Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53360


Title: Xunzi as a Semantic Inferentialist: Zhengmin, Bian-Shuo and Dao-Li
Authors: Lin, chung-I
林從一
Contributors: 政大哲學系
Keywords: Xunzi;Name-rectification;Semantic inferentialism
Date: 2011
Issue Date: 2012-08-21 13:36:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract: It is an assumed view in Chinese philosophy that the grammatical differences between English or Indo-European languages and classical Chinese explain some of the differences between the Western and Chinese philosophical discourses. Although some philosophers have expressed doubts about the general link between classical Chinese philosophy and syntactic form of classical Chinese, I discuss a specific hypothesis, i.e., the mass-noun hypothesis, in this essay. The mass-noun hypothesis assumes that a linguistic distinction such as between the singular terms and the predicates is sufficient to justify or necessarily leads to a specific ontological distinction such as the distinction between the particular and the universal. I argue that one cannot read off semantic properties simply from syntactic ones and hence the syntactic differences do not automatically translate into the semantic differences between languages, that the syntactic features of Chinese nouns do not have explanatory significance in explaining why the particular-universal problem does not arise in the classical period of Chinese philosophy, and that the part-whole ontology allegedly informed by the mass-noun-like semantics does not provide a natural or intuitive picture of the language-world relation.
Relation: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 10(3), 311-340
Data Type: article
DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9228-z
Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
fulltext1.pdf411KbAdobe PDF1367View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing