Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53532
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor政大哲學系en
dc.creator詹康zh_TW
dc.creatorChan, Kangen
dc.date2009-12-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-04T06:06:40Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-04T06:06:40Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-04T06:06:40Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53532-
dc.description.abstract韓非揭發了許多官員行姦之術,也發明了許多君主制臣之術,曾有學者認為韓非無法盡臣無姦,但沒有人做過詳細論證,本文是第一篇全面檢討君術有效性的研究。本文從循名責實術、聽言問對術、不測術、伺姦決誠術、制馭權貴術等五大類來檢討,每一大類都儘量從韓非的言論中歸納出弱點或可規避的途徑。筆者發現,只有兩種術完全操之在君主,因此保證有效,但其效用甚微,而絕大多數的術則不能保證有效。此外,事前的政策評估與君主的領導責任十分重要,但由於與韓非所提倡的術相互矛盾,所以未受其重視。韓非除了教君主用術以制臣,也曾教臣用術以行姦,因此其對君術的論述,是從建構而解構,在此論述過程中托出了政治權謀的真相。en
dc.languagezh_TWen
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relation政治學報, 48, 33-75en
dc.subject中國政治哲學 ; 法家en
dc.subjectChinese political philosophy ; Legalismen
dc.title韓非論君術之窮zh_TW
dc.titleHan Fei on the Poverty of Methods Employed by Princesen
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.6229/CPSR.2009.48.02-
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6229/CPSR.2009.48.02-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
index.html105 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.