Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52719
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor祝鳳岡zh_TW
dc.contributor.author華樹華zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHua, Shu Huaen_US
dc.creator華樹華zh_TW
dc.creatorHua, Shu Huaen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-17T01:09:17Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-17T01:09:17Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17T01:09:17Z-
dc.identifierG0096941023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52719-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description96941023zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract政治傳播具有高度的不可確定性,傳播過程裡的訊息無時無刻地產生發出,且經常讓人感到不可捉摸,而政治則是為調和成員之間的歧異所達成約束集體決策的活動的過程。中央民意代表對於這種人與人之間的相互傳播過程尤其重視,因為這是他的日常生活與工作的情境,中央民意代表與微觀民意之關係,即是於政治傳播情境中探索人民意義認知與再現的過程,屬於政治社會化歷程。\n人民除了以投票的行為表達民意之外,微觀民意,將如何成為政府治理與決策的依據呢?就本文之研究發現,微觀民意不僅具有反映公共政策且具有影響政府決策的能力,但必須仰賴訊息能有效地傳播的基礎。微觀民意如何透過政治傳播歷程形成影響公共的結果?微觀民意與中央民意代表中介者之關係?是本研究的問題意識。中央民意代表接收民意的管道來源包括大眾傳播媒體、本身與民意的互動及週遭人士所提供的訊息等,其中以公共服務所接收的民意訊息最為直接且豐沛,尤其在2008年我國中央民意代表選舉制度改為小選區制後,中央民意代表對於選區內的民意更為重視採用。\n公共服務是中央民意代表與微觀民意間重要的中介工具之一,因此使用者體驗之品質評價及其關係管理,成為公共服務流程中重要的品質設計概念,敏銳的生產設計者也可能因此發現使用者的潛在需求,而發揮創新的動能,本研究在中央民意代表的公共服務中,藉由10,000小時以上傳播互動、超過2,000組個案,統計分析微觀民意樣態,以了解使用者實證經驗與評價,以實證質性研究歸納出民意需求的實質內容,整合量化之研究,提出本文之論述:中央民意代表與微觀民意之意義建構在公共服務歷程中共構,形成影響公共的政治傳播。\n從微觀民意觀點,探討中央民意代表公共服務之品質,其變項由公共服務品質、信任(滿意度)、政治效能感、忠誠度及形象五個構面加以檢證,公共服務品質之因子包括便利度、可靠度、溝通度、專業度及關懷力五個子構面。研究結果與假設吻合,公共服務品質自變項與應變項各構面間具有相關性及關聯度,且信任(滿意度)為公共服務品質與政治效能感之中介變項。\n此外,本研究之重要發現為,在公共服務品質中影響「政治效能感」的評價主要因素為「信任」,而「信任」的建立又奠基於公共服務之「專業度」與「關懷力」,微觀民意因此必須在具有理解的「情感認知」對話情境中,公共服務者提供具有「法理專業」素養對現行公共政策缺陷與潛在需求的「意義建構」澄題與諮商歷程,公共服務品質流程中之「關懷力」評價,對於中央民意代表之「忠誠度」具有重要影響力。\n微觀民意鑲嵌公共服務與中央民意代表之政治傳播歷程將因此有新的意義建構,連結並影響巨觀體制的公共的能力,公共服務品質之管理方法論,必須建置以公共利益為軸心之流程設計概念中,注入細緻的創新元素「關懷力」及「專業度」,使人際與語意傳播之意義建構在具政治信任及政治效能感成份之公共服務流程中,微觀民意得以發揮對於巨觀的社會體制產生影響與改變的能力,使百姓與國家治理者產生有效對話機制。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論---------------------------------------------------------------------1\n第一節:研究概念-----------------------------------------------------------1\n第二節:研究動機-----------------------------------------------------------8\n第三節:研究目的-----------------------------------------------------------11\n第四節:研究流程-----------------------------------------------------------15\n第二章 文獻探討---------------------------------------------------------------18\n第一節:微觀民意與政治傳播--------------------------------------------19\n第二節:民意與民主之政治效能感--------------------------------------33\n第三節:服務、公共服務及其品質--------------------------------------54\n第四節 政治文化中的微觀民意-----------------------------------------76\n第三章 微觀民意之實證分析------------------------------------------------86\n第一節:微觀民意的概念論述初探---------------------------------------86\n第二節:微觀民意如何被建構及其需求與樣態分析----------------92\n第三節:公共服務建構與評價-------------------------------------------103\n第四節:政治效能感與公共服務評價----------------------------------117\n第四章 研究設計--------------------------------------------------------------127\n第一節:研究架構----------------------------------------------------------127\n第二節:研究假設----------------------------------------------------------129\n第三節:研究變項與操作定義-------------------------------------------130\n第四節:問卷設計與研究方法-------------------------------------------134\n第五節:資料分析方法----------------------------------------------------138\n第六節:整體之信度分析與因素分析----------------------------------139\n第七節:焦點團體調查法--------------------------------------------------141\n第五章 研究結果---------------------------------------------------------------143\n第一節:回收樣本敘述性統計---------------------------------------------143\n第二節:因素分析------------------------------------------------------------145\n第三節:各構面變數相關分析---------------------------------------------148\n第四節:假設檢定------------------------------------------------------------153\n第五節:信任(滿意度)之中介效果檢定------------------------------162\n第六節:焦點團體調查結果------------------------------------------------165\n第七節:小結------------------------------------------------------------------178\n第六章 結論與建議-------------------------------------------------------------179\n第一節:研究結論------------------------------------------------------------179\n第二節:研究建議------------------------------------------------------------192\n第三節:研究限制------------------------------------------------------------196zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096941023en_US
dc.subject微觀民意zh_TW
dc.subject公共服務品質zh_TW
dc.subject意義建構zh_TW
dc.subject政治傳播zh_TW
dc.subjectmicro public opinionen_US
dc.subjectpublic service qualityen_US
dc.subjectSense-Makingen_US
dc.subjectPolitical communicationen_US
dc.title從微觀民意觀點探討中央民意代表之公共服務品質之研究zh_TW
dc.titleResearch of the public service quality from micro public opinion viewpoint discussion legislatoren_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceBuurma, Hans, 2001. “Public Policy Marketing: Marketing Exchange in the Public Sector,” European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12): 1287-1302.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference(eds.). Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. The Guillford Press. New York London, pp. 217-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArendt, H. (1979). On Hannah Arendt. In M. A. Hill (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: The recovery of the public world (pp.301-340). N.Y.:St. Martin`s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarber, B. ~u2;Strong Democracy~u1;. Berkely, CA.: University of California Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeniger, James R. & Gusek, Jodi A.(1995). “The Cognition Revolution in Public Opinion and Communication Research” in Glasser, Theodore L. & Salmon, Charles T.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBernard C Hennessy (1975), Public opinion, North Scituate, Mass. : Duxbury Press, Belmont, Calif., Wadsworth Pub. Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBest, J.J.(1973). Public Opinion: Micro and Macro. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlumer, Herbert. (1962). Society as Symbolic Interaction. In Byers, B. (Eds.),Readings in Social Psychology: Perspective and Method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoast, W. M. & Martin, B. (2000)蔡依玲譯。《擅變:看傑出領袖如何掌握變局》。台北:方智。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoston:Irwin/McGraw Hill,1998. chapt.10: Service Quality.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBourdieu, P.(1986)。The Forms of Capital. In Richardson, J. G. ed. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Trans. By Nice, R. New York :Green Wood Press,241-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrowne, M. N. & Keeley, S. M. (2004)羅耀宗譯。《問對問題,找答案》。台北:商智文化zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBuchanan, M. (2003)胡守仁譯。《連結:混沌、複雜之後,最具開創性的「小世界」理論》。台北:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCherry, Kittredge(1974)。韋德懋,傳播與人,台北:莘莘。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristian Garve(1799-1800),http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Gustav_Fulleborn)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDervin, B., Jacobson, T. & Nilan, M. (1982). Measuring Qualitative and Relativistic Aspects of Information Seeking: A Test of a Qualitative Quantitative Methodology. In M. Burgoon, ED., Communication Yearbook 6 (pp.419-445). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Chicago: The Swallow Press. Dewey, J. (1910/1919). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, John(1954).The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, J.(1969)。哲學的改造(傅士明譯)。台北:正文。(原著出版於1920)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, J.(1970)。杜威五大演講(胡適譯)。台北:仙人掌。(原著出版於1920)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDewey, J.(1986). How we think. Repr. in J. A. Boydston(Ed.). The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953(vol. 8). Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonald Devine(1972), The Political Culture of the United States Boston: Little,. Brown and Co.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEaston, David(1965). A systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElisabeth Noelle-Neumann (1979) “Public Opinion and the Classical Tradition: A Re-Evaluation”, Public Opinion Quarterly pp. 143-156zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeynman R., (1967), The Character of Physical Law, Cambridge, Mass., The M. I. T. Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFisk, J. (1989). Understanding Popular Culture. London, New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFitzsimmons, James A. ServiceManagement: operations, Strategy, ane Information Technology. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass.: Irwin, 1998. chapt2: The Natured of Services.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFloyd H. Allport(1937),Toward a Science of Public Opinion , The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1. (Jan., 1937), pp. 7-23.Stable URL:http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0033-362X%28193701%291%3A1%3C7%3ATASOPO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Azh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFowlkes, Diane L. \"Developing a Theory of Countersocialization: Gender, Race, and Politics in the Lives of Women Activists,\" Micropolitics, 3 (No. 2, 1983), 181-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGary A. Mauser著,王淑女譯(1992):《政治行銷》,台北:桂冠書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGibbert, M., Leibold, M. and G.Probst, 2002, “Five Styles of Customer Knowledge Management, and How Smart Companies Use Them To Create Value,” European Management Journal, 20(5), pp.459-469.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHabermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. (T. Burger, Trans.). London: Polity Press. (Original work published 1962)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames J. Thomas and Kristin A. Cook (2005), National Visualization and Analytics Center: Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics p 44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames L. Heskett, Thomas O. Jones, Gary W. Loveman, W. Earl Sasser, Jr., and Leonard A. Schlesinger, \"Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work,\" Harvard Business Review (March-April 1994): 582-593.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohn Storey著(2002),張君玫譯,文化消費與日常生活;台北:巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohn C. Mrrill(1974)。韋德懋,傳播與人,台北:莘莘。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJürgen Habermas(1962), Strukturwandel der Offenlichkeit. Translated by Thomas Burger, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989/1991, Author’s Preface, Chapters 1-7, 16-20; xvii-xix, 1-56, and 141-195. Group I presentation on Habermas and reviews and bibliography for The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevine, C. H., B. G. Peters, and F. J. Thompson. (1990a). “The Faces of Administrative Politics.” In Public Administration: Challenges, Choice, Consequences. Glenview IL: Scott Foresman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, N. (2003)林祐聖、葉欣怡譯。《社會資本》台北:弘智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLovelock, Christopher H. \"Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights.` Journal of Marketing 47 (Summer 1983): 9-20. Also in 50-63. Managing Services: Marketing, Operations, and Human Resources.2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLund, A.B. (2000). Media Research Cutting Edges: All Quiet at the Nordic Front? Nordicom Review. 2/2000: 31-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcLeod, J. M., Pan, Z., & Rucinski, D. (1995). Levels of analysis in public opinion research. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 55-85). New York: Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMerton, R. K. (1959) Notes on problem-finding in sociology. In Merton, R. K., Broom, L. &Cottrell, L. S. (Eds.), Sociology today: Problems and prospects (pp. ix-xxxiv). New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMichel Foucault(2001)。王德威譯,知識的考掘,台北:麥田zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilton Rokeach, (1968)“A Theory of Organization and Change Within Value Attitude Systems” Jouranl of Social Issues, 24, Jan, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOperations,Strategy, and Information Technology. 2nd Edition.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePan, Zhongdang & McLeod, Jack M.(1991). “Multilevel Analysis in Mass Communication Research” Communication Research, 18(2), April, pp.140-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceProfessor John Hibbing:2007 年7 月23 日於東吳大學演講之題目:The Future of Legislative Studies。引用自東吳大學國會中心網頁資料。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRitchie, L. David & Price, Vincent (1991). “Of Matters Micro and Macro Special Issues for Communication Research”. Communication Research, 18(2), April, pp.133-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRenyi A(1967), Dialogue ?ber Mathematik, Birkh?user Verlag Basel und Stuttgart.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 13-30). New York: Cambridge University Press. (總圖153.9 P881)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStewart, T.A.(1997), Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations, Dell Publishing Group, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Public Opinion Quarterly is currently published by Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTom Kelley(2008):決定未來的10種人The Ten Faces of Innovation。林茂昌(譯),台北:大塊文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiki1:民主和平論,維基百科,Rummel, R.J.Democratic Peace Bibliography Version 3.0.Freedom, Democracy, Peace; Power, Democide, and War.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, W. (1887). “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly, 2(2):197-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceW. Phillips Davison, (1958)“The Public Opinion Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 22, Summer 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王石番(1995)。民意理論與實務。台北:黎明。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺(2003)。《公共領域中理性溝通的可能性》,引用網路資源。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修(1997),再造公民性政府,政治大學地方自治與國家發展研討會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修(2007)。政府效能失靈,江明修部落格:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/msjiang/18780511。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余致力(2000),民意與公共政策:表達方式的釐清與因果關係的探究,《中國行政評論第9卷第4期〉。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳庚(2007),《行政法理論與實務》,十版,台北:商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳俊德、陳永福(2005)。投票與不投票的抉擇—2004年總統大選與公民投票的探索性研究,《臺灣民主季刊》第二卷,第四期 ,2005年12月:頁67-98。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明(2009)。書評:Democracy’s Good Name: The Rise and Risks of the World’s Most Popular Form of Government〔民主的好名聲:今世最風行政府之興起與風險〕by Michael Mandelbaum〔邁可.曼德鮑〕(New York: Public Affairs, 2007)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林東清(2002)。〈顧客關係管理(CRM)研究的一些相關理論模式與重要議題,《資訊管理學報》第9卷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林松茂、曾愷棣(2008)。〈COP顧客導向流程的標準化〉,《品質月刊》,2008年4月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林國明(2009)。公共領域、公民社會與審議民主,《思想》11期 (2009/03)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施能傑(2004)。公共服務倫理的理論架構與規範作法,政治科學論叢20期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference韋念德(Christoph M. Wieland,1799; http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/643260/Christoph-Martin-Wieland)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference董保城 (2006),法治與權利救濟,台北:元照。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫關宏(2003)。政治學概論,上海:復旦。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference祝基瀅(1990)。《政治傳播學》,三版。台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference祝鳳岡(2004)。〈品牌行銷策略規劃之研究〉,第十二屆中華民國廣告暨公關學術與實務研討會,台北:政大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference祝鳳岡 (1996) :整合行銷傳播之運用:觀念與問題,《傳播研究簡訊》,台北:政大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陸輝(2002)。〈政治信任感與臺灣地區選民投票行為〉,《選舉研究》,第9卷,第2期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陸輝(2003)。〈政治信任、施政表現與民眾對臺灣民主的展望〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,第7卷,第2期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陸輝(2006)。台灣民眾政治信任的起源及其政治後果,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,國立政治大學選舉研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陸輝、連偉廷(2009)。知性、黨性與資訊──台灣民眾政治效能感的分析,《台灣民主季刊》第五卷,第三期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳陸輝、陳義彥(2002)。〈政治功效意識、政治信任感以及臺灣選民的民主價值〉,「2001年選舉與民主化調查研究學術研討會」論文。台北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳雪雲(2002),〈台灣傳播學門之回顧與展望〉結案報告,媒介與我:閱聽人研究回顧與展望。台北:國科會,政大新聞系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳敦源(2002)。〈公部門政策行銷五問〉,公訓報導,台北:台北市政府。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳敦源(2008)。《公共政策行銷》,余致力等編,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳順孝、康永欽 ( 1997 )。新聞記者如何記實避禍?----傳播者與社會情境互動的本土研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳錦輝(1991)。數學與大自然的對話,什麼不是數學,台北:科學人,1991年11月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳義彥(1998)。〈政治信任感〉,《台灣人看政治》,台北:二十一世紀基金會編。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭芸(1990)。《政治傳播》,一版二印,台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾虛白,(1974)。民意原理,《自反縮不縮?新聞系七十年》,台北:政大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃光國,胡先縉等(1998)。《中國人的權力遊戲》,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃光國(2004):〈科學哲學與學術創造力〉。潘彗玲(主編):《教育研究方法論》。台北:心理出版社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃光國(1998),知識與行動: 中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋,台北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃秀端(2008)。書評:Democracy (Made in Taiwan): The“Success” State as a Political Theory〔民主(台灣製造):一個政治理論下的「成功」國家〕by Chih-Yu Shih〔石之瑜〕(Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008, Hardcover),《臺灣民主季刊》第五卷,第二期(2008年6月)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊意菁(1999)。〈民意理論與研究取向—一個微觀與巨觀多元層級觀點的整合〉,《民意研究》,第二0九期,台北:民意測驗學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊意菁(1999)。《民意與公共性:批判解讀台灣電視談話節目》,新聞學研究79期,台北:政大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊意菁(2007)。當審議民主遇上公共新聞學:理論對話與交流,《新聞學研究》 第93期,2007年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference瑪麗琳‧弗格森(Marilyn Ferguson),廖世德譯,〈寶瓶同謀〉(The Aquarian Conspiracy:Personal and Social Transformation in the 1980s),新店市 : 方智,1版,1993zh_TW
dc.relation.reference遠見雜誌民調中心「台灣民心指數」。網址:http://www.gvm.com.tw/gvsrc/tpmi/archive.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉星(2007)。《論政府服務超越顧客導向的必然性與可能性》,政治與公共管理,理論探索,2007年第4期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference歐用生(1996)。提升教師行動研究的能力。載於教師專業成長(pp. 137-150)。台北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡佳泓(2007)。書評:Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave〔民主轉型:探討第四波民主的結構原因〕by Renske Doorenspleet〔仁斯基.杜蘭斯普利特〕(Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005, Hardcover),《臺灣民主季刊》第四卷,第四期 (2007年12月)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝復生(1992)。民意、制衡與效率──論民主的價值。國科會學術處研究獎助代表作。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文(2003)。《評估新聞工作的專家生手:尋找新判準》,台北,國科會專題研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文(2005)。玩物之中見創意—以傳播工具為例,《淡江人文社會學刊55週年校慶特刊》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文(2005)。傳播學門正當性問題:不學何以言術?《自反縮不縮?新聞系七十年》。台北:政治大學新聞系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文(2005)。《個人+:新時代知識能力典範》,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾蔚文, 臧國仁, 陳百齡, 陳順孝 ( 1996 ), 傳播教育應該教什麼? 幾個極諯的想法. 新聞學研究 ( 53 ), 107-130.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference關尚仁(2002),〈台灣傳播學門之問顧與展望結案報告〉,媒介管理過去、現況與未來,國科會,政大新聞系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇峰山(2007)。民主的未來,書評:Politics of Friendship〔友誼的政治學〕by Jacques Derrida〔雅各.德希達(原著)〕translatedbyGeorgeCollins〔喬治.柯林斯(譯)〕translated by George Collins(New York: Verso Press, 1997, Paperback),《臺灣民主季刊》第四卷,第二期 (2007年6月)。zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
102301.pdf3.61 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.