Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54709
題名: 企業托兒福利、工作與家庭平衡及員工工作績效之研究
Research on corporate child care service, work-family balance and employee job performance
作者: 康傑弘
貢獻者: 孫本初
康傑弘
關鍵詞: 企業托兒
企業福利
工作與家庭平衡
工作績效
corporate child care
employee benefit
work-family balance
job performance
日期: 2011
上傳時間: 30-Oct-2012
摘要: 隨著女性大量投入勞動就業市場,家庭結構的轉變,核心家庭中的雙薪家庭盛行,兒童照護將不再是女性責任。托兒問題加上少子女化的現況,也已成為目前國家安全的重要課題。\n 本研究之研究途徑採用「行為研究途徑」,研究方法係採文獻探討法及問卷調查法,樣本來源以北、中、南勞工密集的工業區或科學園區鄰近的12家托育機構為主,總共發出500份問卷,回收443份問卷,刪除無效問卷42份,問卷有效回收率80.2%,分別以描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及多元迴歸分析等統計方法來探討各變項間之關係。\n 本研究結果發現:\n一、企業提供彈性工時(地點)、托育津貼、員工親職教育活動、員工優質托育機構與資訊的選擇、組成員工托育的成長團體或支持團體對於「工作與家庭平衡」結果顯示有差異,另外,企業提供托兒福利措施中,「產假(陪產假)」對於「員工工作績效」結果顯示沒有差異。\n二、企業托兒福利使用程度對於工作與家庭平衡與員工工作績效有顯著相關,並且有預測力。\n三、工作與家庭平衡對於員工工作績效有顯著相關,並且有預測力。\n四、工作與家庭平衡在企業托兒福利使用程度與員工工作績效之間產生中介效果。
Nowadays, the structure of family has been changed because the huge numbers of woman are working in labor market. There are many dual-earner household among of nuclear family. Taking care of children is no longer the responsibility of woman, therefore, the current situation of childcare and low fertility have been the most important issues of national security. \n Behavioral research approach and the method of literature review and structural questionnaire method have been used in this study. The targets of samples included 12 child care institutions which are located in the work-intensive industrial or the neighboring science park among the area of north, middle and south of Taiwan. A total of 500 questionnaires were issued, 443 questionnaires have been recovered, 42 questionnaires are invalid which have been deleted. The effective rate of questionnaire is 80.2%. To find out the relationship among these materials, the method of Descriptive Statistics, t Test, One Way Analysis of Variance, Pearson, Product Moment the Correlation, Multiple Regression have been used in this study. \n The results showed that:\n1. It affects work-family balance if the enterprise provides: flexible working hours (location), child care allowance, the activities of staff parenting education , the information of choosing a quality child care institution and the growth or support group composed of staff. In addition, the result shows that there is no difference if the enterprise provides "maternity leave, (paternity leave)" which is one of the measures of child care welfare.\n2. It will affect and predict work-family balance and job performance if the enterprise provides corporate child care.\n3. It exists remarkable relationship between work-family balance and job performance. The relationship is also predictable.\n4. Work-family balance has become the mediation role of corporate child care and job performance.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部分 \n丁兆漪(1994)。社會福利意識型態及兒童照顧需求之研究─以台北市職業婦女為例。中國文化大學兒童福利學系碩士論文),未出版,台北。\n王麗容(1991)。美國辦理企業托兒服務現況分析與影響因素之探討,九○年代女性工作者福利之展望-婦女勞工福利研討會,行政院勞工委員會編,台北,行政院勞工委員會。\n王麗容(1994)。企業托兒服務的功能與發展-婦幼福利的新方向。社會建設,第85期,頁48-58。\n朱柔若譯(2000)。社會研究方法:質化與量化取向。台北:揚智。\n行政院勞工委員會(2011)。100年僱用管理性別平等概況調查報告。\n何士隆(2003)。以合作社模式提供托兒服務滿意度之研究-以台灣消費合作社附設托兒所為例。國立台北大學合作經濟學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n何永福、楊國安(1993)。人力資源策略管理。台北:三民書局\n吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務。第三版。台北:知城。\n吳明隆(2007)。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。台北:知城 \n吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用-問卷統計分析實務。台北:五南\n吳明隆、涂金堂(2003)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北:五南 \n呂寶靜(1991)。台灣企業辦理托兒服務需求性的探討,九○年代女性工作者福利之展望-婦女勞工福利研討會,行政院勞工委員會編,台北,行政院勞工委員會。\n李三益(2000)。員工子女托育機構的設置與提升企業人力資之調查分析。二十一世紀台灣社會福利願景學術研討會。嘉義南華大學。\n李佳俐(2004)。工作/家庭政策、工作/家庭平衡與員工績效關係之研究。國立成功大學國際企研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。\n李易駿(1988)。社會福利中企業福利-台灣地區企業福利的檢證與未來發展。台灣大學社會所碩士論,未出版,台北。\n李惠滿(1992)。托兒福利與員工工作滿足之關係。中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所研士論文,未出版,台北。\n沈進成、王銘傑(2007)。工作士氣對工作績效影響關係之研究-以工作壓力干擾變項。經營管理論叢。第3卷,第1期,頁84。\n周淑貞(1995)。女性員工對托兒服務滿意度、工作滿足與離職傾向關係之研究。中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n林美齡(2006)。企業托育執行續效之研究。中國文化大學青少年兒童福利學系研士論文,未出版,台北。\n林清山(1999)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。\n林澄貴(2001)。知識管理、工程專業人員核心能力與工作績效關係之研究- 以中鋼公司為例。國主中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。\n社會工作辭典(2000)。台北:內政部社區發展雜誌社。\n邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。\n俞筱鈞、郭靜晃(1996)。學齡前兒童托育問題之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n范玫芳(2000)。我國政府部門實施員工托兒福利之研究-以北、高兩市為例。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n翁政興(1996)。台灣地區企業托兒服務之研究。國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n翁麗芳(2004)。當代日本的幼托政策-少子化時代的幼兒托育。台北:心理出版。\n莊靜宜(2002)。兩性工作平等對促進女性就業影響之研究。中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n許棃雲(2006)。公部門補助企業托兒服務政策之評估研究。公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n陳若琳(2005)。職業婦女的工作-家庭衝突、親職角色期望與其親職角色實踐之研究。輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n焦興鎧(1999)。兩性工作平等法制之國際趨勢比較。勞資關係月刊,第18卷,第7期。\n黃月(1992)。台北市醫院托育服務滿意程度與影響因素之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n黃瓊恩(2008)。工作壓力對組織承諾影響之研究-以家庭親善政策知覺與工作家庭平衡為中介變項。彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。\n黃韻璇(2001)。產業組織提供托兒服務對員工工作與家庭生活感受、生活滿足、組織認同之影響。國立中正大學社會福利系碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。\n楊幸伶(2000)。員工對企業托育服務滿意度組織投注與離職傾向之相關研究。靜宜大學兒童福利學系碩士論文,未出版,台中。\n楊瑩(1991)。英國味就業婦女所提供的子女照顧措施,九○年代女性工作者福利之展望-婦女勞工福利研討會,行政院勞工委員會編,台北,行政院勞工委員會。\n劉仲矩、黃梅君(2007)。由社會交換理論探討勞退新制滿意度對員工績效之影響。國立政治大學公共行政學報,第24期,頁29-69。\n劉梅君(1999)。兩性工作平等法與母性保護之關聯-淺淡育嬰假、家庭照顧假等,促進工作平等措施的立法理由。律師雜誌,第242期,頁34-41。\n蔡宏昭(1989)。企業福利的原則性探討。社會建設,第66/67期,頁41-44。\n蔡宏昭(1991)。日本的婦女勞工福利與托兒服務措施,九○年代女性工作者福利之展望-婦女勞工福利研討會,行政院勞工委員會編,台北,行政院勞工委員會。\n蔡宏昭(1998)。勞工福利政策。台北:桂冠。\n蔡婷婷(2006)。工作家庭政策、工作家庭衝突與組織承諾之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄。\n蕭如閔(2007)。女性護理人員之專業承諾與組織承諾-以工作-家庭平衡中介變項。國防管理學院運籌系碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n蘇義祥(1999)。中華電信專戶服務部門領導型態與工作績效之研究:服務人員特質及成熟度的調節作用。中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。\n \n貳、西文部份\nAllen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environment: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435.\nBarnett, R. C. (1998). Toward a review and reconceptualization of the work/family benefits literature. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 124(2), 125-182.\nBaron, R M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.\nBorman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organization, 71-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nBoyatzis, R. E. (1982), The Competent Manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley.\nBurud, S., Aschbacher, P., & McCroskey, J. (1948). Employer-suported child care: Investing in human resources. Boston: Auburn House.\nCampbell, D. J. (1990). Modeling the performance predication problem in industrial and organization psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organization psychology, (pp. 687-732). California: Consulting Psychologists Press.\nClark, S. C. (2001). Work cultures and work/family balance. Journal of Vocation Behavior, 58:348-365.\nClarke, M. C., Koch, L. C., & Hill, E. J. (2004). The work-family interface. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 31, 121-140.\nCrossman, A., & Abou-Zaki, B. (2003). Job satisfaction and employee performance of Lebanese Banking staff. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(4): 368-376.\nDuxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(1), 60-74.\nFrone M. R. (2003). Work-Family balance. Handbook of occupational health psychology, 143-162. \nGakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5): 649-666.\nGreenhaus, J. H. & Beutell, N. J. (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 76-88. \nGreenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2006). Work-family balance: Exploration of a concept. Paper Presented at the Families and Work Conference, Provo: Utah. \nGrover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly polices on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parent’s. Personnel Psychology, 48: 271-288. \nGuthrie, J. P. (2001). High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 180-190.\nKahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D. & Rosenthal, R. A., (1964) . Organizational stress: study in rose conflict and ambiguity, Wiley, New York.\nKamerman, S.B. & Kahn, A. J. (1978). Family policy: Government and Families in Fourteen Countries. Columbia University Press. \nKatz, D. & Kahn, R. L.(1966). The social Psychology of Organization. N. Y.: Wiley.\nKatz, D. & Kahn, R. L.(1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations, 2nd ed., Wiely, New YorK. \nKonard, A. M. & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1225-1237\nKopelman, R. E., Greenhaus, J. H., & Connolly, T. F.,( 1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organization Behavior and Human Peroamance, 32: 198-215\nLambert, S. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical view and research agenda. Human Relations, 43, 239-257.\nLobel, S. A. (1999). Impacts of diversity and work-life initiatives in organizations. In Handbook of Gender and Work. GN(ed.) Powell. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 453-476\nMotowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from cotextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480. \nNoe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart B., & Wright, P.M.(1999). Human Resources Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.\nOsterman, P. (1995). Work/ family programs and the employment relationship, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 681-702\nPleck, J., Staines, G, & Lang, L., (1980). Conflicts between work and family life. Monthly Labor Review, March: 29-32.\nThompson, C. A., Bearvais, L. L., & Lynees, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
97921068
100
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097921068
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
106801.pdf1.48 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.