Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54193
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃泓智zh_TW
dc.contributor.author林思岑zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLin, Szu Tsenen_US
dc.creator林思岑zh_TW
dc.creatorLin, Szu Tsenen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T02:15:31Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T02:15:31Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-30T02:15:31Z-
dc.identifierG0098358021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54193-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description風險管理與保險研究所zh_TW
dc.description98358021zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract住宅抵押貸款保險(Mortgage Insurance)為管理違約風險的重要工具,在2008年次級房貸風暴後更加受到金融機構的關注。為了能更準確且更有效率的預測房價及合理評價住宅抵押貸款保險,本文延續Christoffersen, Heston and Jacobs (2006)對股票報酬率的研究,提出新的GARCH模型,利用Inverse Gaussian分配取代常態分配來捕捉房價序列中存在的自我相關以及典型現象(stylized facts),並且同時考慮房價市場中所隱含的價格跳躍現象。本文將新模型命名為IG-GARJI模型,以便和傳統GARCH模型作區分。由於傳統的GARCH模型在計算保險價格時,通常不存在封閉解,必須藉由模擬的方法來計算價格,會增加預測的誤差,本文提供IG-GARJI模型半封閉解以增進預測效率與準確度,並利用Bühlmann et al. (1996)提出的Esscher transform方法找出其風險中立機率測度,而後運用Heston and Nandi (2000)提出之遞迴方法,找出適合的住宅抵押貸款保險評價模型。實證結果顯示,在新建房屋市場中,使用Inverse Gaussian分配會比常態分配的表現要好;對於非新建房屋,不同模型間沒有顯著的差異。另外,本文亦引用Bardhan, Karapandža, and Urošević (2006)的觀點,利用不同評價模型來比較若房屋所有權無法及時轉換時,對住宅抵押貸款保險價格帶來的影響,為住宅抵押貸款保險提供更準確的評價方法。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMortgage insurance products represent an attractive alternative for managing default risk. After the subprime crisis in 2008, more and more financial institutions have paid highly attention on the credit risk and default risk in mortgage market. For the purpose of giving a more accurate and more efficient model in forecasting the house price and evaluate mortgage insurance contracts properly, we follow Christoffersen, Heston and Jacobs (2006) approach to propose a new GARCH model with Inverse Gaussian innovation instead of normal distribution which is capable of capturing the auto-correlated characteristic as well as the stylized facts revealed in house price series. In addition, we consider the jump risk within the model, which is widely discussed in the house market. In order to separate our new model from traditional GARCH model, we named our model IG-GARJI model. Generally, traditional GARCH model do not exist an analytical solution, it may increase the prediction error with respect to the simulation procedure for evaluating mortgage insurance. We propose a semi-analytical solution of our model to enhance the efficiency and accuracy. Furthermore, our approach is implemented the Esscher transform introduced by Bühlmann et al. (1996) to identify a martingale measure. Then use the recursive procedure proposed by Heston and Nandi (2000) to evaluate the mortgage insurance contract. The empirical results indicate that the model with Inverse Gaussian distribution gives better performance than the model with normal distribution in newly-built house market and we could not find any significant difference between each model in previously occupied house market. Moreover, we follow Bardhan, Karapandža, and Urošević (2006) approach to investigate the impact on the mortgage insurance premium due to the legal efficiency. Our model gives another alternative to value the mortgage contracts.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCTION 1\n2. THE MODEL OF HOUSE PRICE RETURN VARIATIONS 5\n 2.1 The Compound Poisson Process with Inverse Gaussian Distribution 6\n 2.2 The IG-GARJI Model 9\n3. EQUIVALENT MARTINGALE MEASURE 12\n4. OPTION PRICING 15\n5. THE CLOSED-FORM OF MORTGAGE INSURANCE CONTRACT 17\n 5.1 Mortgage Insurance Contract 17\n 5.2 Legal Inefficiency 19\n6. EMPIRICAL STUDY 21\n 6.1 Data Description 21\n 6.2 Calibration and Comparison 22\n 6.3 Characteristic of Embedded Option 25\n 6.4 Sensitivity Analysis of Mortgage Insurance Contract 27\n7. CONCLUSION 31\n8. REFERENCES 32\nAPPENDIX A : THE PROOF FOR LIMITATION OF CHJ MODEL 35\nAPPENDIX B : CONDITIONAL ESSCHER EQUATION 39zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098358021en_US
dc.subjectGARCH 模型zh_TW
dc.subject住宅抵押貸款保險zh_TW
dc.subjectInverse Gaussian分配zh_TW
dc.subjectEsscher機率轉換過程zh_TW
dc.subjectGARCH modelen_US
dc.subjectMortgage insuranceen_US
dc.subjectInverse Gaussian distributionen_US
dc.subjectEsscher transformen_US
dc.titleIG-GARJI模型下之住宅抵押貸款保險評價zh_TW
dc.titleValuation of Mortgage Insurance Contracts in IG-GARJI modelen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAndersen, T., Bollerslev, T., & Diebold, F. (2007). Roughing it up: Including jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling and Forecasting of Return Volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 701-720.\nBardhan, A., Karapandža, R., & Urošević, B. (2006). Valuing Mortgage Insurance Contracts in Emerging Market Economies. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32(1), 9-20.\nBellini, F., & Mercuri, L. (2007). Option Pricing in Garch Models. Università degli studi di Milano - Bicocca Working paper, no.124.\nBühlmann, Hans, Delbaen, F., Embrechts, P., & Shiryaev, A. N. (1996). No-Arbitrage, Change of Measure and Conditional Esscher Transforms. CWI Quarterly, 9(4), 291-317.\nCase, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes. American Economic Review, 79(1), 125-137.\nChen, H., Cox, S. H., & Wang S. S. (2010). Is the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage in the United States sustainable? Evidence from pricing mortgage insurance premiums and non-recourse provisions using the conditional Esscher transform. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46, 371-384.\nChen, M., Chang C., Lin S., & Shyu, S. (2010). Estimation of Housing Price Jump Risks and Their Impact on the Valuation of Mortgage Insurance Contracts. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(2), 399-422.\nChristoffersen, P., Heston, S., & Jacobs, K. (2006). Option Valuation with Conditional Skewness. Journal of Econometrics, 131, 253-284.\nDennis, B., Kuo, C., & Yang, T. (1997). Rationales of Mortgage Insurance Premium Structures. Journal of Real Estate Research, 14(3), 359-378.\nDeng, Y., & Gabriel, S. (2002). Enhancing Mortgage Credit Availability Among Underserved and Higher Credit-Risk Populations: An Assessment of Default and Prepayment Option Exercise Among FHA-Insured Borrowers. USC Marshall School of Business Working Paper, No. 02, Y10.\nDuan, J. C. (1995). The Garch Option Pricing Model. Mathematical Finance, 5, 13-32.\nHendershott, P., & Van Order, R. (1987). Pricing Mortgages: Interpretation of the Models and Results. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1(1), 19-55.\nHeston, S.L., & Nandi, S. (2000). A Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model. Review of .financial studies, 13(3), 585-625.doi: 10.1093/rfs/13.3.585\nKau, J. B., & Keenan, D. C. (1995). An Overview of the Option-Theoretic Pricing of Mortgages. Journal of Housing Research, 6(2), 217-244.\nKau, J. B., & Keenan, D. C. (1999). Catastrophic Default and Credit Risk for Lending Institutions. Journal of Financial Services Research, 15(2), 87-102.\nKau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., & Muller, W. J. (1993). An Option-Based Pricing Model of Private Mortgage Insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 60(2), 288-299.\nKau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J., & Epperson, J. E. (1992). A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 24, 280-299.\nKau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J., & Epperson, J. E. (1995). The Valuation at Origination of Fixed-Rate Mortgages with Default and Prepayment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 11, 3-36.\nKim, Y. S., Rachev, S. T., Bianchi, M. L., Mitov, I. & Fabozzi, F.J. (2010). Computing VaR and AVaR in infinitely divisible .distributions, Propability and Mathematical Statistics, 30(2), 223-245.\nKim, Y. S., Rachev, S. T., Bianchi, M. L., Mitov, I. & Fabozzi, F.J. (2011). Time Series Analysis for financial market meltdowns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 1879-1891. doi: volltexte/documents/1447451\nLakhbir, H. (2001). Salomon Smith Barney Guide to Mortgage-Backed And Asset-Backed Securities: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.\nMaheu, J. M., & McCurdy, T. H. (2004). News Arrival, Jump Dynamics and Volatility Components for Individual Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 755-793.\nMizrach, B. (2008). Jump and Co-Jump Risk in Subprime Home Equity Derivatives. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Rutgers University.\nNyberg , P., & Wilhelmsson, A. (2009). Measuring Event Risk. Journal of Finance Econometrics, 7(3), 265-287. doi:10.1093/jjfinec/nbp003\nSiu, T. K., Tong, H., & Yang, H. (2004). On Pricing Derivatives under Garch Models: A Dynamic Gerber-Shiu Approach. North American Actuarial Journal, 8(3), 17-31.\nSchwartz, E., & Torous W. (1992). Prepayment, Default, and the Valuation of Mortgage Pass-Through Securities. Journal of Business, 65(2), 221-239.\nUtrilla, J. M., & Constantinou N. (2010). Could the Subprime Crisis have been Predicted? A Mortgage Risk Modeling Approach. University of Essex.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.