Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54707| 題名: | 中國大陸財政地方分權對地方財政赤字的影響 The effect of fiscal decentralization on China’s reigion finance deficit |
作者: | 顏文彬 | 貢獻者: | 黃智聰 Huang , Jr Tsung 顏文彬 |
關鍵詞: | 財政地方分權 地方財政赤字 二因子固定效果模型 Fiscal decentralization Local government deficit Two Ways Fixed effect model |
日期: | 2011 | 上傳時間: | 30-Oct-2012 | 摘要: | 中國大陸自改革開放之後，其經濟成長之快速，成功歸究於自由的市場經濟。然而2008金融海嘯爆發後，使得各國開始檢視過度的分權和市場自由化的適度性。中央政府和地方政府，如何在權利和稅收的分配上，達成一最適的規模？如何有效運用財政地方分權？將是一門複雜且重要的議題。\n本研究之研究目的主要有以下幾點：第一，希望能藉由相關理論文獻，解釋財政地方分權對中國省、市之間地方財政赤字是否會有所影響或是關聯，將以此為本研究之理論基礎，並且進行實證的檢驗；第二，將以1994年以後中國財政改革以後之財政相關資料，利用中國31個省、市的追蹤資料，資料蒐集期間涵蓋1995年至2010年，以各年各省、市的財政赤字作為衡量該省、市的財政情形，以期能夠了解各地區財政的影響情形； 第三，本研究建立一個二因子固定效果模型，來檢視中國31個省市財政分權對其地方財政赤字的影響，並將各省市的情形做歸納；第四，從實證模型中發現，財政地方分權與地方財政赤字間的關聯性為一非線性關係且具有U型曲線關係；最後，利用實證結果來提供具體的政策建議。 Fiscal decentralization is considered as one of the successful institutional reforms to promote the development of China.In order to attract the resource, the regions have to improve or maintain their finance. Therefore, what issues will improve the provincial local government deficit becoming an immense problem. How to use fiscal decentralization tool？It will be an important issue.\nThe research purpose of this literature is to use the empirical model with the panel data which includes 31 provinces, cities and regions in China during the period of 1995 to 2010 as well as to search the following question. First , analyse the provincial local government deficit and find out the determinative factors of regional deficit. Second, in order to realize the precise relationship between the fiscal decentralization and the provincial local government deficit, this study establishes 2 ways fixed effect model. Finally, to reducing the mistakes occurred in positive models and enabling the study more rigorous, this study uses more methods to test the models and the result. Finally, to reducing the mistakes occurred in positive models and enabling the study more rigorous, this study uses more methods to test the models and the result. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n中國國家統計局（1998~2010），《中國統計年鑑》。北京：中國統計出版社。\n王紹光（1997），《分權的底線》，北京：中國計畫出版社。\n林毅夫、劉志強（2000），「中國的財政分權與經濟增長」，《北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版）》(北京)，第4期，頁5-17。\n李永剛（2011），「地方政府債務規模影響因素及化解對策」，《中南財經政法大學學報》（武漢），第6期，頁3-6。\n匡小平（2012），「財政分權、地方財政赤字與土地財政——來自中部欠發達地區J省的經驗證據」，《中南財經政法大學學報》（武漢），第1期，頁127-143。\n吳笪（2012），「地方政府財政風險研究」，《領導科學》（鄭州），第5期，頁23-26。\n錢穎一（1997），「中國特色的維護市場的經濟聯邦制」，《為增長而競爭，中國增長的政治經濟學》（上海），20， (2)，頁23-48。\n賈康（2000），「我國財政體制改革的簡要回顧與分析評價」，《河南財政稅務高等專科學校學報》(河南)，第48期，頁1-7。\n賈康、閻坤（2000），《中國財政：轉軌與變革》。上海：遠東出版社。\n趙志耘（2000），《中國財政理論前沿》。上海：社會科學文獻出版社。\n趙文哲（2010），「不平等厭惡性、財政競爭和地方政府財政赤字膨脹關系研究」，《管理世界》（北京），第1期，頁44-53。\n劉洪鐸（2010），「財政分權導致地方財政赤字規模膨脹嗎？」，《上海經濟研究》(上海)，第9期，頁98-109。\n陳建勳（1999），《中國大陸中央和地方財政分權之實証分析》，台北：中華經濟研究院。\n鄭安志（2006），「財政地方分權在中國各地區經濟成長所扮演的角色」，台北：國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。\n鄭兵（2010），「地方政府如何應對財政赤字問題」，《勞動保障世界(理論版) 》（吉林），第9期，頁51-53。\n蘇明、陳少強（2005），「中國當前的財政政策及趨勢」，《上海經濟研究》(上海)，第9期，頁15-23。\n英文文獻\nBahl, R. W. and J. F. Linn (1992), Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.\nBesley, T. and A. Case (1995), “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition.” American Economic Review, 85, 25-45.\nBuchanan, J.M. and C. J. Goetz (1972), “Efficiency Limits of Fiscal\nMobility: an Assessment of the Tiebout Model.” Journal of Public Economics, 1(1), 25-43.\nBuchanan, J. and R. Wanger (1977), Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.\nBryant, J. (2003), “Modeling the Effect of Population Ageing on Government Social Expenditures.” New Zealand Treasury Working Paper.\nCraigwell, R. C. (1991), “Government Deficits and Spending in Barbados: An Empirical Test of the Buchanan-Wagner Hypothesis.” Public Finance, 46(3),373-381.\nDavoodi, H. and H. Zou (1998), “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study.” Journal of Urban Economics, 43, 244-257.\nFriedman, M. (1978), “The Limitation of Tax Limitation.” Policy Review, 78,7-14.\nGreene, W. H. (2003), Econometric Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.\nHamilton, B. W. (1976), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public\nSpending on Property Values: A Theoretical Comment.” Journal of\n Political Economics, 84 (3), 647-650.\nHausman, J. A. (1978), “Specfication Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.\nHuang, Jr-Tsung, Kuang-Ta Lo, and Po-Wen She (2011), “The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on the Tax Effort of China`s Local Governments after the Tax Sharing System.” Singapore Economic Review, 57(1), 1250005-1-1250005-22. \nKornai, J. (1979), “Resource Constrained versus Demand Constrained Systems.” Econometrica, 47(4), 801-819. \nLin, Hsin-Yi. (2010), “Openness and Inflation Revisited.” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 37, 40-45.\nMartinez-Vazquez J. and R. M. McNab (2003), “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth.” World Development, 31(9), 1597-1616.\nMogull R. G. (1978), “State and Local Antipoverty Expenditures. ” Public Finance Review, 6, 278-303.\nMusgrave, R. A. (1959), The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.\nNiskanen, W.A. (1975), “Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 617-643.\nNiskanen, W. A. (1978), “Deficits, Government Spending, and Inflation: What is the Evidence？” Journal of Monetary Economics, 4(3), 591-602.\nOates, W. (1985), “Searching for Leviathan:an empirical study.” American Economic Review, 75, 748-757.\nOates, W. E. (1969), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: an Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis.” Journal of Political Economy, 77 (6), 957-971.\nOlson (1993), “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. ” The American Political Science Review, 87, 567-576.\nPeacock, A.T. and J. Wiseman (1963), “The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” The Western Political Quarterly, 16, 248-249.\nPrud’homme, R. (1995), “The Dangers of Decentralization.” The World Bank Research Observer, 10 (2), 201-221.\nRodden, J. (2003), “Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government.” International Organization, 57, 695-729.\nRodrik, D. (1998), “Why do More Open Economies Have Larger Governments？” Journal of Political Economy, 63, 116-132.\nSingh, R. and A. Plekhanov. (2005), “How Should Subnational Government Borrowing Be Regulated？Some Cross-Country Empirical Evidence. ” IMF Working Paper, WP/05/54, 2005.\nTer-Minassian, Teresa, and Jon Craig, (1997), “Control of Subnational Government Borrowing.” in Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice, ed. by Teresa \nTiebout, C. M. (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.\nTreisman D. (2002), Defining and measuring decentralization: A Global Perspective. Los Angeles: Department of Political Science, University of California.\nWong, P. W. (1992), “Fiscal Reform and Local Industrialization: The Problematic Sequencing of Reform in Post-Mao China.” Modern China, 18, 197-227.\nWildasin, J. D. and David E. Wildasin (2004), “Capital Tax Competition: Bane or Boon.” Journal of Public Economics, 88(6), 1065-1091.\nZou, T. and H. F. Zou (1998), “Fiscal Decentralization, Public Spending, and Economic Growth in China.” Journal of Public Economic, 67, 221-224. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財政研究所 99255021 100 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099255021 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 502101.pdf | 1.03 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.