Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54503| 題名: | 閱讀後的互動式任務對台灣國中生字彙學習之成效 The effects of post-reading interactive tasks on Taiwanese EFL Junior high school students` vocabulary learning |
作者: | 許巧筠 Hsu, Chiao Yun |
貢獻者: | 許炳煌 Sheu, Ping Huang 許巧筠 Hsu, Chiao Yun |
關鍵詞: | 單字習得 互動式任務 單字學習態度 單字練習題 vocabulary acquisition interactive tasks vocabulary learning attitudes vocabulary exercises |
日期: | 2011 | 上傳時間: | 30-Oct-2012 | 摘要: | 第二語言學習的研究者指出，有效的單字加強練習活動可以增強學生的單字學習，然而過去相關研究的練習題形式偏重於個人學習，較缺乏同儕之間的互動學習。因此，本研究採用準實驗量化研究法，藉此探討比較閱讀後的單字互動式任務(interactive tasks)及傳統的單字練習題(vocabulary exercises)對國中生英語字彙習得(vocabulary learning)與單字學習態度(vocabulary learning attitudes)的影響。\n\n 本實驗的研究對象為桃園縣某公立國中的兩班八年級六十三位學生，所有受試者依其原本的班級被隨機指定為互動式任務組和傳統單字練習題組，兩組同學於每堂課都接受相同的閱讀文章和閱讀理解問題，並在閱讀之後進行不同的單字加強練習活動，每堂課合計為45分鐘，歷時六堂，一共練習25個單字。實驗前後，兩組受試者分別進行單字測驗及單字學習態度前後測，以瞭解學生的主要單字(target words)學習情形和學習態度轉變。資料分析採用SPSS 18.0版本，包含描述性統計、獨立樣本和成對樣本t檢定、及共變數分析。 \n\n 研究結果顯示: (1)在單字學習成效方面，接受互動式任務的學生明顯優於接受傳統單字練習題的學生；(2)在辨識字彙的能力(receptive vocabulary knowledge)和應用字彙的能力(productive vocabulary knowledge)方面，互動式任務明顯地有助於提升受試者在以上下文為主的試題(選擇題和文意字彙)表現，但在無上下文的試題(中翻英和拼字)方面，兩組並無顯著差異；(3) 就受試者單字學習知識(vocabulary knowledge)質的改變而言，互動式任務組亦優於傳統單字練習題組；(4) 對於受試者的單字學習態度，兩組在認知、情意、行為及單字練習加強活動皆有某些方面的改變。\n\n 最後，本研究認為英語教師可以多設計以單字為主的互動式任務來增進學生的學習，並提出建議供未來研究為參考。 Research into second language learning has pointed out that effective word- focused activities can facilitate students’ vocabulary learning. Yet, previous studies have been mainly focused on individual learning and on lack of interaction between peers. Therefore, the study adopted a quasi-experimental research design to compare the effects of specialized post-reading interactive vocabulary tasks and traditional vocabulary exercises on junior high school students’ vocabulary acquisition. Changes in learners’ attitudes to vocabulary learning were also investigated. \n Participants were 63 students from two eighth-grade classes in a junior high school in Taoyuan, Taiwan. The two classes were randomly assigned to the IT (interactive tasks) group and the VE (vocabulary exercises) group. Both groups received the same reading texts and reading comprehension questions, but they completed different vocabulary enhancing activities. Each class session was 45 minutes, and there were six class sessions, with a total of 25 target words for practice. To assess learners’ vocabulary knowledge of the target words, the two groups took pre- and post-vocabulary tests and a vocabulary learning attitude questionnaire before and after the experiment, to see if there were any attitude changes among learners throughout the study. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS 18.0, including descriptive statistics, Independent Samples t-test and Paired Samples t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).\n The results are summarized as follows. First, in terms of vocabulary growth, students completing interactive tasks significantly outperformed those who received vocabulary exercises. Second, concerning receptive and productive word knowledge, interactive tasks were helpful in elevating learners’ performance on contextualized assessments like multiple-choice questions and filling-in blanks. However, in decontextualized assessments like L1 translation and spelling, there was no significant difference between the groups. Third, interactive tasks led to better performance on learners’ qualitative changes in vocabulary knowledge than did vocabulary exercises. Finally, for participants’ vocabulary learning attitudes, both groups had some changes in their cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning, and in perceptions of word-focused activities. \n In conclusion, the researcher suggests that English teachers design and apply more word-focused interactive tasks to enhance students’ vocabulary acquisition, and provides suggestions for future research. |
參考文獻: | Alley, D. C. (2005). A study of Spanish II high school students’ discourse during group work. Foreign Language Annals, 38(2), 250–258.\nArmbruster, B. B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read, kindergarten through grade 3. Jessup, MD: Partnership for Reading.\nAtay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Elementary school EFL learners’ vocabulary learning: The effects of post-reading activities. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(2), 255–273. \nBaddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.). Hove, UK:\n Psychology Press.\nBarcroft, J. (2000). The effect of sentence writing as semantic elaboration on the allocation of processing resources and second language lexical acquisition. Dotoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.\nBarcroft, J. (2007). Effects of word and fragment writing during L2 vocabulary learning. Foreign Language Annals, 49, 713–726\nBlachowicz, C. L. Z., & Fisher, P. J. L. (2010). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms (4th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. \nBreen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23–46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\nChao, J. A. (2006). Effects of reading vocabulary aloud on the English learning and attitude of EFL elementary low achievers. Master’s thesis, National Chengkung University, Tainan, Taiwan. \nCenteno-Cortés, B., & Jiménez- Jiménez, A. F. (2004). Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14(1), 7–35.\nChen, S. I. (2004). A study of junior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices in vocabulary instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan. \nCheng, Y. L. (2008). Enhancing noun acquisition through reading: The impact of a hierarchy of vocabulary exercise on young learners of different English proficiency in an EFL context. Master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan. \nChou, H. T. (2005). The effects of input and output tasks on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Master’s thesis, National Chinhua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.\n\nCoady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 225–237). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. \nCrandall, J. (1993). Content-based learning in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 111–126. \nDecarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 285–299). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publish. \nDubin, F., & Olshtain, E. (1993). Predicting word meanings from contextual clues: Evidence from L1 readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 181–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.\nElley, W. B. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174–187. \nEllis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. \nEllis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449–491. \nEllis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\nFathman, A., & Kessler, C. (1993). Cooperative language learning in school contexts. In W. Grabe, C. Ferguson, R. B. Kaplan, G. R. Tucker, & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics: Issues in second language teaching and learning (pp. 127–140). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.\nFolse, K. S. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 273–279.\nFraser, C. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225–241.\nFry, E. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513–516.\nFry, E. B. (2002). Text readability versus leveling. Reading Teacher, 56(23), 286–292.\nGass, S. M. (1988). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174–187. \nGeorge, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.\nHinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 109–31.\nHsu, W. S. (2005). The effects of vocabulary enhancement instruction and reading only instruction on EFL senior high school students’ vocabulary acquisition in the context of a reading program. Master’s thesis, National Chengkung University, Tainan, Taiwan. \nHuckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 181–193. \nHughes, A. (2008). Testing for language learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nHulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London, UK: Macmillan. \nHulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal, and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nJoe, A. (1995). Text-based tasks and incidental vocabulary learning. Second Language Research, 11, 149–158.\nKargozari, H. R., & Ghaemi, H. (2011). A reappraisal perspective on written task types and vocabulary acquisition and retention of EFL learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(10), 1653–1661.\nKeating, G. D. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 365–386. \nKim, Y. J. (2008). The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 58(2), 285–325.\nKim, Y. J., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pre-task modeling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199.\nKnight, S. M. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78, 285–299. \nKrashen, S. D. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.\nLai, Y. H. (2009). The effects of post-reading vocabulary-enhancing activities on EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. \nLan, C. Y. (2005). The effects of task-induced involvement of vocabulary learning of senior high EFL students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.\nLaufer, B. (1990). Why are some words more difficult than others? Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 28(4), 293–307. \nLaufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.\nLaufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 567–587. \nLaufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250. \nLee, S. H., & Muncie, J. (2006). From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners’ use of vocabulary in a post-reading composition task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295–320.\nLi, X. (1988). Effects of contextual cues on inferring and remembering meanings of new words. Applied Linguistics, 9, 302–313.\nLin, Y. C. (2007). Relationship between junior high school students’ perception of the creation of an English living environment and English learning attitude. Master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. \nLong, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.\nMin, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning 58(1), 73–115.\nMartyn, E. (2001). The effect of task type on negotiation of meaning in small group work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. \nMatsuoka, W., & Hirsh, D. (2010). Vocabulary learning through reading: Does an ELT course book provide good opportunities? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 56–70.\nMuñoz, C. A. (2005). Usos de lengua materna (L1) y lengua meta (L2) en un contexto de inmersión real. Unpublished master’s thesis, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.\nNation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: \nCambridge University Press. \nNation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), \nHandbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 581–196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.\nNewton, J. (1995). Task-based interaction and incidental vocabulary learning: A case study. Second Language Research, 11(2), 159–177. \nNewton, J. (2001). Options for assisting vocabulary learning in communication tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 55, 30–37. \nNunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. \nParibakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 155–178. \nParibakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 174–200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. \nParibakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 196–213.\nPark, J. (Ed.) (2007). Reading on with Aesop’s Fable. Seoul, Korea: Eduplanet, Inc. \nPattison, P. (1987). Developing communication skills. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge \nUniversity Press.\nPrabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy: A perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\nRichards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nRobinson, P. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.\nRott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on word learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165–199.\nSchmitt, N. (2008). Review article. Instructed second language vocabulary learning. \n Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. \nShortreed, I. (1993). Variation in foreign language talk: The effects of task and proficiency. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.\nSkehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\nSkehan, P., Foster, P., & Mehnert, U. (1998). Assessing and using task. In W. Renandya & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Learners and language learning (pp. 227–248). Singapore: Seameo.\nSlavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.\nStahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110.\nStoller, F., & Grabe, W. (1993). Implications for L2 vocabulary acquisition and instruction from L1 to vocabulary research. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 29–45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. \nStuart, W. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46–45.\nSwain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidelhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in the study of language (pp. 125–144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. \nSwain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251–274\nSwain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.\nToya, M. (1993). Form of explanation in modification of listening input in L2 vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the Occasional Paper No. 23, Department of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of English as a Second Language. \nVygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nWatanabe, Y. (1997). Input, intake, and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 19, 287–307. \nWatanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142.\nWaring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 130–163. \nWendon, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Hertfordshire, UK: Prentice Hall.\nWillis, D. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London, UK: Longman.\nWillis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. \nZimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121–140. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 英語教學碩士在職專班 96951016 100 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096951016 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101601.pdf | 1.26 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.