Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52762| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡美麗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 李元碩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Yuan Shuo | en_US |
| dc.creator | 李元碩 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Li, Yuan Shuo | en_US |
| dc.date | 2011 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-17T01:14:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-04-17T01:14:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-04-17T01:14:20Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0951540131 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52762 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 95154013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 100 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 馬庫色 (Herbert Marcuse) 在《愛欲與文明》(Eros and Civilization) 一書中，引用康德 (Immanuel Kant) 《判斷力批判》(Critique of the Power of Judgment) 的第一部分〈審美判斷力批判〉(“Critique of the Aesthetic Power of Judgment”) 所提出之美學概念作為非壓抑性新文明的準繩。不過，馬庫色對美學概念的引用十分簡單扼要，本論文將從解析《愛欲與文明》一書對壓抑性文明的省思，以及闡述康德的美學概念著手，試圖探討美學概念在新型態文明願景中之作用為何、其落實可能性與應用的難處。\n\n 本論文除前言與結語，共分四章：第一章為導論；第二章循《愛欲與文明》之理論脈絡，以佛洛伊德 (Sigmund Freud) 的文明觀及馬克思 (Karl Marx) 的異化 (alienation) 概念為理論背景，帶出馬庫色所認為的宰制性文明及其顛覆的可能性；第三章闡述作為理想文明指導原則的康德與席勒 (Friedrich Schiller) 的美學概念；第四章先提要馬庫色所認為的非壓抑性文明，以及新感性 (the new sensibility) 發揮希望與顛覆力量的藝術領域，再行探討康德美學概念與愛欲 (eros) 得以自由抒發的理想生命型態之間的關係，並試圖討論美學概念的應用問題。文末，以結語總結以上研究工作。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 前 言 1\n第一章 導論 3\n1. 研究要旨 3\n2. 研究理路與章節提要 4\n第二章 文明的壓抑 9\n1. 佛洛伊德論文明 9\n1.1 快樂原則與現實原則 9\n1.2 自我、本我與超我 10\n1.3 愛欲及死亡本能，與文明的發展 11\n1.4 夢與幻想 13\n2. 人的異化 15\n3. 宰制的邏輯 19\n3.1 自然世界之解魅 20\n3.2 宰制的單面向邏輯 21\n4.《愛欲與文明》的文明觀 23\n4.1 操作原則與額外壓抑 24\n4.2 受宰制的愛欲 25\n4.3 顛覆的契機 26\n第三章 康德的美學概念 31\n1. 反思判斷力 31\n2. 鑑賞判斷的分析 33\n2.1 質的面向 34\n2.2 量的面向 35\n2.3 關係的面向 36\n2.4 模態的面向 37\n2.5 小結 38\n3. 鑑賞與創作 38\n3.1 鑑賞 39\n3.2 美的藝術 41\n3.3 創作 43\n4. 席勒的《美感教育書簡》 47\n第四章 非壓抑性文明 51\n1. 非壓抑性文明 51\n1.1 美的現實原則 51\n1.2 愛欲的回歸 53\n1.3 新的感性 55\n2. 康德美學概念之作用 59\n2.1 與自然世界的和解 59\n2.2 自由的生命情調 62\n2.3 對世界的共通感受 64\n3. 美學概念的展望 66\n3.1 落實的可能性 67\n3.2 應用之難處 69\n結 語 73\n參考書目 75\n1. 馬庫色、康德、佛洛伊德及席勒著作 75\n2. 相關研究著作 76 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0951540131 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 壓抑性文明 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 無目的的合目的性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 無法則的合法則性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共通感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新感性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | repressive civilization | en_US |
| dc.subject | purposiveness without purpose | en_US |
| dc.subject | lawfulness without law | en_US |
| dc.subject | common sense | en_US |
| dc.subject | the new sensibility | en_US |
| dc.title | 馬庫色《愛欲與文明》一書中 康德美感概念之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Concepts of Kant`s Aesthetics in Marcuse`s \"Eros and Civilization\" | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference | 1. 馬庫色、康德、佛洛伊德及席勒著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Marcuse, Herbert. 1962. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. New York: Vintage Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1965. “On Science and Phenomenology.” In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. Eds. by A. Arato and E. Gebhardt. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1968. Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. Trans. by J. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1969. An Essay on Liberation. Boston: Beacon Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1972. Counterrevolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1978. The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Boston : Beacon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1991. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. With a new introduction by D. Kellner. Boston: Beacon Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Kant, Immanuel. 2001. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. with an introduction by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 2001. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and edited by P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1997. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. and ed. by M. Gregor Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Freud, Sigmund. 1958. A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis. Trans. by J. Riviere. New York: Permabooks. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1962. The Ego and the Id. Trans. by J. Riviere. New York: The Norton Library. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1959. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Trans. by J. Strachey. New York: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | The Norton Library, Bantam Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1961. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. by J. Strachey. New York: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | The Norton Library. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1977. “Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning (1911).” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14. Trans. under the general editorship of J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1977. “On Narcissism: An Introduction (1914).” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12. Trans. under the general editorship of J. Strachey. London: Hogarth Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──.《佛洛伊德自傳》，游乾桂校閱，台北：桂冠，2002年。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Schiller, Friedrich. 2004. On the Aesthetic Education of Man. Trans. with an introduction by R. Snell. New York: Dover Publications, INC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 2. 相關研究著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Abromeit, John and Mark Cobb, W. Eds. 2004. Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Allison, Henry E. 2001. Kantʼs Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Bowie, Andrew. 2003. Aesthetics and subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche. 2nd ed. Manchester University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Chadwick, Ruth E. and Cazeaus, Clive. Eds. 1992. Immanuel Kant, Critical Assessments. Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Cohen, Ted and Guyer, Paul. Eds. 1982. Essays in Kantʼs Aesthetics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Crawford, Donald W. 1974. Kantʼs Aesthetic Theory. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | d`Entrèves, Maurizio P. and Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. “Consciousness-Raising or Redemptive Criticism — The Contemporaneity of Walter Benjamin.” In New German Critique, Vol.17, Spring. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. by F. G. Lawrence. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──. 2000. “Psychic Thermidor and the Rebirth of Rebellious Subjuctivity.” In German 20th-century philosophy: The Frankfurt School. Ed. by Wolfgang Schirmacher. New York: Continuum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Henrich, Dieter. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor W. 2001. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. by J. Cumming. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Ingram, David. 1991. “Habermas on Aesthetics and Rationality: Completing the Project of Enlightenment.” In New German Critique, Vol. 53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Kātz, Barry. 1982. Herbert Marcuse and the Art of Liberation. Norfolk: Thetford Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Lipshires, Sidney. 1974. Herbert Marcuse: From Marx to Freud and Beyond. Cambridge: Schenkman Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Murray, Patrick T. 1994. The Development of German Aesthetic Theory from Kant to Schiller: A Philosophical Commentary on Schillerʼs Aesthetic Education of Man (1795). Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, Ltd. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Pippin, Robert, Feenberg, A., and Webel, C. P. 1988. Marcuse: Critical Theory & the Promise of Utopia. London: Macmillan Education LTD. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Reitz, Charles. 2000. Art, Alienation, and the Humanities: a critical engagement with Herbert Marcuse. Albany: State University of New York. Storr, Anthony. 1989. Freud : A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Weber, Shierry M. 1989. “Aesthetic Experience and Self-Reflection as Emancipatory Processes: Two Complementary Aspects of Critical Theory.” In On Critical Theory, ed. by J. OʼNeill. Lanham: University Press of America. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Wenzel, Christian. H. 2005. An Introduction to Kantʼs Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Blackwell Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 巴托莫爾 (Tom Bottomore)，1998，《法蘭克福學派》，廖仁義譯，台北： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 桂冠。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 文德爾班，1998，《西洋哲學史》，羅達仁譯，台北：台灣商務印書館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 包姆嘉特納 (H. M. Baumgartner)，1988，《康德『純粹理性批判』導讀》，李明輝譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 伊曼努埃‧康德 (Immanuel Kant)，1992，《康德：判斷力批判上冊》，牟宗三 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 譯，台北：台灣學生書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，2002，《判斷力批判》，鄧曉芒譯，北京：人民。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，2004，《純粹理性批判》，鄧曉芒譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，2004，《實踐理性批判》，鄧曉芒譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，2005，《論優美和崇高感》，何兆武譯，北京：商務印書館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，1990，《道德底形上學之基礎》，李明輝譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，1988，〈康德：答何謂啟蒙〉，《聯經思想集刊①》，李明輝譯，台北： | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 弗里德里希‧席勒 (Friedrich Schiller)，1999，《審美教育書簡》，馮至、范大燦 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 譯，台北：淑馨。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 阿拉斯代爾‧麥金太爾 (Alasdair MacIntyre)，1992，《馬庫塞》，邵一誕譯，台北：桂冠。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 彼得‧林得 (Peter Lind)，1994，《馬庫色的自由理論》 (Marcuse and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | Freedom)，關向光譯，台北：遠流。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 張鼎國，〈文本與詮釋──論高達美如何理解康德《判斷力批判》〉，《國立中 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 央大學人文學報》，34，2008年，4月，頁 63-96。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 傅偉勳，2004，《西洋哲學史》，台北：三民。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 漢寶德，2004，《漢寶德談美》，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 漢斯立克，1997，《論音樂美：音樂美學的修改芻議》，陳慧珊譯，台北：世界 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 文物。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 蔡美麗，1995，《維納斯之變顏──理性與感性論文集》，台北：允晨。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，2003，《黑格爾》，臺北縣新店市 : 左岸。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | ──，《現代西洋哲學史──尋索現代性之始源、發展及困境──》， | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 未出版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 蔡幸芝，2008，《康德美學中的構想力研究》，台北：國立政治大學哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference | 博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013101.pdf | 1.73 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.