Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54239
題名: 中央政府觀光行銷計畫變遷(2001-2010)之研究
A study on the changes of the tourism marketing plans (2001-2010) of central government in Taiwan
作者: 葉孟靄
Yeh, Meng Ai
貢獻者: 施能傑
Shih, Neng Jay
葉孟靄
Yeh, Meng Ai
關鍵詞: 政策變遷
組織學習
學習型組織
政策學習
觀光行銷
Policy Change
Organization Learning
Learning Organization
Policy Learning
Tourism Marketing
日期: 2011
上傳時間: 30-Oct-2012
摘要: 觀光作為國家的重點發展產業,政府將藉由觀光行銷計畫的推陳出新以提升\n其觀光競爭力。台灣中央政府從2001 年到2010 年推出一連串的觀光行銷計畫,\n從中可以發現觀光行銷計畫的內容出現一定程度的變遷,可是目前的研究很少針\n對觀光行銷計畫的變遷進行探究。因此,本研究由政策變遷理論作為探討基礎,\n試圖以學習的途徑解釋觀光行銷計畫的變遷,採用文件分析法和訪談法發現觀光\n行銷計畫發生哪些重要變遷,以及造成變遷的因素為何,並透過組織學習與政策\n學習理論分析學習在觀光行銷計畫的變遷中所扮演的角色。\n經過資料的蒐集與分析之後,結論針對研究發現與研究發現的意涵進行討論,\n並提出研究建議,包括:觀光局機關首長的領導為引發學習的關鍵因素,且促使\n觀光局逐漸轉型為學習型組織;在變遷與學習的關係中,也發現機關內各單位與\n階層之間出現不一致的改變程度,代表觀光局仍然需要更全面的學習。因此,未\n來觀光局新的首長必須持續領導觀光局的學習,平衡機關內各單位與階層之間的\n改變程度,並學習新的行銷趨勢,才能不斷產出更為出色的觀光行銷計畫。
Because the tourism industry is one of the country’s important industries, government may improve and innovate on tourism marketing plans to increase tourism competitiveness of country. From 2001 to 2010, the central government in Taiwan promoted a series of tourism marketing plans, which can be found some changes in tourism marketing plans. However, the current study has few discussions on the changes of the tourism marketing plans. Therefore, this study counts on the policy change theory as the research basis, then tries to apply learning approach to explain the changes of the tourism marketing plans. The research methods of this study use document analysis and interviews to found what important changes in the tourism marketing plans, as well as found the factors that caused the changes. Besides,\nthrough organizational learning and policy learning theory, this study analyses of the role of learning in the changes of the tourism marketing plans.\nAfter the data collection and analysis, the conclusion of this study discusses the finding and the meaning of finding, raises some suggestions as well. For example, the leadership of the head of the Tourism Bureau was the key factor which leads to learning, and the head transformed the Tourism Bureau into a learning organization gradually; between the changes and learning, this study also found so inconsistent\ndegree of changes among the internal various units and levels that the Tourism Bureau still need for more comprehensive learning. Therefore, in order to continue producing even better tourism marketing plans, the new head of the Tourism Bureau must continue leading the Tourism Bureau to learn, balance the degree of changes among the internal various units and levels, and learn new marketing trend in the future.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n方凱弘、梁綰琪(2009)。政策為何變遷?以桃園縣開徵地方稅為例。台灣民主\n季刊,6(3),頁125-167。\n王逸峰(2003)。從觀光行銷的基本概念檢討「觀光客倍增計畫」。研考雙月刊,\n27(3),頁21-28。\n交通部(2002a)。交通政策白皮書:觀光。台北:交通部運輸研究所。\n交通部(2002b)。觀光客倍增計畫。載於行政院經濟建設委員會(編),「挑\n戰2008:國家發展重點計畫」。台北:行政院經建會。\n交通部(2009)。六大新興產業發展規劃—觀光拔尖領航方案行動計畫(核定本)。台北:交通部。\n交通部觀光局(2002a)。二00二生態旅遊年工作計畫。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2002b)。中華民國九十年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2002c)。生態旅遊白皮書。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2003a)。2004台灣觀光年工作計畫。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2003b)。中華民國九十一年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2004)。中華民國九十二年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2005)。中華民國九十三年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2006)。中華民國九十四年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2007a)。2008-2009旅行台灣年工作計畫。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2007b)。中華民國九十五年觀光年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2008)。中華民國九十六年觀光業務年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2009)。中華民國九十七年觀光業務年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n交通部觀光局(2010a)。「旅行台灣,感動一百」工作計畫。台北:交通部觀\n光局。\n交通部觀光局(2010b)。中華民國九十八年觀光業務年報。台北:交通部觀光\n局。\n交通部觀光局(2011)。中華民國九十九年觀光業務年報。台北:交通部觀光局。\n朱芳葶(2003)。組織如何有效學習—組織學習策略之理論初探。T&D 飛訊,8,\n頁 1-8。\n吳定(1998)。自政策學習觀點論政府再造之推動。考銓季刊,16,頁49-61。\n吳定(2005)。公共政策辭典(三版)。台北:五南。\n吳武忠、賴宏昇、王蘭薰、李俊彥(2010)。從澳門、濟州島等國外島嶼觀光再\n發展經驗探討金門地區未來觀光發展方向之研究。休閒事業研究,8(2),\n頁105-123。\n李婕(2007)。拚創意,玩行銷!--創意行銷的三大關鍵。貿易雜誌,196,頁\n34-38。\n李惠芳(2010)。國際大型運動賽會與城市創意行銷。國民體育季刊,39(3),\n頁 68-73。\n林水波(2006)。政策變遷的三面向分析。政策研究學報,6,頁1-18。\n林玉華(2000)。民營化的政策學習:政策執行工具的革新。國立台北大學學報,\n2, 頁31-73。\n林佳慧(2005)。公部門政策行銷策略之研究。T&D 飛訊,39,頁1-20。\n范宜芳(2000)。美國「失依兒童家庭救助」計畫之研究:政策變遷的觀點。國\n立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n孫本初(2009)。新公共管理(修訂二版)。台北:一品。\n孫本初、傅岳邦(2008)。我國公務人員的終身學習與政策行銷能力。研習論壇,\n96,頁9-18。\n徐仁輝、蔡馨芳(2007)。結果導向的學習:績效管理與組織學習。T&D飛訊,\n3,頁20-30。\n馬岳琳、盧昭燕(2010a)。台灣小情調。天下雜誌,462,頁76-81。\n馬岳琳、盧昭燕(2010b)。你是否從不知道自己的美征服外國人的六大魅力。\n天下雜誌,462,頁82-89。\n高俊雄(譯)(1998)。觀光旅遊地區發展(Clare Gunn 原著)。台北:桂魯。\n張大春(2005)。政府觀光行銷-以后豐鐵馬道為例。逢甲大學經營管理碩士在\n職專班碩士論文,未出版,台中。\n張芬芬(譯)(2005)。質性研究資料分析(Matthew Miles, & Michael Huberman原著)。台北:雙葉。\n張逸民(編譯)(1999)。行銷學(Philip Kotler, & Gary Armstrong 原著)。台北:華泰。\n曹勝雄(2001)。觀光行銷學(初版)。台北:揚智文化。\n莊文忠(2003)。政策體系與政策變遷之研究:停建核四政策個案分析。國立政\n治大學公共行政研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。\n郭思妤(譯)(2007)。科特勒談政府如何做行銷(Philip Kotler, & Nancy Lee 原著)。台北:台灣培生教育。\n郭昱瑩(2006)。以政策學習論醫院評鑑。載於余致力(主編),新世紀公共政\n策理論與實務(177-208 頁)。台北:世新大學。\n郭進隆(譯)(1994)。第五項修練:學習型組織的藝術與實務(初版)(Peter Senge原著)。台北:天下遠見。\n陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究(初版)。台北:五南。\n陳良源(2007)。我國觀光政策行銷之研究--以觀光客倍增計畫為例。商業現代\n化學刊,4(2),頁45-52。\n陳恆鈞(2003)。政策學習概念及其對行政組織之意涵。研習論壇,28,頁20-29。\n陳恆鈞、劉劭祥(2007)。由政策選擇觀點談政策變遷。T&D飛訊,56,頁1-18。\n陳家瑜(2010)。我國觀光發展政策之研究。行政院研考會委託研究報告(編號:\nRDEC-RES-098-008)。台北:行政院研考會。\n陳家樹(2005)。政策學習的應用與成效分析—台北大眾捷運系統為例。南華大\n學公共行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。\n陳敦源、魯炳炎(2008)。創造共識:民主治理中的政策行銷管理。研考雙月刊,\n32(2),頁3-15。\n傅岳邦(2007)。公務人員政策行銷能力之培訓:以行銷資訊系統為例。考銓季\n刊,49,頁69-89。\n曾嘉怡、黃東益(2009年11月)。政府為何採用公民會議?政策學習的觀點。2009台灣政治學會年會暨學術研討會-「動盪年代中的政治學:理論與實踐」,\n新竹。\n黃東益(2002)。城市外交與政策學習:台北、香港「雙城論壇」的個案研究。\n戰略與國際研究,4(3),頁102-165。\n黃東益(2004)。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向:府際政策學習。國家政策\n季刊,3(1),頁135-153。\n黃東益、陳偉華(2006)。國際非政府組織與跨國政策學習:「國際透明組織」\n的個案探討。中國行政,77,頁1-26。\n黃俊英(2004)。行銷學原理(初版)。台北:華泰。\n黃國敏、張碧琴(2009)。觀光產業行銷策略規劃:新竹縣個案分析。中華行政\n學報,6,頁61-93。\n黃國敏、陳宏杰(2005)。南投縣觀光產業行銷策略規劃。中華行政學報,2,頁\n41-58。\n黃深勳、曹勝雄、容繼業、陳建和(2005)。觀光行銷學(二版)。台北:空大。\n楊秀敏(2004)。政策行銷策略之研究:以限用塑膠袋政策為例。國立政治大學\n公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n葉維輝(2010)。從創新談創意行銷。研習論壇,113,頁17-26。\n劉正山(2009)。當前審議式民主的困境及可能的出路。中國行政評論,17(2),頁 109-132。\n劉復苓(譯)(2001)。組織學習能力(初版)(Arthur Yeung 等合著)。台北:聯經。\n鄧博維、林棋凡、楊嘉玟、莊鴻濱、蔡維鈞、郭秋伶(2008)。高雄市左營區觀\n光行銷策略之研究。觀光餐旅評論,2(1),頁21-36。\n魯炳炎(2007)。政策行銷理論意涵之研究。中國行政,78,頁31-53。\n魯炳炎(2009)。政策企業家於政策行銷過程的角色扮演。文官制度季刊,1(3),頁 125-158。\n蕭富峰(2003)。創意行銷5 部曲。能力雜誌,574,頁26-32。\n英文部分\nAnderson, J. E. (1997). Public Policymaking: An Introduction(3rd Ed.). Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.\nArgyris, C. (1976). Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 363-375.\nArgyris, C. and D. Schön (1996). Organizational Learning (2nd Ed.). Malden, Ma: Blackwell.\nBennett, C. (1991). What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215-233.\nBennett, C. and M. Howlett (1992). The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275-294.\nBierly, P. and T. Hamalainen (1995). Organizational Learning and Strategy. Scand. J. Management, 11(3), 209-224.\nBlanke, J. and T. Chiesa (Eds.). (2009). The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2009: Managing in a Time of Turbulence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.\nBlanke, J. and T. Chiesa (Eds.). (2011). The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2011: Beyond the Downturn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.\nBorzsony, P. and K. Hunter (1996). Becoming a Learning Organization through Partnership. Learning Organization, The, 3(1), 22-30.\nBozeman, B. and J. Straussman (1990). Public Management Strategies: Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nBuurma, H. (2001). Public Policy Marketing: Marketing Exchange in the Public Sector. European Journal of Marketing, 35 (11), 1287-1302.\nCoffman, L. (1986). Public Sector Marketing: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nCohen, M. D. and L. S. Sproull (Eds.). (1996). Organizational Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.\nCohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.\nCrompton, J. L. and C. W. Lamb (1986). Marketing Government and Social Services. New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nCrossan, M. M., H. W. Lane and R. E. White (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.\nDaft, R. L. and G. P. Huber (1987). How Organizations Learning: A Communication Framework. In N. DiTomaso, & S. Bacharach(Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations(pp.1-36). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.\nDamanpour, F. and M. Schneider (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers. British\nJournal of Management, 17, 215-236.\nDolowitz, D. P. and D. Marsh (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer in Literature. Political Studies, 44, 343-357.\nDolowitz, D. P. and D. Marsh (2000). Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5-24.\nEtheredge, L. S. (1981). Government Learning: An Overview. In S. L. Long(Ed.), The Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 73-161). New York: Plenum Press.\nEtheredge, L. S. and J. Short (1983). Think about Government Learning. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 41-58.\nGoh, S. C. (1998). Toward a Learning Organization: The Strategic Building Blocks. Sam Advanced Management Journal, 63(2), 15-22.\nHall, P. (1988). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State. Washington, D.C.: International Political Science Association.\nHall, P. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.\nHelco, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in British and Sweden: from Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.\nHogwood, B. W. and B. G. Peters (1983). Policy Dynamics. New York: St. Martin`s Press.\nHoyle, L. H. (2002). Event Marketing: How to Successfully Promote Events, Festivals,Conventions, and Expositions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nHuber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: the Contributing Process and the Literatures. Organizational Science, 2(1), 88-115.\nKotler, P. and G. Armstrong (1993). Marketing: An Introduction(3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.\nKotler, P. and S. J. Levy (1969). Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10-15.\nKotler, P., I. Rein and D. H. Haider (1993). Marketing Place: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States,and Nations. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.\nLamb, C. (1987). Public-Sector Marketing Is Different. Business Horizons, 30(4), 56-60.\nLeeuw, F. L., R. C. Rist and R. C. Sonnichsen (2000). Can Governments Learn? Comparative Perspectives on Evaluation and Organizational Learning. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction\nLoermans, J. (2002). Synergizing the Learning Organization and Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 285-294.\nMcCarthy, E. J. (1978). Basic Marketing(6th Ed.). Homewood, Ill.: R. D. Irwin.\nMcGill, M. E., J. W. Slocum and D. Lei (1992). Management Practices in Learning Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 5-17.\nMeseguer, C. (2005). Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598. 67-81.\nMokwa, M. P. and S. E. Permut (1981). Government Marketing: Theory and Practice. New York: Praeger.\nMoynihan, D. P. (2005). Goal-Based Learning and the Future of Performance Management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 206-216.\nÖ rtenblad, A. (2001). On Differences between Organizational Learning and Learning Organization. Learning Organization, The, 8(3), 125-133.\nProctor, T. (2007). Public Sector Marketing. New York: Prentice-Hall.\nRose, R. (1991). What is Lesson-Drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3-30.\nRose, R. (1993). Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.\nSabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8, 649-692.\nSabatier, P. A. (1988). An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Science, 21, 129-68.\nSabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of The Policy Process(2nd Ed.). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.\nSabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy change and learning : An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.\nSabatier, P. A. and H. C. Jenkins-Smith (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 117-166). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.\nSchulz, M. (2001). The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows. Academy of Management Journal, Briarcliff Manor, 44(4),661-681\nSelen, W. (2000). Knowledge Management in Resource-Based Competitive Environments: A Roadmap for Building Learning Organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 346-353.\nSnavely, K. (1991). Marketing in the Government Sector: A Public Policy Model. American Review of Public Administration, 21(4), 311-326.\nSwieringa, J. and A. F. M. Wierdsma (1992). Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.\nTsang, E. (1997). Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Dichotomy between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research. Human Relations, 50(, 73-89.\nWalsh, K. (1994). Marketing and Public Sector Management. European Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 63-71.\nWijnhoven, F. (2001). Acquiring Organizatonal Learning Norms: A Contingency Approach for Understanding Deutero Learning. Management Learning, 32(2), 181-200.\nWikstrom, S. and R. Norman (1994). Knowledge and Value: A New Perspective on Corporate Transformation. New York: Routledge Press.\n電子化資料\nAmerican Marketing Association (2007). Definition of Marketing. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from\nhttp://www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/DefinitionofMarketing.aspx.\n張世賢(2002)。電子化政府的政策行銷。國政研究報告,內政(研)091-059\n號。2011 年4 月20 日。取自:\nhttp://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/IA/091/IA-R-091-059.htm。\n張倩瑋(2005)。觀光局行銷台灣繳出亮麗成績單,2011年4月20日,取自:\nhttp://www.newtaiwan.com.tw/bulletinview.jsp?bulletinid=23085。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政研究所
98256001
100
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098256001
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
600101.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
600102.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.