Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54255| 題名: | 兩性在婚前戀愛關係不公平下的儲存公平策略選擇 Gender choices of the equity restoring strategies in underbenefited premarital romantic relationships |
作者: | 徐子晨 Hsu, Tzu Chen |
貢獻者: | 陳婉真 徐子晨 Hsu, Tzu Chen |
關鍵詞: | 不公平 儲存公平 inequity equity restoring |
日期: | 2011 | 上傳時間: | 30-Oct-2012 | 摘要: | 「公平」概念始於西方的社會交換和公平理論，據目前研究，已知公平感乃維繫親密關係滿意的關鍵。當個體覺得親密關係愈公平，會愈滿意、快樂，關係也會趨於穩定；而當個體在關係中因不公平而感到痛苦時，會尋求能提升公平感的因應方式，此即「儲存公平」。然目前西方與台灣皆尚未發展出儲存公平的量化工具，本研究係針對此點，以台灣未婚的大學生和研究生作為研究對象，回顧中西相關文獻，歸納出「和諧忍讓」、「直接溝通」、「自我成長」、「放棄關係」四個儲存公平策略，並編製成量表，經預試及正式施測後，量表的內部一致性α為 .820，解釋變異量百分比達56.718%，顯示信效度俱佳。本研究以儲存公平策略量表為工具，探討中華文化脈絡中的年輕未婚學生族群在面臨各種不公平情形時，兩性所採取的「儲存公平策略」是否產生差異。\n 本研究以1200份問卷進行正式施測，以周玉慧和謝雨生（2009）的「夫妻支持授與受量表」篩選出340位不公平的樣本進行統計分析。本研究沿用原量表的分類方式，將不公平的狀態分為「情緒不公平」、「實質不公平」、「資訊不公平」，研究者並增設「整體不公平」。本研究發現，研究樣本在「情緒」、「實質」、「資訊」三向度不公平的感受程度具有顯著差異，在實質和資訊向度感覺最不公平。而男、女兩性對於不公平的感受程度沒有顯著差異；而在儲存公平策略選擇方面，男性在所有的不公平情境下，選擇「自我成長」與「和諧忍讓」傾向顯著最高；然而，女性在「整體不公平」和「資訊不公平」的情況下，選擇「自我成長」的傾向升為首位，「和諧忍讓」退至第二選擇。\n 整體而言，本研究的貢獻乃發展儲存公平策略量表，研究結果並可供諮商輔導實務領域參考，而研究者也提出具體建議，供未來相關研究參考。 Equity theory unveils the important role of equity – people rely on equity to decide whether to leave or stay in relationships. Many researches had already proved that “equity” is connected to satisfaction and happiness. Furthermore, “inequity”, according to social support theory, can be classified to emotional, tangible and informational, simulates people to find solutions to balance their relationships; and the solutions to gain equity are called “equity restoring”. This study aims to develop “Equity Restoring Strategy Scale” to discover how people cope with unequal situations in premarital romantic relationships, and to investigate if gender differences exist.\nEquity Restoring Strategy Scale is consisted of four strategies, which refer to self-growth, tolerance, leaving the field and communication. Analysis results exhibit that gender differences exist in strategy choosing. Male prefer both self-growth and tolerance in all kind of inequities, whereas female choose only self-growth when dealing informational inequity and global inequity. |
參考文獻: | 王叢桂（2005）。華人價值研究。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主編），華 人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，633-664。\n王叢桂、羅國英（2010）。自我發展與利他服務價值觀的融合：華人工作價值 的變遷與發展。本土心理學研究，33，3～57。\n呂玉瑕、伊慶春（2005）。社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工：台灣七Ｏ年代 與九Ｏ年代社會文化脈絡的比較。台灣社會學，10，41-94。\n李良哲（1996）。大台北地區已婚者婚姻衝突因應行為之年齡與性別差異研 究。教育與心理研究，19，169-196。\n李良哲（1997）。婚姻衝突因應行為歷程模式之驗證研究。國立政治大學學\n 報，74，53-94。\n李敏龍、楊國樞。（2005）忍的心理與行為。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳 \n （主編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，599-629。\n利翠珊（1995）。年輕夫妻互動歷程之探討：以台北地區年輕夫妻為例之一項\n 初探性研究，本土心理學研究，4 ，260-321。\n利翠珊（2005）。婚姻關係及其調適。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，331-364。\n利翠珊、蕭英玲（2008）。華人婚姻品質的維繫：衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本\n 土心理學研究，29，77-116。\n利翠珊（2010年6月）。夫妻間的忍與支持：對偶關係的效應。『華人家人關\n 係』學術研討會發表之論文，南港中研院。\n余德慧（1991）。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。載於楊中芳、高尚仁（主\n 編），中國人˙中國心－人格與社會篇。臺北市：遠流，292-362。\n周玉慧（1993）。在日中國系留學生用ソーシャル・サポート尺度作成の試み。\n 社會心理學研究，8，235-245。\n周玉慧（2009）。夫妻間衝突因應策略類型及其影響。中華心理學刊，51，81-\n 100。周玉慧、楊文山、莊義利（1998）。晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老人\n 身心健康。人文及社會學科集刊，10（2），227-265。\n周玉慧、謝雨生（2009）。夫妻間支持授受及其影響。中華心理學刊，\n 51（2），215-234。\n金耀基（1980）。人際關係中的人情分析。第一屆漢學會議論文集發表之論\n 文，中央研究院。\n洪蘭（譯）（2008）。改變是大腦的天性（原作者：N. Doidge）。臺北市：\n 遠流。\n常向群（2009）。關係抑或禮尚往來？新北市：Airiti Press Inc.。\n陸洛（1995）。社會支持之潛在的負向作用。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究\n 成果報告（編號：NSC83-0301-H037-008 ）。\n陳秉華、李素芬、林美珣（2008）。伴侶關係諮商中的自我協調歷程初探。本\n 土心理學研究，29，117-182。 \n張思嘉（2001）。婚姻早期的適應過程－新婚夫妻之質性研究。本土心理學研\n 究，16，91-133。\n張志學（2005）。中國人的分配正義觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，864-901。\n張妤玥、陸洛（2007）。愛情關係中對方衝突管理方式與自身關係滿意度之關\n 連。中華心理衛生學刊，20（2），155-178\n張晉芬、李奕慧（2007）。女人的家事、男人的家事：家事分工性別化的持續\n 與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊，19（2），203-229。\n黃光國（1985）人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲。載於李亦園、楊國樞、文崇\n 一（主編），現代化與中國化論集。台北：桂冠圖書公司。\n黃光國（2005a）。華人關係主義的理論建構。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳\n （主編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，215-245。\n黃光國（2005b）。華人的道德觀與正義觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，407-446。\n黃囇莉（2005）。人際和諧與人際衝突。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市，遠流，521-566。\n楊中芳（1999）。人際關係與人際情感的概念化。本土心理學研究，12，105-\n 179。楊中芳、彭泗清（2005）。人際交往中的人情與關係。載於楊國樞、\n 黃光國、楊中芳（主編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，483-520。\n楊國樞（2005a）。華人社會取向的理論分析。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳\n （主編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，173-212。\n楊國樞（2005b）人際關係中的緣觀。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，567-598。\n楊國樞、葉明華（2005）。家族主義與泛家族主義。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊\n 中芳（主編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，249-292。\n趙志裕（1991）。義：中國社會的公平觀。載於高尚仁、楊中芳（主編），中\n 國人˙中國心－傳統篇。台北市：遠流，261-286。\n劉兆明（2005）。華人的工作動機與態度。載於楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主\n 編），華人本土心理學。臺北市：遠流，833-862。\n劉惠琴（1995）。大學生「分手」行為研究－結構與歷程因素探討。行政院國\n 家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC84-2413-H031-004）。\n劉惠琴（1999a）。女性主義觀點看夫妻衝突與影響歷程。婦女與兩性學刊，\n 10，41-77。\n劉惠琴（1999b）。從辯證的歷程觀點看夫妻衝突。本土心理學研究，11，\n 153-202。\n劉惠琴（1999c）。女性主義與心理學。載於王雅各（主編），性屬關係。台北\n 市：心理出版社，135-169。\n劉惠琴（2003）。夫妻衝突調適歷程的測量。中華心理衛生學刊，16，23-\n 50。\n鍾宜吟（2008）。臺灣地區民眾婚前同居、婚姻態度之相關分析（未出版之碩\n 士論文）。國立臺北大學社會學系，臺北市。\n嚴奇峰（1993）。互動平衡論－從儒家規範與正義觀點探討本土之和諧人際互\n 動關係。中原學報，22，154-163。\n嚴麗娟（譯）（2008）。女人的大腦很那個（原作者：L. Brizendine）。臺\n 北市：平安文化。\nAdams, J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In \n L.Berkowtiz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social \n psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York, NY: Academic \n Press.\nAron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2000). Self-expansion motivation \n and including other in the self. In W. Ickes & S. Duck \n (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships \n (pp. 109-128). Chichester, England: Wiley.\nAron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (2001). Shared self-\n expanding activities as a means of maintaining and \n enhancing close romantic relationships. In J. Harvey \n & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: \n Preservation and enhancement (pp. 47-66). Mahwah, NJ: \n Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nBarash, D. P., & Lipton, J. E. (2002). Gender gap: The \n biology of male-female differences. New Brunswick, NJ: \n Transaction Publishers.\nBarrera, M., Jr., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsey, T. B. (1981). \n Preliminary development of a scale of social support: \n Studies on college students. Journal of Community \n Psychology, 9, 435-447.\nBarbee, A. P., Gulley, M. R., & Cunningham, M. R. (1990). \n Support seeking in close relationships. Journal of \n Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 531-540.\nBerger, J. M., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Wagner, D. G. \n (1983). The formation of reward expectations in status \n situations. In D. M. Messick & K. S. Cook \n (Eds.), Equity theory (pp. 127-168). New York, NY: \n Praeger Publishers.\nBlau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New \n York, NY: Wiley.\nBlau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), \n International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. \n 7, pp. 452-467). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.\nBurns, T. (1973). A structural theory of social exchange. \n Acta Sociologica, 16, 183-208.\nBuunk, B. P., & Mutsaers, W. (1999). Equity perceptions and \n marital satisfaction in former and current marriage: A \n study among the remarried. Journal of Social and \n Personal Relationships, 16, 123-132.\nCaplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental \n health: Lectures on concept development. New York, NY: \n Behavior Publications.\nCaplan, G. (1976). The family as support system. In G. Caplan & M. Killilea (Eds.), \n Support systems and mutual help: Multidisciplinary \n explorations. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.\nCanary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (2001). Equity in the \n preservation of personal relationships. In J. Harvey & \n A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: \n Preservation and enhancement (pp. 133-151). Mahwah, NJ: \n Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nCanary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance \n strategies and equity in marriage. Communication \n Monographs, 59, 243-267.\nCanary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1993). Preservation of \n relational characteristics: Maintenance strategies, \n equity, and locus of control. In P. J. Kalbfleisch \n (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving \n interpersonal relationships (pp. 237-259). Hillsdale, NJ: \n Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. \nCobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life \n stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300-314.\nCohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social \n support in the etiology of physical disease. Health \n Psychology, 7, 269-297.\nCook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). Social determinants of \n equity judgments: The problem of multidimensional input. \n In D. M. Messick & K. S.Cook (Eds.), Equity theory (pp. \n 95-126). New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.\nDavis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. NewYork, NY : Free \n Press.\nEmerson, R. (1976). Social exchange theory. In A. Inkeles, \n J. Coleman, & N.Smelser (Eds.) Annual review of \n sociology (Vol. 2, pp. 335-362). Palo Alto, CA: Annual \n Reviews.\nFoa, E. B. & Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social \n exchange. In J. S. Thibaut, J. Spence, & R. Carson \n (Eds,), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. \n 99-131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.\nGagné, F. M., & Lydon, J. E. (2003). Identification and the \n commitment shift: A counting for gender differences in \n relationship illusions. Personality and Social \n Psychology Bulletin, 29, 907-919.\nGottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic. A scientifically \n based marital therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & \n Company. \nHatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Aumer-Ryan, K. (2008). Social \n justice in love relationships: Recent developments. \n Social Justice Research, 21, 413-431. New York, NY: \n Springer.\nHatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, \n M. (1985). Equity in close relationships. In W. Ickes \n (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. \n 91–117). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.\nHatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Walster, G. W. (1979). Equity \n and extramarital sexuality. In M. Cook & G. Wilson \n (Eds.), Love and attraction: An international conference \n (pp. 309-323). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. \nHolmes, J. G. (2004). The benefits of abstract functional \n analysis in theory construction: The case of \n interdependence theory. Personal Relationships, 9, \n 1-26.\nHomans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its elementary forms. \n New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.\nHomans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms \n (revised edition). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace \n Jovanovich.\nHouse, J. A. (1981). Work stress and social support. \n Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.\nHuang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. \n America Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.\nHuang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical \n construction and methodological consideration. Journal \n for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(2), 155-178.\nGray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A \n practical guide for improving communication and getting \n what you want in your relationships (1 edition). New \n York, NY: Harper Collins.\nKarney, B. R., & Frye, N. E. (2002). “But we’ve been getting \n better lately”: Comparing retrospective and \n retrospective views of relationship development. \n Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 222-\n 238.\nKnapp, M. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to \n goodbye. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.\nMiller, G. & Steinberg, M. (1975). Between people: A new \n analysis of interpersonal communication. Palo Alto, CA: \n Science Research Associates.\nMiller, R. S., & Perlman, D. (2009). Intimate relationships \n (5 edition). New York, NY: Mcgral-Hill Higher Education.\nMills, J., Clark & M. S. (2001). Viewing close romantic \n relationships as communal relationships: Implications \n for maintenance and enhancement. In J. Harvey & A. \n Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: \n Preservation and enhancement (pp.13-25). Mahwah, NJ: \n Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nMurray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The \n self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal \n of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.\nNewby-Clark, I. R., & Ross, M. (2003). Conceiving the past \n and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 807-818.\nRusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. \n (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance \n mechanisms. In J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close \n romantic relationships: Preservation and enhancement \n (pp. 87-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nSprecher, S. (1986). The relation between equity and \n emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology \n Bulletin, 49, 309–321.\nStafford, L. (2003). Maintaining romantic relationships: A \n summary and analysis of one research program. In D. J. \n Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships \n through communication: Relational contextual, and \n cultural variations (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.\nStafford, L. & Canary, D. J. (2006). Equity and \n interdependence as predictors of relational maintenance \n strategies. Journal of Family and Communication, 6, \n 227-254.\nThibaut, J., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of \n groups. New York, NY: John Wiley.\nThoits, P. A. (1985). Social support processes and \n psychological well-being: Theoretical possibilities. In \n I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: \n Theory, research and applications (pp. 51-72).Dordrecht, \n the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof.\nThoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support \n processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health \n and Social Behavior, 35, 53-79.\nTraupmann, J., Peterson R., Utne M., & Hatfield E. (1981). \n Measuring equity in intimate relations. Applied \n Psychological Measurement, 5(4), 467-480.\nWalster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: \n Theory and research. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.\nWalster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New \n directions in equity research. Journal of Personality \n and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.\nYang, C. F. (1995, April). Psychocultural foundations of \n informal groups: The issues of loyalty, sincerity, and \n trust. Paper presented at 47th Annual Meeting of the \n Association of Asian Studies, Washington, D. C.\nYang, L. S. (1957). The Concept of Bao as a Basis for Social \n Relations in China. In J.K. Fairbank (Ed.), Chinese \n thought and institutions (pp.291-309). Chicago, IL: \n University of Chicago Press. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 教育研究所 98152008 100 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098152008 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200801.pdf | 1.6 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.