Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51682
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor邱坤玄zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChiu, Kun Shuanen_US
dc.contributor.author倪智琳zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKitty Noel Ngaien_US
dc.creator倪智琳zh_TW
dc.creatorKitty Noel Ngaien_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-14T05:41:40Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-14T05:41:40Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-14T05:41:40Z-
dc.identifierG0093261023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51682-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國家發展研究所zh_TW
dc.description93261023zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract冷戰結束後,朝鮮半島依舊是東北亞區域勢力的交會點,區內相關國家始終沒有放棄在該區的利益。在2002年北韓核武危機嚴重影響東北亞的和平與穩定。中國從中協調舉辦了「三方會談」及六輪「六方會談」,與東北亞相關國家尋求和平解決對安全的憂慮,令北韓放棄核武計劃。在會談中,中國所扮演的關鍵角色令人關注。\r\n\r\n本論文透過回顧中國在六方會談與北韓核武危機中扮演的角色,探討中國的戰略和分析其他參與國對中國的評估。隨著中國國力的相對崛起,中國在北韓核武危機與六方會談中發揮了至關重要的影響力。中國的東北亞政策採用現實主義的路線,維護北韓政權的存續,亦同時保障中國的安全利益﹔藉由主導六方會談去穩固區域現狀,以強化區域領導者角色,符合其最大的國家利益。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAfter the Cold War, the conflicts on the Korean Peninsula still remain unsolvable over half century, the related countries have not given up its interests in the Northeast Asia region. In 2002, North Korea nuclear crisis has brought up the serious security concern to the Northeast Asia. China has organized \"Trilateral Talks\" and \"Six-Party Talks\", hoping to find a peaceful solution through mediation. China had played a key role in the Talks.\r\n\r\nThis paper aims to explore and analyze the role and strategies of China in Six-Party Talks. China, as host of the Six-Party alks, played a vital role and had been engaged in more active diplomacy to defuse this crisis, leading its growing influence in the Northeast Asia. China has the potential both to guarantee North Korea`s security, and to impose and enforce a denuclearization agreement. The role of China in the Six-Party Talk is to eliminate the North Korea nuclear capability, stable the status quo in the Korean Peninsula and strengthen its influence in the Northeast Asia region.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgments \r\nChinese Abstract\r\nEnglish Abstract\r\n\r\nChapter 1. Introduction..….………………………………………………..........................7\r\n1.1: Motivation and Purpose ……………………………………………………………7\r\n1.2: Literature Review …………………………………………………………………..9\r\n1.3: Research Method and Approach ……….………………………………………… 19\r\n1.4: Research Framework and Limitation ….…………………………………………. 31\r\n\r\nChapter 2. Causes and Process of Six-Party Talks ..……………………………………. 33\r\n2.1: North Korea Nuclear Weapon Development ..……………………………………. 34\r\n2.2: Cause of Six-Party Talks and its purpose ……...………………………………….. 37\r\n2.3: The process from the 1st to 6th round of Six-Party Talks………………………….. 44\r\n 2.3.1 1st round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………...46\r\n 2.3.2 2nd round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………..51\r\n 2.3.3 3rd round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………..52\r\n2.3.4 4th round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………..54\r\n2.3.5 5th round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………..56\r\n2.3.6 6th round of Six-Party Talks ……...……………………………………..58\r\n2.4: Latest Development ……..……...…………………………………..……………..59\r\n2.5 Summary …..……...…………………………………..…………………………...63\r\n\r\nChapter 3. Role and Strategies of China in the Six-Party Talks ..….………………….....65\r\n3.1: The Objectives of China toward North Korea Nuclear Crisis …………………………67\r\n3.2: The Strategies of China toward North Korea in Present Day ………………….……73\r\n 3.2.1 Transformation of China’s Strategies ……………………………………….…….75\r\n3.2.2 China’s Economic Goal and its Policy toward North Korea………………….……...80\r\n 3.2.3China’s Political Goal and its Policy toward North Korea …………………….……..85\r\n3.3: Role of China and its influence in Six-Party Talks ………………………….....….88\r\n 3.3.1 Causes for China’s Consideration to Initiate the Six-Party Talks…………….….…..89\r\n3.3.2 China as be an Factilator of Six-Party Talks……...........................…...…90\r\n3.3.3China Holds the Key to Korean Peace……………………………….……97\r\n3.4: Summary …..……...…………………………………..………………………….103\r\n\r\n \r\nChapter 4. Assessments and Influence of China in the Six-Party Talks ………………..106\r\n4.1: Other Participants’ Views over China in Six-Party Talks…………………..…108\r\n 4.1.1 The United States ……………………………………………..……………108\r\n 4.1.2 Russia …………………………………………………….……..………….110\r\n 4.1.3 Japan ………………………………………………………….…………….114\r\n 4.1.4 South Korea ………………………………………………….……………..118\r\n4.2: The Results and Obstacles to the Six- Party Talks ………………………………..120\r\n 4.2.1 Results of Six-Party Talks ………………………………………….…..120\r\n 4.2.2 The Obstacles of Six-Party Talks ……………………………………….….122\r\n4.3: Influence of China toward Six-Party Talks and Northeast Asia Region…………….….128\r\n 4.3.1 China and Relative Gains ……………………………………………….….130\r\n 4.3.2 Security Cooperation …………………………………………………….…132\r\n 4.3.3 Promote Economic Cooperation in the Surrounding Environment ………..134\r\n 4.3.4 China’s Geo-Economic Strategy to North and South Korea ………….……136\r\n4.4: Summary …..……...…………………………………..………………………….141\r\n\r\nChapter 5 Conclusion ...…….………………………..………………………………...143\r\n5.1 Finding ……...…………………………………..………………………………..143\r\n5.2 Future Outlook ……...……………………………..……………………………..145\r\n \r\nAttachments ..…..……...…………………………………..………………………………. 148\r\nBibiography ...…..……...…………………………………..………………………………..171zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093261023en_US
dc.subject中國zh_TW
dc.subject北韓核武危機zh_TW
dc.subject六方會談zh_TW
dc.subject現實主義zh_TW
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectNorth Korean Nuclear Crisisen_US
dc.subjectSix-Party Talksen_US
dc.subjectRealismen_US
dc.title中國在六方會談中的角色與展望zh_TW
dc.titleChina in Six-Party Talks: Role and Prospectsen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceChinese Reference:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA. Bookszh_TW
dc.relation.reference王友仁,東北亞區域研究國際現勢。台北:文化大學,民國87年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王友仁。從美國戰略論冷戰後的東北亞危機─從朝鮮半島看當前臺日美之戰略互動關係。臺北:中央研究院,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王良能,中國崛起的國際戰略環境。臺北:唐山,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王緝思等,冷戰後美國的全球戰略和世界地位。臺北:生智出版社,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石之瑜,中共外交的理論與實踐。臺北市 : 三民書局, 民國83年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference史政編譯室,中共軍力成長。臺北市 : 史政編譯室, 民國93年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,南北韓的關係與統一。台北:臺灣商務印書館股份有限公司,民國93年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,新世紀亞太情勢與區域安全。「北韓發展核武與東亞區域安全」。台北:國際政治大學國際關係研究中心,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱峰,彈道防禦計畫與國際安全。上海:人大出版社,民國90年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳曉杭,「北韓共產制度實施現況與核武危機演變之探討」。展望與探索,第五卷,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第三期 (2007年),頁84-102。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張登及,「中共朝鮮半島戰略偏好架構試擬」。展望與探索,第二卷,第五期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2004年5月),頁110-114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張東寧,「東北亞區域安全架構:從合作到制度」。東北師大學報,第二期 (2007年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉山,「中朝經貿關係發展的現狀及未來走勢分析」。東北亞論壇,第十五卷,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第一期 (2006年1月),頁5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊永明,「美國亞太安全戰略之理論分析」。美歐季刊,第十二卷,第三期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(1997年12月秋季號),頁35-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃夙志,「東北亞安全秩序的困境與對策研究」。東北亞論壇,第十四卷,第三期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference西原正,美日聯盟的新挑戰。台北:中華民國國防部史政編譯室譯,民國91年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2005年3月),頁34-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹欣,「美國與朝鮮核問題的歷史分析」。東北師大學報,第二期 (2007年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉冠効,「轉變中的日本安全保障政策-「反恐特別措施法」的探討」。問題與研究,第四十一卷,第五期 (2002年 9-10月),頁41-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖小娟,「中共與北韓的雙邊關係-以兩次核武危機的處理檢視」,展望與探索,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第3卷,第5期,(2005年5月)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡政修,「九一一事件後的美國國家安全戰略:以波灣戰爭與北韓核子危機為例」。問題與研究,第四十三卷,第六期 (2004年11-12月),頁129-161。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡增家,「美日2+2安保諮商的政治意涵及其影響」。展望與探索,第三卷,第三期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2005年3月),頁1-5。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊永明,「國際限武與裁軍機制與規範的發展︰國際關係理論與國際法規範之檢驗」。問題與研究,第四十三卷,第五期(2004年5-6月),頁77-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許維新,「東北亞區域合作與我國的對策」。世界經濟,第一期 (1992年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明,南北韓政經發展與東北亞安全。台北:五南圖書出版, 1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉振安,「小布希時期美中軍事交流之研究」。展望與探索,第二卷,第五期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2004年5月),頁23-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊鈞池,「六邊會談及其對東北亞區域秩序之影響與分析」。復興岡學報 (2004年6月),頁238-239zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceC. Dissertationszh_TW
dc.relation.reference王維信,「中共核武戰略對亞太地區之影響」,東海大學政治學系碩士論文,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李庚嬉,「北韓發展「核子嚇阻力量」之過程及策略分析」,台灣大學政治系博士論文,2006年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金民榮,「北韓發展核武對朝鮮半島的影響」,台灣大學政治系碩士論文,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳宏盛,「中共外交政策之研究. 1969-1982」,政治作戰學校政治研究所碩士論文,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1983年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳宜強,「六方會談與北韓核武危機」,淡江大學國際事務與戰略研究所碩士論文,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李美華、孔祥明、林嘉娟與王婷玉譯,社會科學研究方法。臺北:時英,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference梁正邦,「南北韓衝突問題研究 – 以衝突和平理論分析」,政治作戰學校政治研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference碩士論文,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許政中,「冷戰後美國的朝鮮半島政策對南北韓之影響」,東海大學政治學系碩士論文,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張漢平,「冷戰結束後中共地緣政治之研究」,國立政治大學外交戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班碩士論文,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃一正,「中共外交政策中“國家利益”與“意識型態”研究途徑之分析與比較」,國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊名豪,「中共「新安全觀」下的朝鮮半島外交政策:以「六方會談」為例」,碩士論文,國立政治大學東亞研究所,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡顯炎,「六方會談與東北亞區域安全」,國立政治大學戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.relation.reference碩士論文,2006年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧敬銘,「後冷戰中共外交政策之研究 – 以「北韓核武危機」為例」,國立政治大學戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班碩士論文,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余忠勇、吳福生、李育慈與黃俊彥譯, 2001-02戰略亞洲:權力與目的。臺北:國防部史政編譯室,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD. Newpaperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference大紀元時報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國時報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中央社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中央廣播電台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國青年報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference自由時報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference共同社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference多維週刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference明報新聞網zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周煦,冷戰後美國的東亞戰策(1989-1997)。台北:生智,民國88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference財經時報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference亞洲時報zh_TW
dc.relation.reference路透社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference聯合報zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE. Internet Resourceszh_TW
dc.relation.reference人民日報,http://www.people.com.cn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國評論網,http://www.chinareviewnews.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國新聞網,http://www.chinanews.com.cn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國國防部,http://www.mod.gov.cn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國外交部,http://www.mfa.gov.cn/chn/gxh/tyb/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳奇達、張台航譯,金德基著,東北亞海軍戰略。臺北:國防部史政編譯室,2004年。易君博,政治理論與研究方法。臺北:三民,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國駐朝鮮民主主義共和國大使館,http://kp.china-embassy.org/chn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國駐美利堅合眾國大使館,http://www.china-embassy.org/chn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國駐日本大使館,http://www.china-embassy.or.jp/chn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華人民共和國人民政府門戶網站,http://www.gov.cn/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中央社,http://www.cna.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朝鮮日報,http://english.chosun.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新華網,http://www.xinhuanet.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEnglish Reference:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA. Bookszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndré, Beaufre. Introduction à la stratégie. Paris, 1964; New York: Praeger, 1965.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林碧炤,國際政治與外交政策。臺北:五南,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAggarwal, Vinod K. and Gyo Koo Min. Asia’s New Institutional Architecture: Managing Trade and Security Relations in a Post-September 11 World. Berkeley APEC Study Center, University of California at Berkeley, California, December 9-10, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlbin, Cecilia. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBacharach, Samuel B. and Edward J. Lawler. Bargaining: Power, Tactics, and Outcome. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBenson, John. et al. Managing Negotiations. Taipei: Yuan-Liou, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerthier, Serge. China’s Regional Relations and Its Impact on the World Order. Presentation at the World Economic Forum China Business Summit, Hong Kong SAR, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrams, Steven J. & A.D. Taylor. Fair Division: from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, Michael E. The rise of China. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCapie, David & Jim Rolfe. Rival Regions? East Asian Regionalism and Its Challenges to the Asia-Pacific. The Asia-Pacific: A Region in Transition. Honolulu, HI: Asia-Pacific Centre for Security Studies, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChayes, Abram & Antonia H. Chayes. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChao, Chuen Chun. Relations between Three Power in Northeast Asia. Social Science Academia Press, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡春惠、宋成有主編,東北亞的發展與展望國際討論會論文選。臺北:正中,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChism, N.V.N. Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas J. and Michael A. Glosny. “China: Sources of Stability in U.S.-China Relations,” in Richard J. Ellings and Aaron Friedbery, eds. Fragility and Crisis: Strategic Asia, 2003-2004. Settle, WA: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2003-2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChong Bong Uk ed. North Korea:Uneasy, Shaky Kim Jong-Il Regime. Seoul:Naewoe Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, Steven P. Negotiating Skills for Managers. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, Raymond. Negotiating across cultures: communication obstacles in international diplomacy. Washington D.C: United States Institute of Peace, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoulthard, Malcolm. Ed. Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeng, Xiaoping. The Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping. Vol. 2. Beijing: The People’s Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeng, Xiaoping, The Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping Vol. 3. Beijing: The People’s Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFaure, Guy O. & Jeffrey Z. Rulin Ed. Culture and Negotiation. London: Sage Publications, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFisher, Glen. International Negotiation: a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Chicago: International Press, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡祖慶譯,Kenneth N. Waltz著,國際政治體系理論解析。臺北:麥格羅‧希爾,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFisher, Roger & William Ury. Getting to yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFisher, Roger & Danny Ertel. Getting Ready to Negotiate. N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFisher, Roger, et al. Coping with International Conflict: A Systematic Approach to Influence in International Negotiation. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreeman, John. Security and the CSCE Process: The Stockholm Conference and Beyond. London: MacMillan, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGartner, Scott Sigmund. Strategic Assessment in War. . Yale University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGhebali, Victor-Yves. Confidence-building Measures within the CSCE Process: Paragraph-by-paragraph Analysis of the Helsinki and Stockholm Regimes. New York: The United Nations Institute of Disarmament Research, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoodale, Malcolm.. The Language of Meetings. Taipei: Wen-he (Crane) Publishing Co, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraham, Jhon, Pervez N. Ghauri & Jean-Claude Usunier. vis-a-vis: International Business Negotiation, International Business Negotiations. Eds. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGriffin, Trenholme J. & W. R. Daggatt. The Global Negotiator: Building Strong Business Relationships Anywhere in the World. New York: Harper Business, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeo, Uk, Terence Roehrig & Jungmin Seo. Korean Security in a changing East Asia. Greenwood Publishing Group, CT: Westport, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolsti, Ole R. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1969 Jan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHook, G.lenn D., Juile Gilson, Christopher W. Hughes & Hugo Dobson. Japan’s International Relations, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnston, Alastair I. Superpower Maritime Strategy in the Pacific. London: Routledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoehane, Robert O. International Institution and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder. Colo: Westview Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKremenyuk, Victor A. International Negotiation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKueng, Yuenchun. “North Korea Nuclear Dispute Remind Unsolved,” 2004 World Almanac. Taipei: Central Books Publishing House, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLee, Chae Jin. U.S. Policy Toward South Korea. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLewicki, Roy J. Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. Boston: IRWIN/McGraw Hill, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLewicki, Roy J., David M. Saunders & John W. Minton. Negotiation, 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference阿嘎瓦拉,中國的崛起 : 威脅還是機遇? 太原市 : 山西經濟出版發行 : 新華經銷, 2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLum, Thomas. China’s “Soft Power” in Southeast Asia. Washington, DC: U.S. Senate Committee of Foreign Relations, 2008.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCormick, James M. American Foreign Policy and Process. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMen, Honghua. World, U.S. and China-Explore the Theory in the International Relations and International Strategy in the New Century. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgenthau, Han. Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNathan, Andrew & Robert S. Ross. The Great Wall and the Empty Fortress: China’s Search for Security. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press, 2nd Edition. England: Oxford, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRequejo, William H. & John L. Graham. Global Negotiation: The New Rules, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 2008.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRodgers, Drew. English for International Negotiations, 4th Printing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John G. ed. Multilateralism Matters. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShambaugh, David. Reshaping Rouge States. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference袁世珮譯,談判協商立即上手。臺北市:麥格羅.希爾,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, Scott. The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organizaiton: Implications for Northeast Asian Regional Security Cooperation? B.C.: The University of British Columbia, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSolingen, Etel. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSutter, Robert. China’s Rise in Asia: Promises and Perlis. Lanham, M.A.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSutter, Robert. Chinese Foreign Relations: Power and Policy since the Cold War. MD Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2009,.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSwain, Michael D. & Ashley J. Tellis. Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTae, Hwan Kwak and Ho Joo Seung. The Korean Peace Process and the Four Powers. Ashgate Publishing, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Stanley Foundation. Building an Open and Inclusive Regional Architecture of Asia. Policy Dialogue Brief. 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Jisi. The rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order. New York: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhiting, Allen. Chinese Foreign Policy: Retrospect and Prospect. China and the World. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWit, Joel S., Daniel B. Poneman & Robert L. Gallucci. The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Going Critical. Washington, D.C., Brooking Institution Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高一中譯,Abram N. Shulsky著,嚇阻理論與中共的行為。臺北:國防部史政編譯室,2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodwar, Bob. Bush at War. New York:Simon & Shuster, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYarger, Harry R. Strategic Theory for the 21st Century: The Little Book on Big Strategy. (Title 17 United State Code, Section 101). United State Army War College: PA, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYee, Herber & Ian Store eds., The China Threat: Perception, Myths, and Reality. New York: Routledge Curzon, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXin, Xu eds. Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace. Chinese People’s Public Security University Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceB. Periodicalszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrzezinksi, Zbigniew & Mearsheimer John J. “Clash of the Titans.” Foreign Policy, No. 146zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2005 Jan. /Feb), pp. 46-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuzan, Barry. “Security Architecture in Asia: The Interplay of Regional and Global Levels.” The Pacific Review, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2003), pp. 143-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaporaso, James A. “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations.” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 3 (1992), pp.599-632.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChanda, Nayan. “Chinese Welcome North Korea’s Kim, But Relations Are Subtly Changing.” Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, (Oct. 21, 1991), pp. 24, 26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高崇雲,中共與南北韓關係的研究。臺北市 : 大學聯合出版委員會出版 : 正中發行,1989年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChao, Chein Min & Chin Chia Hsu. “The “Harmonies World” of China’s Fourth Generation Leaders: Theory and Implication.” Prospect Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2009), pp. 4-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChina Customs Statistics. “The Statistic of China’s Import and Export to the Main Country (Region) in January to December 2005.” International Trading, No. 2 (2006), pp. 71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChung, Yu Shan. “Analysis the Status quo and Future Trend on Sino-DPRK Economic and Trade Relations.” Northeast Asia Forum, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2006 Jan), pp. 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChu, Chung Pak. “Six-Party Talks and the North Korean Nuclear Crisis.” Prospection and exploration, Vol. 1, No. 9 (2003 Sept), pp. 6.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChoo, Jaewoo. “Is Institutionalization of the Six-Party Talks Possible?” East Asia, Vol.22,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNo. 4 (2005), pp. 39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChow, Chung Lan and Tung Lau. “Studied on North Korean Economic Reform Strategy.” Northeast Asia Forum, Vol. 13, No. 2 (2004 March), p. 58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas. “Chinese Realpolitik: Reading Beijing’s World View.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75 (1996), pp.37–52zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas. “Chinese Realpolitik.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 5 (1996),zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 37-52zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國防部史政編譯局,中共崛起。臺北市: 國防部史政編譯局,民國91年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas J. “China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia.” International Security, Vol. 23, No.4 (1999), pp. 49-80zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristensen, Thomas. “Chinese Realpolitik.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75, No. 5 (1996),zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 37-52zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavis, Christina L. “International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberation.” American Political Science Review, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Feb. 2004), 153-169.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilbert R. Winham. “Multilateral Economic Negotiation.” Negotiation Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2 (1987 April), pp.175-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlaser,Charles. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-help.” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (1994), pp. 50-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGurtov, Mel. “Common Security in North Korea: Quest for a New Paradigm in Inter-Korea Relations.” Asian Survey, Vol. 42, No. 3 (2002), pp. 399.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlaser, Bonnie. “U.S.-China Relations: Dialogue Boosts Ties, Even without Results.” Comparative Connections, Vol. 8, No. 4 (January 15, 2007), pp.3-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlosserman, Brad. “U.S.-Japan Relations: Mr. Koizumi’s Payback.” Comparative Connections, Vol. 6, No. 2 (July 1, 2004), pp. 13-14zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHertz, John. “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma.” World Politics, No. 2 (January 1950), pp. 157-180.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高崇雲,中共與南北韓關係的研究。臺北:正中,1990年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJervis, Robert. “Perceptional and Misperception; “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2 (1978), pp. 167-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKahler, Miles. “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 3 (1992), pp. 681-708.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Baojun & Zhengyuan Xu. “China’s Self-identity Construction as a Responsible Power in the Post-cold War Era.” Teaching and Research, Vol. 1 (2006), pp.30-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Min. “The Peace Development of China and the Situation of the Korean Peninsula.” Contemporary International Relations, No. 12 (2005), pp.52.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLi, Nan Chow. “The changes of North Korea and Sino-DPRK relations – from Traditional friendly Relations into Real interest.” Contemporary International Relations, No. 9 (2005), pp. 56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLipson, Charles. “Banker’s Dilemmas: Private Cooperation in Rescheduling Sovereign Debt.” World Politics, No. 38 (1985 October), pp. 200-225zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLynch, Daniel. “Chinese Thinking on the Future of International Relations: Realism as the Ti, Rationalism as the Yong?” The China Quarterly, Vol. 197 (2009 March), pp.87–107zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMack, A. and Kerr, P. “The Evolving Security Discourse in the Asia-Pacific.” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.1 (1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMen, Honghua. “Assessment for China’s Soft Power.” International Observation, No. 3 (2007), pp. 40-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMabbett, I. W. “The Date of the Arthaśāstra.” Journal of the American Oriental Society,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高崇雲,美國對韓政策與韓國政情。臺北:黎明,1983年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVol. 84, No. 2 (1964 April), pp.162–169.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiyashita, A. “Where do Norms Come From? Foundations of Japan’s Postwar Pacifism.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 7(2007), pp. 99-120zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorrison, Charles E. “Reflections on Regional Architecture.” APEC Economies Newsletter, Vol. 11, No.7 (2007), pp.1-2zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNye S. Jr. “Pacific Forum Center for Strategic and International Studies/Japanese Institute of International Affaire.” Speed: Strategy for East Asia and the U.S. – Japan Security Alliance, Vol. 10, No. 35 (1995 March)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRavenhill, John. “A Three Bloc World? The New East Asian Regionalism.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 2, No.2 (2002), pp.167-195zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobert, Jervis. “Realism, Neo-liberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1 (1999), pp. 42-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie, John G. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.” International Organization. Vol. 46, No. 3(1992), pp. 561-598.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchweizer, Peter. “Victory: The Reagan Administration’s Secret Strategy That Hastened the Collapse of the Soviet Union.” Atlantic Monthly Press (1994), pp. 213zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShambaugh, David. “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order.” International Security, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2004 Winter), pp.64–99.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSteele, Jesse D. “Negotiating with Deity: Strategies and Influences Related to Recent North Korean Negotiating Behavior.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, Vol. 9 (2008 Jan), pp. 119-130.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許志嘉,中共外交決策模式研究 : 鄧小平時期的檢證分析。臺北市 : 水牛,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTang, Shiping. “Correspondence: Uncertainly and Reassurance in International Politics.” International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1 (2007), pp. 180-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Tipping Point for the Six-Party Talks?” Issues & Insights, Vol. 9, No. 8 (2009 May), pp. 34zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“United States Urges China to Be Responsible World Citizen.” Public Affairs Section Embassy of the United States of American, Washington File (2005 September),zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp. 3-7.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVatikiotis, Michael and Hiebert, Muarry. “How China is Building an Empire.” Far Eastern Economic Review, Vol. 166, No. 46 (2003 Nov), pp. 30-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWang, Chi Wei and Rui, Wang. “Analysis of North Korean Economic Development Trend.” Asia-Pacific Economic and Management Review, No. 5 (2007), pp. 81zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYang, Kwan Chi. “The Analysis of Six-Party Talks and its Influence of the Order in Northeast Asia.” Fu Hsign Kang Academic Journal (2004 June), pp. 238-239.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhang, Lian Huai. “What Do We Need to Break the Impasse?” World Affairs (2006), pp. 14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceC. Newspaperzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJoongAng Ilbozh_TW
dc.relation.reference許志嘉,當代中共外交政策與中美關係。臺北市 : 生智,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHinduston Timeszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceL’Agence France-Pressezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York Timeszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSouth China Morning Postzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTime Magazinezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWashington Postzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeekly Dong-azh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWorld Affairszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD. Internet Resourceszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCentral Intelligence Agency. http://www.cia.gov/libraryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭萬超,中國崛起 : 一個東方大國的成長之道。南昌 : 江西人民出版發行 :zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCountries Studies. http://countrystudies.us/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForeign Policy Association. http://csis.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForeign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/china/index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJapan Department of Foreign Affairs. http://www.mofa.gov.jp/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Korea Times. http://times.hankooki.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Ministry of Foreign Affair of People’s Republic of China. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Ministry of Foreign Affair of Japan - http://www.mod.go.jp/e/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilitary Education Research Library Network. http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinistry of National Defense Republic of Korea. http://www.mnd.go.kr/zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePresident of Russia. http://eng.kremlin.ru/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新華經銷,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Russian Federation Ministry of Defense. http://www.mil.ru/eng/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Congress Library. http://thomas.loc.gov/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of Defense. http://www.defenselink.mil/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of States. http://www.state.gov/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. House of Senate. http://www.senate.gov/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Whitehouse. http://www.whitehouse.gov/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWashington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJapanese Reference:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA. Bookszh_TW
dc.relation.reference大嶽秀夫,日本政治の對立軸。東京:中央公論新社,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張國忠,商業談判:原理與實務。臺北縣:前程企管,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大嶽秀夫,日本型ポピュリズム─政治への期待と幻滅。東京:中央公論新社,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference小林直樹,憲法第九條。東京:岩波書店,1982年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference小澤一郎,日本國憲法改正試案。1999年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference五百旗頭真(編),戰後日本外交史。東京:有斐閣,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北岡伸一,日本の自力─對米協調とアジア外交。東京:中央公論新社,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田久保忠衛,新しい日米同盟─親米ナショナリズムへの戰略。東京:PHP研究所,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江畑謙介,日本の安全保障。東京:講談社,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference涉谷秀樹,憲法への招待。東京:岩波書店,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張啟雄主編,後冷戰時期南北韓與中日美俄四強的關係研討會論文集。臺北:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference淺井基文,集团的自衛權と日本国憲法。東京:集英社,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference都留重人,日米安保解消への道。東京:岩波書店,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference渡邊洋三,日本國憲法の精神。東京:新日本出版社,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高井三郎,北朝鮮特殊部。東京:並木書房,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference清水惇,北朝鮮軍の全貌 。東京:光人社,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference清水惇,北朝鮮情報機関の全貌。東京:光人社,2004年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference清水惇,北朝鮮軍特殊部隊の脅威。東京:光人社,2005年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceB. Periodicalszh_TW
dc.relation.reference小山貴,「米國に輕水爐提供の意思はない」。中央公論 (2005年11月),頁170-173。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中居良文,「中國の北朝鮮政策をめぐっで楊斌事件」。國際政治,第135期 (2004年),頁78-95。,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中央研究院,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference手嶋龍一,「アメリカは核の傘を確約した」。中央公論,(2006年12月),頁54~63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference古川勝久,「スカッド・ナドン・テポドン同時發射の軍事的意味」。世界週報 (2006年8月),頁6-9。,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference西原正,「6力國協議の中韓口朝連攜に要注意」。世界週報,第一卷,第一期 (2005年10月),頁42-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北岡伸一,「憲法九條の呪縛から拔け出すとき」。This is讀賣 (1999年3月),頁126-135。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伊豆見元,「朝鮮半島情勢と東アジアのアメリカの米國の位置づけ」。台日論壇會議(2008年7月20日),頁9-15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伊豆見元,「北朝鮮への真の壓力は何か:國際的制裁の道をざすな」,中央公論,第二期 (2005年),頁148-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference村井友秀,「東アジア情勢と日本の安全保障」。問題と研究 (2007年3/4月),頁53-59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宇垣大成,「米軍對北朝鮮懲罰攻擊OPLAN5027」。軍事研究 (2005年1月),頁40~51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱建榮,「中國の北朝鮮政策大轉換」。中央公論 (2007年1月),頁156~165。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明峻,「朝鮮半島情勢とアメリカの東アジアにおける位置づけ」。台日論壇會議 (2008年7月20日),頁25-33。,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張啟雄主編,戰後東北亞國際關係。臺北:中央研究院,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference阿部純一,「中國が朝鮮半島統一を望まない理由」。世界週報 (2005年7月),頁54-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference村田晃嗣,「イラク戰爭後の日米關係」。國際問題 (2004年3月),頁25-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference武貞秀士,「韓國對北・對米戰略轉換と美軍削減」。軍事研究 (2004年7月),頁64-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高木誠一郎,「中國の新安全保障觀」。防衛研究所紀要,第五卷,第二期 (2003年),頁68-72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference野木惠一,「北朝鮮ついに核実驗か!?」。軍事研究 (2006年10月),頁28-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference野木惠一,「核擴散阻止と核實驗檢証」。軍事研究 (2007年 1月),頁30-31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference野木惠一,「北朝鮮製ミサイル入門-世界を震撼させた」。丸 (2006年10月) ,頁55-63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference稻阪硬一,「止らない軍拡中國の危險軍事力診斷」。丸 (2006年4月),頁55-62。,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference遠藤哲也,「北「核実驗」がもたらした実施衝擊」。世界週報 (2006年11月7日),頁10-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陶美心,中美長期對話 1986-2001。北京市 : 中國社會科學2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳峰君、王傳劍,亞太大國與朝鮮半島。北京:北京大學出版社,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸俊元,地緣政治的本質與規律。北京:時事,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許授南譯,即將到來的美中衝突。台北:麥田,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國防部史政編譯局,中共崛起。臺北市: 國防部史政編譯局,民國91年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾祥穎譯,日本岡崎研究所彈道飛彈防禦小組著,新核武戰略及日本彈道飛彈防禦。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference臺北:國防部史政編譯室,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊連仲、陳孝爕、張瑞帆與吳奇達譯,西原正編,美日聯盟的新挑戰。臺北:國防部史政編譯室,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧東濱,商務談判之策略與技巧。格致顧問公司,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖為智譯,松村劭著,1999遠東有事爆發。臺北:前衛,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉必榮,談判聖經。臺北市:商周,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉明,博弈:冷戰後的美國與中國。北京:中國傳媒大學出版社,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新新聞譯,Yossef Bodansky著,北韓危機。臺北,新新聞翻譯社,1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference歐佛,中國威脅 : 中國一旦覺醒,天下震動。臺北市 : 智庫文化出版,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference歐信宏、胡祖慶譯,Joshua S. Goldstein著,國際關係。臺北:雙葉,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference錢剛鐸,中共外交政策與策略。臺北市 : 黎明文化, 民國72年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃鈴媚,談判與協商。臺北市:五南,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝豐安、吳福生譯,恐怖主義威脅與美國政府的回應。臺北:國防部史政編譯室,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference龐福瑞,中共在亞洲崛起之安全意涵。臺北市 : 史政編譯室,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceB. Periodicalszh_TW
dc.relation.reference丁樹範,「美國導彈防衛與核武態勢評估對中國核武政策影響」。問題與研究,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第四十四卷,第三期 (2005年5-6月),頁93-117。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王志偉、孫泓,「朝鮮經濟發展趨勢分析」。亞太經濟,第五期 (2007年),頁81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏、李明峻,「朝鮮半島情勢與亞太安全:理性計算的不理性遊戲」。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新世紀的中國大陸情勢與東亞 (2004年7月),頁65-67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「北韓的飛彈外交與亞太安全」。問題與研究,第三十九卷,第二期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2000年2月),頁1-11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「朝鮮半島核武危機」。問題與研究,第三十三卷,第七期 (1994年7月),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference頁1-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「南北韓高峰會的意義與前景」。亞洲研究,第四十期 (2001年9月),頁120-127。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「美國與北韓簽訂核子協議及其影響」。問題與研究,第三十四卷,第一期,(1999年1月),頁11-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「南北韓新政府的統一政策及其進展」。問題與研究,第三十八卷,第一期,(1999年11月),頁11-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「朝鮮半島四邊會談的構想與實際」。問題與研究,第三十六卷,第八期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2001年8月),頁 8-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「美國與北韓簽訂核子協議及其影響」。問題與研究,第三十四卷,第一期,(1995年1月),頁20-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「六邊會談與朝鮮半島核武危機」。展望與探索,第一卷,第九期,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2003年9月),頁4-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱松柏,「北韓的飛彈外交與亞太安全」。問題與研究,臺北:國立政治大學國際關係 研究中心 (2000年2月),頁11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱鋒,「布希政府的半島政策與朝鮮核危機」。現代國際關係,北京:中國現代國際關 係研究所 (2003年),頁1-6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱顯平、李天籽,「加強東北亞區域能源合作 保障我國能源安全」。東北亞論壇,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第六期 (2004年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明,「朝鮮半島四邊會談的功能與限制」。亞洲研究,第150期 (2002年6月1日),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference頁44-46。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明,「六方會談與中共」。海峽評論,第154期 (2003年10月1日),頁10-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明,「近期北韓核武危機亟待解決」。中華歐亞研究基金會研究通訊,第6卷zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2003年3月),頁22-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明,「北韓核爆後的東亞國際情勢研析」。展望與探索,第四卷,第十一期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2006年11月),頁16-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄,「布希總統連任後美國與中共關係之展望」。展望與探索,第二卷,第十一期 (2004年11月),頁4-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄,「中共對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成」。東亞研究,第三十五卷,第二期 (2004年7月),頁2-32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄,「冷戰後中共與朝鮮半島的權力平衡」。中國事務,第四期,(2001年4月),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference頁90-102。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄,「中共與朝鮮半島核武危機」。韓國學報,第十四期 (1996年5月) ,頁233-243。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱坤玄,「現階段南北韓統一政策之比較」。問題與研究,第四十一卷,第五期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2002年9-10月),頁1-11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林秋山,「南韓國會改選結果的影響及啟示」。展望與探索,第二卷,第五期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2004年5月),頁18-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金鐘範,「南韓經濟形勢回顧與展望」。外國經濟與管理,第二十五卷,第二期zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(2003年2月),頁24-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周敏凱,「朝鮮核危機與美國及東亞主要國家的立場分析」。華東師範大學學報,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference第三十五卷,第五期 (2003年),頁35-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周松蘭、劉棟,「朝鮮改革開放經濟發展戰略研究」。東北亞論壇,第十三卷,第二期 (2004年3月),頁58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐充、劉衛東,「從“六方會談”看東北亞經濟合作」。東北亞論壇,第二期 (2005年)。zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.