Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54378
題名: Facebook社群遊戲與社會連結的關係: 反思遊戲成癮之人格特質
The relationship between social game and social connectedness: a reflection on game addictive personality
作者: 洪嘉蓮
Hung, Chia Lien
貢獻者: 陳憶寧
Chen, Yi Ning
洪嘉蓮
Hung, Chia Lien
關鍵詞: 社群遊戲
遊戲成癮
社會連結
人格特質
Facebook
Facebook
social game
social connectedness
game addiction
personality
日期: 2011
上傳時間: 30-Oct-2012
摘要: Facebook在台灣的流行及使用習慣皆與社群遊戲功能息息相關,社群遊戲整合、複製真實人際網絡至線上,藉由遊戲互動增強線下的人際關係,社群遊戲使用行為與社會連結的關係,「真實與虛擬人際關係的相互增強」成為本研究關注的焦點。基於社群遊戲的特殊性質,使用者是否透過遊戲行為同時滿足社交需求,以及給予「沉迷」於線上遊戲者大多疏於發展真實人際網絡此刻板印象翻轉的契機,藉本研究一探其互動關係。\n本研究以網路問卷調查的方式於PTT的熱門版發放,問卷發放日期自2012年5月9日至5月18日,為期十天,回收問卷共計666份。研究結果發現:\n(1)使用社群遊戲可滿足「娛樂」與「社交」需求,並且可實際提升與朋友之間的「親密感」,藉由社群遊戲的互動,使用者會更了解他們原本不是很熟的朋友,社群遊戲對於發展「弱繫」的人際關係有顯著的功能。(2)「過與不及」的社群遊戲使用行為,對於增強社會連結不會產生實質幫助。社群遊戲使用者若長時間投入於遊戲使用行為,對於發展實質社交關係並沒有幫助,導致社會連結程度下降;但若是每天持續使用社群遊戲,將其當作一種與朋友聯繫感情的社交工具,而非沉迷於遊戲中,則對「主動建立關係」仍有實質幫助。(3)人格特質「嚴謹性」程度較低者與「神經質」程度越高者,較容易產生社群遊戲成癮;人格特質「外傾性」特質愈明顯者,愈傾向社群遊戲「習慣成癮」。\n\nFacebook社群遊戲的使用有助於發展社交網絡,達到社會連結的調節作用,積極、主動與他人建立關係,若從中得到社交滿足感,便會持續地使用社群遊戲,強化人格特質、遊戲行為與社會連結的相互作用關係,但使用者若過度沉迷其中則會達到反效果。
The popularity of Facebook in Taiwan is said to be closely linked with social games features. Because social games carry certain characteristics, users may meet their social needs by playing social games. Also wonder if the assumption of online game players who addicted to playing games may neglect to develop the interpersonal relationship in real world. Social games integrate and copy the interpersonal networks in real world to online games. Furthermore, the interaction in social games may enhance the offline relationships. \n\nThis study adopted online questionnaire survey via the Facebook board on PTT. With a total of 666 valid questionnaires, the results showed that (1) playing social games could not only satisfy the needs for entertaining and social contact, but also increase the sense of intimacy with friends. Through interactions via social games, users could understand more about the acquaintances. Therefore, playing social games will help develop weak ties;(2)an excessive use of social games makes little differences on enhancing the relationships, in terms of social connectedness. However, instead of addicting to the social games, if players use social game as a tool for communicating with others, then the social games can be seen as constructive on relationship building; and(3)users who have lower degree of conscientiousness or higher degree of neuroticism of personality trait may be more likely to be addicted to social games. People with higher degrees of extraversion are more likely to addict habitually to social games.\n\nPlaying social games shows an impact on developing people’s social network. If players meet their social needs, it would reinforce the relations between personality, game use and social connectedness. In conclusion, the social game on Facebook can still contribute to the development of social network, but over-indulgence may cause the opposite effect.
參考文獻: 丁耀民(2005)。《人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響》。清華大學資訊系統與應用研究所碩士論文。\n中國經營報(2009.08.31)。〈SNS網站錯位發展 遊戲化超越社交本質〉。上網時間:2009年11月3日,取自人民網http://media.people.com.cn/BIG5/9953709.html\n 朱晏瑱(2009.7.22)。〈從Facebook看網路遊戲走向社交網路遊戲的未來〉,上網 時間:2012年2月5日,取自電子商務時報網站http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=090721194305\n江嘉軒(2007)。《虛擬社群網站使用動機與社會臨場感研究》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 \n吳萬益、林清河(2001)。《企業研究方法》,台北:華泰書局。\n宋政桓(2008)。《Members’ Participation and Interaction Network in a Virtual Community: a Social Network Perspective = 虛擬社群會員參與及互動之社會網路分析》。清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。\n李宜穆(2012.2.2)。〈Facebook上市報告: 12%收益來自Zynga〉。上網時間:2012年2月5日,取自數位時代網站http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/128/id/21904\n沈意棠(2009)。《A study of online interaction network structure and behavioral factors influencing gamers’ loyalty= 影響遊戲忠誠度之線上互動結構與行為因素》。清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。\n林以正、王澄華、吳佳煇(2005)。〈網路人際互動特質與依戀型態對網路成癮的影響〉。《中華心理學刊》,47(3):289-309。\n林季謙(2003)。《不同網路能力、人格特質與人際關係中小學生對網路成癮的影響》。南華大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文。\n林俊劭(2012年2月)。〈拿隱私交換溫暖 打造8.5億人王國〉,《商業周刊》,1264:114-118。\n林盈廷(2011)。 《社交網路遊戲對使用者社會網絡及線上人際互動之影響-以 \n Facebook為例》。交通大學理學院與數位學習學程碩士論文。\n邱皓政(2007)。《量化研究與統計分析-SPSS中文視窗版分析範例解析》,台北:五南。\n徐慧霞、何苔麗、陳照森(2011.07)。〈社群遊戲不持續使用與負面口碑之研究-以社會及情感觀點討論〉。「2011年第三屆管理創新與行銷專案研討會」論文。台灣,高雄。\n馬嘉宏(2004)。《網路線上遊戲成癮因素之個案研究》。高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。\n許凱玲(2012.1.9)。〈調查:30歲以上女性熱愛手機遊戲,26.7%每天玩超過3\n小時〉。上網時間:2012年2月5日,取自數位時代網站\nhttp://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/126/id/21643\n張玉佩(2009),〈遊戲、人生:從線上遊戲玩家探討網路世界與日常生活的結合〉。《新聞學研究》(TSSCI),98:1-45。 \n張春興(2005)。《教育心理學 : 三化取向的理論與實踐》。台北:臺灣東華。\n梁媛穎(2007)。《社會交友網站-以Friendster.com, Facebook.com, MySpace.com為例》。交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。\n梁懷文(2008)。《Study on the influence of user interaction in virtual communities- a social network perspective = 以社會網路觀點研究虛擬社群中成員互動之影響》。清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。\n莊春蘭(2006)。《線上遊戲玩家人格特質與虛擬社群功能對於玩家行為影響之研究》。長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。\n陳怡安(2003)。《線上遊戲的魅力—以重度玩家為例》。南華大學碩士論文。\n陳哲賢(2006)。《探討虛擬社群之知識分享行為:以線上遊戲社群為例》。長榮大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n陳淑惠、翁儷禎、蘇逸人、吳和懋、楊品鳳 (2003)。中文網路成癮量表之編製\n 與心理計量特性研究。《中華心理學刊》(TSSCI),45(3):279-294。\n陳縵禎(2008)。《從虛擬社群意識探討線上遊戲玩家之行為影響因素》。政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。\n創市際(2009),〈社交網站Facebook使用概況〉。上網時間:2009年11月3日。取自http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_05_13_09.html.\n創市際(2011),〈社友使用社群網站時間較入口網站高出2小時〉。上網時間:2011年2月3日。取自http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_04_20_11.html\n創新發現誌(2011.06)。人人網赴美掛牌,這是中國的 Facebook 嗎?上網時間:2012年2月3日,取自http://mrjamie.cc/2011/05/28/renren-ipo/\n黃千芳(2009)。《線上遊戲玩家之背景、動機、行為、人際關係與遊戲沈迷之研究》。新竹教育大學職業繼續教育所碩士論文。\n黃文孝(2008)。《線上社群網路的探討= A Study of Online Social Network》。交通大學管理學院企業管理學程碩士論文。\n黃宇暄(2006)。《國中生線上遊戲行為與人際關係之相關探討》。輔仁大學應用統計學研究所碩士論文。\n黃厚銘(2000)。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉,《台大社會學刊》,28,117-154。\n黃堅厚(1999)。《人格心理學》。台北:心理。\n黃雅慧(2004)。《虛擬世界中的真實人生:線上遊戲成癮現象及其相關因素探究》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n黃薇菁譯(2011)。《150法則:從演化角度解密人類的社會行為》。台北:商周。Dunbar, R. [2010]. How Many Friends Does One Person Need. London: Faber & Faber. )\n楊宛盼(2011.12.03)。〈繼Google後金額最大 公司估值上看70億美元 比預期低 Zynga申請IPO 籌資10億美元〉。上網時間:2012年5月16日,取自聯合知識庫網站http://udndata.com/library/\n楊棠安(2005)。《線上遊戲玩家表現與其人格特質之研究-以天堂為例》。靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n董彥欣(2009.11)。(以TPB與社會資本觀點探討影響使用社群意圖之因素:以Facebook為例〉。「2009年第六屆台灣資訊社會研究年會暨學術研討會」論文。台灣,新竹。\n劉致昕(2012年2月)。〈最重要夥伴 獲利低到想拆夥〉,《商業周刊》,1264:114-118。\n蔡濱璨(2010)。《社交網路玩家社群遊戲使用行為之影響因素》。高雄第一科技大 大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。\n鄭杰(2011.1.20)。〈智慧手機小遊戲崛起 或將挑戰Facebook社群網站王者地\n位〉。上網時間:2012年2月16日,取自鉅亨網新聞網站\nhttp://news.cnyes.com/content/20120120/KFI00RBCJ6UUR.shtml\n鄭明萱譯(2006)。《認識媒體:人的延伸》。台北:貓頭鷹。(原書McLuhan, M.   \n  [1964/1994]. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Corinne Mcluhan.) \n鄭冠駿(2005)。《由溝通媒介的選擇,探討個人人格特質對於其溝通滿足之影響》。中央大學企業管理硏究所碩士論文。\n鄭意璇、張凱茹(2011.11)。〈Facebook替你撐腰?社群網站中的社會資本與促進意見表達之關聯性研究〉。「2011年台灣資訊社會研究年會暨學術研討會」論文。台灣,新竹。\n鄭朝誠(2004)。《線上遊戲玩家的遊戲行動與意義》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n盧一伶(2010)。《內外向人格特質與Facebook使用動機與行為之探討》。政治大\n學廣告所碩士論文。\n盧浩權(2007.12)。(青少年沉迷網路的心理分析與因應)。《社區發展季刊》,119:206-221\n優活健康網(2012年3月29日)。〈捨近求遠低頭族 現實人際關係易疏離〉。上網時間:2012年5月3日。取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%8D%A8%E8%BF%91%E6%B1%82%E9%81%A0%E4%BD%8E%E9%A0%AD%E6%97%8F-%E7%8F%BE%E5%AF%A6%E4%BA%BA%E9%9A%9B%E9%97%9C%E4%BF%82%E6%98%93%E7%96%8F%E9%9B%A2-061500476.html\n戴怡君、董旭英(2002.1)。〈使用網路網路進行互動者特質之探討〉。《資訊社會 研究》,2:29-58。\n聯合新聞網(2009年9月16日)。〈台灣瘋Facebook 成長世界第一〉。上網時間:2012年2月3日。取自http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=314&f_SUB_ID=2922&f_ART_ID=212903\n薛世杰(2002)。《國中男、女生的網路遊戲使用時間與使用動機、自我效能、人格特質、學業成就、人際關係之相關研究》。屏東師範學院教育科技研究所碩士論文。\n鍾瓅萱(2009.11)。〈探索社群網站之社會連結、寂寞感與忠誠度之關聯— 以Facebook為例〉。「2009年第六屆台灣資訊社會研究年會暨學術研討會」論文。台灣,新竹。\n譚天、吳佳真譯(1998)。,《虛擬化身-網路世代的身份認同》,台北:遠流。(原書S. Turkle. [1998]. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.)\nAckland, R.(2009). Social Network Services as Data Sources and Platforms for e-Researching Social Networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27: 481-492.\nArmstrong, L., Phillips, J. G., & Saling, L. L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 537-550.\nBaumann, M. & Greenwood, B. (2008.05).Facebook Apps: Deeper social networking. Information Today, 25(5), 45-46.\nBourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education(pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm\nBoyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B., (2007). “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.\nCenter for Internet Addiction Recovery (2011.10.27). Addiction to social networking causes serious mental health issues according to a new study. Retrieved January 2, 2012, from http://netaddictionrecovery.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.html#7868199862690086702\nChen, S.(2009.04.29). The Social Network Game Boom. Retrieved Novemver 4,2009, from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4009/the_social_network_game_boom.php\nChen, S. H.(1999.08). Development of Chinese Internet Addiction Scale in Taiwan. Presented at the American Psychological Association 1999 Convention, August 20-24, 1999, Boston, USA.\nChou, C. & Chen, S. H.(2000.08). Internet Addiction among Taiwan College Students – An On-line Interview Study. Presented at the 108th American Psychology Association Annual Convention, August 4-8, 2000, Washington DC, USA. \nColeman, J. S. (1988), Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.\nCornwell, B., Laumannl E. O., & Schumm P. (2008) .The Social Connectedness of Older Adults:A National Profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185-203.\nCosta, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the neo personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5-13. \nCosta, P. T., & McCrae, R. R.(1994). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). In Boyle G. J. (Series Ed.), The sage handbook of personality theory and assessment.(pp.179-198). Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.\nDonath, J., & boyd, d.(2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.\nDucheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R.(2006.04). "Alone together?":exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at the conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems CHI2006, Montreal, Canada. \nEgenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding Video Games. New York, NY: Routledge.\nEllison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2009). Facebook connection strategies \nand relationship development: patterns of social network use and communication on Campus. Paper presented at University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Retrieved January 3, 2012, from http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/workshops/org-markets/archive/pdf/Ellison_et_al_Revised_CONNECTION_STRATEGIES_td.doc \nEllison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.\nFenichel, M. (2009.05.01). Facebook Addiction Disorder. Retrieved January 10,2012, from Fenichel.com http://www.fenichel.com/facebook/\nGriffiths, M. (1998). Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications, (pp. 61–75). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.\nGoldberg, I.(1996). Internet addiction disorder. Retrieved January 10, 2012, from http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/supportgp.html\nHampton, K., Goulet L. S., Marlow, C., and Rainie, L. (2012). Why Most FacebookUsers Get More Than They Give: The Effect of Facebook "Power Users" onEverbody Else. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC. Retrieved February 2, 2012, from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_Facebook%20users_2.3.12.pdf\nHampton, K., Goulet L. S., Rainie, L. and Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center. Washington, DC. Retrieved February 2, 2012, from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/~/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP%20-%20Social%20networking%20sites%20and%20our%20lives.pdf\nHendry, L. B., & Reid, M. (2000). Social relationships and health: the meaning of social “connectedness” and how it relates to health concerns for rural Scottish adolescents. The Association for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Available online 25 March 2002 and retrieved Novemver 4, 2009, from http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/4182/.\nIndvik, L.(2012.2.1). Facebook: Zynga Generates 12% of Our Revenue and We Need Them. Retrieved February 2, 2012, from http://mashable.com/2012/02/01/zynga-facebook-revenue/\nJansz, J., and Martens, L., (2005). Gaming at a LAN event: the social context of playing video games. New Media & Society, 7(3), 333-355.\nKaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity, Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.\nKraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.\nLampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C., (2006.11). A Face(book)in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167-170). New York: ACM Press.\nLazzaro, N.(2005). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion. Retrieved April 4, 2011, from http://www.xeodesign.com/whyweplaygames/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf.\nLee, R. M., Dean, B. L., & Jung, K. (2008). Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: Testing a mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 414-19.\nLee, R. M, Draper, M., &Lee, S.(2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 310-318.\nLewis, J., & West, A.(2009). ‘ Friending’ : London-based undergraduates’ \nexperience of Facebook. New Media and Society, 11(7), 1209-1229.\nMervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2000). The big five personality factors as a model for thestructure of children’s peer nominations. European Journal of Personality, 14(2), 91–106.\nNicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield& Cliff Lampe(2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168\nO`Dell, J.(2011.1.13). Are We Too Obsessed With Facebook? Retrieved April 4, 2011, from http://mashable.com/2011/01/12/obsessed-with-facebook-infographic/\nO`Neill, N.(2008.7.31). What Exactly are Social Games? Retrieved April 4, 2011, from http://socialtimes.com/social-games_b690\nPempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L.(2009). College students` social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238.\nPutnam, R.D.(1995). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28, 1-20. \nPutnam, R.D.(2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York. \nPutnam, R. D.(2004). Bowling together. OECD Observer. Retrieved July 28, 2008, from http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/1215/Bowling_together.html.\nSchroeder, S.(2010.9.10). Web users now on Facebook longer than Google. Retrieved April 4, 2011, from http://articles.cnn.com/2010-09-10/tech/facebook.google.time_1_mark-zuckerberg-facebook-web-users?_s=PM:TECH\nSubrahmanyam, K., Reich, S. M., Waechter, N., & Espinoza, G.(2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420–433.\nThe Telegraph.(2012.2.1). Facebook IPO: Letter from Mark Zuckerberg. Retrieved February 10, 2012, from\nhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/ 9055830/Facebook-IPO-Letter-from-Mark-Zuckerberg.html \nWarren, C.(2011.12.22). Facebook Names Top Games of 2011. Retrieved January 2,\n2012, from http://mashable.com/2011/12/21/top-facebook-games-2011\nYee, N.(2006). Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychology& Behavior 9, 772-775.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
98451011
100
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098451011
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101101.pdf978.44 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.