1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 國際事務學院
  3. 俄羅斯研究所
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51710
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王定士zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Ding Shuen_US
dc.contributor.author江子揚zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Tzu Yangen_US
dc.creator江子揚zh_TW
dc.creatorChiang, Tzu Yangen_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-14T06:41:45Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-14T06:41:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-14T06:41:45Z-
dc.identifierG0952630121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51710-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description俄羅斯研究所zh_TW
dc.description95263012zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文主要透過新制度主義研究途徑以探析「轉型正義」行為模式之創制與發\n展，並循比較政治研究途徑對俄羅斯及台灣實踐「轉型正義」之特性，進行異同\n比較。\n 檢視20 世紀下半葉，諸多威權政體相繼歷經民主轉型過程，對前朝政權系統\n性斲害人權等罪愆之施暴者與蒙難者該如何處置，往往為此等轉型國家之嚴峻挑\n戰；「轉型正義」即泛指新興民主國家面對該挑戰時所採取之各項措施。相關對\n以往威權罪愆之回應，現今，國際間已啟動轉型正義機制之國家，大多循經刑事\n訴責、公共遺却及真相委員會等三途徑以進行。\n 本論文認為，歷經民主轉型，俄羅斯發生轉型正義之動因乃為深化與維持民主\n體系，遏止威權復辟之可能，並擇取「祛記憶」途徑以進行，在實踐作為層面則\n因集體遺却與政治冷漠，而遭所侷限；台灣發生轉型正義之動因為深化與維持民\n主體系，遏止威權復辟之可能，並擇取一類似於「真相委員會」途徑以進行，在\n實踐作為層面則受到國家認同與族群分立等情境所制約。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to analyze the creation and development of\n\"transitional justice\" behavior patterns through new institutionalism approach,\nand to compare the similar and different features that “transitional justice”\npracticed in Russia and Taiwan through comparative politics approach.\n Recalling the second half of the 20th century, many authoritarian regimes\nhave been through the process of democratic transition, the regime of former\nvictims of systematic human rights of battle sins of the perpetrators and how to\ndispose of those battered, often for this and other challenges in transition\ncountries; \"transitional justice \"that refers to the new democracies of the\nchallenges faced by the various measures taken. The relevant authority of the\npast sins of the response, now, internationally, the nations that begun the\ntransitional justice mechanism, great majority, through the prosecution channel,\nthe amnesia channel and the truth commissions channel to proceed.\n This author argues in this study that, after democratic transition, the\nfactor of transitional justice in Russia is to deepen and maintain the democratic\nsystem, guarding against the possible of authoritarian of restoration, and to\nchoose the ”disremembering” channel. The practice is restricted by collective\namnesia and indifferent of politics; the factor of transitional justice in Taiwan is\nto deepen and maintain the democratic system, guarding against the possible of\nauthoritarian of restoration, and to choose a channel similar to the \"truth\ncommissions \". The practice is restricted by some situations like national\nidentity and ethnic division.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\n第一節 研究動機與研究目的……………………………………………1\n第二節 假設命題與研究架構……………………………………………6\n第三節 文獻述評與研究方法……………………………………………10\n第二章 轉型正義形塑與理論建構\n第一節 轉型正義概念與意涵……………………………………………23\n第二節 轉型正義與民主轉型……………………………………………29\n第三節 轉型正義運作之兩難……………………………………………36\n第四節 轉型正義途徑與建制……………………………………………41\n第五節 小結………………………………………………………………52\n第三章 俄羅斯與台灣轉型正義實證\n第一節 體制確立與統治經驗……………………………………………55\n第二節 威權解構與民主肇建……………………………………………67\n第三節 政府相關措施與作為侷限………………………………………80\n第四節 制度與結構性約制………………………………………………86\n第五節 小結………………………………………………………………91\n第四章 結論\n第一節 俄羅斯與台灣轉型正義進程之比較分析………………………93\n第二節 建議與展望………………………………………………………98\n參考文獻…………………………………………………………………100\n 圖表目錄\n圖2-1 正義概念化…………………………………………………………25zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0952630121en_US
dc.subject民主轉型zh_TW
dc.subject正義價值zh_TW
dc.subject轉型正義zh_TW
dc.subject俄羅斯zh_TW
dc.subject台灣zh_TW
dc.subjectdemocratic transitionen_US
dc.subjectjust valueen_US
dc.subjecttransitional justiceen_US
dc.subjectRussiaen_US
dc.subjectTaiwanen_US
dc.title俄羅斯與台灣轉型正義之比較研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Comparative Study on the Transitional Justice of Russia and Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference壹、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference一、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurnham,Peter，何景榮譯，政治學硏究方法 (台北: 韋伯文化國際出版有限公司，2008)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChilcote,Ronald H.，蘇子喬譯，比較政治與政治經濟 (台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFischer,Malte，「黨產調查委員會的組成與運作-德國經驗」，收錄於徐永明主編，轉型，要不要正義？-新興民主國家與台灣的經驗對話 (台北：財團法人台灣智庫，2008)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIsaak,Alan，潘邦順譯，彭懷恩主編，政治學 (台北：風雲論壇出版社，1992)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLichbach,Mark Irving; Alan S. Zuckerman，蘇子喬譯，比較政治 : 理性、文化與結構 (台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeters,B. Guy，陳永芳譯，比較政治的理論與方法 (台北: 韋伯文化國際出版有限公司，2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiaeda,Howard J.，李培元譯，比較政治的新趨向 (台北:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司，2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尹慶耀，蘇維埃帝國的消亡 (台北：五南圖書出版有限公司，1994)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王玉民，社會科學研究方法原理 (台北:洪葉文化事業有限公司，1994)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王時思，「轉型正義在台灣-政府的角色」，徐永明主編，轉型，要不要正義？-新興民主國家與台灣的經驗對話 (台北：財團法人台灣智庫，2008)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王躍生，新制度主義 (台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司，1997)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田弘茂，大轉型：中華民國的政治和社會變遷 (台北：時報文化出版公司，1991)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference伊藤潔，陳水螺譯，台灣歷史 (台北：前衛出版社，2004)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference列寧，岑鼎山等譯，列寧全集第28 卷 (北京：人民出版社，1955)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference考茨基，鄭學稼譯，論無產階級專政 (台北：黎明文化事業公司，1980)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院研究二二八事件小組，「二二八」事件研究報告 (台北：時報出版社，1994)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余炳輝，社會研究的方法 (杭州:浙江人民出版社，1987)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德，回首來時路:威權遺產或民主資產？ ，總統府國父紀念月會專題報告 (台北：總統府，2005/2/21)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳文程，政治發展與民主轉型:比較政治理論的檢視與批判 (台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玉山，俄羅斯轉型1992-1999：一個政治經濟學的分析 (台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李玉珍，「共產黨」，畢英賢主編，蘇聯 (台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1989)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李玉珍，「簡史」，畢英賢主編，蘇聯 (台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1989)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明著，新制度主義與社會資本 (台北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司，2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李邁先，俄國史 (台北：國立編譯館，1971)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周尚文，葉書宗，王斯德，蘇聯興亡史 (上海：人民出版社，1993)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周雪舫，俄羅斯史：謎樣的國度 (台北：三民書局股份有限公司，2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周繼祥，政治學 (台北：威仕曼文化事業股份有限公司，2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference易君博，政治理論與研究方法 (台北：三民書局，1990)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林水吉，憲政改革與民主化 (台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司，1998)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林欣怡，「二二八與轉型正義」，收錄於二二八歷史教育與傳承學術論文集 (台北: 財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會，2009)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施正鋒，台灣政治史 (台中：新新台灣文教基金會，2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪美蘭，經濟激進轉型策略-中東歐之經驗啟示 (台北：翰盧圖書出版有限公司，2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪茂雄，戈巴契夫評傳 (台北：幼獅文化事業公司，1992)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪麗完、張永楨、李力庸、王昭文，高明士主編，臺灣史，(台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡佛，「臺灣威權政治之傘狀結構」，收錄於政治學的科學探究(四)政治變遷與民主化 (台北：三民書局股份有限公司，1998)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference若林正丈，許佩賢、洪金珠譯，台灣:分裂國家與民主化 (台北:新自然主義股份有限公司，2009)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference倪炎元，東亞威權政權之轉型：比較台灣與南韓的民主化歷程 (台北：月旦出版社股份有限公司，zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫哲，獨裁政治學 (台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司，1995)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐桂香，「俄羅斯聯邦體制及民族分離的挑戰-以韃靼、車臣與喀爾瑪克為例」，蒙藏委員會八十八年度專題研究 (台北：蒙藏委員會，1999)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference海洛德、鄭敦仁，「台灣政權的轉變：理論與比較觀點」，張京育主編，中華民國民主化-過程、制度與影響 (台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1992)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬丁．阿爾布羅，閻布克 譯，官僚制 (北京：知識出版社，1990)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬克思恩格斯，沫若譯，德意志意識型態 (台北：問學出版社，1988)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張炎憲、許志雄、薛化元、李福鐘、陳世宏，陳世宏執筆，李登輝先生與台灣民主化 (台北：玉山社出版事業股份有限公司，2004)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張炎憲、黃秀政、陳儀深、陳翠蓮、李筱峰、何義麟、陳志龍、黃茂榮，張炎憲主編，二二八事件責任歸屬研究報告 (台北：財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會，2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張邵勳，研究方法 (台中：滄海書局，2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戚嘉林，臺灣史 (台北：海峽學術出版社，2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference畢英賢，「政治發展」，畢英賢主編，俄羅斯 (台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1995)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference畢英賢，新蘇聯 (台北：時報文化出版企業有限公司，1991)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭武平，「俄羅斯政黨發展與政治民主化」，陳文俊主編，台灣的民主化：回顧檢討及展望 (高雄：國立中山大學政治研究所，1996)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳水源，台灣歷史的軌跡(下) (台中：晨星出版有限公司，2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陽德、衛芷言，中華民國憲法動態新論 (台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，1997)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳翠蓮，「歷史正義在台灣-兼論國民黨的二二八論述」，二二八事件60 週年國際學術研討會-人權與轉型正義學術論文集 (台北：財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會，2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳儀深，「政黨輪替與轉型正義」，柳照遠主編， 2008 年第一屆台韓人權論壇論文集：政黨輪替與轉型正義 (台北：財團法人二二八事件紀念基金會，2009)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳寬政，〈「二二八事件」死亡人數的人口學統計〉，「二二八事件」研究報告附錄五 (台北：行政院研究「二二八事件」小組，1992)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳鴻圖，臺灣史 (台北：三民書局股份有限公司，2004)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference喜安幸夫，台灣：四百年的故事 (台北：海信圖書公司，2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭懷恩，台灣政治發展 (台北：風雲論壇出版社有限公司，2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭懷恩，台灣政治變遷四十年 (台北：自立晚報，1987)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭懷恩，政治學理論與方法論 Q&A (台北:風雲論壇出版社有限公司，2003)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃文雄，「政治轉型期的正義與法律」， Ruti G. Teitel，鄭純宜譯，變遷中的正義〈導讀〉(台北：商周出版，2001)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃秀政，臺灣史志新論 (台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃德福，民主進步黨與台灣地區政治民主化 (台北：時英出版社，1992)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊國樞，社會及行為科學研究方法 (台北:東華書局，1990)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉自成，俄羅斯政府與政治 (台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司，1997)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉至誠、葉立誠，研究方法與論文寫作 (台北:商鼎文化出版社，2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉俊榮，轉型正義初探 (國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告，2001)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙永茂，「台灣地方派系的發展與民主化的關係」，陳文俊主編，台灣的民主化：回顧、檢討及展望 (高雄：國立中山大學政治學研究所，1996)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙敦華，勞斯的《正義論》解說 (台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司，1988)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡東杰，台灣與墨西哥民主化之比較研究 (台北：風雲論壇出版社有限公司，2002)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴澤涵，「台灣光復、接收與光復初期的台灣社會與政治變遷」，賴澤涵主編，台灣400 年的變遷(桃園：中央大學，2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference龍舒甲，「政府」，畢英賢主編，蘇聯 (台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，1989)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴寶村，國立編譯館主編，臺灣政治史 (台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2006)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference韓培爾，社會科學方法論:量化與質化Q&A (台北:風雲論壇出版社有限公司，1998)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference藍博洲，白色恐怖 (台北：揚智文化事業股份有限公司，1993)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王塗發，張珮怡，「轉型正義與中國國民黨黨產」，新世紀智庫論壇， 39 (台北：財團法人台灣新世紀文教基金會，2008):122-125。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺，「台灣的轉型正義及其省思」，思想，5 (台北：聯經出版事業股份有限公司，2007):65-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德，「書寫民族創傷：二二八事件的歷史記憶」，思想，8 (台北：聯經出版事業股份有限公司，2008):39-70。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德，「轉型正義和歷史記憶：台灣民主化的未竟之業」，思想，2 (台北：聯經出版事業股份有限公司，2006):1-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李酉潭，「民主鞏固或崩潰：台灣與俄羅斯的觀察」，問題與研究， 45，6 (台北：2006)：33-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪平雲，「國民黨黨產、黨國體制與轉型正義-「有轉型而無正義」的台灣民主化」，當代，230 (台北：合志文化事業股份有限公司，2006)：14-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference范建中，「俄羅斯官僚資本集團透析」，當代世界與社會主義，1 (北京：報刊發行局，2001)：84-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐永明，「追求台灣政治的轉型正義」，當代，230 (台北：合志文化事業股份有限公司，2006)：26-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐恕，「獨聯體國家中的官僚階級」，俄羅斯研究，3 (上海：上海社會科學研究院，1999)：42-45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭承天，「台灣轉型正義研究的轉型」，台灣政治學刊，12，1 (台北:巨流圖書股份有限公司，zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2008)：3-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭承天，「後現代政治經濟學與新制度論」，社會科學論叢，3，1 (台北：政治大學社會科學院：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2009)：2-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳芳明著，「轉型正義與台灣歷史」，思想，5 (台北：聯經出版事業股份有限公司，2007)：83-94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊長鎮，「雙重轉型與待完成的正義實踐」，當代，230 (台北：合志文化事業股份有限公司，2006)：36-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉浩，「價值多元式轉型正義理論:一個政治哲學進路的嘗試」，台灣政治學刊，12，1 (台北:巨流圖書股份有限公司，2008)：11-51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference董曉陽，「俄羅斯官僚資產階級是如何形成的」，東歐中亞研究，6 (北京：中國社會科學院，1998)：21-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛化元，「轉型正義」問題的意義及歷史考察」，新世紀智庫論壇，36 (台北：財團法人台灣新世紀文教基金會，2006)：104-106。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇俊雄，「轉型正義與刑法正義」，中研院法學期刊，創刊號 (台北：中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處，2007)：63-74。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference貳、西文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference一、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAguilar, Paloma and Katherine Kite. “Historical Memory and Authoritarian Legacies in Process of Political Change:Spain and Chile,” in Katherine Hite and Paola Cesarini eds,Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAguilar, Paloma. “Justice, Politics, and Memory in Spanish Transition,” in Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Carmen Gonzalez-Enriquez and Paloma Aguilar eds, The Politics of Memory : Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (Oxford : Oxford University Press, c2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlford, R. R. and R. Friedland. Powers of Theory:Capitalism, the Sate, and Democrcy (Cambridge:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCambridge University Press, 1985).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllen, Jonathan. “A Liberal-Pluralist Case for Truth Commissions: Lessons from Isaiah Berlin,” inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeorge Crowder and Henry Hardy eds, The One and the Many: Reading Isaiah Berlin (Amherst,Now York: Prometheus Books, 2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBell, D..The End of Ideology : On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties(with a new afterword)(Cambridge , MA : Haevard University Press, 1988).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBiggar, Nigel. “Making Peace or Doing Justice: Must We Choose?,” in Nigel Biggar ed, Burying The Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict(Washington D. C., U.S.: Georgetown University Press, 2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBiggar, Nigel.Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict (Washington D.C., U.S.: Georgetown, 2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoraine, Alex. “The Morality of Truth Commissions in South Africa,” in Robert I Rotebrg and Dennis Thompson eds, Truth v. Justice：The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton, New York：Princeton University Press, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, Angus.” A Classification of the Presidential Elections,” in Angus Campbell ed, Elections and the Political Order (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1966).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, Chin-Kai. The Problem of the KMT’s Assets, From the Perspective of Transitional Justice, Paper Presented at International Conference on the Comparative Studies of Transitional Justice, hosted by Taiwan Bank,,Taipei, Taiwan, July 28,2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChu, Yun-han , Fu Hu and Chung-in Moon.” South Korea and Taiwan: The International Context,” in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu and Hung-mao Tien eds, Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies : Regional Challenges (Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 ) .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollier, D.. “The Comparative Method,” in A. Finifter eds. The State of the Discipline(Washington ,DC: The American Political Science Association, 1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCreswell, John W.. Research Design : Qualitative,Quantitative, and Mixed Methodzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceApproaches(Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications, c2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDahl, Robert A.. Democracy and Its Critics (New Haven : Yale University Press, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDahl,Robert A.. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDe Brito, Alexandra Barahona, Carmen Gonzalez-Enriquez and Paloma Aguilar eds. The Politics of Memory : Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies(Oxford : Oxford University Press,c2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDel Hughes, William A. Schabas and Ramesh Thakur. “Introduction,” in Edel Hughes, William A.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchabas and Ramesh Thakur eds, Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice(New York : United Nations University Press, 2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDer Merwe, Hugo van Victoria Baxter, and Audrey R. Chapman eds. Assessing theImpact of Transitional Justice : Challenges for Empirical Research(Washington, D.C. : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2009).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeutscher, I.. The Unfinished Revolution: Russia 1917-1967(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonnell, Guillermo’s and Philippe Schmitter. “Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies,”in Transition from Authoritarian Rule(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuverger, Maurice.1954. Political Parties(New York: John Wiley, 1986).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEckstein, Harry. “A Perspective on Comparative Politics, Past and Present,” in Harry Eckstein and David E. Apter, eds. Comparative Politics: A Reader(New York: The Free Press of Glencoe,1963 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElster, Jon ed. Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy (New York : Cambridge University Press, 2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElster, Jon.Closing the Books : Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective(Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, c2004 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, Peter. “Comparative Politics: An Overview,” in Robert E. Goodin and Han-Dieter Klingmann.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceeds. A New Handbook of Political Science(Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGerth, Hans and C. Wright Mills. From Max Webber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoodin, R.. “Institutions and their Design,” in R. Goodin eds. The Theory of Institutional Designzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaggard, Stephan and Robert R. Kaufman. The Political Economy of Democratic Transition (New Jersey: Princeton University Press5, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHanson, Stephen E.. “Russia,” in Jeffrey Kopstein and Mark Lichbach eds, Comparative Politics : Interests, Identities, and Institutions In a Changing Global Order(Cambridge [England] ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHardie, W. F. R.. Aristotle’s Ethical Theory (Oxford, The Clarendon Press, 1968).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHesse, Carla and Robert Post.“Introduction,” in Carla Hesse & Robert Post eds, Human Rights in Political Transitions : Gettysburg to Bosnia (New York : Zone Books, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHood, Steven J.. The Kuomintang and The Democratization of Taiwan (Boulder, Colo. : WestviewPress,1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHooper, John.The New Spaniards(Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHopkin, Jonathan. “Comparative Methods,” in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker eds. Theory and Methods in Political Science (New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael and Hagen Koo. “The Middle Classes and Democratization,” in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu and Hung-mao Tien eds, Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies : Themes and Perspectives(Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuntington, Samuel P.. “Social and Institutional Dynamics of One-party System,” in Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore eds, Authoritarian Politics in Modern Society: The Dynamics of Established One-party System(New York: Basic Books, 1970).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuntington, Samuel P.. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Last Twentieth Century (New Heaven,Conn.: Yale University Press, 1991 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuyse, Luc. “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past,”in Neil J. Kritz eds, Transitional Justice : How Emerging Democracies Reckon With Former Regimes(Washington, D.C. : United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKirchheimer, Otto. Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends(Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1961).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLandman, Todd. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics : An Introduction (New York : Routledge,2003 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLane, Jan-Erik and Svante Ersson. The New Institutional Politics : Performance and Outcomes(New York : Routledge, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLinz, Juan J.. “An Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Spain,” in Erik Allardt and Stein Rokkan eds,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMass Politics : Studies in Political Sociology(New York : Free Press, 1970).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLocke, F.L, W.W.Spirdusoand J.S.Silverman. Proposals that Work：A Guide for Planning Dissertations and Grant Proposals(4th ed.)(Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLon, Chia-Lung. Transition Without Justice: On the Challenges of KMT’s Party Asset for Consolidatingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDemocracy in Taiwan, Paper Presented at International Conference on the Comparative Studies of Transitional Justice, hosted by Taiwan Bank,,Taipei, Taiwan (28 July 2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLowndes, Vivien. “Institutionalism,” in David Marsh and Gerry Stoker eds. Theory and Methods in Political Science(New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMacKenzie, David and Michael W. Curran. A History of Russia, The Soviet Union, andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeyond(Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth Pub, 1993 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaier, Charles S.. “Doing History, Doing Justice,” in Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson eds,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTruth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton: Princeton University Press,2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayer, C. L.. Redefining Comparative Politics: Promise versus Performance(Newbury Park, CA: Sage,1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcAdams, A. James ed. Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame,IN : University of Notre Dame Press, 1997 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcEvoy, Kieran and Lorna McGregor eds.Transitional Justice from Below : Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Chang(Portland, Or. : Hart, 2008).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcFaul, Michael. “Russia’s Rough Ride,” in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu and Hung-mao Tien eds, Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies :Regional Challenges (Baltimore,Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMendez, Juan E.. “In Defense of Transitional Justice,” in A. James McAdams ed, Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press,1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinow, Martha. “The Hope for Healing: What Can Truth Commission Do?,”in Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson eds, Truth v. Justice : The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNalepa, Monika. Skeletons in The Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeedler, C.M.. Political Development in Latin America: Instability,Violence,and Evolutionary Change(New York: Random House, 1968).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Brien, D. Cruise. quoted from Goran Hyden, No Shortcuts to Progress: African Development Management in Perspective (London: Heineman, 1983).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePalmer, D. S..” The Politics of Authoritarian in Spanish America,” in James M. Molloy ed,Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America(Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press,1979).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePérez-Díaz, Víctor M.. The Return of Civil Ssociety: The Emergence of Democratic Spain (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePeters, G.. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’ (London: Printer, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePhilpott, Daniel ed. The Politics of Past Evil :Religion, Reconciliation, and the Dilemmas of Transitional Justice(Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press, c2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePotter, David. “Explaining democratization,” in David Potter ed, Democratization (Malden, Mass. : Polity Press in association with The Open University, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrethus, Robert. The Organizational Society (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1978).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrzeworski, A. and H. Teune. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (New York: Wiley, 1970).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrzeworski, Adam. Democracy and Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLatin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePrzeworski, Adam.”Some Problem in the Study of the Transition to Democracy,” in Guillermozh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Donnell , Philippe C. Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead eds, Transition from Authoritariam Rule: Comparative Perspective(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuinn, Joanna R..”Introduction,” in Joanna R. Quinn ed, Reconciliation(s): Transitional Justice in Postconflict Societies (Montreal& Kingston: McGill-Queen University Press, 2009).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRawls, John. A Theory of Justice(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRawls, John. Edited by Erin Kelly, Justice as Fairness : A Restatement(Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, c2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRawls, John. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRhodes, R.. Understanding Governance (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRigby, Andrew. Justice and Reconciliation : After the Violence(Boulder, Colo. : L. Rienner, 2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoht-Arriaza, Naomi and Javier Mariezcurrena eds. Transitional Justice in The Twenty-First Century :zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeyond Truth Versus Justice(New York : Cambridge University Press, 2006).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoy, Denny. Taiwan : A Political History( Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchattschneider, E. E.. Party Government (New York: Rinehart, 1942 ).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShain, Y. and J. Linz. Between Stales: Interim Government Democratic Transitions (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShapiro, Ian. Democratic Justice (New Haven : Yale University Press, c1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShelton, Dinah L.. Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crime against Humanity(Detroit: Macmillan Reference, 2005).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShklar, Judith N.. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,1964).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShriver, Donald W.. “Where and When in Political Life Is Justice Serve by Forgiveness?,” in Nigel Biggar ed, Burying The Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice After Civil Conflict(Washington D.C., U.S.: Georgetown University Press, 2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Charles Duryea. “Introduction,” in Neil J. Kritz eds, Transitional Justice : How Emerging Democracies Reckon With Former Regimes(Washington, D.C. : United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSørensen, Georg. Democracy and Democratization : Processes and Prospects in a ChangingWorld(Boulder, Colo. : Westview Press, 1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTeitel, Ruti G.. Transitional Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThomson, David. Truth and Reconciliation Commission (South Africa: Rondebosch: Justice in Transition/Ministry, 1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTien, Hung-mao. “Taiwan’s Transformation,” in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHung-mao Tien eds, Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies :Regional Challenges(Baltimore,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMd. : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTikhomirov, Yurii A.. “Problems of Ececutive-Legislative Relations in Russian Federation,” in Jeffrey W. Hahn ed, Democratization in Russia (New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1996).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTutu, Desmond Mpilo. No Future without Forgiveness (New York: Doubleday, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeschler, Lawrence. Calamities of Exile: Three Nonfiction Novellas (London: Chicago University Press, 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite, Stephen. “Russia’s Troubled Transition,” in David Potter ed, Democratization (Malden, Mass. : Polity Press in association with The Open University, 1997).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilkinson, M..A.. The Scientist’s Handbook for Writing Papers and Dissertations(Englewood Cliffs, New York：Prentice Hall, 1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, Richard A.. “Justice and Legitimacy in the South African Transition,” in Alexandra Barahona de Brito, Carmen Gonzalez-Enriquez and Paloma Aguilar eds, The Politics of Memory : Transitional Jjustice in Democratizing Societies (Oxford : Oxford University Press, c2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWu, Naiteh. “Transition without Justice, or Justice without History: Transitional Justice in Taiwan,” inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceS. Philip Hsu and Chang-Ling Huang eds, Political Challenges and Democratic Institutions:International and Taiwan’s Perspectives (Taipei: Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, 2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoung, Christopher H.. The structure of innovation of visual mass media technologies(Ann Arbor,Mich. : UMI, 1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceЛапина, М.А.. Современная реформа системы Государственного управления (Москва:центр Российского государственного гуманитарного университета, 2007).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChalmers, Douglas A. and Crgig H. Robinson, “Why Power Contender Choose Liberalization,”International Studies Quarter, Vol.26 No.1(March, 1982): 16-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCheng, Tun-jen.” Democratization the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan,” World Politics, 41, no.4(1989): 471-499zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, Roger. U.N. in Bosnia, Black Robes Clash with Blue Hats , New York Times 25 (April 1995):A3.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFishman, Robert M.. “Rethinking State and Regime: Southern Europe’s Transition to Democracy,”World Politics, 42 (1990): 422-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGeddes, B.. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias” Comparative Politics, Politics Analysis, 2 (1990): 131-150.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGittings, John. “Silence Marks Cambodia’s Bloody Anniversary,” The Guardian, 18 (April 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKarl, Terry L.. “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 23, no.1(1990): 1-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeman, H. and P. Pennings. “Managing Political and Social Conflict in Democracies : Do Consensus or Corporatism Matter?,” British Journal of Political Science 25 (1995): 271-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLinz, Juan J.. “Transitions to Democracy” The Washington Quarterly 13, no. 30(1990): 143-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOffe, C. Bönker, F..” A Forum on Restitution,” East European Constitutional Review, vol.2, no.3(Summer 1993): 30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenberg, Tina. “Overcoming the Legacies of Dictatorship,” Foreign Affair 74, no.3 (1995): 134-153.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSartori, Giovanni. “Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics,” American Political Science Review, 64 (1970): 1033-1053.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStepan, Alfred.” Democratic Opposition and Democratization Theory,” Government and Opposition, 32 (1997): 657-673.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStinchcombe, Arthur.” Lustration as a Problem of Social Basis of Constitutionalism,” Law and Social Inquiry, v.20, no.1 (Winter 1995): 245-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeschler, Lawrence.”A Report at Large,” New Yorker (10 December 1990): 127.zh_TW
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
012101.pdf1 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.