Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54881
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor莊委桐zh_TW
dc.contributor.author邱彥閔zh_TW
dc.creator邱彥閔zh_TW
dc.date2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:04:49Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:04:49Z-
dc.date.issued2012-10-30T06:04:49Z-
dc.identifierG0099258018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54881-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description99258018zh_TW
dc.description100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文首先構建了在完全資訊下的異質分群模型。當玩家可以觀察其他玩家的類型,則均衡必定是非隔離的:大多數玩家將無意移動,這是因為他們的夥伴可以為他們帶來最好的報酬。均衡狀態將會是一個有效率的狀態。\n    然後,我們構建另一個分組模型:訊息不完全和雙重改變下的分群模型。結果表明,雖然非隔離的均衡有可能是在短期的穩定均衡,但只有隔離的均衡狀態可以在長期維持穩定。這是因為在長期下,大多數非隔離狀態可以輕易地切換到隔離狀態的緣故。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper first constructs a grouping model with heterogeneous population under the setting of complete information. When player can observe other`s type, the result isnon-segregation: most players have no intention to move and they can match with the one who brings them the best payoff in the original group. The equilibrium state is always efficient.\n We then construct another grouping model with incomplete information and double mutation. The result shows that, although non-segregation equilibria may emerge as stable equilibria in the short run, only segregation equilibria can be stochastically stable in the long run. This is because most of non-segregated states can switch to the others by the same re-sistance and some of them can easily switch to segregated state, but it is hard to switch back.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents封頁\n謝辭\n摘要\n目次\n1. Introduction and Literature Review…………………………………………….…..5\n2. Grouping Equilibrium with Complete Information……………………………...…7\n3. Two-Group Grouping Model with incomplete information…………………….…11\n 3.1 Setting of Incomplete Information…………………………………………...12\n 3.2 Equilibrium with incomplete information ………………………………......14\n4. Stochastic Stability with Double Mutations……………………………………….23\n 4.1. Stochastic stability when type size difference is small……………………...24\n 4.1.1. Specifications of recurrent classes……………………………...…24\n 4.1.2. Transition between classes in the same specification…………..…25\n 4.1.3. Transition between specification (i) and (iii)……………………...28\n 4.1.4. Transition between specification (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v)…………..30\n 4.1.5. Transition between (i), (ii), (iv), and (v)…………………………..32\n 4.1.6. The stochastic potential of classes in each specification…………..36\n 4.2. Stochastic stability when type size difference is large………………………41\n5. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………44\nAppendix A…………………………………………………………………………..46\nReference……………………………………………………………………………..47zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099258018en_US
dc.subject分群模型zh_TW
dc.subject異質人群zh_TW
dc.subject不完全資訊zh_TW
dc.subject改變zh_TW
dc.subject隨機潛能zh_TW
dc.subject長期均衡zh_TW
dc.subjectgroupingen_US
dc.subjectheterogenous populationen_US
dc.subjectincopmplete informationen_US
dc.subjectmutationen_US
dc.subjectstochastic potentialen_US
dc.subjectequilibria in long termen_US
dc.title不完全資訊和雙重改變下的分群模型zh_TW
dc.titleGrouping with Heterogeneity: Incomplete Information and Double Mutationen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1. Borgers, T. and Sarin, R. "Naive Reinforcement Learning with Endogenous Aspirations," International Economic Review, 2000, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 921-950.\n2. Carrington, William J., Detragiache, Enrica, and Vishwanath, Tara. "Migration with Endogenous Moving Costs," American Economic Review, 1996, vol. 86, pp. 909-930.\n3. Castillo, Marco and Petrie, Ragan. "Discrimaination in The Lab: Does Information Trump Appearance," Games and Economic Behavior, 2010, vol. 68, pp. 50-59.\n4. Currarini, Sergio, Jackson,Matthew O., and Pin, Paolo. "An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation," Econometrica, 2009, vol. 77, No. 4, pp.1003-1045.\n5. Foster, D.P., Young H.P. "Regret testing: learning to play Nash equilibrium without knowing you have an opponent," Theoretical Economics, 2006, pp. 341-367.\n6. Hart, Sergiu and Mas-Colell, Andreu. "A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading to Correlated Equilibrium," Econometrica, 2000, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1127-1150.\n7. Hoff, Karla and Sen, Arijit. "Homeownership, Community Interactions, and Segreagation," American Economic Review, 2005, vol.95, pp. 1167-1189.\n8. Jackson, Matthew O. and Watts, Alison. "Social Games: Matching and The Play of Infinity Repeated Games," Games and Economic Behavior, 2010, vol. 70, pp. 170-191.\n9. Milchtaich, Igal. "Stability and Segregation in Group Formation.” Games and Economic Behavior, 2002, vol. 38, pp. 318-346.\n10. Schelling, Thomas C. "Models of Segregation," American Economic Review, 1971, vol. 59, pp.488-493.\n11. William T. Bielby and James N. Baron, "Sex Segreagation With Occupations," American Economic Review, 1998, vol. 76, pp. 43-47.\n12. Young H.P. “Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions." Prinston, 2001.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
801801.pdf823.02 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.