, Wien, 2009, 585-594. Ladhari, R. (2008). Perceived service quality, perceived value and recommendation: A study among Canadian public library users. Library Management, 29(4/5), 352-366. Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(2), 172-198. Liao, T. S., Wang, M. T., & Tserng, H. P. (2002). A framework of electronic tendering for government procurement: A lesson learned in Taiwan. Automation in Construction, 11, 731-742. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2000). WebQual: A Web Site Quality Instrument. Massachusetts: Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2002). WebQual: A measure of website quality. 2002 Marketing educators’ conference: Marketing theory and applications, Chicago, American. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007). WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 51-87. Lyon, P. (2000). Partnership for good eGovernance in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(3), 87-92. McGill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean`s model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24-45. Millard, J. (2008). E-government measurement for policy makers. European Journal of ePractice, 4, 1-14. Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2001). E-commerce systems success: An attempt to extend and respecify the Delong and Mclean model of IS success. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(4), 131-141. Montagna, J. M. (2005). A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic government proposals. Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 4(3), 204-219. Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43-60. Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Obi, T. (2007). 2007 Waseda University e-government ranking. Tokyo: The Waseda University Institute of e-Government. Obi, T. (2008). 2008 Waseda University e-government ranking. Tokyo: The Waseda University Institute of e-Government. Obi, T. (2009). 2009 Waseda University e-government ranking. Tokyo: The Waseda University Institute of e-Government. Obi, T. (2010). 2010 Waseda University e-government ranking. Tokyo: The Waseda University Institute of e-Government. OECD (2003). OECD e-Government studies: The e-government imperative. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD (2006). OECD e-Government studies: Denmark. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD (2007a). OECD e-Government studies: Hungary. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD (2007b). OECD e-Government studies: Netherlands. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD (2007c). OECD e-Government studies: Turkey. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD (2009). OECD e-Government studies: Rethinking e-Government Services. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Parasuramen, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-50. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 29-40. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. Petter, S., DeLone, W., & Mclean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236-263. Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-161. Rathmell, J. M. (1966). What is meant by services? Journal of Marketing, 30(October), 32-36. Rayport, J. F., & Sviokla, J. J. (1994). Managing in the marketspace. Harvard Business Review, 72(6), 141–150. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305-335. Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecfication and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 240-253. Schellong, A. (2009). EU eGovernment Benchmarking 2010+: General remarks on the future of benchmarking digital eovernment in the EU. Retrived from: http://www.iq.harvard.edu/blog/netgov/papers/schellong_2009_wp_eu_egovernment_benchmarking_future_methodology.pdf Singla, M. L. (2002). The governance: Transforming the mational bone marrow. Journal of Management Research, 2(3), 165-175. Slaton, C. D., & Arthur, J. L. (2004). Public administration for a democratic society: Instilling public trust through greater collaboration with citizens. In Matti Malkia, Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko & Reijo Savolainen (eds.), eTransformation in Governance: New Directions in Government and Politics (pp. 110-130). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. Sukasame, N. (2004), The development of e-service in Thai government. BU Academic Review, 3, 8 pages. Retrieved from: http://www.bu.ac.th/knowledgecenter/epaper/jan_june2004/nittana.pdf Tapscott, D., & Agnew, D. (1999), Governance in the digital economy. Finance & Development, 36(4), 34-37. Thompson, D. (1999). James Madison on Cyberdemocracy. In Elaine Kamarck & Joseph Nye (eds), Democracy.com? Governance in a Networked World (pp. 35-42). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 277-302. United Nations. (2002). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2003). United Nations e-Government Survey 2003. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2008). United Nations e-Government Survey 2008: From e-Government to Connected Governance. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2009). United Nations e-Government Survey 2009: Getting to the Next Level. New York: United Nations. UNESCAP (2004) . What is good governance? Retrieved from: http://www.unescap.org/huset/gg/governance Vaidya, K. (2007). Applying the DeLone and McLean information success model to measure public e-procurement success. Paper presented at the CollECTeR 2007: Melbourne Australia. Van Ryzin, G. G., Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., & Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfactionindex model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-341. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the thenology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing e-government systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 717-733. Wassenaar, A. (2000). E-government value chain models: E-government from a business (modeling) perspective. In Tjoa, A. M., Wagner, R.R., & Al-Zobaidie, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. (pp.289-293). Washington: IEEE Computer Society. Wauters, P. (2006). Benchmarking e-government policy within the e-Europe programme. Asilib Proceeding, 58(5), 389-403. Welch, E. W., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391. West, D. M. (2008). Improving technology utilization in electronic government around the world. Brookings: Governance Studies. World Bank (1992). Governance and development. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. World Bank (2007). Worldwide governance indicator. Retrieved from: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi2007/ World Economic Forum (2008). The global gnformation technology report 2007–2008. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. World Economic Forum (2009). The global gnformation technology report 2008–2009. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. World Economic Forum (2010). The global gnformation technology report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. Wolfinbarger, M. & Gilly, M. C. (2003). eTailQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting e-tail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), 183-198. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 31-47. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge. Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 362-375. Zmud, R. W. (1979). Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management Science, 25(10), 966-979 |
描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 公共行政研究所 96256030 98 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962560301 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030101.pdf | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.