Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59206
題名: 電視新聞使用3D動畫的可信度研究
A Study of the Credibility of 3D Animation used in Television News
作者: 周欣怡
Chou, Hsin I
貢獻者: 江靜之
周欣怡
Chou, Hsin I
關鍵詞: 社會新聞
3D動畫
新聞可信度
Social news
3D animation
News credibility
日期: 2012
上傳時間: 2-Sep-2013
摘要: 2009年底,台灣蘋果日報推出【動新聞】,因為其以3D動畫的方式詳述性侵、暴力等社會新聞,引發輿論批評,而且國家傳播通訊委員(NCC)也明白指出,電視新聞使用3D動畫非真實呈現,換句話說,民間與官方都一致認為電視新聞使用3D動畫恐怕有損新聞的專業性。有鑑於新聞媒體最重要的價值就是「新聞可信度」,因此,本研究遂將一般閱聽眾視研究對象,採取實驗法進行社會新聞使用3D動畫有無,進行新聞可信度差異研究。\n  受測者總計52人,依社會新聞次分類分別為突發新聞、犯罪新聞,又依3D動畫有無,共計分為4組,採t檢定檢驗發現,3D動畫有無不會影響新聞可信度,而且突發、犯罪新聞的新聞可信度也無差異;又採二因子變異數檢定發現,新聞可信度不會因為「社會新聞次類型」、「3D動畫有無」或其交互作用產生差異。此外,二因子變異數的檢驗發現,閱聽眾對於3D動畫的既有態度不會影響新聞可信度評估,最後,人口學變項也不會影響新聞可信度評估。\n  即便本研究初步證實社會新聞使用3D動畫有無,在新聞可信度上並無差異,但相較於沒有使用3D動畫的,有使用的反而獲得較高的平均數。
At the end of 2009, Taiwan Next Media introduced Animated News, which induced considerable public criticism due to its use of 3D animation to portray social news containing acts of sexual assault and violence. Furthermore, the National Communications Commission (NCC) has clearly pointed out that the 3D animation used in TV news is not a real representation. In other words, both the public and government believe to a large degree that 3D animation used in TV news may harm journalistic professionalism. In view of the fact that the most important value of news media is "news credibility," the study employs experimental methods to determine the difference in the credibility of news in the eyes of research subjects consisting of ordinary viewers that results when social news adopts 3D animation. \n The total of 52 respondents were divided into four groups viewing news in the two subcategories of breaking news and crime news either with or without 3D animation. Inspection employing the t-test revealed that the presence of 3D animation does not affect the credibility of news, and no effect was observed in the case of either breaking news or crime news. Two-way ANOVA further discovered that the credibility of news does not vary due to "social news subcategory," "presence of 3D animation," or their interaction. In addition, two-way ANOVA also revealed that viewers` existing attitude toward 3D animation does not influence their assessment of the credibility of news. \nThis study not only found that the use of 3D animation and social news does not affect the credibility of the news, but also discovered that compared with news not employing 3D animation, news using animation in fact received relatively high average credibility scores.
參考文獻: 王文科、王智弘(2012)。《教育研究法》。台北:五南。\n王旭、莫季雍、湯允一(1999年6月)。〈媒介表現:關於新聞可信度的討論與測量〉,「中華傳播學會1999年會」,新竹關西。\n王思勻(2010年7月)。〈當電視新聞遇上電腦圖像:電腦繪圖(CG)的真實再現〉,「2010中華傳播學會年會暨第四屆數位傳播國際學術研討會」,嘉義民雄。\n王泰俐、蘇蘅(2009)。〈電視新聞商業置入廠商身份揭露、產品類型以及置入策略對新聞可信度之影響〉,《廣告學研究》,32: 27-53。\n朱芳瑤(2009年11月25日)。〈豈只腥羶 動新聞踐踏人權隱私〉,《中國時報》,頁A7。\n江靜之(2010年7月)。〈動不動有關係:從媒材看動(畫)新聞爭議〉,「2010中華傳播學會年會暨第四屆數位傳播國際學術研討會」,嘉義民雄。\n何亮亮(2009年12月7日)。時事亮亮點。香港:鳳凰衛視。\n〈你所不知道的動新聞與壹傳媒秘辛〉(2011年8月14日),《Inside》,取自http://www.inside.com.tw/2011/08/04/inside-next-media-\nanimation\n吳文清(1991)。《教育研究基本觀念與方法之分析》。台北:五南。\n李品葭(2011年7月)。〈動新聞動了什麼:談動新聞的新聞類型及感官類型運用策略〉,「中華傳播學會2011年會」,新竹市。\n林君襄、孫宇萱(2012年11月)。〈從動機、滿足感及新聞可信度探討閱聽人對動新聞之態度〉,台灣資訊社會研究學會年會暨學術研討會。台北信義。\n林鴻源(2004)。《網路與報紙新聞可信度之比較》。文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n胡詩憶(2012)。《硬性動畫新聞對閱聽人影響之初探研究》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n徐聖鈞(2010)。《選舉部落格使用動機與媒體可信度相關性分析》。亞洲大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。\n張明賢(1989)。《我國大眾傳播媒介政治公信力之研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n張樹人(2007)。《媒介使用頻率、資訊搜尋行為與媒介依賴程度對網路政治新聞可信度評估影響研究》。輔仁大學大眾傳播所碩士論文。\n張馨文(2009)。《網誌廣告化程度與內容之可信度研究》。文化大學新聞學系碩士論文。\n許臻耘(2009)。《閱聽人對電視新聞創「議」置入產品訊息接收之研究》。政治大學傳播學院在職專班碩士論文。\n陳俊仁(2006)。《閱聽人對電視新聞跑馬燈收看行為與態度之研究》。文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n陳俍任(2009年11月26日)。〈看了動新聞 NCC喊夭壽 彭芸:動新聞根本不叫新聞 官員暗示壹電視新聞台不會過了〉,《聯合報》,頁A2。\n陳國明、彭文正、葉銀嬌、安然(2010)。《傳播研究方法》。台北:威仕曼文化。\n陳智華、何定照(2009年11月26日)。〈媒體淨化 全家盟:政府硬起來〉,《聯合報》,頁A1。\n陳嘉爵(1996)。《選舉期間電視新聞可信度比較之研究》。文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n陳曉宜(2012年7月)。〈「動新聞」之敘事研究:觀者欲望與想像的產製〉,「中華傳播學會2012年會」,台中沙鹿。\n彭賢恩、張郁敏(2008)。〈政治置入性新聞對新聞可信度之影響〉,《新聞學研究》,95: 55-110。\n黃登鍵(2011)。《置入性行銷對部落格可信度之影響》。臺灣藝術大學應用媒體藝術研究所碩士論文。\n黃慧敏(2009年11月24日)。〈媒觀譴責動新聞 籲嚴審壹傳媒電視執照〉,《中央社》。\n葉恆芬(2000)。《網路媒體可信度及其影響因素初探-以台灣地區網路使用者為例》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n廖宜盈(2012年7月)。〈新聞也可以3D? 從動新聞看資訊理解與風險判斷〉,「中華傳播學會2012年會」,台中沙鹿。\n蒯光武(1989)。《受播者評價新聞媒介可信度的研究》。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n褚瑞婷(2005)。《電視新聞產製數位化之硏究: 以新聞動畫為例》。銘傳大學傳播管理硏究所碩士論文。\n蔡惠萍(2009 年12 月10 日)。〈動畫新聞「踐踏人性」 NCC凍壹電視〉,《聯合報》,頁A7。\n盧鴻毅(1992)。《新聞媒介可信度之研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n錢震宇(2009年11月26日)。〈動新聞 罰50萬〉,《聯合報》,頁A1。\n羅文輝(2004)。〈選擇可信度:1992及2002年報紙與電視新聞可信度的比較研究〉,《新聞學研究》,80: 1-50。\n羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬(2003)。〈媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響--五種媒介的比較〉,《新聞學研究》,74: 19-44。\n羅文輝、陳世敏(1993)。《新聞媒介可信度之研究》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告。\n蘇孟文(2010)。《置入性行銷與人格特質對產品態度與購買意願之影響》。中正大學企管研究所碩士論文。\nNownews影劇中心(2009年10月27日)。〈假牙惹禍/薛志正燒退能眨眼老婆跑通告貼家用〉,《Nownews》。取自http://rumor.nownews.com/2009/10/27/10845-2524993.htm\n\nAbel, J. & Wirth, M. (1977). Newspaper vs TV credibility for local news. Journalism Quarterly, 54(2), 371-375.\nASNE (1985). Newspaper credibility: Building reader trust. Washington, DC: ASNE.\nBerlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B. & Mertz, R. (1970). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33(4), 563-576.\nBrann, M. & Himes, K. L. (2010). Perceived credibility of male versus female television newscasters. Communication Research Reports, 27(3), 243–252.\nBurgoon, J. K. & Buller, D.B. (1986). News paper image: Dimensions and relation to demographics, satisfaction. Journalism Quarterly, 63(4), 771-781.\nCarter, R. F., & Greenberg, B. S. (1965). Newspaper or television: Which do you believe? Journalism Quarterly, 42(4), 29-34.\nCobbey, R. (1980). Audiences attitudes and readership. American Newspaper Publishers Association News Research Report. 29, 8-9.\nCollins, S. J.(2004). Predictors of campus newspaper readership. College Media Review, 10(1), 24-29.\nCozma, R. (2006). Source diversity increases credibility of risk stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 27(3), 8-21.\nDickson, G. (2007). Graphic consolidation. Broadcasting & Cable, 137(33), 20.\nDickson, G. (2008). CNN gets a new graphic look. Broadcasting & Cable, 138(49), 25.\nGantz,W. (1981).The influence of research methods on television and newspaper credibility evaluation. Journal of Broadcasting, 25(2), 155-169.\nGaziano, C. & McGrath, K.(1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451-462.\nGunther, A., Kautz, D., & Roth, A., (2011). The credibility of female sports broadcasters: The perception of gender in a male-dominated profession. Human Communication. 14(2), 71–84.\nHersly, I. (2000). Talking a peak at graphics. Broadcasting & Cable, 130(5), 47.\nHovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven. Westport, CT: Yale University Press.\n\nIzard, R, S. (1985). Public confidence in the news media. Journalism Quarterly, 62(2), 247-255.\nJacobson, H. K.(1969). Mass media credibility: A study of receiver judgement. Journalism Quarterly,46(1) ,20-28.\nJohnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on credibility of online political information among politically interested internet users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 865-879.\nKiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381-403.\nLee, R. S. H. (1978). Credibility of newspaper and television news. Journalism Quarterly, 55(2), 282-287.\nMeyer, P.(1988).Defining and measuring credibility of newspaper:developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 567-574, 588.\nMoody, K. E. (2011). Credibility or convenience? Political information choices in a media-saturated environment. Media International Australia, 140, 35-46.\nMulder, R. (1980). Media credibility: A use-gratification approach. Journalism Quarterly, 57(3), 474-477.\nMulder, R. (1981). A log-linear analysis of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 58(4), 635-638.\nO’keffe, D. J. (1992). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.\nPrikios, K. A. (2001). CGs generate own whistles. Broadcasting & Cable, 131(16), 44-48.\nReagan, J. & Zenaty, J. (1979). Local news credibility:Newspaper vs. TV revisited. Journalism Quarterly, 56(1), 168-172.\nRimmer, T. & Weaver, D. (1987). Different questions, different answers? Media use and media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 64(1), 28-36. \nRoper Organization (1979). Public perceptions of television and other mass media: A twenty year review 1959-1978. New York, NY: Television Information Office.\nSchweiger, W. (2000). Media credibility-experience or image? A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of communication, 15(1), 37-59.\nThorson, K., Vraga, E., Ekdale, B.,(2010). Credibility in context: How uncivil online commentary affects news credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 289–313.\nTime Mirror (1986). The People & Press: A Time Mirror Investigation of Public Attitudes Toward the News Media. Conducted by Gallup in collaboration with Michael J. Robinson, on Los Angeles: Time Mirror Company.\nWanta, W.. & Hu, Y. W. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 90-98.\nWest, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159-168.\nWestley, B. H. & Severin, W. J. (1964). Some correlates of media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 41(2), 325-335.\nWinslow, G. (2011). Sharing the graphics wealth. Broadcasting & Cable, 141(32), 33.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
99941007
101
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099941007
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
100701.pdf1.89 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
100702.pdf1.89 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.