Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52729
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor許牧彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsu, Mu Yenen_US
dc.contributor.author黃群益zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chun Yien_US
dc.creator黃群益zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Chun Yien_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-17T01:10:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-17T01:10:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17T01:10:53Z-
dc.identifierG0098359013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52729-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description98359013zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract台灣為了提昇總體的競爭力,將精緻農業訂為重要的經濟發展策略,期望由政府帶頭,創造下一波的產業契機。台灣的農業技術世界聞名,農民平均的栽種面積約一公頃,屬於小農制的國家,目前藉由成立區域性產銷班組織的方式來整合農戶,雖然可以降低成本及擴大產量,但並無法有效的解決產銷問題,因此導致農業的發展受到限制,產銷問題的發生在於產銷雙方缺乏企業化的整合者而導致資訊的不對稱,本研究希望能藉由對國內外蔬果類農產品產銷組織個案與國內農產品創新個案的分析,研擬台灣蔬果類農產品建立產銷商業創新營運模式的可行性及其策略。\n 本研究利用企業網絡關係 (S, Stakeholder Network)、關鍵資產 (P, Property Right)、活動能力 (A, Activity Capabilities)、市場結構 (M, Market Structure),四個層面來分析國內現行蔬果類農產品的產銷體系個案,專業有機生產班、綜合經營班、集運中心,歸納出目前台灣農業發展的機會點與問題點,再與國外內產銷創新個案,包括:南加州果農合作社、紐西蘭奇異果營銷局、美國都樂公司、金三角蔬果運銷合作社、微熱山丘、佳美食品公司,進行個案綜合比較與分析,找出適合台灣蔬果類農產品的商業創新營運模式。\n 本研究發現:(1) 產銷組織之產權網絡關係會影響產銷市場的結構,透過產權的鏈結可以擴大農企業的競爭優勢;(2) 農企業的以整合者的定位有助於解決產銷雙方資訊不對稱的問題;(3) 農企業必需要行銷為導向來建構生產管理系統,能有效解決產銷問題;(4) 農企業必需以品牌與附加價值來增進企業獲利營運模式。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn order to enhance Taiwan`s overall competitiveness, let exquisite agricultural become an important economic development strategy. Hoping the government to take the lead, create the next wave of industry opportunities. Taiwan`s agricultural technology is world known; farmers planted an average area of one hectare, considered small-scale farming system. Currently organized by the establishment of regional production and marketing approach to integrate farmers, although it could reduce costs and expand production, but not effectively solve production and marketing issues, therefore the development of agriculture is limited. Production and marketing issue occurs when both production and marketing were the lack of integration of enterprise which led to information uncoordinated. This study hopes by analyzing domestic and international produce production cases and marketing organization innovative. Develop Taiwanese produce production and marketing of agricultural products to establish the feasibility of commercial and business model innovation strategies.\n\n In this study, enterprise networking (S, Stakeholder Network), the key assets (P, Property Right), activity (A, Activity Capabilities), market structure (M, Market Structure), four dimension to the analyze domestic produce production and marketing system individual case, the professional organic production class, integrated management class, Cargo Center, summed up the current point of Taiwan`s agricultural development opportunities and issues. within the production and marketing innovation with foreign cases, including: California Fruit Growers Exchange & Sunkist, Zespri International, Dole Company ,Goldern Triangle Company, Sunnyhill Incorporated, Chia Meei Food Group to conduct a comprehensive comparison and analysis of the cases, identify suitable business innovation business model for Taiwan`s agricultural products..\n The study found that: (1) network marketing organization of the property sales market will affect the relationship between the structure of the network can be extended through the property the competitive advantage of agricultural enterprises; (2) agricultural enterprises to integrate the positioning of both production and marketing to help solve the problem of information uncoordinated (3)agricultural enterprises must market build production-oriented management system, it can effectively solve the sales problem; (4) agricultural enterprises need to brand and value-added business model to enhance corporate profits.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝…………………………………………………………………………….I\n摘要…………………………………………………………………………….II\nAbstract………………………………………..……………………………..III\n目錄……………………………………………………...…………………….IV\n表目錄…………………………………………………………………………VI\n圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………VII\n第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………01\n第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………01\n第二節 研究目的與研究問題……….…………………………………..05\n第二章 文獻探討………………………...………………………………08\n 第一節 台灣蔬果類農產品產銷組織現況………….…………………..08\n 第二節 產銷組織建立與交易成本間的關連性…………………………18\n 第三節 運用商業創新元素建構台灣農業競爭力…….……………..…20\n第三章 研究方法與設計…………………………………...……...……25\n 第一節 研究方法………………………………………………..………25\n 第二節 研究設計………………………...…………………………..…25\n 第三節 個案選擇……………………………….………………………30\n第四章 個案探討……………………………………..…………………32\n第一節 台灣地區現有產銷營運模式個案……………………..………32\n一、 專業有機生產班:彰化縣溪洲鄉蔬菜產班第二十一班 (綠純社) …32\n二、 綜合經營班:西螺鎮蔬菜產銷班第三班 (漢光社) …………………35\n三、 集運經營中心:梓官鄉農會蔬菜配銷中心…………………...….…37\n 第二節 國外蔬果類農產品產銷營運模式個案...………….……..……42\n 一、產銷分權模式:美國南加州果農合作社&香吉士 (Sunkist)...42\n二、產銷結合模式:紐西蘭奇異果營銷局 (Zespri) …………….………46\n三、行銷導向模式:美國都樂公司 (Dole) ……………………………….53\n 第三節 台灣農業創新營運模式個案……………………………………57\n一、 植物工廠化經營,建立農產品品質機制:金三角運銷合作社.……57\n二、 農產加工品,加入文創元素,開創外銷市場:微熱山丘….………65\n三、 運用產銷資訊、貯運技術、代工導向,建構規模市場:佳美食品.69\n第五章 研究發現……………………………………………...…………75\n第一節 產銷組織之產權網絡與與市場經營的關連性...………………75\n第二節 產銷企業定位與營運模式的關連性…………….…………………80\n第三節 營運模式與商業創新的關連性….…………………………………84\n第四節 台灣蔬果類農產品商業創新營運模式的可行性及策略方向….…87\n第六章 結論與建議…………………...…………………….……….………92\n 第一節 研究結論………………………………...………………………92\n 第二節 研究建議………………………..……….………………………97\n 第三節 研究限制與後續研究……………....……..……………………98\n參考文獻………………………………..……………….……………………99zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098359013en_US
dc.subject企業營運模式分析zh_TW
dc.subject產銷班zh_TW
dc.subject農業創新zh_TW
dc.subject農業個案分析zh_TW
dc.subjectenterprise business model analysisen_US
dc.subjectproduction and marketingen_US
dc.subjectagricultural innovationen_US
dc.subjectagricultural case studiesen_US
dc.title台灣蔬果類農產品商業創新模式之研究zh_TW
dc.titleStudy on Taiwan Business Innovation Model of Agricultural Productsen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference論文、期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1. 行政院農業委員會 (2009),農業統計年報,頁23、53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. 李賢德 (2000),農業產銷班利潤導向之企業化經營分析,農業產銷班企業化經營輔導研討會轉輯,行政院農業委員會、高雄區農業改良場編印,頁13~14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. 呂政彰 (2011),攻佔所有人的胃,讓世界的天空很雲林,閱讀林雙月刊Vol.05。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. 吳惠萍 (2009),國政分析:發展精緻農業加速農業轉型升級,財團法人國家政策研究基金會科經(析)098-025號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. 邱湧忠 (2000),農業產銷班未來發展方向,農業產銷班企業化經營轉導研討會專輯,行政院農業委員會、高雄區農業改良場編印,頁2~3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. 洪進雄、呂明雄 (1995),如何利用農企業產銷經營型態來調整農業經營策略,台灣省農林廳台灣農業31(6):頁12~16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. 段兆麟 (1996),農場經營合作策略類型與營運改進之研究,農業經營管理,中國農業經營管理,中國農業經營管理學會編印,頁26~58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. 許漢卿 (1992),台灣蔬菜運銷問題與改進措施,台灣省農林廳台灣農業,28(5):頁86~94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. 許牧彥 (2006),高科技產業策略上課講義,頁26-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. 陳昭郎 (1994),台灣產銷班組織之功能與運作,台灣省農林廳台灣農業,30(2):頁92~105。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11. 陳昭郎 (1999),農業組織型態演進過程,農業推廣學會通訊,38:頁1。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12. 陳武雄 (2006),突破小農經營困境-台灣小農企業化的經驗,財團法人國家政策研究基金會科經(析)095-010號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13. 菅谷一男 (2010),農業精品讓世界瘋台灣,能力雜誌。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14. 陸雲 (2011),國政分析:農業發展要靠組織整合,財團法人國家政策研究基金會科經(析)100-009號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15. 張景翔 (2005),商業智能與經營模式設計之文獻研究-兼論與突破式創新演化之關係,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,頁3。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16. 鄒樹康 (2004),台灣蔬菜產銷班組織發展型態之比較分析,國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作研究所碩士論文,頁12~16、34~38、56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17. 蔡培儀 (1997),農業產銷壞組織文化與組織效能之研究摘要,台灣省農林廳農業推廣文彙,中國農業推廣學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18. 鄭健雄 (2000),產銷班策略聯盟,台中區農業改良場,頁4~7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19. 盧水生 (1997),談農業產銷班共同運作輔導的重要性,農業推廣文彙,中國農業推廣學會,台灣省農林廳,42:頁143。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20. 羅明哲、李朝賢 (1980),擴大台灣農場經營規模之組織型態之研究,國立中興大學農業經濟系所,頁6~7、23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21. 羅明哲 (1984),第二階段農地改革推行水田地區共同委託及合作經營之效益,農業金融論叢,中國農民銀行,頁1~32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22. 羅竹平 (2009),台灣水果外銷大陸的產銷機制:ZESPRI or SUNKIST?,台大農業推廣通訊98(12),頁1~3。 zh_TW
dc.relation.referencezh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文期刊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1. Afuah and Tucci, (2001), Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Case, NY: McGraw Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Alt, R., Zimmermann, H., (2001), Preface: Introduction to special section-business models, Electronic Market, 11(1), pp.3-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Betz, (1987), Strategic Technology Management, NY: McGraw Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Chacke, G. K., (1998), Technology Management-Application to Corporate Markets and Missions, NY: Praeger.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Frankel, E. G., (1990), Management of Technological Change, NY: Kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. Magretta, J., (2002), Why Business Matter, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp.3-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. Malhotra, Y., (2000), Knowledge Management and New Organization Forms: A Framework for Business Model Innovation, Knowledge Management and Virtual Organizations, Hershey: Idea Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. Marquis, D. G., (1982), The Anatomy of Successful Innovation, In Tushman, M. L. and Moore, W. L. eds, Reading in the Management Innovation, Pitman, Mass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. Schumann, P. A., (1994), Innovation: Straight Path to Quality, Customer Delight & Competitive Advantage, NY: McGraw Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. Timmers, P., (1998), Business Model for Electronic Markets, EM-Electronic Markets, 8(2), pp.3-8.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
901301.pdf2.33 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.