Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52844
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor李明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author龔向華zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorBruyas, Dimitrien_US
dc.creator龔向華zh_TW
dc.creatorBruyas, Dimitrien_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-17T01:30:51Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-17T01:30:51Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17T01:30:51Z-
dc.identifierG0094925045en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52844-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description94925045zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the recent signing of an economic cooperation pact between Taiwan and China, crossstrait\nrelations have entered a new era that could eventually make rapprochement a peaceful process.\n\nThe Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which is a free trade agreement in substance if not in name, is initially aimed at normalizing cross-strait economic relations, though it could further raise the issue of a possible freeze on U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. After all,\nif Taipei and Beijing are actively working on burying the hatchet, should the United States change its long-standing policy of providing weapons to Taiwan?\n\nRecall that the U.S. government’s decision to sell more than US$6 billion worth of military equipment to Taiwan earlier this year set off furious reprisals from Chinese authorities who summoned the U.S. ambassador and defense attaché in China and threatened to punish U.S. companies that make and sell weapons to Taiwan.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1: Introduction 1\n1. Research Topic 4\n2. The Argument 6\n3. The Assumptions, Primary Goals and Strategies 7\n4. Conceptual Framework 8\n4.1 Theoretical constraints of the international system 9\n4.2 Taiwan’s position in the international immunity 9\n5. Literature Review 10\n5.1 Structural Realism, Anarchy and the International System 10\n5.2 Kenneth Walt and the Study of International Relations 11\n6. Methodology: Sources and Process 12\n6.1 Sources Classification 12\n6.2 Methodological Barriers 13\nChapter 2: Conceptual Framework 15\n1. Classical Realist Thinkers 16\n1.1 Thucydides’ Account of the Peloponnesian War 16\n1.2 St. Augustine and Human’s Nature 18\n1.3 Niccolo Machiavelli and the Role of the Leadership 18\n1.4 Thomas Hobbes and Anarchy 19\n2. Hans Morgenthau and the Balance of Power 19\n2.1 Relations Between Individuals and Relations Among Nations 20\n2.2 Autonomy of the Politics, Morality and Power 21\n2.3 International Politics and the Balance of Power 22\n3. Kenneth Waltz: Structural Aspects of the Balance of Power 23\n3.1 A scientific theory of international relations 24\n3.2 Structure, Domestic and International Politics and Anarchy 27\n3.3 Structures as Independent Determinants of Behavior 28\n3.4 Economic and Political Effects of Anarchy 29\n3.5 Anarchy and Change 31\n4. Stephen Walt: Alliance Politics and the Balance-of-Threat 32\n4.1 States’ Behavior in a Balance-of-Threats Theory 33\n4.2 Factors Influencing the Level of Threat 34\n5. Barry Posen and the Buck-Passing Strategy 35\n5.1 The Origins of War 36\n5.2 The Number of Great Powers and Buck-Passing Behaviors 36\nChapter 3: Ambiguous Ambiguity 39\n1. Strategic Ambiguity in Historical Perspective 40\n1.1 The Second World War 40\n1.2 Mutual Defense Treaty with Taipei 41\n1.3 Normalization of Sino-American relations 43\n1.4 Taiwan Relations Act 45\n1.5 F-16 Arms sales and Taiwan Strait crisis 49\n1.6 ‘Three noes’ policy vs. ‘State-to-state’ theory 51\n1.7 Washington-Beijing-Taipei relations in the 21st century 52\n2. The U.S. objectives in the Cross-Strait Stalemate 54\n2.1 Commitment to Taiwan Defense 55\n2.2 Commitment to the ‘Status Quo’ 55\nChapter 4: Rise to Superpower Status 59\n1. and the Sino-American Normalization 61\n2.1 The Korean War and the Sino-Soviet Threat 61\n2.2 The Jinmen Crises and the Rise of the Beijing Threat 65\n2.3 The Sino-Soviet Split and the Expansion of the Soviet Threat 67\n2.4 Sino-American Normalization and the Balance of Power 69\n2.5 Arms sales to Taiwan 70\n2. The American Factor in post-ECFA Cross-Strait Relations 72\n2.1 The Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Rise of a Unipolar World 73\n2.2 Balancing the United States 75\n2.3 The signing of the ECFA 75\n2.4 Washington views of the ECFA signing 79\n3. Ma Ying-jeou’s pragmatic diplomacy 81\nChapter 5: Conclusion 87\nBibliography 92zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094925045en_US
dc.subjectCross-Strait Relationen_US
dc.subjectU.S.-Taiwan Relationsen_US
dc.subjectTriangular Relationsen_US
dc.subjectECFAen_US
dc.titleThe American factor across the Taiwan straiten_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceBernkopf Tucker, Nancy (Ed.), Dangerous Strait: The U.S. - Taiwan - China Crisis (New York: Columbia University, 2005)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBracken Paul, Fire in the East: The Rise of Asian Military Power (New York: Harper Collins,1999)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurchill, Scott et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan (3rd Edition), 2005zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush, George W. H. & Scowcroft, Brent, A World Transformed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush, Richard C., Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait (Washington:The Brookings Institution, 2005)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush, Richard C., Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait (Washington:The Brookings Institution, 2005)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton, Bill, My Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClough, Ralph N. (1999), Cooperation and Conflict in the Taiwan Strait (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrane, Gregory, Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism (Berkley: University of California Press, 1998)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunne, T. & Kurki, M & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations: Discipline and Diversity (New York: Oxford University Press)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEdwards, Alistair & Townsend, Jules (Eds.), Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: from Machiavelli to Marx (New York: Palgrave, 2002)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldstein, Avery, Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security (Stanford, California: Stanford University press, 2005)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldstein, Steven M. & Johnston, Alistair I. & Ross, Robert S. (Ed.), Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power (London: Routledge, 1999)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrene, David, Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War (Vol. I & II) (Toronto, Canada: University of Michigan, 1959)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarisson, Ross, Hobbes, Locke and Confusion’s Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-century Political Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003)zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
504501.pdf462.43 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.