Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54671
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃智聰zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHuang, Jr Tsungen_US
dc.contributor.author葛崇高zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Chung Liangen_US
dc.creator葛崇高zh_TW
dc.creatorKoh, Chung Liangen_US
dc.date2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T03:30:18Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T03:30:18Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-30T03:30:18Z-
dc.identifierG0099261010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54671-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國家發展研究所zh_TW
dc.description99261010zh_TW
dc.description100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract天津經過百年來的努力發展,以及改革開放後濱海新區在「十一五規劃」被納入國家發展戰略,不但成為中國大陸高收入的城市,亦是眾多外資亟欲前往的投資地點。從天津三級產業結構的觀察,可以發現雖然目前天津的第二、三級產業的分布仍與先進國家有所落差,但整體來說,仍是逐漸從二三一的產業結構往三二一的產業結構發展。但1997年至2006年仍發生工業化現象,即工業部門產值比重增加。這段時間亦伴隨產業升級,使得產業結構從消費財產業轉成為資本財產業。由政策上觀察,此結果主要與天津濱海新區的發展關係最密切。\n從本研究的ARDL時間序列模型的估計中發現,造成天津工業化的最主要因素為資本勞動比的提升與貿易依存度的增加,而造成產業升級的主要因素則為外資與財政的科技支出。天津政府在經濟迅速發展的條件下,調節產業結構的均衡發展亦是重要任務,使得天津以及中國大陸其他城市能夠早日進入已開發國家的產業結構模式。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAfter centuries of efforts to develop and the Binhai New Area being writing into national development strategies in the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" after reform and open-up, Tianjin has not only become the high-income cities in mainland China, but also a location that many foreign investment is anxious to go. According to the observation of Thrice Industrial structure in Tianjin, there is a big gap that the distribution of Tianjin’s secondary and tertiary industry with compared with other advanced countries. However, on the whole, there is still a gradual shift from the industrial structure of two-three-one to three-two-one. From 1997 to 2006, there is still a phenomenon of industrialization in Tianjin, which means that the percentage of secondary industry increasing the whole industrial sectors’ GDP. It’s also accompanied with industrial upgrading, which means that industrial structure will turn from consumer goods industries to capital property industries. From the prospect of policy, this result is most closely related to the development of the Tianjin Binhai New Area. \nBy using ARDL time series model, this study estimates found that the most important factor of Tianjin industrialization was the capital-labor ratio improvement and the increase of trade dependence. The main factor of causing the industrial upgrading was the foreign investment and finance spending on technology. Under the rapid economic development, adjusting the industrial structure for balanced development is also Tianjin Government’s important task that could help Tianjin and other cities in mainland China as early as possible to enter the mode of development of the country`s industrial structure.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究目的與研究流程 5\n第二章 文獻回顧 8\n第一節 工業化與產業升級的衡量 8\n第二節 探討中國三級產業結構研究的文獻 12\n第三節 探討中國產業升級研究的文獻 14\n第四節 本章小結 16\n第三章 天津市的產業結構發展、現況與政策 17\n第一節 天津市的三級產業結構發展與現狀 16\n第二節 天津市製造業產業結構的發展現況 21\n第三節 天津產業結構發展相關的政策 25\n第四節 本章小結 29\n第四章 實證模型與變數說明 30\n第一節 研究範圍與資料來源 30\n第二節 研究方法與模型介紹 33\n第三節 變數說明 36\n第四節 本章小結 44\n第五章 實證研究結果 45\n第一節 工業化的實證結果與模型正確度檢定 45\n第二節 產業升級實證結果與模型的正確度檢度 51\n第三節 本章小結 56\n第六章 結論與政策意涵 58\n第一節 結論 58\n第二節 政策意涵 60\n參考文獻 61zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099261010en_US
dc.subject天津zh_TW
dc.subject產業結構zh_TW
dc.subject工業化zh_TW
dc.subject產業升級zh_TW
dc.subject共整和ARDLzh_TW
dc.subjectTianjinen_US
dc.subjectindustrial structureen_US
dc.subjectindustrializationen_US
dc.subjectindustrial upgradingen_US
dc.subjectARDL with cointegrationen_US
dc.title改革開放後天津產業結構的發展與其影響因素zh_TW
dc.titleTianjin’s industrial structure development and its influencing factors after the reforms and openingen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、 中文:\n人民網,www.people.com.cn\n中華人民共和國國家統計局網站,www.stats.gov.cn\n中國經濟社會發展統計數據庫-統計年鑑導航,www.data.cnki.net\n中國國家統計局(1983~2010),《中國統計年鑑》。北京:中國統計出版社。\n天津市檔案館(2009),《天津濱海新區經濟發展實錄》。天津:天津人民出版社。\n天津統計信息網,http://www.stats-tj.gov.cn/\n天津市檔案館(2009),《天津濱海新區經濟發展實錄》。天津:天津人民出版社。\n天津統計局(1999),《天津五十年1949-1999》。北京:中國統計出版社。\n天津統計局(1983~2010),《天津統計年鑑》。北京:中國統計出版社。\n王得新、牟永泉(2011),「外商直接投資對天津市產業結構影響的實證分析」,《天津行政學院學報》(天津),第十三卷第一期,頁101-104。\n王翠華(2011),「中國製造業產業結構升級的影響因素與對策討論」,《改革與戰略》(武漢),第三期,頁157-159。\n北方網,www.enorth.com.cn \n甘國華(2005),「教育形成的專業化人力資本對產業結構演進的影響」,《南昌大學學報》(南昌),第十一卷第七期,頁148-153。\n岳福琴(2011),「外商直接投資對我國產業結構的負面影響與對策」,《出國與就業》(西安),第十二期,頁35-39。\n杭州寫字樓網,「台商工業園區在天津落戶」,http://www.o571.com/news/gyyq/20081215134248.htm\n祝爾娟(2010),《天津濱海新區與北京產業對接的研究》。北京:中國經濟出版社。\n袁金宇、湯荻(2006),「外貿對產業結構的影響因素」,《長沙民政職業技術學院學報》(長沙),第二期,頁71-73。\n許松根(2000),「中國大陸的出口擴張、產業成長與升級」,中央研究院研討論文(臺北),No9001。\n陸澤錦、黎迪康(2011),「產業結構演化的影響因素及應用」,《廣西財經學院學報》(廣西),第六期,頁110-114。\n黃智聰、潘俊男(2002),「中國大陸地區製造業產業結構的決定因素」,《中國大陸研究》(台北),第四十五卷第二期,頁97-123。\n曾志超(2009),「台商進駐天津濱海新區開拓華北市場」,國政研究報告,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,科經(研)098-002號。\n賈康(1997),「產業升級的必要條件-企業技術改造與機制的轉換」,《經濟管理》(北京),第五期,頁22-24。\n靳友雯、潘娜(2011),「北部灣經濟區產業結構優化的環境分析-以財政支出結構為視角」,《稅收經濟研究》(南昌),第十一卷第七期,頁148-153。\n魏作磊(2006),「FDI對我國三次產業結構演變的影響-兼論我國服務業增加值比重偏低的現象」,《經濟學家》(成都),第三期,頁61-67。\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n二、英文:\nBlomstrom, M. and H. Persson (1983), “ Foreign Investment and Spillover Efficiency in an Underdeveloped Economy:Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry.” World Development, 11(6), 493-501.\nChenery, H. B. (1960), “Pattern of Industrial Growth.” The American Economic Review, Nashville: American Economic Association, 50, 624-654.\nChenery, H. B. and M. Syrquin (1986), “Typical Pattern of Transformation.” In: H. B. Chenery, S. Robinson and M. Syquin (Eds.), Industrialization and Growth. New York: Oxford University Press, 37-83.\nChung, C. (1994), “Taiwan’s DFI in Mainland China: Impact on the Domestic and Host Economies.” In Lyons, T. P. and V. Nee (Eds.), The Economic Transformation of South China: Reform and Development in the Post-Mao Era. Cornell East Asia Series. Ithaca: Cornell University, East Asia Program, 215-242. \nClark, C. (1957), The Conditions of Economic Progress. London: Macmillan.\nFisher, A. G. B. (1939), “Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Production.” Economic Record, 6, 24-38.\nGloberan, S. (1979), “Foreign Investment and ‘Spillover’ Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries.” Canadian Journal of Economics, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 12, 42-56..\nHoffman, W. G. (1958), The Growth of Industrial Economics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.\nKuznets, S. (1965), “The Economic Requirements of Modern Industrialization.” In S. Kuznets (Ed.), Economic Growth and Structure. 194-212.\nPesaran, H.M. and Y. Shin (1998), “An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modeling Approach to Cointegration Analysis,” In Strom, Steinar(Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in The Twentieth Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium. New York: Cambridge Press. 371-413\nPesaran, H.M. Y. Shin and R. J. Smith (2001), “Bounds Testing Approaches to The Analysis of Level Relationships,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.\nSutcliffe, R. B. (1971), “The Pattern of Industrialization.” in: R. B. Sutcliffe (Ed.), Industry and Underdevelopmen. 16-106.\nThe World Bank, http://www.worldbank.org/zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101001.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.