Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57602
題名: 一種青春,兩個世界:跨越教育體制畢業生之質性研究
One youth, two worlds- a qualitative research from a crossing broader`s perspective, a student studied in a mainstream and an alternative school.
作者: 謝雅君
Hsieh, Ya Chun
貢獻者: 鄭同僚
謝雅君
Hsieh, Ya Chun
關鍵詞: 另類教育
全人中學
敘說探究
自我
alternative school
Holistic school
narrative
self
日期: 2012
上傳時間: 1-Apr-2013
摘要: 另類學校處於升學主義與考試中心的價值洪流中,不時地被添上許多莫須有的帽子,例如「另類學校畢業生沒有競爭力」、「另類學校是貴族學校」、「有問題的學生才需要另類教育」等罪名,這些問題必得由教育的主體─學生來發聲,根據他們的體驗與視角,來摘除上述種種對於另類教育的汙名。此外,為了探究不同體制的學校教育如何影響學生的自我形構,本研究嘗試以敘說研究的方式,來探究一位跨越教育體制畢業生的生命故事,從而瞭解其自我調適的歷程與自我形構的因素。自我形構是一個動態的未完成狀態,人的一生不斷的調整自我內在與外在環境至一個和諧的狀態,因此,外在環境對於自我形構的影響甚鉅,而對學生的自我形構而言,學校教育的環境便是一大重要場域。研究發現,開放自由的教育理念與方式培養學生建立較具正面與積極的自我圖像,而較保守封閉的教育理念與方式會使得學生對於自我圖像失去想像力空間,而創造性變得比較狹隘。藉由兩種教育體制的對照與激盪,不僅碰撞出教育本質之應然所在之處,同時也為另類教育學提供另一種論述基礎。\n\n\n關鍵字:另類教育、全人中學、敘說探究、自我
Alternative schools are usually misunderstood by people surrounded in the mainstream of credentialism, such as non-competitiveness, exclusive schools only for nobles or problem-maker students. In order to answer these questions raised above, it should be spoken by the narrative of students who had studied in a mainstream school and an alternative school to get rid of rumors. The purpose of the research is to deliberate the process of the self construction of students in different educational system of schools. Self construction is an ongoing process, and people would adjust constantly between inner self and outside environment to achieve a status of harmony. Therefore, school environment is one of the most important places for students. It finds that students grow positive self images easier in open and liberal school environments. On the contrary, students have lower imagination and creativity to their self images in conservative and closed school environments. The research is not only remind people what education is, but also provide a narrative for alternative schools.\n\n\nKeywords: alternative school, Holistic school, narrative, self
參考文獻: 參考書目\n中文文獻\n王克難(譯)(2003)。夏山學校(原作者:A. S. Neil)。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版年:1960)\n王新超(譯)(2005)。教師實用心理學(原作者:David Fontana)。香港:中文大學出版社。(原著出版年:1995)\n王俊斌(2008)。臺灣政治解嚴以來另類學校的變革。載於蘇永明、方永泉(主編),解嚴以來臺灣教育改革的省思(273-309貢)。臺北市:學富文化。\n史英(2004)。從森林小徑到椰林大道─人本教育的思考與實踐。臺北市:天下遠見出版社。\n朱敬先(1992)。健康心理學:教學取向。臺北市:五南出版社。\n朱敬先(2002)。教育心理學:教學取向。臺北市:五南出版社。\n李錦旭(譯)(1989)。資本主義美國的學校教育(原作者:Bowles, S., & Gintis, H.)。臺北市:桂冠圖書公司。(原著出版年:1976)\n李雅卿(1997)。種籽手記─開放教育的希望工程。臺北市:遠流出版社。\n李崇建、甘耀明(2004)。沒有圍牆的學校─體制外的學習天空。臺北市:寶瓶文化。\n李崇建(2005)。移動的學校─體制外的學習天空。臺北市:寶瓶文化。\n吳麗君(2003)。論教育質性研究報告另類書寫的合理性。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),297-320。 \n吳清山(2003)。國民教育階段辦理非學校型態實驗教育之挑戰與策略。北縣教 育,45,18-26。\n林淑梨、王若蘭、黃慧真(譯)(1997)。人格心理學(原作者:E. Jerry Phares)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版年:1991)\n周鄭州(2007)。全人的生活教育、自治會與九人小組【全人實驗高級中學網站】。取自於http://holistic.so-buy.com/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=summercampfile01\n凃柏章(2007)。這一頁,我來說教師:國小初任教師專業認同之教育傳記研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。。\n張春興(1992)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。\n張家銘(1993)。米德的「社會自我」理論:從歷程與結構的觀點剖析。東吳社會學報,2,61-87。\n張鳳燕、楊妙芬、邱珍婉、蔡素紋(譯)(2002)。人格心理學─策略與議題(原作者:Robert M. Liebert & Lynn Longenbach Liebert)。臺北市:五南出版公司。(原著出版年:1994)\n張碧如(2006)。教與學的另類可能─在家教育自主學習之個案研究。臺北市:五南出版社。\n張元植(2012)。全人,我成為這樣的人【全人教育電子報試刊第2期】。取自http://holistic.so-buy.com/ezfiles/holistic/download/attach/6/holisticepaper-No.2.htm\n倪鳴香(2004)。敘述訪談和傳記研究。教育研究月刊,118,26-31。\n唐宗浩、李雅卿、陳念萱主編(2006)。另類教育在臺灣。臺北市:唐山出版社。\n郭為藩(1971)。角色理論在教育學上之意義。師大教育研究所集刊,13,5-27。\n陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南出版社。\n軟糖(2012)。記100學年度第2學期推動修改自治會組織章程案【全人實驗高級中學網站】。取自於http://holistic.so-buy.com/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=2012113002&Category=108519\n曾華源(1986)。臺灣地區社會工作員在社區工作中角色期望之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。\n曾俊凱(2006)。彩虹般的教育潮流─我國另類學校現況。研習資訊,23(3),45-54。\n黃舒玲(1994)。助人協談志願服務人員角色壓力與離職傾向之相關因素研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立東吳大學,臺北市。\n黃心怡(2001)。自主學習與學生自我賦權──以北市自主學習實驗計畫學生為例之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n黃政雄(2012)。苗栗縣全人實驗高級中學申復申請書【全人教育電子報試刊3號】。取自於http://holistic.so-buy.com/ezfiles/holistic/download/attach/6/holisticepaper-Test.No.0306.htm\n馮朝霖(2001)。另類教育與全球思考。教育研究月刊,92,33-42。\n馮朝霖(2005)。謙卑、敢行與參化─教育美學在全人另類學校的開顯。載於李崇建,移動的學校─體制外的學習天空,297-314。臺北市:寶瓶文化。\n馮朝霖(2006)。另類教育與二十一世紀教育改革趨勢。研習資訊,23(3),5-13。\n彭千芸(2010)。另類教育與即興美學-一位華德福學校學生的生命故事(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n潘正德(2009)。諮商理論、技術與實務。臺北市:心理出版社。\n蔡文輝(1979)。社會學理論。臺北市:三民書局。\n鄭皓(2003)。我在全人的日子【全人教育電子報試刊2號】。取自於http://holistic.so-buy.com/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=2012102801&Category=419409\n鄭同僚(譯)(2004)。教育研究的批判民俗誌:理論與實務指南(原作者:Carspecken, P. F.)。臺北市:高點教育文化出版社。(原著出版年:1995)\n鄭同僚(2011年10月29日)。校規誰來訂?【部落格文字資料】。取自http://penghucitizens.pixnet.net/blog/post/82779903-%E3%80%90%E9%98%BF%E5%83%9A%E5%B0%88%E6%AC%84%E3%80%91%E6%A0%A1%E8%A6%8F%E8%AA%B0%E4%BE%86%E8%A8%82%EF%BC%9F\n劉北成、楊遠嬰(譯)(1992)。規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生(原作者:Foucault, M.)。臺北市:桂冠出版社。(原著出版年:1975)\n劉世傑(2007)。我國國小學校體制內與體制外之比較─以全人實驗中學小學部為例。網路社會學通訊,60。\n魏麗敏、黃德祥(1995)。諮商理論與技術。臺北市:五南出版社。\n薛曉華(譯)(2002)。學習自由的國度─另類理念學校在美國的實踐(原作者:R. E. Koetzsch)。臺北市:高等教育文化。(原著出版年:1997)\n謝雅君(2010)。受教經驗與尋求志業歷程之探究─以一位研究生為例(未出版之期末報告)。國立政治大學,臺北市。\n賴沛青(2007)。一位非主流學生的生存策略:看見、反思與自我敘說。國立花蓮教育大學,花蓮縣。\n羅弘旭(2011年6月)。全人教育理想不敵杏壇保守勢力。今週刊,758。取自http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/v1/content.aspx?a=W20110601050\n英文文獻\nBlumer, H., (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology , 71, 535-548.\nBruner, J., (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11-32.\nCooley, C. H., (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Transaction Publishers.\nCooper, B. S. (1994). Alternative Schools and Programs. In The International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.), 1, 260-266.\nCrossley, M. L., (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Buckingham: Open University Press.\nCrites, S., (1986). Storytime: recollecting the past and projecting the future. In (Ed) Sarbin, T. Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct, 152-173. New York: Praeger.\nFestinger, L. (1957). A Theory Of Cognitive Dissonance. CA: Stanford University Press.\nGrant, B. (1997). Disciplining students: The construction of student subjectivities. The British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(1), 101-114.\nHilgard, E., Atkinson, R. & Atkinson, R. (1979). Introduction to Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.\nHiggins, E. T. (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.\nHamachek, D. (1995). Self-concept and school achievement: Interaction dynamics and a tool for assessing the self-concept component. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 419 - 425.\nKellmayer, J. (1995). How to establish an alternative school. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press. \nLecky, P. (1969). Self-Consistency: A theory of personality. New York: Doubleday Anchor. \nLiebert, R. M. & Liebert, L. L. (1998). Liebert & Spiegler`s personality: Strategies and issues (8th ed.). US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.\nLange, C. M., & Sletten, S. J. (2002). Alternative education: a brief history and research synthesis (Project FORUM). Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.\nLoy, K. H., & Gregory, D. E. (2002). Educating troubled youth in alternative settings. In G. McAuliffe (Eds.), II. Specific programs for work with troubled youth in schools. New York: Bergin & Garvey.\nMead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press.\nMarkus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63 – 78.\nMintz, J. et. al. (editor) (1994). The handbook of alternative education. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.\nNeil, A. S. (1995). Summerhill school: a new view of childhood. New York: St. Martin`s Griffin.\nPatrice De La Ossa (2005). Hear my voice: alternative high school students’ perceptions and implications for school change. American Secondary Education, 34(1), 24-39.\nPolkinghorne, D. E., (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: State University of New York.\nPolkinghorne, D. E., (1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of narrative and life story, 1(2&3), 135-153.\nPotter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.\nRogers, C. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist`s View of Psychotherapy. London: Constable.\nRaywid, M. A. (1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 26-31.\nSullivan, H. S., (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.\nSmith, G. R., Gregory T. B., &Pugh, R. C. (1981). Meeting student needs: evidence for the superiority of alternative schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 62(8), 561-564.\nShavelson, R. J. & Bolus, R.,(1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 3-17.\nShankland, R., Genolini, C., Franca, L. R., Guelfi, J. D., & Inoescu, S. (2010). Student adjustment to higher education: the role of alternative educational pathways in coping with the demands of student life. High Education, 59, 353-366.\nSarbin, T. R. & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindsey, & E. Aronsom, The Handbook of Social Psychology, V1. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.\nSarbin, T. R. (ed.) (1986). Narrative psychology: the storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.\nTurner, J. H. (1986). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont & California:Wadsworth. \nWillis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: how working class kids get working class jobs. New York:Columbia University Press.\nYoung, T. (1990). Public Alternative Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
96152019
101
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096152019
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
201901.pdf1.29 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.